Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 4, 2002, 10:51 AM   #1
Vierge99
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Lightbulb Maybe related to a new IBM / Apple project

If you go to Apple's website and click on "Hot News" right now, one of the headings is "Recession Bright Spots." It takes you to a story about the economy, IT fields, and more importantly, Comdex 2002. There is a paragraph in it that says:

"...IBM marked down key elements of its software product line, restoring simple, one-price licensing for companies with fewer than 1,000 employees. IBM has slashed prices for new Unix systems based on the 64-bit Power CPU (hello, Moto?)..."

I'm not sure how or if this relates to Apple, but with the current rumble about a new chip that may one day be installed in future Power Macs, it could be good information.

Here is the link:

http://www.infoworld.com/articles/op...202opnoise.xml
Vierge99 is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 10:56 AM   #2
MacCoaster
macrumors 6502a
 
MacCoaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Washington, DC / Rochester, NY / Lexington, NC
Send a message via AIM to MacCoaster
I think they were talking about slashing prices of their Unix line--the IBM Servers and Workstations.

But the price slash could mean lower processor cost for Apple. Who knows.
__________________
The Mac Coaster
Quad Core Q6600 PC, 23" Apple Cinema HD LCD, White MacBook C2D 2.16 GHz, Athlon64 PC, AthlonXP PC, iPod photo 60 GB
MacCoaster is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 11:44 AM   #3
lmalave
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chinatown NYC
Send a message via AIM to lmalave Send a message via MSN to lmalave Send a message via Yahoo to lmalave Send a message via Skype™ to lmalave
Here's a related article:

http://news.com.com/2100-1001-975940.html?tag=fd_top


IBM is moving to all-Linux for its workstations and Low-end servers, and this is indeed good news. For now IBM is trying to lower the price on their Power4 based Linux servers (which still puts them in the $10,000 to $15,000 range), and once the 970 chip is produced, IBM will use it in a new line of Linux workstations (not sure what the pricing's going to be). The reason this is good news for Apple is because IBM is commited to using the 970 in its own Linux workstations, which means IBM will produce the 970 in greater volume and will devote more R&D resources to its ongoing development.
__________________
White MacBook 1.83 GHz, 60 GB HD, 1.25 GB RAM
Sony Ericsson D750i, 1GB memory stick
lmalave is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 12:58 PM   #4
MisterMe
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: USA
Re: Maybe related to a new IBM / Apple project

Quote:
Originally posted by Vierge99
If you go to Apple's website and click on "Hot News" right now, one of the headings is "Recession Bright Spots." It takes you to a story about the economy, IT fields, and more importantly, Comdex 2002. There is a paragraph in it that says:

"...IBM marked down key elements of its software product line, restoring simple, one-price licensing for companies with fewer than 1,000 employees. IBM has slashed prices for new Unix systems based on the 64-bit Power CPU (hello, Moto?)..."

....
The CPU is a small fraction of the cost of building a server or workstation. This has virtually nothing to do with Apple. Even if IBM gave Apple the CPUs and Apple passed all of the cost reduction to its buyers, the price drop on its products would be barely noticeable.
MisterMe is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 01:28 PM   #5
oldMac
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Power 4 Linux = Good News for Apple

I also read an article about IBM pushing Linux running on Power 4 processors. Inparticular, about trying to drive down the costs.

This is potentially good news for Apple as it demonstrates IBMs intentions to push Linux via the Power architecture.

Unfortunately, Apple doesn't push the CPU volume necessary to push PowerPC processor development in a competitive way. They can only fix this by moving to a processor that has higher volume or by increasing their own marketshare (which is very difficult to do when your processor of choice is not competitive.)

On the up-side, if IBM succeeds in increasing the market for this processor, Apple will be able to switch without large detriment to their user and developer base.

On the down-side, if IBM does not succeed in creating a viable market, then Apple is simply delaying their ultimate move to an x86-based architecture, which will require significant energy and cause many problems for users and developers. If this is the ultimate outcome, it would probably be better to get it over with now than to delay and wait out the indecision of yet another dying processor line. Either way (switchig to x86 now or later), it will be a PR nightmare for Apple.

That being said, if IBM has a fast processor that Apple can move to with minimal headache, Apple should take them up on it (IMO). Ultimately, I think Apple will have to move to x86, but perhaps they can lay the groundwork over time, so that the transition will be less painful (and less "on-the-heels" of the significant move to OS X.)
__________________
software developer & Mac user
oldMac is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 01:32 PM   #6
Catfish_Man
macrumors 68030
 
Catfish_Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Send a message via AIM to Catfish_Man
Re: Power 4 Linux = Good News for Apple

Quote:
Originally posted by oldMac
I also read an article about IBM pushing Linux running on Power 4 processors. Inparticular, about trying to drive down the costs.

This is potentially good news for Apple as it demonstrates IBMs intentions to push Linux via the Power architecture.

Unfortunately, Apple doesn't push the CPU volume necessary to push PowerPC processor development in a competitive way. They can only fix this by moving to a processor that has higher volume or by increasing their own marketshare (which is very difficult to do when your processor of choice is not competitive.)

On the up-side, if IBM succeeds in increasing the market for this processor, Apple will be able to switch without large detriment to their user and developer base.

On the down-side, if IBM does not succeed in creating a viable market, then Apple is simply delaying their ultimate move to an x86-based architecture, which will require significant energy and cause many problems for users and developers. If this is the ultimate outcome, it would probably be better to get it over with now than to delay and wait out the indecision of yet another dying processor line. Either way (switchig to x86 now or later), it will be a PR nightmare for Apple.

That being said, if IBM has a fast processor that Apple can move to with minimal headache, Apple should take them up on it (IMO). Ultimately, I think Apple will have to move to x86, but perhaps they can lay the groundwork over time, so that the transition will be less painful (and less "on-the-heels" of the significant move to OS X.)
If you replace all the instances of x86 in that post with something else (IA-64, perhaps) then I think you're right. Apple will eventually need to switch away from PowerPC, but I don't think it will need to for at least a decade.
Catfish_Man is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 02:44 PM   #7
bluecell
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: cleveland:oh
Re: Re: Power 4 Linux = Good News for Apple

Quote:
Originally posted by Catfish_Man
If you replace all the instances of x86 in that post with something else (IA-64, perhaps) then I think you're right. Apple will eventually need to switch away from PowerPC, but I don't think it will need to for at least a decade.
A decade? How did you come to that conclusion? Apple won't be around in a decade if they're relying on IBM and Motorola. The sad truth is, Apple's getting annihilated because of the slow development of the PowerPC. They don't have enough in the way of options there anyway.
bluecell is offline   0
Old Dec 4, 2002, 03:22 PM   #8
Computer_Phreak
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Re: Re: Maybe related to a new IBM / Apple project

Quote:
Originally posted by MisterMe


The CPU is a small fraction of the cost of building a server or workstation. This has virtually nothing to do with Apple. Even if IBM gave Apple the CPUs and Apple passed all of the cost reduction to its buyers, the price drop on its products would be barely noticeable.
Yep... know how much the 15K RPM 73 GB SCSI Hard Drives cost? Thousands... plus all the RAM and the high margins because companies can afford to pay almost any amount for top-notch performance and stability.
Computer_Phreak is offline   0


 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bizarre download throttling issue. Mac OS related or wireless network related? Jottle Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 9 Jul 22, 2013 01:30 PM
Know your Apple-related movies? What's this from... xcodeaddict Community Discussion 8 Jun 23, 2013 05:29 PM
If Apple stayed with IBM PowerPC 76ShovelHead PowerPC Macs 48 Jan 7, 2013 03:33 AM
Anyone cancel their preorder with Apple to buy at Apple Store? At&t related. Rm.237 iPhone 5 Sep 19, 2012 02:03 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:54 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC