Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 21, 2012, 10:13 AM   #1
gdourado
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
DIY Fusion drive: Performance difference between 7200 and 5400 rpm?

Hello,

Like the topic says, if I put a 128gb or 256gb SSD as a second drive in a 2012 i7 mini with the standard 1tb 5400 rpm drive, will performance be noticiable different if I replace the standard 1tb drive with let's say a western digital black 750gb 7200 rpm hdd?

Basically, is a DIY fusion with SSD and 7200 rpm drive faster than a DIY fusion with SSD and 5400 rpm hdd?

Cheers!
gdourado is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 10:30 AM   #2
philipma1957
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
good question I do not think anyone has tested it out yet. I have played around with apples fusion it is really fast.


if I was to diy one I would go for the biggest ssd (at least a 256gb) and use apples 1tb . but that is just me.


my thinking is as the fusion drive fills it will get slower since more is on the hdd . so a bigger ssd and a bigger hdd may work faster with the most info.

256gb ssd plus 1tb hdd filled with 628gb vs

256gb ssd plus 750gb hdd filled with 628gb

the first is 50% the second is 62.4 %



the fusion program will make decisions where to put info/programs based on ?

one of the ? has to be disk size vs disk space occupied .

so my guess is the bigger the better.
philipma1957 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 10:51 AM   #3
KrisLord
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Northumberland, UK
Whilst size of drives would be relevant, I don't see the speed of the slower drive being too important. Writes hit the SSD first and only when idle does it shuffle data to the mechanical drive. So there is no urgency on this part of the process.
KrisLord is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 11:05 AM   #4
philipma1957
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by KrisLord View Post
Whilst size of drives would be relevant, I don't see the speed of the slower drive being too important. Writes hit the SSD first and only when idle does it shuffle data to the mechanical drive. So there is no urgency on this part of the process.
thats is my thinking..


When I get the time.. I will do some testing with 800gb on an apple fusion of 128gb ssd + 1tb hdd.

my priority is low for this as I have the promise pegasus r6 and a few lacie lbds all thunderbolt. this kind of makes fusion worthless to me. although for the right user it does seem nice.
philipma1957 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5400 rpm HDD compared to 7200 rpm in my 2006 iMac MajorPain Mac mini 13 Apr 25, 2013 10:07 PM
Going from a rig with 7200 drive, will the 5400 side of a Fusion drive annoy me? Whackintosh iMac 9 Feb 25, 2013 05:46 PM
750GB at 7200 RPM or 1TB at 5400 RPM? DrJames MacBook Pro 44 Jan 18, 2013 02:05 PM
Fusion Drive 5400 or 7200 rpm? vmd iMac 45 Jan 16, 2013 09:44 PM
5400 or 7200 rpm HDD? wiehazy MacBook Pro 20 Sep 17, 2012 06:51 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:08 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC