|Jan 5, 2013, 04:40 PM||#1|
Please help configure best Mac Pro for Photoshop & Modo
I need help on the best configuration of a new Mac Pro.
My main work is large, hi-res Photoshop files with many layers. I also do 3D work in Modo but this is only on still images rendered out at large file sizes - no animation work. Apart from this the machine would also be used for iTunes, email, safari -the usual stuff.
So I am looking at the best configuration for those requirements. I am currently looking at these two options:
Apple Mac Pro 6 Core 3.33GHz costing about £1,999.00
Apple Mac Pro 12 Core 2.66GHz costing about £3,349.00.
In both options I would install 32GB RAM.
So, does the extra cores in the 12 core model really justify the huge price increase for my type of work?
My concern is that the cost increase simply wont be justified against the actual performance improvements?
Any advice on this would be greatly appreciated.
A further detail which might make a difference: I currently have an 8 core Mac Pro (late 2008 model). In theory I could utilise the cores in this machine to perform network renders in modo thus benefitting from 14 cores worth of render processing. I'm not sure how efficient modo network rendering is but at least theoretically this seems like a good option to me. But again, advice from anyone with this more figured out would be appreciated.
|Jan 5, 2013, 05:39 PM||#2|
The 12 cores will be irrelevant in Photoshop, but will give you twice as much rendering power in Modo as it scales up well and uses all available Cores for pretty much all elements of the rendering process. Since you're not rendering out animations though, this could be a moot point....are your 3d projects ever based around tight deadlines?
I guess you could also utilise some cores for modo and leave some free so that you could carry on with photoshop work and the 12 core machine would be useful in that regard. But personally, I would go for the 6 core machine and if you need the extra rendering muscle, just build an i7 based PC. The current Mac Pros are poor value for money comparatively speaking.
Hope this helps.
If in doubt, use a car analogy.
|Jan 17, 2013, 09:34 AM||#4|
smart decision, the current mac pros are a waste of money, heck I'm still on my 2008 because the update isn't worth it.
especially for photoshop data, check out www.macperformanceguide.com if you haven't already - always the best source for data and performance info regarding macs and photoshop that I've found.
2013 nMP 6core 16GB RAM, Promise Pegaus2 R6 12TB RAID; uMBP 17/Matte
|Jan 17, 2013, 10:10 AM||#5|
Last edited by tony3d; Jan 17, 2013 at 10:29 AM.
|Jun 19, 2013, 09:53 AM||#6|
You might be interested in reading up about these:
I have been able to use an older Mac Pro for a lot longer then I should have by using the accessior, which was only running at half speed. I will be putting it into the 6 core 3.33 which can accommodate full 16x speed. It should be at least twice as fast as running off of a ssd.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Macbook Pro Retina & Photoshop||tek9designs||MacBook Pro||3||Oct 26, 2013 02:50 PM|
|How to Configure '08 Mac Pro for Best FCPX Performance?||MacPhotog||Mac Pro||7||Apr 4, 2013 10:30 AM|
|Photoshop CS3 on Mac Pro 1,4||dhughes9||Digital Photography||11||Mar 10, 2013 05:06 PM|
|Need to ./configure && make||Candunc||Mac Programming||1||Jul 25, 2012 12:18 PM|
|Mac Pro 3.1 Photoshop suitability||Rustyrd||Mac Pro||9||Jun 30, 2012 12:52 AM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:28 AM.