Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:30 PM   #1
ViperDesign
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utah
Thunderbolt or USB 3?

So I am considering moving away from my HP MediaSmart Server to one of those when my new iMac gets here.

I know thunderbolt is more expensive but will I see a big speed difference between my gignetwork which gives me around 50 to 70 MB/sec? Or even USB3 for that matter.

Thanks
__________________
iPhone 6, 64GB Silver TMobile(White), Macbook Pro Retina Late 2013, 2x AppleTV, 2x Chromecast
ViperDesign is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:50 PM   #2
Menge
macrumors 6502a
 
Menge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brazil
Thunderbolt is 10Gb/s
SATA III (current fastest consumer disk interface) is 6Gb/s
USB 3 is 5Gb/s
Gigabit Ethernet is 1Gb/s

Whichever interface you choose, your bottleneck will always be the network. If you're transferring files over the network.
__________________
Menge - 2011 2.3GHz 13" MBP - 16GB iPhone 5 - 32GB iPad WiFi+4G - 8GB iPod Nano - AEBS
Menge is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:52 PM   #3
53x12
macrumors 68000
 
53x12's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Menge View Post
Thunderbolt is 10Gb/s
SATA III (current fastest consumer disk interface) is 6Gb/s
USB 3 is 5Gb/s
Gigabit Ethernet is 1Gb/s

Whichever interface you choose, your bottleneck will always be the network. If you're transferring files over the network.

To add to that, external USB 3 drives are significantly cheaper than TB. Balance of speed vs size vs cost. What is the saying, you can only have 2 of the 3?
53x12 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:55 PM   #4
blueroom
macrumors 603
 
blueroom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto, Canada
USB 3 has a lot of CPU overhead compared to Thunderbolt.
__________________
My iOS devices are not jailbroken.
Bill
My Blog
blueroom is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 07:56 PM   #5
ViperDesign
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utah
Quote:
Originally Posted by 53x12 View Post
To add to that, external USB 3 drives are significantly cheaper than TB. Balance of speed vs size vs cost. What is the saying, you can only have 2 of the 3?
So USB 3 should be faster than a gig network, but in reality is it?

I like my HP MediaSmart Server, just didn't know if there was something better and faster than what I have.
__________________
iPhone 6, 64GB Silver TMobile(White), Macbook Pro Retina Late 2013, 2x AppleTV, 2x Chromecast
ViperDesign is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 08:04 PM   #6
Menge
macrumors 6502a
 
Menge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Brazil
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperDesign View Post
So USB 3 should be faster than a gig network, but in reality is it?
According to benchmarks by members of this own forum, a proper USB 3.0 enclosure that uses SATA III internally with an SSD in it will do ~400MB/s.

Keep in mind, though, that a lot of USB 3.0 enclosures use SATA II - which will limit you to 300MB/s tops, even though USB 3.0 can do more.

I have a 1TB Seagate GoFlex (5200rpm HD) which easily does 65MB/s on USB 3.0 (just for comparison).
__________________
Menge - 2011 2.3GHz 13" MBP - 16GB iPhone 5 - 32GB iPad WiFi+4G - 8GB iPod Nano - AEBS
Menge is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 08:06 PM   #7
ViperDesign
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utah
good information. Yeah it would have to be a drive in the 4 to 6TB range to supplant my Media Server.

Thunderbolt seems like the future proof, but USB3 is the cost savings choice
__________________
iPhone 6, 64GB Silver TMobile(White), Macbook Pro Retina Late 2013, 2x AppleTV, 2x Chromecast
ViperDesign is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 08:27 PM   #8
CrAkD
macrumors 68030
 
CrAkD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Boston, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by ViperDesign View Post
good information. Yeah it would have to be a drive in the 4 to 6TB range to supplant my Media Server.

Thunderbolt seems like the future proof, but USB3 is the cost savings choice
if its going to be a spinning drive theres no reason not to get USB3. Way cheaper and the mechanical drive wont saturate even USB3 nevermind Thunderbolt.
__________________
iPhone 5S 64GB Macbook Air TV iPad Mini Retina 16gb LTE Hackintosh i7 920
CrAkD is online now   6 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 13, 2012, 09:55 PM   #9
Apple Corps
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: California
I went usb 3.0 enclosure primarily due to so few TB choices and high cost. When choices go up and cost goes down I'll switch to TB.
Apple Corps is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2012, 09:21 PM   #10
ViperDesign
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Utah
So I think I am going with the Seagate 4TB USB3 that Costco sells in their stores. I figure that if If and when I want thunderbolt I can just purchase the adaptor they sell.

The 4TB at costco sells for 174 (3TB is for 119 right now).
__________________
iPhone 6, 64GB Silver TMobile(White), Macbook Pro Retina Late 2013, 2x AppleTV, 2x Chromecast
ViperDesign is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thunderbolt 2 + USB 3.1 DingoDance Buying Tips and Advice 1 Dec 4, 2013 07:41 AM
New iMac with thunderbolt/USB 3.0 and old MB with USB 2.0 (Transfer iTunes/iPhoto)? sallycat17 iMac 14 Jan 27, 2013 06:30 PM
thunderbolt vs usb 3.0 frozi Digital Video 7 Jun 16, 2012 07:05 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:10 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps