Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:52 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Revised Mac mini now shipping?



According to a user submission, Apple has started shipping 1.5Ghz G4 Mac minis while still packaged in 1.42Ghz boxes. The system profiler shows the video card as a 64MB VRAM Radeon 9200, and an Dual-Layer 8x SuperDrive.

Mac mini upgrades were recently rumored in this page 2 post. The Apple online store still lists the mini as being offered with either a 1.25Ghz or 1.42Ghz PowerPC G4.
MacRumors is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:58 PM   #2
ColoJohnBoy
macrumors 65816
 
ColoJohnBoy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Denver, Colorado
Send a message via AIM to ColoJohnBoy
Here's to hoping, but I'm incredibly doubtful that Apple would do this without hint or mention to the customer.
__________________
"I'm very inappropriate."
Whack the Bastard
ColoJohnBoy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:58 PM   #3
Wonder Boy
macrumors 6502a
 
Wonder Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Send a message via AIM to Wonder Boy
dare i buy this (eventual) update to tide me over until the rev b intel imacs? will there be another ppc imac update? too many questions. curse you apple and you ability to make me spend $
__________________
girls are pretty.
Wonder Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:58 PM   #4
rockthecasbah
macrumors 68020
 
rockthecasbah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Moorestown, NJ
that's completely stupid. why would they bother to upgrade the specs if they won't even change the lettering / numbering on the boxes to ADVERTISE the upgrade! Sounds like a whole lotta bullplop ...bullplop is a funny word haha.
__________________
15'' 2.4ghz MacBook Pro (Matte), 2GB RAM, 200GB HD
Wii code: 7876 8987 6478 7445
My Last.fm
"Ignore her, she's a feminist"
rockthecasbah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:59 PM   #5
Doctor Q
macrumors god
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: at the table with countless relatives
I've never heard of Apple shipping a different processor than the label shows. Has anyone?
__________________
"You've just been abducted, of course you need crepes!" -- Walter Bishop
Doctor Q is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 05:59 PM   #6
Some_Big_Spoon
macrumors 6502a
 
Some_Big_Spoon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Seattle.. just plain ol' wet whitebread Seattle
Send a message via AIM to Some_Big_Spoon
any screen shots to back this up? and seems weird that they'd nix updating the site and packaging materials.
Some_Big_Spoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:02 PM   #7
AlBDamned
macrumors 68030
 
AlBDamned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by Some_Big_Spoon
any screen shots to back this up? and seems weird that they'd nix updating the site and packaging materials.
Can we see the system profile screen shots?
AlBDamned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:06 PM   #8
ibook30
macrumors 6502a
 
ibook30's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: 2,000 light years from home
Imagine - some guy in apple's shipping department - says to boss: " I did what ???"
__________________
ibook30 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:10 PM   #9
clayj
macrumors 601
 
clayj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 1123,6536,5321
That very same screenshot does not contain ANY information to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that it came from a Mac mini.

I'm sorry, but I don't believe that Apple would be stealth-shipping 1.5 GHz Mac minis when NO part of the Apple web site mentions this.
__________________
mba guru
mac pro
2.8 ghz 8 core 14 gb ram 4 tb hd 30" acd | macbook air 1.8 ghz 64 gb ssd | mac minis 2.0 ghz c2d 1.66 ghz cd | iphone 3G | ipods x4
clayj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:12 PM   #10
crees!
macrumors 68000
 
crees!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Springfield, VA
Now this is a true definition of a "quiet update". Reporters, bloggers, ... please take note of this when you continue to report on so-called "quiet updates" in the future and keep things in perspective.

\m/
crees! is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:13 PM   #11
mrgreen4242
macrumors 68040
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Interesting... if it's true it's nice that they went to 64mb VRAM, but kind of a weak video card upgrade... a 9200 with 256mb of VRAM is still a 9200. Should be a 9550/64mb at the least!
__________________
iMac 2.4ghz Core2Duo, 2gb, 1.5TB
Dell mini 9, 2gb, 32gb SSD, OS X
16gb iPod touch - 40gb AppleTV
Nikon D40 w/ Sigma 18-200mm OS
mrgreen4242 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:14 PM   #12
maddav
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Here's the link to the post with the screenshot in
__________________
Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing. ~ Wernher von Braun
maddav is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:19 PM   #13
AlBDamned
macrumors 68030
 
AlBDamned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by maddav

no way of verifying it I guess. if so that's one very quiet update. they didn't even tell the sticker people, their own stores or the buying public. Aside from 'de-emphasizing' expos as launch events, this would pretty much de-emphasize...well.. pretty much everything about a launch.
AlBDamned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:20 PM   #14
brother
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
profiler screenshots

I'm the one who submitted the rumor. Posted at macnn.com forums as well. The box lists the machine as a 1.42 Ghz, so this is either a *very* quite rollout or a fortunate screw-up for my co-worker. This machine was actually received last week, but I wasn't able to set it up until today. Here are the screens:




brother is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:26 PM   #15
AlBDamned
macrumors 68030
 
AlBDamned's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Well that looks pretty right as far as I can tell.

Doesn't make much sense though.
AlBDamned is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:26 PM   #16
LimeiBook86
macrumors Demi-God
 
LimeiBook86's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Hanging around in NJ with his cutie. :)
Send a message via AIM to LimeiBook86 Send a message via MSN to LimeiBook86 Send a message via Yahoo to LimeiBook86
A Mac mini with a 64mb graphics card, dual-layer DVD burning support, and bluetooth and wi-fi? Damn...sounds pretty sweet to me!
__________________
my site my blog
Mac's Comic Mac's Shop
"Just you try and stop me..."
LimeiBook86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:33 PM   #17
d00kie
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
I'm just waiting to see what's in store when Apple Intels hit the market before I consider going back to OS X. Really like the mini design and I hope it will be awesome when it goes Intel. They should constantly update the mini to make it more and more appealing Then when I buy it, a few months down the road and they give it something special
d00kie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:43 PM   #18
Xephian
macrumors 6502a
 
Xephian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by LimeiBook86
A Mac mini with a 64mb graphics card, dual-layer DVD burning support, and bluetooth and wi-fi? Damn...sounds pretty sweet to me!
Yeah, hope it's true and they update the Apple store soon.
__________________
Main: AMD Opt 165 2.5Ghz / 8800GTX
iPod 5G 30GB
Xephian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 06:52 PM   #19
Little King
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Shrewsbury, UK
Send a message via AIM to Little King Send a message via Skype™ to Little King
I suppose if this is true, Apple can't deny it and will have to release it soon.
Little King is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:02 PM   #20
Wonder Boy
macrumors 6502a
 
Wonder Boy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: South Windsor, CT
Send a message via AIM to Wonder Boy
Quote:
Originally Posted by Little King
I suppose if this is true, Apple can't deny it and will have to release it soon.
not necessarily. "asteroid" comes to mind.
__________________
girls are pretty.
Wonder Boy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:08 PM   #21
tzibo
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: GB
Quote:
Originally Posted by LimeiBook86
A Mac mini with a 64mb graphics card
Shouldn't a 64mb card support Core Image? the captures say it doesn't?
__________________
MacBook Pro 2.2 SR | G5 iMac 20" 2GHz | G3 iBook 800MHz | Shuttle AMD64 3000
iPhone 8Gb | G3 iPod 15Gb | iPod Nano 4Gb
tzibo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:12 PM   #22
zap2
macrumors 601
 
zap2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: NJ
let it be!
__________________
"We can't all be heroes because somebody has to sit on the curb and clap as they go by." Will Rogers
zap2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:16 PM   #23
aafuss1
macrumors 65832
 
aafuss1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Gold Coast, Australia
Send a message via AIM to aafuss1 Send a message via MSN to aafuss1 Send a message via Yahoo to aafuss1
I also saw a mention of Mac mini (late 2005)-Sep 05 at the AppleCare site. Obviously that must not be the July revision, but this month's update.

A Mac mini with faster HD's, and 1.5/1.42 G4's, DL DVD burner (which the iBook hasn't), 64MB 9200 and BT 2.0+EDR is a nice update in addition to the 512MB RAM the Mac mini got 2 months earlier.
__________________
A.A.'s Mac mini-Core Solo 1.5 GHz,2GB, 60GB,Mac OS X 10.6
iPods:touch 32GB,5th gen 30GB, shuffle 2nd gen 1GB, shuffle 3rd gen 4GB, nano 1st gen 2GB, nano 3rd gen 4GB, nano 5th gen 8GB

Last edited by aafuss1 : Sep 27, 2005 at 07:18 PM.
aafuss1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:23 PM   #24
eva01
macrumors 68040
 
eva01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Gah! Plymouth
Send a message via AIM to eva01 Send a message via MSN to eva01 Send a message via Yahoo to eva01
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzibo
Shouldn't a 64mb card support Core Image? the captures say it doesn't?
how many times do we have to go over this

Video MB have NOTHING to do with core image -_-

My revision B 12" powerbook with 32MB of video RAM can perform core image, but a GeforceTi with 128MB of video ram can't.
__________________
If I go on a crazy non-sensical rant, it's the painkillers talking. If however I make perfect sense I take full credit.
eva01 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Sep 27, 2005, 07:25 PM   #25
mrgreen4242
macrumors 68040
 
mrgreen4242's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by tzibo
Shouldn't a 64mb card support Core Image? the captures say it doesn't?
No, the video RAM has nothing to do with Core Image. Core Image support is defined by the shader capabilities of the GPU. The 9200 doesn't support whatever shader levels Core Image requires. The 9600 does, the fx5200 does, etc, but the 9200 does not.
__________________
iMac 2.4ghz Core2Duo, 2gb, 1.5TB
Dell mini 9, 2gb, 32gb SSD, OS X
16gb iPod touch - 40gb AppleTV
Nikon D40 w/ Sigma 18-200mm OS
mrgreen4242 is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors' Page 2 News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:44 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC