Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

View Poll Results: On a 27" iMac, would you chose a Core i7 or GTX680
3.4GHz Quad-core Intel Core i7 11 15.94%
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 680MX 2GB GDDR5 58 84.06%
Voters: 69. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 22, 2012, 03:48 AM   #1
Abbas
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Core i7 or GTX680 on 27"

What would you chose if you could only chose between one of them?
Abbas is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 03:52 AM   #2
NVRENUF!
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: PERTH, Australia
Send a message via Skype™ to NVRENUF!
GPU for sure.. as the I5 will most probably cover any thing you need anyway.
__________________
27" Late 2012 | 120gb SSD | 680mx 2gig | 3.4ghz I7 | 24gig ram |
27" Late 2011, 120 gig SSD, 512mb GPU, I5
2 x Iphone 5, 1 x Iphone 4s, 1 x Ipad 3 , 1 x Ipad 2
NVRENUF! is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 05:05 AM   #3
Dr FranknFurter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Cambridge UK
I went for the GTX680 rather than the i7 although i was tempted to just get both! lol
__________________
MacBook Air 2012 # Old iPad 3 # iPhone 5 # Apple TV3 # Time Capsule 2TB # 2 x Pods # and finally received my 2012 27" iMac
Dr FranknFurter is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 05:06 AM   #4
NVRENUF!
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: PERTH, Australia
Send a message via Skype™ to NVRENUF!
i got both, but if i had to choose i would go for graphic over i7
__________________
27" Late 2012 | 120gb SSD | 680mx 2gig | 3.4ghz I7 | 24gig ram |
27" Late 2011, 120 gig SSD, 512mb GPU, I5
2 x Iphone 5, 1 x Iphone 4s, 1 x Ipad 3 , 1 x Ipad 2
NVRENUF! is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 05:11 AM   #5
turtlez
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
if you are buying it for games then the 680 but if you are buying it for work (pro apps) the i7
turtlez is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 06:49 AM   #6
digitalfailure
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
I ordered both but would have gone for the gpu over the i7 if the choice was limited.
digitalfailure is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 06:59 AM   #7
obsoletepower
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Toronto, Canada
I think you should post what you mostly intend to use the computer for before people can accurately vote.

Personally I got both because I know that if I leave one or the other I will regret it later but for you the extra $150-$200 investment might not be worth it.
__________________
27" iMac 3.4GHz i7 w/ GTX 680MX 2GB | 15" MacBook Pro | 16GB iPad WiFi + 3G (1st gen) | 16GB iPad WiFi (3rd gen)
obsoletepower is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 07:20 AM   #8
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbas View Post
What would you chose if you could only chose between one of them?
For most people , for $50 less, the increased graphics are going to give you the most bang for your buck, no question about it. Not everything you do, is going to benefit from that i7; only the most processor-intensive applications are going to be using those 8 cores, whereas the GTX680MX graphics chip with double the memory, will make everything seem to jump onto the screen that much faster, dare I say 'Snappier?' With a 20% faster clock cycle and almost double the frame rate, the upgraded graphics are, especially for gaming, a no-brainer.

But if you're flush with ca$h, sure, take both!
macs4nw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 09:00 AM   #9
KaraH
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: DC
Voted for the GPU (finally Apple gives us a nvidia!) but plan on ordering an both. Yes, for email and such you will not notice the difference, but one of the things I do on my duo extreme is a compile that takes an hour ... I can pretty easily make a case for needing to max out my CPU as well.
__________________
through the years: Apple ][ eventually upgraded to a //e (and it never really died), Centris 660AV, PowerMac 7600, Macbook, iPod 5G, eMac, a couple of aluminium iMacs, STILL hoping for a 2013 MP
KaraH is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 09:02 AM   #10
TweakOnline
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Europe
The GPU without doubt.
__________________
An Apple a day, Microsoft away.
TweakOnline is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 10:55 AM   #11
Jazwire
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: 127.0.0.1
I got both myself, but the GPU for sure if I had to pick just 1.
__________________
|| 27" iMac i7-3.4, 32 GB, 3TB Fusion, Nvidia 680MX 2GB w/ 27" TB Display (Dual Mon) ||
Macbook Air 11" i7, 8GB, 256GB || 15" MacBook Pro Retina 2.7, 16GB, 512GB||
Jazwire is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 11:37 AM   #12
torana355
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Sydney, Australia
The 680mx for sure!!! It is a beast for a mobile GPU.
__________________
2012 27" iMac with 680mx | 2011 13" MBA 128gb | iPhone 4 32gb | Nexus 7 16gb | Nexus 4 on Carbon and Trinity.
torana355 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 11:42 AM   #13
Shadow2k
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
I would choose the 680MX, even though my new iMac has both options installed.
__________________
The time you enjoy wasting is not wasted time.
Bertrand Russell
Shadow2k is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 02:31 PM   #14
Abbas
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Thanks everyone- I guess I'll get the GPU then.
Abbas is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 04:57 PM   #15
chuckiehina
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
A third option would be 32MB of 3rd party RAM.
chuckiehina is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 10:58 PM   #16
Ambulater
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abbas View Post
What would you chose if you could only chose between one of them?
Abbas,

As someone else noted, the answer is highly dependent on what you will primarily be using your imac for. The i5 and i7 are both quad core CPUs so both can process four threads simultaneously. The biggest difference is that hyperthreading is enabled on the i7 which allows four additional logical cores for those applications designed to take advantage of this feature. Applications that can use more than four cores are relatively sparse. Primarily, we would be talking about applications for encoding video. If you do a lot of work with editing and encoding video, then the available benchmarks suggest the i7 would be a good choice. If that's not something you do a lot of then you are unlikely to see any benefit from the hyperthreading feature. For most other applications the i5s and i7s running at the same clock speed benchmark nearly identically.

Of course, the selctions for the iMac are not identical in clock speed so this is another consideration. The i7 is clocked 6% higher than the i5 and can clock up to 8% higher when turbo boost for each CPU is compared. However, 6-8% higher clockspeed does not necessarily mean it benchmarks 6-8% faster. For many uses, a 6-8% difference in clock speed will result in only very small difference in benchmarks. So if you don't use hyperthreading video encoding apps very often, it's probably not a good deal to pay $200 for a very small bump in clockspeed. It's unlikely you will be able to discern the difference in any real world task.

In regard to the GPU, the differences really come down to gaming. Both GPUs are going to perform about the same for nearly all other functions. There really aren't a lot of good benchmarks available yet for the 680MX. The specs are certainly impressive and would suggest a mobile GPU that should perform nearly as well as some mainstream desktop GPUs. The 675MX has respectable benchmark scores for a mobile GPU and should play most modern games okay at fairly high settings. If you're only an occasional, casual gamer, you're probably okay with the 675MX. However, the 680MX seems to have the potential to finally make the iMac a serious gaming machine. If you're into gaming and care about eye-candy, then the 680MX would be a good choice.

I also think the fusion drive upgrade is a very good choice if a bit over priced. This is one upgrade that everyone should see significant performace improvements from in nearly everything they do. Regardless of your use scenario, you should get much snappier performance with an SSD onboard.

I couldn't think of any good reason for me to spend $200 on an i7 as I am unlikely to ever see any real world benefits from it in my personal usage. I did, however, spring for the 680MX as I've been building gaming PCs since about 1993 and can't quite give up the gaming bug now that I'm switching to Mac. I also felt like the fusion drive was a no-brainer for me.

Hope that helps.
Ambulater is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 02:51 AM   #17
Abbas
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Thanks Ambulator-

Very helpful. I don't do much video encoding. Probably play more games than encode videos so GPU it is. Fusion drive is definitely happening!

Abbas


Quote:
Originally Posted by Ambulater View Post
Abbas,

As someone else noted, the answer is highly dependent on what you will primarily be using your imac for. The i5 and i7 are both quad core CPUs so both can process four threads simultaneously. The biggest difference is that hyperthreading is enabled on the i7 which allows four additional logical cores for those applications designed to take advantage of this feature. Applications that can use more than four cores are relatively sparse. Primarily, we would be talking about applications for encoding video. If you do a lot of work with editing and encoding video, then the available benchmarks suggest the i7 would be a good choice. If that's not something you do a lot of then you are unlikely to see any benefit from the hyperthreading feature. For most other applications the i5s and i7s running at the same clock speed benchmark nearly identically.

Of course, the selctions for the iMac are not identical in clock speed so this is another consideration. The i7 is clocked 6% higher than the i5 and can clock up to 8% higher when turbo boost for each CPU is compared. However, 6-8% higher clockspeed does not necessarily mean it benchmarks 6-8% faster. For many uses, a 6-8% difference in clock speed will result in only very small difference in benchmarks. So if you don't use hyperthreading video encoding apps very often, it's probably not a good deal to pay $200 for a very small bump in clockspeed. It's unlikely you will be able to discern the difference in any real world task.

In regard to the GPU, the differences really come down to gaming. Both GPUs are going to perform about the same for nearly all other functions. There really aren't a lot of good benchmarks available yet for the 680MX. The specs are certainly impressive and would suggest a mobile GPU that should perform nearly as well as some mainstream desktop GPUs. The 675MX has respectable benchmark scores for a mobile GPU and should play most modern games okay at fairly high settings. If you're only an occasional, casual gamer, you're probably okay with the 675MX. However, the 680MX seems to have the potential to finally make the iMac a serious gaming machine. If you're into gaming and care about eye-candy, then the 680MX would be a good choice.

I also think the fusion drive upgrade is a very good choice if a bit over priced. This is one upgrade that everyone should see significant performace improvements from in nearly everything they do. Regardless of your use scenario, you should get much snappier performance with an SSD onboard.

I couldn't think of any good reason for me to spend $200 on an i7 as I am unlikely to ever see any real world benefits from it in my personal usage. I did, however, spring for the 680MX as I've been building gaming PCs since about 1993 and can't quite give up the gaming bug now that I'm switching to Mac. I also felt like the fusion drive was a no-brainer for me.

Hope that helps.
Abbas is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
"Always use PCI slot No 2 when using a Mac Graphics Card such as the GTX680" But Why? Mac Pro 2009 Mac Pro 27 Jan 14, 2014 11:14 PM
Resolved: No USB on ACD 30" w/ 5,1, GTX680, 10.9 Macshroomer Mac Pro 2 Oct 28, 2013 08:22 PM
Video tearing and fullscreen choppy with GTX680 / 30" ACD JesterJJZ Mac Pro 7 Oct 18, 2013 01:56 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:34 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC