Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 23, 2012, 03:14 PM   #1
Spink10
macrumors 68020
 
Spink10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oklahoma
I dont believe it

http://www.iclarified.com/26371/tria...-march-release

No way it is thinner and with retina.
Spink10 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 03:46 PM   #2
flavr
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Eh...if this is somehow true that's why I bought the mini 16GB...when retina comes out ill sell for a minimal loss and get a 32GB retina mini and hang on to that one for awhile...
flavr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 03:59 PM   #3
ljmjag
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Sure you believe it. Spend anytime with this first mini and it is absolutely apparent that this was/is as close to a "beta" product that Apple has released in years. No retina and a 2 year old chip - c'mon, really? It's the worst kept secret in all of tech that the mini was going to get an early refresh to improve its specs for the overall Apple experience. Especially since Amazon and Google have been advertising how much better their current screens are - and for so much less money. Apple will now bury the rest of the playing field.

Can't wait for the mini2!
ljmjag is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 04:01 PM   #4
Spink10
Thread Starter
macrumors 68020
 
Spink10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Apple lowest profit margin ever if it is true.

I dont believe retina + thinner
Spink10 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 04:41 PM   #5
GreatDrok
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: New Zealand
Not true. The current mini was designed to retain good quality while lowering the cost. Adding retina wouldn't have met that market need. Worse, the power requirements of the A6X needed to move those pixels would mean the thing would suck too much power and run very hot. The current mini actually gets pretty hot despite the die shrink that the A5 went through in the later iPad 2. They'll need to have another die shrink to get the A6X into it and that isn't going to happen overnight. We might not even see a retina mini within the next year and in fact as others have pointed out, the only real advantage the full size iPad has over the mini is the retina display. The other issue is manufacturing the newer panel without defects - the more pixels the more likely you're going to have dead pixels and that all adds to the cost of production.

Comparing the mini to an original iPad or iPad 2 shows a definite improvement in the pixel density. I was shocked going back to the older iPad to see just how obvious the pixels were by comparison, plus the mini screen is a significant step up in quality over the older screen even though the resolution is the same. It looks substantially crisper. More importantly, don't compare a retina device with a mini in portrait mode because you're not seeing the fonts at their rendered resolution. In landscape the fonts look fine, but in portrait it scales the fonts a little since they're rendered at 1024 wide and scaled down to 768 in portrait. It is site dependent though, for instance the mobile version of MacRumors works well in portrait, but the full desktop version is much better in landscape. Apple should really implement minimum font settings in Safari to improve the experience but for everything else, the screen is good and it preserves battery life and performance.
__________________
Retina MacBook Pro 13" i5 16GB 500GB SSD, Mac mini C2D + 20" ACD 8GB 960GB SSD, iPad mini 64G WiFi+cellular, ATV2, ATV3, white iPhone 4 16GB, white/gold iPhone 6+ 64GB coming soon
GreatDrok is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 05:13 PM   #6
SR71
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
I could definitely see this happening. I see the current iPad Mini as a "test" for Apple to see how customerrs would take to a smaller iPad, so instead of going all out on their first gen "tester" product, they used older parts, and a worse screen so they could keep costs down as they wouldn't want to waste money on a product that could potentially fail.. If people like it, they update it with better specs and bring better features to it (i.e. retina display). This is definitely going to happen.

Last edited by SR71; Dec 23, 2012 at 05:35 PM.
SR71 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 05:18 PM   #7
irDigital0l
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Totally could see this happening.

And not just the iPad Mini, iPhone 5S will be back to WWDC 2013 and June announcement.
irDigital0l is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 05:48 PM   #8
Batavian
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
As I mentioned in another thread, I think the retina Mini goes for $399, iPad stays $499, and iPod $299. Apple boosts their margins on the Mini. And people will line up for a retina Mini.
__________________
I miss the down arrow.
Batavian is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 05:54 PM   #9
Ayemerica
macrumors 6502a
 
Ayemerica's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
The technology isn't there to make it that thin with RetinaScreen /Battery/CPU/GPU on the current battery technology.
__________________
iPhone 5S 16GB Space Grey - iPad 4 32GB Black - Mac mini 2012
Ayemerica is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 06:03 PM   #10
SnowLeopard OSX
macrumors 6502a
 
SnowLeopard OSX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southern California
March is far too early. November earliest.
__________________
iPad |4th gen Black/ 32GB/ iOS 8.0
iMac |G4 1.0 GHz/ 1.25 GHz PPCG4 (7445)
iPod |Classic Black/ 80GB|U2 edition 20GB
iPhone |4S White/16GB/ iOS 7.0|3G White/16GB iOS 8.0
SnowLeopard OSX is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 06:05 PM   #11
MrGimper
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Basingstoke, UK
Deffo horsecrap....

If the technology existed to do this, then they surely would have delayed the ipad 4 till March 2013 and released a much thinner device thank the current Gen 3.
__________________
iP6+ 128GB Silver | iPad Air 64GB White | iPad rMini 128GB 4G White | Early 2011 MB Pro i7 2.2/16GB 15" Hi-Res Glossy | Mid 2012 MB Air 13" i7 2.0/8GB/512GB | Late 2012 iMac 27" i7 3.4/32GB/1TB FD
MrGimper is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 06:09 PM   #12
irDigital0l
Guest
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrGimper View Post
Deffo horsecrap....

If the technology existed to do this, then they surely would have delayed the ipad 4 till March 2013 and released a much thinner device thank the current Gen 3.
It would have been foolish to release an iPad Mini that had more current tech than the larger iPad (better LTE, better cameras, Lightening connector, etc).

So they had to update the iPad along with the iPad mini.
irDigital0l is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2012, 06:19 PM   #13
Akash.B
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ayemerica View Post
The technology isn't there to make it that thin with RetinaScreen /Battery/CPU/GPU on the current battery technology.
Agreed. The Mini is not for the power user, it's for the person looking for a lightweight and small tablet. Retina would be nice but not if it sacrificed form
Akash.B is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Why i dont like some PC users. jojolafrite Wasteland 1 Jun 26, 2013 07:04 AM
Why dont these match?? kjaxplicit24 OS X 10.8 Mountain Lion 3 Sep 1, 2012 10:58 AM
Dont Disturb AntonisCy iOS 6 22 Jun 16, 2012 12:02 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:50 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC