Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 8, 2013, 12:55 PM   #1
danistyping
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Boston, MA
ULV Haswell not coming until Late 2013/2014...so why is everyone saying June?

The desktop variants of Haswell are coming around June, sure. But the mobile chips aren't coming until late 2013/early 2014. Unless Apple gets the chips super early...why is everyone saying the MBA will adopt Haswell around June? It's all over these forums for some reason. I get that the MBA upgrade cycle hits around then...
danistyping is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2013, 01:10 PM   #2
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Has the timing been confirmed? I thought I had heard "fall 2013" for the ULV chips. Also, there are lower power versions of Ivy Bridge chips coming soon, so it is possible that Apple could do a mid-cycle spec update, or if they were planning to do something more dramatic (such as offer a Retina Display option, or increase the resolution to 1080p) they could do that without changing the processor).
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2013, 01:31 PM   #3
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by danistyping View Post
The desktop variants of Haswell are coming around June, sure. But the mobile chips aren't coming until late 2013/early 2014. Unless Apple gets the chips super early...why is everyone saying the MBA will adopt Haswell around June? It's all over these forums for some reason. I get that the MBA upgrade cycle hits around then...
I don't think that Apple would use the ULV chips. In my opinion, they are just a marketing gimmick.

All the Intel processors use different amounts of power depending on the speed they are running, and depending on how many cores are operating. The "TLD" number that some people think shows how power efficient a chip is just says what the maximum possible power consumption of the chip is, with all cores at the maximum possible speed.

You can reduce the TLD (maximum power use) by just limiting the clock speed of the chip. If a chip could run at 3 GHz, but you don't allow it to ever go beyond 1.5 GHz, then the maximum power usage will be dramatically lower. However, the chip is not one bit more power efficient: Running at 1.5 GHz it uses just as much power as the 3 GHz chip when it runs at 1.5 GHz.

I think that is what Intel is doing with the ULV chips. If you run a normal laptop chip at the same low speed as a ULV, I wouldn't expect it to use much more power. On the other hand, the ULV chip will be limited in how fast it can do tasks. If I have a very CPU intensive job, I'd rather have the battery empty after four hours with the job done, than a battery that still has some charge left after six hours, but the job isn't finished.

Summary: Apple has never used ULV chips, and I can't see a reason why they would start doing so with Haswell.
gnasher729 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2013, 01:41 PM   #4
leman
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
Summary: Apple has never used ULV chips, and I can't see a reason why they would start doing so with Haswell.
Actually, one of the first Intel ULV chip was created specifically for the MacBook Air The MBA has been using ULV chips ever since.
leman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2013, 01:43 PM   #5
Michael Goff
macrumors 68030
 
Michael Goff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by gnasher729 View Post
I don't think that Apple would use the ULV chips. In my opinion, they are just a marketing gimmick.

All the Intel processors use different amounts of power depending on the speed they are running, and depending on how many cores are operating. The "TLD" number that some people think shows how power efficient a chip is just says what the maximum possible power consumption of the chip is, with all cores at the maximum possible speed.

You can reduce the TLD (maximum power use) by just limiting the clock speed of the chip. If a chip could run at 3 GHz, but you don't allow it to ever go beyond 1.5 GHz, then the maximum power usage will be dramatically lower. However, the chip is not one bit more power efficient: Running at 1.5 GHz it uses just as much power as the 3 GHz chip when it runs at 1.5 GHz.

I think that is what Intel is doing with the ULV chips. If you run a normal laptop chip at the same low speed as a ULV, I wouldn't expect it to use much more power. On the other hand, the ULV chip will be limited in how fast it can do tasks. If I have a very CPU intensive job, I'd rather have the battery empty after four hours with the job done, than a battery that still has some charge left after six hours, but the job isn't finished.

Summary: Apple has never used ULV chips, and I can't see a reason why they would start doing so with Haswell.
i7-3667u.

That's the high-end MBA for 2012.

Apple uses ULV in their Macbook Air line
__________________
13" Macbook Air (2012) Ultimate
OS X 10.9
Michael Goff is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:28 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC