|
|
#1 |
|
ipad 4 pixel density
Love the iPad 4 screen, but I can see the pixels due to the fact it's density is 264 ppi, vs. the iPhone's density which is 326 ppi.
Think the iPad 5 will have a more iPhone like pixel density? |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Surprised to see this from a 2008 account. Are you holding it 2" away from your face or what?
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Holding the iPad at normal distance of 12-15 inches makes it a retina screen. I think its important to understand how resolution works. Apple is not going to make a slightly higher res screen because apps will not scale properly and would cause fragmentation. It would cause all developers to re-write their apps. Not to mention even more graphic horsepower needed.
Think you are being a bit OCD on this one. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Are you sure you didn't accidently buy an iPad 2? Being serious here.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#6 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
People don't realise that while Apple's Retina displays are fantastic, the whole "Retina" thing is not quite what it's made out to be. They do not disclose what level of vision their "Retina" classification is based upon, but most experts would tell you it is certainly a very average one.
STORY TIME ![]() When I had my last mandatory eye test, I had, to quote the strangely cheerful woman, "the best eyesight I've ever come across." Granted, this makes me a rare case, but I can see every single pixel in any of Apple's Retina displays from their supposed "average viewing distance" and even a bit further back. Thankfully, they are small enough not to be a nuisance. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Quote:
Either way, it would add a lot of work for developers for very little gain.
__________________
Mac <- Macintosh <- McIntosh apples <- John McIntosh <- McIntosh surname <- "Mac an toshach" <- "Son of the Chief" |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
You can see the pixels where? Many assets and graphics are not fully retina capable so they are blurry. I doubt you can see the pixels in properly rendered text.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 |
|
So now that people are done complaining about the iPad mini's screen we're going to start bullying the best tablet display on the market? Okay, cool.
__________________
21.5" iMac (2010) HTC One (Sprint) |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#11 | ||
|
Quote:
Quote:
![]() I love my iPad, it was just an observation, but I suppose you have the standard 4 second American attention span and didn't bother to read the thread. ![]() I can see the pixels with 20/20 vision. I'm not bitching, just noting that I can see them and was curious if people thought Apple would bump the density to iPhone levels in the next iteration. Hardly "bullying" the display. ![]() Some people offered good responses, others just contributed garbage. |
|||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
On the other hand, it would be insanely expensive if not impossible to make a 528 PPI display (which is likely the next density Apple will go to).
__________________
rMBP (10.8), 2.6 GHz, 8 GB RAM, 512 GB SSD Hackintosh (10.7.4), 4.6 GHz i7-3930K, 32 GB RAM, 3xHD7970, 2x240GB Vertex 3 RAID 0 SSD, 2x600GB Velociraptor 10KRPM, Drobo S 5x2TB, 2x HP LP3065 30-inch. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:29 PM.









Linear Mode
