|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 |
|
Oakley prescription glasses, regular or Oakley lenses?
I've had my current Oakley frame for almost 6 years. Still looks new, so I picked out another Oakley frame.
When I'm picking lenses for it, I have two options 1. $233.95 Hi-index 1.67, Transitions, Crizal coating or 2. $350 Oakley plutonite, transitions, Oakley AR coating I got option #1 last time and they have held up perfectly. Do I spend the extra $120 on Oakley lenses? Anyone have experience with them? Is Plutonite that much better?
__________________
rMBP 15 2.3 i7/16gb/256 SSD| MacBook Air (Late 2011) 1.7 i5/4gb/128 SSD| riPad 32gb WiFi| TV (3rd gen)| Airport Extreme| iP5|S4|Note2
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
| 2011 Mac Mini i7 | 32GB iPad (4th Gen) | 16GB iPhone 4S | |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
Quote:
I also found out the place where I'm ordering is running a promotion on lenses (non Oakley) so after that, they're over $180 less. Plus the regular lenses are still Zeiss |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
| 2011 Mac Mini i7 | 32GB iPad (4th Gen) | 16GB iPhone 4S | |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:51 AM.




rMBP 15 2.3 i7/16gb/256 SSD|




Linear Mode
