Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:01 PM   #76
HiRez
macrumors 601
 
HiRez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Western US
I'm an Apple fan, Apple user, and Apple shareholder, but I support this. Copyrighting vague software processes is bad enough, when you start copyrighting generic words and word combinations, you've gone too far. (This is a lot more generic than a company name, but I agree Amazon's 1 Click and others should also be invalidated.)
__________________
Go outside, the graphics are amazing!
HiRez is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:01 PM   #77
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by Padraig View Post
Stop digging.

I've been coming here for maybe ten years at this stage and your last comment was easily one of the stupidest things I've read on here. And that's a hell of an achievement.
I genuinely don't believe you, you just want to be rude.
What exactly is wrong with my logic that makes it stupid when saying that "killer app" is used in a different context than "app" alone?

You could say your opinion differs, but for mine to be stupid, it would have to be irrational or have a logical fallacy.

Do you honestly think "killer app" is used in the same context? Would you call Halo for Xbox an app?

If my argument is weak, prove why instead of just pulling an ad hominem on me.
pgiguere1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:01 PM   #78
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
Who ever called a store where you can download software "App Store" before Apple did? The word "App" was common, but the combination "App Store" was not. Nobody ever used that combination. The generic name that was actually used was "Software store". And there is a company selling or renting containers who has a trademark on "Container Store", so there is precedent.


Where is Apple claiming they have the trademark for the word "Apps" or "App"?


Again, where does Apple claim the trademark for the word "App"?
If the term App is generic and Store is generic then it's relevant to the discussion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
"App" being used in jargon is different from commercial use.
There is a difference between a reviewer calling software an "app" and Palm themselves selling them as "Apps".

I've seen some people here claim that Palm did in fact call them apps. Does somebody have a link?
My point is - they were called Apps. Handango I believe had an APP store. (Handmark) although I'm not currently finding it via a simple search. And I don't have time to delve into it too much.

Are you arguing that no one used the term? That it wasn't popular? That Apple was the first to use the term app store?

Your initial statement was "but there's no doubt that the term "App" wasn't used at all before Apple's App Store."

That's what people responded to.
samcraig is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:01 PM   #79
unlinked
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Ireland
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
"Application" was also not originally the .exe filetype in Windows. It used to say "Executable".
What version of Windows did they switch over in?
unlinked is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:02 PM   #80
slffl
macrumors 65816
 
slffl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Seattle, WA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckotek View Post
How is it different? The point is that Apple didn't coin the term and it was commonly used.
You really should read up on what a trademark is
__________________
Why waste your time posting how much you hate Apple products?
slffl is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:02 PM   #81
Earendil
macrumors 68000
 
Earendil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Washington
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckotek View Post
Looking for it...used to have a link showing it but can't seem to find it. However, I've found "Handango Mobile App Store" so the "Mobile" part is an addition I don't recall seeing.

Interestingly enough, here's a mention of "Global Source" starting an "App Store".

http://www.1src.com/forums/archive/i...p/t-12876.html
Thanks! Refreshing to have someone make a claim and then not disappear when a citation is asked for
__________________
Current: MacMini 2ghz / iPod Touch 2g / iPhone 4g
Retired: Alum Powerbook 1.25ghz / 4gb iPod Mini

"ooo! They have the internet on computers now!" - Homer J. Simpson
Earendil is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:04 PM   #82
50548
Guest
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Currently in Switzerland
Quote:
Originally Posted by johnnyjibbs View Post
In reality, Apple should not have been allowed to trademark such a generic name as "App Store"
Interestingly, the "generic" and compound" term "appstore" had NEVER been used before Apple alone started employing it...just like what we all saw with the before-after iPhone designs...go figure.
50548 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:04 PM   #83
Geckotek
macrumors G3
 
Geckotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by slffl View Post
You really should read up on what a trademark is
I do know this, but the trademark shouldn't be given to a term that's already generic.
__________________
Gecko Art | Facebook | flickr
Geckotek is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:05 PM   #84
macsmurf
macrumors 65816
 
macsmurf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
If my argument is weak, prove why instead of just pulling an ad hominem on me.
I already proved it in post #53. I honestly expected at least an attempt of moving the goalposts but ignoring the post altogether works too, I guess.
macsmurf is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:05 PM   #85
Arcady
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Louisville, KY
Send a message via AIM to Arcady
I guess Apple with have to be content with their other 185 trademarks.
__________________
"The Macintosh uses an experimental pointing device called a 'mouse.' There is no evidence that people want to use these things."
-John C. Dvorak, SF Examiner, Feb. 1984.
Arcady is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:09 PM   #86
Arcus
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: of my hand will get me slapped.
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
Whether "App Store" should be trademarkable or not is another question, but there's no doubt that the term "App" wasn't used at all before Apple's App Store.

Microsoft didn't even call Windows software "applications", they had always called them "programs".

I find it weird that a diminutive of a generic term is necessarily considered a generic term as well, even if nobody used the term. By the same logic, you couldn't have a trademark on something like "Mus Store" or "Boo Store". Meanwhile, it's OK for Microsoft to trademark terms like "Windows", "Office", "Word".

EDIT:

Okay, I did some research like macsmurf suggested.

Wikipedia:
In recent years, the term "app" has been used to exclusively refer to applications for mobile devices such as smartphones and tablets, referring to their smaller scope in relation to applications used by PCs.

There may be some anecdotal use of the term "app" before the iPhone (none of which I can easily find using Google, point me in the right direction if you can), but never was it a standard term used by any major tech company.

People started to refer to computer/mobile software as "apps" after Apple's App store, not before.

The only exception I can find is the term "Killer app", but like I said earlier, it has a different meaning. It's also the diminutive of "application", but you wouldn't use the term in the same context. For example, you could say that "X video game" is a console's "killer app". However, would you refer to console games as "apps"? I don't think anybody would, because it doesn't fit with the modern definition of "app" which Apple is responsible for.

Halo was the Xbox's killer app.
You wouldn't say "let's go to Gamestop preorder this app called Halo".
The term "killer app" has been around and in use since at least the early 80s. I remember VisiCalc was called a "killer app" back then. Not sure where you get this information you put forth as truth but I know it is just plain wrong.
__________________
SE30 | Bondi Blu iMac | iBook G3 700 - 384 Megs 40gig |5th gen iPod 30gig Video | 17" 2.0 CD2 iMac |20" 2.16 CD2 iMac |5gb 1st Gen iPhone |16gb 4th Gen iPhone
Arcus is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:10 PM   #87
bedifferent
macrumors Demi-God
 
bedifferent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arcady View Post
I guess Apple with have to be content with their other 185 trademarks.
Quote:
Multi-Touch™ touchscreen interface
Whoa, Apple was granted a TM on "multi-touch"? Is this for real?
bedifferent is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:12 PM   #88
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Ok so when does Amazon's one click patent become invalidated?
__________________
"I have a very optimistic view of individuals. As individuals, people are inherently good. I have a somewhat more pessimistic view of people in groups." -- Steve Jobs , Wired interview
Rogifan is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:13 PM   #89
Dr McKay
macrumors 68040
 
Dr McKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kirkland
Send a message via MSN to Dr McKay Send a message via Skype™ to Dr McKay
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
Whether "App Store" should be trademarkable or not is another question, but there's no doubt that the term "App" wasn't used at all before Apple's App Store.

Microsoft didn't even call Windows software "applications", they had always called them "programs".
Wrong, go in Windows and look at a .exe files properties. Windows will list it as an "Application".
__________________
If only I could be so grossly incandescent.
Dr McKay is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:13 PM   #90
barkmonster
macrumors 68020
 
barkmonster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Lancashire
Till iOS. Only Macs refered to Apps or Applications. Other platforms ran programs but as soon as Apple popularised the shorter term "App" as it refers to mobile applications, everyone suddenly decided to call all software, regardless of platform "Apps". I know a program IS an application and the terms are interchangable but Apple really should have had something here.

It really cracks me up to see Windows 8 suddenly throw out 18 years of half-baked, "different enough not to be patent plagiarism" conventions and start call software Apps like Apple always have after having a "Programs" menu where Apple have an "Applications" one and Amazon are no different.
__________________
16Gb iPhone 5 • 2.53Ghz Mac Mini (8Gb, 60Gb Vertex 2) • Icy Box IB-328U3SEb with Toshiba DT01ACA300 HDD
Mbox2 • LG W2343T • Samsung SyncMaster 913n
barkmonster is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:20 PM   #91
fabianjj
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by pgiguere1 View Post
"App" being used in jargon is different from commercial use.
There is a difference between a reviewer calling software an "app" and Palm themselves selling them as "Apps".

I've seen some people here claim that Palm did in fact call them apps. Does somebody have a link?
Here's a picture of a TI-84 from 2004, it has a button that says APPS in purple, which opens a list of installed apps. I'd say this is at least an indication that the word app was used by others referring to software applications generically before apple, which in turn should make the term 'App Store' considered generic.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	image.jpg
Views:	26
Size:	173.6 KB
ID:	387456  
fabianjj is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:23 PM   #92
pgiguere1
macrumors 68000
 
pgiguere1's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Montreal, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
My point is - they were called Apps. Handango I believe had an APP store. (Handmark) although I'm not currently finding it via a simple search. And I don't have time to delve into it too much.

Are you arguing that no one used the term? That it wasn't popular? That Apple was the first to use the term app store?

Your initial statement was "but there's no doubt that the term "App" wasn't used at all before Apple's App Store."

That's what people responded to.
I'm arguing that Microsoft and Amazon are calling their store "App store/Appstore" strictly because of Apple's popularization of the term app. Even if there were some minor usage of the term "app" before, it was not a widespread term.

If you want an analogy, take the Samsung Galaxy Tab. This device was in direct reaction to the iPad and obviously wouldn't have happened otherwise. Yes, some tablets were made way before the iPad (namely Windows XP tablet PCs), but they are not the reason why there has been a huge surge in tablets a decade later, the iPad is. The fact that XP tablet PCs existed a decade ago don't change the fact that the Galaxy Tab only exists because of the iPad.

Likewise, there may have been some use of "app" you could find on Google before 2007, but the term didn't catch on in common language. Maybe it's just me, but I personally have never heard someone call a Windows program an "app" before Apple's App store came. It's very obvious for me that Amazon wouldn't have called their store "Appstore" and Microsoft wouldn't have called theirs "App Store" if it wasn't of Apple's App Store.

Like I said in my original comment, I'm not saying it's OK for Apple to trademark the term "App Store", I'm basically giving them credit for the fact that "App" is now commonly used by all other tech companies.

I exaggerated when saying there was no usage at all, but the little usage of the term "app" that actually happened before the App Store is not the reason why the term is super popular now, like the fact that some tablet PCs existed a decade ago is not the reason why tablets are super popular now.

Last edited by pgiguere1; Jan 2, 2013 at 01:32 PM.
pgiguere1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:24 PM   #93
Geckotek
macrumors G3
 
Geckotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC
Too many clueless fanboys in this thread that don't even bother to do any research.

Apple did not popularize anything, but the spread of smartphones in general made the term more widely used.
__________________
Gecko Art | Facebook | flickr
Geckotek is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:26 PM   #94
tito2020
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
chefs assocation should be the one suing they invented the word apps for dinner.
tito2020 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:30 PM   #95
Dr McKay
macrumors 68040
 
Dr McKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kirkland
Send a message via MSN to Dr McKay Send a message via Skype™ to Dr McKay
Quote:
Originally Posted by barkmonster View Post
Till iOS. Only Macs refered to Apps or Applications. Other platforms ran programs but as soon as Apple popularised the shorter term "App" as it refers to mobile applications, everyone suddenly decided to call all software, regardless of platform "Apps". I know a program IS an application and the terms are interchangable but Apple really should have had something here.

It really cracks me up to see Windows 8 suddenly throw out 18 years of half-baked, "different enough not to be patent plagiarism" conventions and start call software Apps like Apple always have after having a "Programs" menu where Apple have an "Applications" one and Amazon are no different.
Windows has referred to .exes as Applications for longer than iOS, other older mobile platforms like PDAs have ran apps too. You base your evidence because Windows has a "Programme Files" folder? Why does Windows also have an App Data folder?
__________________
If only I could be so grossly incandescent.
Dr McKay is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:31 PM   #96
uknowimright
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
can we start banning people (at least temporarily) spreading FUD and delete their FUD posts so people don't take it as fact?
uknowimright is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:31 PM   #97
bedifferent
macrumors Demi-God
 
bedifferent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by Geckotek View Post
Too many clueless fanboys in this thread that don't even bother to do any research.
It makes me a bit sad to be an Apple Mac user when so many people are quick to let Apple off when they judge other companies for the same behavior so harshly. This is how a company, empire, etc loses its reign, loss of objective and critical analysis. By not objectively acknowledging any faults, how will they progress, innovate, improve? The recent "Do Not Disturb" matter in which Apple states it will resolve itself on the first Monday of the year (the 7th, as it did last year, the 2nd) without fixing it, this is unacceptable. By allowing this we simply give Apple a pass, just as last year. If another manufacturer responded in the same vein, such as Android based devices, you bet comments on here would be far different.

C'mon everyone, we're all here because we use and like Apple devices, let's not allow that fact to cloud our judgment(s) by giving Apple a pass over everything. We need competition, criticism, objectivity to keep Apple on its toes. Steve Jobs lived by this method, so should we.
bedifferent is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:32 PM   #98
miknos
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Seems like Apple made the term popular. Let free markets decide which "App Store" is better. The only people benefiting from this fight are lawyers.
miknos is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:35 PM   #99
Morod
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: On The Nickel, over there....
Yay for Amazon!
__________________
Everything should be made as simple as possible, but not simpler.
Albert Einstein
Morod is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 2, 2013, 01:35 PM   #100
Geckotek
macrumors G3
 
Geckotek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by miknos View Post
Seems like Apple made the term popular. Let free markets decide which "App Store" is better. The only people benefiting from this fight are lawyers.
It would most likely seem that way to those who are younger or newer to the tech world. But for those of us that have been around for a while, it doesn't seem that way at all. At least that's where the line appears to be based no the conversations I'm reading here. Most of those saying they didn't popularize the term seem to have been gadget and/or IT geeks far before the iPhone was launched.
__________________
Gecko Art | Facebook | flickr
Geckotek is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Judge Invalidates Two Samsung Patent Claims Ahead of Second Patent Lawsuit with Apple MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 60 Jan 23, 2014 01:31 PM
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Over Apple's Location Tracking in iOS MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 56 Dec 4, 2013 02:19 PM
Judge in Brazilian 'iPhone' Trademark Lawsuit Rules in Apple's Favor MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 61 Sep 27, 2013 10:53 AM
Judge Dismisses Lawsuit Alleging App Store Monopoly MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 113 Aug 19, 2013 10:00 AM
Judge dismisses jury trial for Apple and Motorola case kdarling Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 1 Jun 8, 2012 09:41 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:46 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC