Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 17, 2012, 05:42 PM   #1
kylepro88
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Atlanta, GA
Send a message via AIM to kylepro88 Send a message via MSN to kylepro88
Maxed Out 27in iMac Geekbench Scores

Now that the new 27in are in the wild, I've been waiting anxiously for the Geekbench scores from normal users. Looks like a fully maxed out iMac 27" with 32GB RAM, etc. comes in at almost 18,000 on the charts, which is on par with my current '09 MacPro 2.93Ghz with 26GB RAM.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...x86+bits%3A64+

I wonder how a new iMac would stack up in real world performance. I'm primarily involved in video/graphics so most of my time I'm editing, rendering, working in Photoshop, etc. The only real time I ever notice a huge speed increase in my current MP as opposed to the older one I had (2006) was when I hit "render" in FCPX. I have Premiere but don't use it much. The render speed of FCPX, especially when working with 1080p Prores information is lightning fast. I wonder how the iMac would stack up with its updated GPU, something FCPX would take full advantage of. I currently have a 5870 1GB in this MP, and it's nice but it's also older. The iMac also has 4 less cores then my MP, which counts for something but not if its 4 cores are on par with my 8. Multitasking would come into play at that point with 8 cores vs 4, but I rarely have multiple video/editing applications open at once.

What it ultimately comes down to here is CPU/GPU, and the availability of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt. Thunderbolt's speed is insane, but when editing/crunching/rendering 1080p footage, its speed is only going to help so much. TB can only help with render speeds if the speed at which it's getting the info to my editor can be matched by my GPU/CPU's ability to process it and rewrite it to my HD, otherwise it'll just bottleneck.

Any thoughts? I wish a more modest SSD option was available for BTO iMac's, since opening the machine to replace myself looks super risky. I wonder how the new iMac would match up overall to the current machine or whether or not they'd be basically the same.

Still...good to see the scores so high!
kylepro88 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2012, 05:51 PM   #2
cosmicjoke
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Portland, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by kylepro88 View Post
Now that the new 27in are in the wild, I've been waiting anxiously for the Geekbench scores from normal users. Looks like a fully maxed out iMac 27" with 32GB RAM, etc. comes in at almost 18,000 on the charts, which is on par with my current '09 MacPro 2.93Ghz with 26GB RAM.

http://browser.primatelabs.com/geekb...x86+bits%3A64+

I wonder how a new iMac would stack up in real world performance. I'm primarily involved in video/graphics so most of my time I'm editing, rendering, working in Photoshop, etc. The only real time I ever notice a huge speed increase in my current MP as opposed to the older one I had (2006) was when I hit "render" in FCPX. I have Premiere but don't use it much. The render speed of FCPX, especially when working with 1080p Prores information is lightning fast. I wonder how the iMac would stack up with its updated GPU, something FCPX would take full advantage of. I currently have a 5870 1GB in this MP, and it's nice but it's also older. The iMac also has 4 less cores then my MP, which counts for something but not if its 4 cores are on par with my 8. Multitasking would come into play at that point with 8 cores vs 4, but I rarely have multiple video/editing applications open at once.

What it ultimately comes down to here is CPU/GPU, and the availability of USB 3.0 and Thunderbolt. Thunderbolt's speed is insane, but when editing/crunching/rendering 1080p footage, its speed is only going to help so much. TB can only help with render speeds if the speed at which it's getting the info to my editor can be matched by my GPU/CPU's ability to process it and rewrite it to my HD, otherwise it'll just bottleneck.

Any thoughts? I wish a more modest SSD option was available for BTO iMac's, since opening the machine to replace myself looks super risky. I wonder how the new iMac would match up overall to the current machine or whether or not they'd be basically the same.

Still...good to see the scores so high!
I'm not seeing any real iMacs on this up there in the 18k range? I'm seeing OC'd i7-2600ks and what not (aka hackintoshers)
cosmicjoke is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2012, 05:54 PM   #3
charlieegan3
macrumors 68020
 
charlieegan3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: U.K
A lot of these results aren't real iMacs.
__________________
www.charlieegan3.com
charlieegan3 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2012, 05:55 PM   #4
Adam552
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2006
edit im tired wrong post
Adam552 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 17, 2012, 05:57 PM   #5
skyenet
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Near Glasgow - Scotland
I just ran the Try out version of Geekbench 2 on my fresh out of the box BTO iMac

3.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7, Turbo Boost up to 3.9GHz
8GB 1600MHz DDR3 SDRAM - 2x4GB
3TB Fusion Drive
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB GDDR5

and got 13061

Will install my Crucial 32GB later and run Geekbench 2 again
__________________
 2012 iMac 3.4GHz i7 27"  2012 MacBook Pro Retina 2.3Ghz i7  2011 2.3 GHz Mac Mini  2009 iMac 3.06 GHz 27"  2007 iMac 2.8GHz 24"  iPhone 5  Apple TV 2nd & 3rd Gen  iPads 1st & 3rd Gen
skyenet is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Geekbench for maxed out Haswell 27" iMac? jobinho iMac 23 Nov 6, 2013 11:25 AM
Maxed Out 27in iMac vs. Other Macs (TESTED) kylepro88 iMac 1 Oct 18, 2013 11:43 AM
2012 iMac Geekbench scores 21.5" vs. 27" StephenCampbell iMac 2 Sep 27, 2013 01:30 AM
2012 iMac 3.4 ; Why The Unimpressive Geekbench Scores? 2.3Ghz=11,100; 3.4Ghz=13,100 Ahheck01 iMac 18 Dec 17, 2012 05:54 AM
Maxed 2011 iMac beats maxed 2012 iMac on 64-bit Geekbench symber iMac 2 Dec 3, 2012 11:03 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC