Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 1, 2013, 11:57 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
NPD: Consumers Want Content, Not 'Smart' Features, on Their TVs




The Daily Mail is reporting that new NPD research has found that consumers want more access to online video services like HBO Go rather than "smart" features like social networking access on their TVs. The research comes a day after it was reported that Intel was planning to launch a TV service and set top box in 2013 that focused on content.

NPD said that a big problem is that TV owners are confused because too much choice is creating a complex user experience.
Quote:
'To counter this, OEMs and retailers need to focus less on new innovation in this space and more on simplification of the user experience and messaging if they want to drive additional, and new, behaviors on the TV."
Luke Peters, Editor of T3 Magazine, told MailOnline that Smart TVs will only become mainstream when they're as easy to use as changing a channel. Peters also notes that most Smart TV user interfaces are too complex for most people and that the content isn't good enough and that social networking doesn't make a lot of sense on TVs.

Apple has long been rumored to be interested in creating a TV that focuses on content as well in addition to features that could change human-to-TV interaction with Siri, Facetime and motion control. Apple was also rumored to be in talks with cable services like Comcast and Time Warner Cable in mid-2012, although no content deals have materialized yet.



Apple, like Intel, has largely had problems negotiating with content providers because of contractual limitations with cable providers, which may be why Apple's TV offering hasn't appeared yet. Although Intel's offering is set to debut January 7 at CES there's no telling if or when Apple's may debut, although recently it's been rumored that Foxconn is currently testing television set designs in the 50 - 55 inch range.

Article Link: NPD: Consumers Want Content, Not 'Smart' Features, on Their TVs
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:00 PM   #2
AirThis
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Quote:
The Daily Mail is reporting that new NPD research has found that consumers want more access to online video services like HBO Go rather than "smart" features like social networking access on their TVs.
They've got my vote for that. I'm simply fed up of seeing social networking features being poured on top of apps like marmalade.
__________________
Mac Mini 2009 - Iphone 4 16GB - rMBP 2.6 - Time Capsule 2TB
AirThis is offline   27 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:01 PM   #3
MacMan1620
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
I use my iPhone for twitter. I use my tv for content. Pretty basic idea.
MacMan1620 is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:01 PM   #4
CBJammin103
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Louisiana, United States
Wait we don't need 15 different $7/month subscriptions services in each of our Bluray Players, TVs, HT receivers, and set top boxes? What a revelation!
__________________
iMac 27" Core i7 15" Retina Macbook Pro iPhone 5
CBJammin103 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:01 PM   #5
DakotaGuy
macrumors 68030
 
DakotaGuy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: South Dakota, USA
If I want to "social network" I will get on my iMac or iPad or Droid. When I sit down to watch TV or a movie... I want to watch TV or a movie.
__________________
Mac: 21.5" iMac Core i5 2.5 Ghz "Sandy Bridge"
iPad Air 16 GB WiFi - iPod Classic 80GB - LG G3
DakotaGuy is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:07 PM   #6
Torrijos
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
This just in consumers want a faster horse!

Yeah you know want I mean!
Torrijos is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:08 PM   #7
newdeal
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
...

Eventually Apple will get content, release a device and have massive success and then really **** over the other providers when they are begging to get on board. I am honestly surprised they aren't already all over this with DVRs, commercial skipping and internet that is now fast enough to download high def video easily (aka as fast as when people were stealing songs with dialup)
newdeal is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:09 PM   #8
tann
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Nottingham, England
Finally they will realise!

Content trumps all on the TV!
__________________
2013 13" MacBook Air i5/8GB/256GB || White 64GB iPhone 5 || 32GB Cellular Silver iPad rMini!
Follow me on Twitter!
tann is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:10 PM   #9
gpat
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Italy
Simple concept that the hardware companies failed to grasp. So users are not likely to input messages and websites using a TV remote? What a revelation!
__________________
13" MBA 2013, Nexus 7 2013, LG G2 (oh noes i automatically become an apple hater)
(Sorry for bad english, not my mother tongue!)
gpat is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:10 PM   #10
bushido
macrumors 601
 
bushido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: España y Germany
i dont want content that ads up to 5 dif. subscriptions and 2,95€ eps to rent! either ...

the whole business model needs a make over otherwise its cheaper to just keep ur cable
bushido is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:12 PM   #11
baryon
macrumors 68030
 
baryon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I think the problem of TV is that 99.9999999% of content is complete crap, and most people just watch TV to turn their brain off and don't care about what is actually happening. People can watch celebrities arguing, people who can't sing sining, or people talking about politics for hours.

I don't think TV can be saved at all, or that there is a need for it in today's world. You can do everything on a computer that a TV could do, and much more, so why do you need a TV? Is it just for the big screen? Then why not just get a bigger computer monitor?

People who grew up with TV are of course addicted to it, but those who grew up with the internet are less reliant on TV. I think and hope that TV will at some point become extinct and replaced by what is already there on computers.

As Daft Punk says, "Television rules the nation"…
__________________
Sent from my iPod Shuffle
baryon is offline   22 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:15 PM   #12
zoozx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ca
TV service with no fine print, contracts and reasonable prices ( not what we have now, nothing close to what we have now ). Pay for what you want instead of 100 channels of crap.

A wireless TV and DVD player with a simple menu, that run off Siri and a single simple remote.

I don't need social networking on a tv, as a matter of fact, i don't need it at all.
zoozx is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:17 PM   #13
SBlue1
macrumors 6502a
 
SBlue1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
We want NFL! We want NFL!...

SBlue1 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:18 PM   #14
Radio
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Central California
I want everything but pay for nothing
Radio is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:18 PM   #15
RobertoCohen
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Apple just needs to hurry and release their on TV so they can kick Samsungs ass. They really annoy me by releasing a new model of their 'Smart TV's' like every month. My sammy tv is probably already out of date.
RobertoCohen is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:19 PM   #16
maxwelltech
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Irvine, CA, USA
Very, very true. I don't need a web browser and a Facebook client on a TV because I have my laptop and iPad for that. I use my TV for watching blockbuster films. Netflix is great, but their content is pretty bad. Hope Apple can turn the tide here and offer great selections of content.
__________________
Hackintosh w/ i7-4770K, 16GB RAM, 2x120GB SSDs, 1TB HDD, GTX 760; MacBook Pro 13 i7 (Mid 2012) w/ 240GB SSD; iPad 4 WiFi 32GB; HTC One 32GB AT&T
maxwelltech is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:20 PM   #17
Nebulance
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by zoozx View Post
TV service with no fine print, contracts and reasonable prices ( not what we have now, nothing close to what we have now ). Pay for what you want instead of 100 channels of crap.

A wireless TV and DVD player with a simple menu, that run off Siri and a single simple remote.

I don't need social networking on a tv, as a matter of fact, i don't need it at all.
This. I watch only a handful of channels, but I pay $100/month for hundreds of channels I just don't care for. I wish you could pick and chose certain channels a little more freely.
Nebulance is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:27 PM   #18
Morshu9001
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: the capital of Assyria
I don't like "smart" features like social networking, but I like other features. And I couldn't care less about HBO Go. Above all, I want my box to have no HDCP.
Morshu9001 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:28 PM   #19
mantan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: By Grabthar's Hammer
The TV model is a tough nut to crack because right now the networks have all the incentive and make too much money to allow a la carte pricing. They've been hesitant to do it for networks...let alone first run content or movies.

Consumers, for as much as they complain about high prices, would likely not consume nearly as much content if they had to pay for what they watch.

Any viable model is going to be expected to come in around what people already spend for their cable/satellite bill. Otherwise neither the networks or consumers will bite.

Apple seems like they are wanting to model Apple TV after their success in the music industry. But that was a completely different situation. That industry was caught completely unprepared for the digital age. They were desperate.

Some would say the 'ad sales' driven model isn't sustainable in an age where more and more people watch taped shows on a DVR. But the industry is still making a ton of money.

Unless Apple can get cost effective first run content and live sports, it's a non-starter. And by live sports, specifically big money makers like the NFL, college football and postseason games in major sports. Those are sacred cows the networks (and in the case of the NFL satellite providers)are going to pay dearly to maintain exclusive rights.
mantan is online now   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:30 PM   #20
wordoflife
macrumors 604
 
wordoflife's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
I agree with this completely.
Heck, I don't even have Facebook or Twitter integration in my iOS devices, even though I have both of those services. Not going to use it in a TV either.
wordoflife is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:31 PM   #21
commander.data
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Sometimes less is more. A TV should be for shows and movies, hopefully without ads. If I wanted a full computer in my living room, I would just put a computer in my living room.
commander.data is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:32 PM   #22
KdParker
macrumors 68030
 
KdParker's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Of course we want content.

That is the only thing that will hold back the success of these new smart features for TVs.
__________________
16g iPhone5s Space Grey; 16g iPhone5 White;
15" retina - MBP 2.6 GHZ 16 RAM;
iPad4 retina
KdParker is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:34 PM   #23
CReimer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Silicon Valley
If you're going to reinvent the boob tube, keep it simple for stupid people.
CReimer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:37 PM   #24
blackhand1001
macrumors 68030
 
blackhand1001's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
I want a high end tv that focus's on picture quality, number of inputs and controls. Not 3d, smart tv features and other bullcrap.
__________________
Macbook 2008
HP Dv7t - 2.53 ghz, 9600m GT, WSXGA+, 120gb ssd, 250 gb 7200rpm
Core i7 3770k, 8gb ram, 2x 120gb sdd raid0, 500gb hdd, GTX 460
Moto X Dev Edition (VZW) Nexus 7
blackhand1001 is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 1, 2013, 12:39 PM   #25
TripleCore
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Hasn't the whole social media thing played itself out yet?
TripleCore is offline   8 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it possible that we will see Full Ultra HD TVs and Content in the near future mrmarts Apple TV and Home Theater 5 Sep 27, 2013 03:20 AM
two apple TVs on two separate TVs question maria122285 Apple TV and Home Theater 4 Aug 24, 2013 02:42 PM
Consumers Less Willing to Pay for Content as Free Apps Surge MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 136 Jul 23, 2013 02:47 PM
YouTube App Updated with 'Send to TV' Feature, Now Pairs with Smart TVs and Consoles MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 27 Mar 27, 2013 01:10 AM
Content on Mac Mini, XBMC/Plex streaming to Apple TVs/Roku? jshbckr Apple TV and Home Theater 1 Nov 13, 2012 01:19 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:33 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC