Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:10 AM   #1
eroxx
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
$1799 iMac FASTER than $1999?!

Did you guys see the macworld article?

http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/?newsid=3420278
eroxx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:22 AM   #2
Confuzzzed
macrumors 68000
 
Confuzzzed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Liverpool, UK
In summary this article claims the 3.2GHz Core i5 of the top-end 27" iMac to be inferior to the 2.9GHz Core i5 of the entry level version.

The only other difference in the machines being the GPUs.

As someone who is about to receive the 3.2GHz Core i5 iMac, these are not results I wanted to see but perhaps I am not going to tighten the noose just yet. There's lies, damn lies and then there's statistics. I am sure the tests they run have more to do with the HDD than anything else. Perhaps luck of the draw? Mine sports fusion anyway, so hoping it's got a bit more zip
Confuzzzed is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:29 AM   #3
ybz90
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
The difference is extremely minor and almost certainly due to the hard drives. Furthermore, these results shouldn't be surprising at all as the two models are nearly identical, one being the 3470 and the other is the i5 3470S, differing in just 0.3GHz. For all intents and purposes, the performance difference between the two is negligible anyway.
ybz90 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:30 AM   #4
pauldy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by eroxx View Post
Did you guys see the macworld article?

http://www.macworld.co.uk/mac/news/?newsid=3420278
NM I misread the i5 3.2 vs i5 2.9.
pauldy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 08:34 AM   #5
oldgeezer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Maryland
The review attributes the speed difference to the Seagate Barracuda drive vs the Western drive. I'd like to see the same tests with each iMac sporting the same drive - preferably the fusion drive.

You don't have to read between the lines to determine that their testing methodology is for overall speed and not a measure of CPU/GPU performance alone and they state that the Cinebench tests of CPU performance show the higher end processor to be 7% faster.
oldgeezer is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 09:11 AM   #6
Arman
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: SoCal
Still, given hard drives are the bottleneck of modern pc, it is a little disheartening to see such a gap in performance between the two drives.
__________________
Late 2012 27" iMac 3.4Ghz, 32GB, 1TB fusion, 675MX
Late 2011 15" MacBook Pro, 2.2Ghz, 16GB, 250GB SSD
iPhone 5 Black 32GB; iPad 4 Black 32GB
Arman is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:10 AM   #7
eroxx
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Does anyone know which HDD the Fusion drive uses as it's HDD "partition"?
eroxx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:30 AM   #8
Mister Bumbo
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Just FYI, I have the 3.2 i5 with Seagate Barracuda HD.
Mister Bumbo is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:31 AM   #9
eroxx
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
I'm curious if all fusions have a certain model ...
eroxx is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 14, 2013, 11:51 AM   #10
kflanary
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
I have the Seagate drive - I found the serial number for that. But how do you check the cache on the drive? Thanks in advance.
kflanary is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Should I get a $1999 iMac or $2199 MacBook Pro Retina cinnabun93 iMac 27 Aug 19, 2014 09:47 PM
15" rMBP (1799) or stock 27" iMac (1699 one) iancapable Buying Tips and Advice 14 Dec 11, 2012 08:53 AM
[Help] Base 27" ($1799) or higher end 27" ($1999) C-Dub iMac 7 Dec 7, 2012 11:08 PM
2011 27" iMac ($1999 model) or 2012 27" ($1799 model) obsoletepower iMac 9 Nov 15, 2012 06:46 PM
15 cMBP 1799 or 15 rMBP 1799? barebackbadger8 MacBook Pro 2 Nov 8, 2012 10:07 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:09 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC