Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 15, 2013, 04:36 PM   #1
shenan1982
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Cheapest External ThunderBolt Drive that I could replace the HDD with SSD on?

Anyone know of the best thunderbolt portable drive to do this with? I have a 512GB SSD drive (Samsung), and I want to get a thunderbolt enclosure and put the drive in and have my OS boot off of it, so when I'm home I boot my iMac off it and have my OS on it at home, and then when I'm on the road I unplug it and plug it into my MacBook Air and have the same OS setup on the road.

My only concern is there are seemingly no external thunderbolt enclosures on the market, but I've heard several people have taken external TB drives, and opened them up, replaced the hard drive with a SSD then closed em back up and had wicked-fast boot experiences with the drive. Since I already have the 512GB SSD, the biggest cost is out of the way.

Any advice would be appreciated!
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 01:08 AM   #2
Dr Charter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
Anyone know of the best thunderbolt portable drive to do this with? I have a 512GB SSD drive (Samsung), and I want to get a thunderbolt enclosure and put the drive in and have my OS boot off of it, so when I'm home I boot my iMac off it and have my OS on it at home, and then when I'm on the road I unplug it and plug it into my MacBook Air and have the same OS setup on the road.

My only concern is there are seemingly no external thunderbolt enclosures on the market, but I've heard several people have taken external TB drives, and opened them up, replaced the hard drive with a SSD then closed em back up and had wicked-fast boot experiences with the drive. Since I already have the 512GB SSD, the biggest cost is out of the way.

Any advice would be appreciated!
It's not an enclosure per se but you can plug it into a Seagate Thunderbolt adapter. They only run $99. I am actually not aware of any thunderbolt enclosures but I imagine you could open up a Buffalo Ministation and replace the drive ($174).
Dr Charter is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 08:22 AM   #3
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
I have a 512GB SSD drive (Samsung), and I want to get a thunderbolt enclosure and put the drive in and have my OS boot off of it!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Charter View Post
It's not an enclosure per se but you can plug it into a Seagate Thunderbolt adapter. They only run $99. I am actually not aware of any thunderbolt enclosures but I imagine you could open up a Buffalo Ministation and replace the drive ($174).
I use the Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter with a "regular" SSD (an OCZ Agility 3 and an Intel 320) as a backup drive. It gets nearly native speeds, and slightly better than using those same drives in a USB 3.0 enclosure.

Note that the adapter is intended primarily for use with Seagate GoFlex drives, but the connector is standard SATA III. If you use a bare drive, there will be a little bit of a gap between the bottom of the drive and the base of the adapter (it's about 4" long and 1" thick), so you might want to consider using something (such as double-sided foam tape) to "mount" the drive onto the enclosure. The new 0.5 meter Thunderbolt cable is perfect for it.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 12:32 PM   #4
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KPOM View Post
I use the Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter with a "regular" SSD (an OCZ Agility 3 and an Intel 320) as a backup drive. It gets nearly native speeds, and slightly better than using those same drives in a USB 3.0 enclosure.

Note that the adapter is intended primarily for use with Seagate GoFlex drives, but the connector is standard SATA III. If you use a bare drive, there will be a little bit of a gap between the bottom of the drive and the base of the adapter (it's about 4" long and 1" thick), so you might want to consider using something (such as double-sided foam tape) to "mount" the drive onto the enclosure. The new 0.5 meter Thunderbolt cable is perfect for it.
Oye that seems really primitive (no offense). I want something that at least looks decent if it's going to be sitting on my desktop, even if it means waiting.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 12:42 PM   #5
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
I use the Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter (2.5") and it works great in OS X and Windows with a SSD. Yes, it does allow any SATA drive to be attached "bare", but I bought a couple of new "GoFlex enclosures" on eBay which allow you to insert your SSD and snap it closed to complete the package. Alternately, you could buy the GoFlex with a hard disk kit, then open the enclosure and swap the hard disk for your SSD and snap it back together. The hard disk you removed can be sold, put in another laptop, or installed in a cheap USB-3.0 enclosure for a backup drive. The GoFlex seems to power the larger 512GB SSDs without problems.

The Buffalo has been reported here to be very difficult to open due to strong double-stick tape holding it closed causing damage to the case. The LaCie rugged looks to be easier to open without damage to replace the HD with SSD. Both of these have been reported to have power issues with larger 512GB SSDs.

You can also get "refurb" LaCie "Little Big Disk" Thunderbolt at MacMall which hold 2 drives that can be used individually or as a RAID-0 for very fast transfer rates. It is not bus powered so requires a power supply connection. There are several threads which discuss this further here.


-howard
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 12:50 PM   #6
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfg View Post
I use the Seagate GoFlex Thunderbolt Adapter (2.5") and it works great in OS X and Windows with a SSD. Yes, it does allow any SATA drive to be attached "bare", but I bought a couple of new "GoFlex enclosures" on eBay which allow you to insert your SSD and snap it closed to complete the package. Alternately, you could buy the GoFlex with a hard disk kit, then open the enclosure and swap the hard disk for your SSD and snap it back together. The hard disk you removed can be sold, put in another laptop, or installed in a cheap USB-3.0 enclosure for a backup drive. The GoFlex seems to power the larger 512GB SSDs without problems.

The Buffalo has been reported here to be very difficult to open due to strong double-stick tape holding it closed causing damage to the case. The LaCie rugged looks to be easier to open without damage to replace the HD with SSD. Both of these have been reported to have power issues with larger 512GB SSDs.

You can also get "refurb" LaCie "Little Big Disk" Thunderbolt at MacMall which hold 2 drives that can be used individually or as a RAID-0 for very fast transfer rates. It is not bus powered so requires a power supply connection. There are several threads which discuss this further here.


-howard
OK, so I'm looking on Amazon, my preferred vendor, and don't see which Seagates you're referring to, could you link me to the two parts (the drive\enclosure that I could easily replace the drive on, and the thunderbolt that's powered and would go along with said drive)? Thanks

And the seagate enclosure is openable to swap drives easily?

The one I see is:

http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Portab...dp_ob_title_ce

And that's not powered so won't work.

Last edited by shenan1982; Jan 16, 2013 at 12:57 PM.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 12:59 PM   #7
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
OK, so I'm looking on Amazon, my preferred vendor, and don't see which Seagates you're referring to, could you link me to the two parts (the drive\enclosure that I could easily replace the drive on, and the thunderbolt that's powered and would go along with said drive)? Thanks

And the seagate enclosure is openable to swap drives easily?
Thunderbolt adapter only (no TB cable):
http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Portab...dp_ob_title_ce

Here is a 1TB drive with the Thunderbolt adapter with TB cable:
http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Thunde...ac+thunderbolt


The enclosure is the typical "snap together" construction which can be carefully opened with a plastic credit card so as not to break too many of the snap points.

-howard

EDIT: I actually had the Mac Backup kit shown above, and even though I have the eBay enclosures which are the same as my other GoFLex interchangeable drives, I elected to open that case and swap drives because it is just a little slimmer and is better looking with a metal silver stripe around the perimeter than the other case.

Last edited by hfg; Jan 16, 2013 at 10:39 PM. Reason: newer part link
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 01:01 PM   #8
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by hfg View Post
Thunderbolt adapter only (no TB cable):
http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-GoFlex...ex+thunderbolt

Here is a 1TB drive with the Thunderbolt adapter with TB cable:
http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Thunde...ac+thunderbolt


The enclosure is the typical "snap together" construction which can be carefully opened with a plastic credit card so as not to break too many of the snap points.

-howard
Yeah I saw these, but they aren't powered externally, so don't want to run into issues.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 01:10 PM   #9
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
OK, so I'm looking on Amazon, my preferred vendor, and don't see which Seagates you're referring to, could you link me to the two parts (the drive\enclosure that I could easily replace the drive on, and the thunderbolt that's powered and would go along with said drive)? Thanks

And the seagate enclosure is openable to swap drives easily?

The one I see is:

http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Portab...dp_ob_title_ce

And that's not powered so won't work.
That one will work and is bus powered. It is an older model, but I have not noticed a speed difference in testing between that and the one I linked above (I have both). Note that the bare TB interface does not come with a TB cable, which can cost $50 separately.


Product Features
Take advantage of the revolutionary, high performance speed of Thunderbolt connectivity
Tranfers occur at 10Gbps, which is up to 20x faster than USB 2.0 and 12x faster than FireWire 800
Transfer HD movies and other large files in seconds with Thunderbolt's ultra-fast performance
The STAE128 turns any Backup Plus Portable Drive into a blazing-fast Thunderbolt device for your compatible computer
Completely bus powered, no external power supply needed
Connect to the end of a daisy chain of Thunderbolt devices, or directly to the Thunderbolt port on your computer
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 01:21 PM   #10
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
OK, so I'm looking on Amazon, my preferred vendor, and don't see which Seagates you're referring to, could you link me to the two parts (the drive\enclosure that I could easily replace the drive on, and the thunderbolt that's powered and would go along with said drive)? Thanks

And the seagate enclosure is openable to swap drives easily?

The one I see is:

http://www.amazon.com/Seagate-Portab...dp_ob_title_ce

And that's not powered so won't work.
If you are just going to plug in a 2.5" SSD it works fine. The GoFlex draw all the power it needs from the Thunderbolt port. All the enclosure does is wrap around the drive so that it plugs in.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 16, 2013, 01:35 PM   #11
Dr Charter
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Oklahoma
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
Oye that seems really primitive (no offense). I want something that at least looks decent if it's going to be sitting on my desktop, even if it means waiting.
I know what you mean. If I go this route, I'm just going to get a Twelvesouth backpack for my iMac so it's not sitting on my desk. Out of sight. Out of mind.
Dr Charter is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 01:52 AM   #12
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KPOM View Post
If you are just going to plug in a 2.5" SSD it works fine. The GoFlex draw all the power it needs from the Thunderbolt port. All the enclosure does is wrap around the drive so that it plugs in.
Yeah, but at 512gb as a primary boot drive (to fully avail of the SSD speed) won't it bomb when processor is going nuts?

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Charter View Post
I know what you mean. If I go this route, I'm just going to get a Twelvesouth backpack for my iMac so it's not sitting on my desk. Out of sight. Out of mind.
Yeah I have one, I swear by them, hopefully the back connection works with the iMac 2012 ... my new iMac is being delivered on Monday, so I hope this works.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 02:24 AM   #13
ybz90
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
Yeah I saw these, but they aren't powered externally, so don't want to run into issues.
Why do you want them externally powered? It's unnecessary and would add clutter. You may be confusing 2.5" with 3.5" clunkers, which do need external power to function. All laptop drives, and especially SSDs, which draw even less power, are powered on bus-only and you will not have issues.

In fact, there is not a single 2.5" drive that I know of that is (or needs to be) externally powered.
ybz90 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 02:35 AM   #14
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by ybz90 View Post
Why do you want them externally powered? It's unnecessary and would add clutter. You may be confusing 2.5" with 3.5" clunkers, which do need external power to function. All laptop drives, and especially SSDs, which draw even less power, are powered on bus-only and you will not have issues.

In fact, there is not a single 2.5" drive that I know of that is (or needs to be) externally powered.
As many have stated here, a 512 GB ssd doesn't get enough power from the system to reliably run the os off of.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 06:35 AM   #15
ybz90
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
As many have stated here, a 512 GB ssd doesn't get enough power from the system to reliably run the os off of.
This is demonstrably untrue, I actually just picked up the Seagate earlier this week and am running a Crucial M4 512GB on it right now, and I run protein libraries from it without a hiccup, so not quite OS, but during simulations, it needs sustained power for hours at a time.

Unfortunately, though, like I said, I can't think of nor am I aware of any 2.5" enclosures that have any sort of external power. I just don't think they're made that way. It's possible they exist, but if so, there are very, very few, and it seems, none that can do Thunderbolt. It's kind of the weakness of Thunderbolt right now -- there's just not enough of anything available on it, and it seems we're limited right now to the handful of enclosures, none of which have external power.

If you get an external SATA power supply, you could maybe use that, but that's even less elegant than the "ghetto" Seagate dock.
ybz90 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 06:52 AM   #16
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
Yeah, but at 512gb as a primary boot drive (to fully avail of the SSD speed) won't it bomb when processor is going nuts?.
I don't believe this is the case. These are intended to power traditional hard drives, which draw a lot more power than even the largest SSDs.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 10:43 AM   #17
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
From the Wiki ... Thunderbolt can supply 10 watts of power.


Power capabilities versus other interfaces

Thunderbolt was clearly intended as, and functions as, a unifying interface for mobile, laptop and desktop devices to prevent more proliferation of cables and connectors for displays and storage. Its power characteristics reflect this. The power, at 10 Watts, improves on USB 3.0's 4.5 watts, but is not beyond the ability of a laptop or tablet to power.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunder...her_interfaces



-howard
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 10:51 AM   #18
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by ybz90 View Post
This is demonstrably untrue, I actually just picked up the Seagate earlier this week and am running a Crucial M4 512GB on it right now, and I run protein libraries from it without a hiccup, so not quite OS, but during simulations, it needs sustained power for hours at a time.

Unfortunately, though, like I said, I can't think of nor am I aware of any 2.5" enclosures that have any sort of external power. I just don't think they're made that way. It's possible they exist, but if so, there are very, very few, and it seems, none that can do Thunderbolt. It's kind of the weakness of Thunderbolt right now -- there's just not enough of anything available on it, and it seems we're limited right now to the handful of enclosures, none of which have external power.

If you get an external SATA power supply, you could maybe use that, but that's even less elegant than the "ghetto" Seagate dock.
I'm not sure why the general consensus here seems to be that the non-powered solution won't work then. In several forums on here as well as other sites, people are saying that powering a drive off the system's BUS is prone to failure when using processor intensive tasks and using the external as the primary boot drive. I just can't have that kinda failure. I'd like to see someone who's actually got that setup successfully. Most people, like you, don't fully use it as an external boot drive as their primary day to day OS disk.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by hfg View Post
From the Wiki ... Thunderbolt can supply 10 watts of power.


Power capabilities versus other interfaces

Thunderbolt was clearly intended as, and functions as, a unifying interface for mobile, laptop and desktop devices to prevent more proliferation of cables and connectors for displays and storage. Its power characteristics reflect this. The power, at 10 Watts, improves on USB 3.0's 4.5 watts, but is not beyond the ability of a laptop or tablet to power.


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunder...her_interfaces



-howard
So here's what I ordered:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003ZUXXVU/..._M3T1_ST1_dp_1

Do you think the Seagate TB solution would perform as well if not better than this drive? One concern I do have is the sleep\wake functionality of a non-powered unit. If the computer shuts the power off to the external drive, I'm afraid of issues when sleep waking when using the external TB unpowered Seagate as my boot drive
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:06 AM   #19
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
I posted some speed tests results over on your other thread about this same subject.


That drive dock that you linked to on Amazon is huge, certainly not something you want to carry around with your Macbook Air. And it doesn't have Thunderbolt interface.
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:18 AM   #20
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
I'd like to see someone who's actually got that setup successfully. Most people, like you, don't fully use it as an external boot drive as their primary day to day OS disk.[COLOR="#808080"]


So here's what I ordered:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003ZUXXVU/..._M3T1_ST1_dp_1

Do you think the Seagate TB solution would perform as well if not better than this drive? One concern I do have is the sleep\wake functionality of a non-powered unit. If the computer shuts the power off to the external drive, I'm afraid of issues when sleep waking when using the external TB unpowered Seagate as my boot drive
To clarify, why do you want to run the external drive as the primary drive? Running the system off an external drive (USB 3.0 or Thunderbolt) generally does tax the processor a bit more and the fans will run hotter.

If it will be sitting on a desk, there is a Seagate Thunderbolt enclosure intended for desktop use (the other one is technically portable) that can accept up to 3.5" drives. I haven't looked into it, but it may have a separate power source.

Anyway, I have tested hard drives and SSDs in both a USB 3.0 enclosure and the Seagate. I've gotten slightly better SSD scores with the Thunderbolt adapter, and slightly better HDD scores in the USB 3.0 enclosure, although the differences are negligible. Specifically, the large sustained read and write tests tend to be faster on the SSD with the Thunderbolt adapter.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:21 AM   #21
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KPOM View Post
To clarify, why do you want to run the external drive as the primary drive? Running the system off an external drive (USB 3.0 or Thunderbolt) generally does tax the processor a bit more and the fans will run hotter.

If it will be sitting on a desk, there is a Seagate Thunderbolt enclosure intended for desktop use (the other one is technically portable) that can accept up to 3.5" drives. I haven't looked into it, but it may have a separate power source.

Anyway, I have tested hard drives and SSDs in both a USB 3.0 enclosure and the Seagate. I've gotten slightly better SSD scores with the Thunderbolt adapter, and slightly better HDD scores in the USB 3.0 enclosure, although the differences are negligible. Specifically, the large sustained read and write tests tend to be faster on the SSD with the Thunderbolt adapter.
I want to be able to install OSX onto the SSD, so it boots in 8 seconds like it does installed internally on my iMac (2010) or as close to it as possible. I know I'm going to be disappointed with Fusion after being in a 100% SSD environment for the last 6 months. Having the TB portable drive would allow me to boot to it when at home on the iMac, then take it with me and have my iMac "on my MB Air" by plugging it in and booting off it on the road.
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:46 AM   #22
KPOM
macrumors G3
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
I want to be able to install OSX onto the SSD, so it boots in 8 seconds like it does installed internally on my iMac (2010) or as close to it as possible. I know I'm going to be disappointed with Fusion after being in a 100% SSD environment for the last 6 months. Having the TB portable drive would allow me to boot to it when at home on the iMac, then take it with me and have my iMac "on my MB Air" by plugging it in and booting off it on the road.
Are you sure that it will boot both the iMac and the MacBook Air? Sometimes specific models have their own builds. I know that Lion builds for the MacBook Air wouldn't boot on other Macs and vice versa. Also, how are you connecting the drive to the iMac? The 2010 model didn't have Thunderbolt, and Firewire is noticeably slower than USB 3.0 or Thunderbolt.
KPOM is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 11:58 AM   #23
shenan1982
Thread Starter
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by KPOM View Post
Are you sure that it will boot both the iMac and the MacBook Air? Sometimes specific models have their own builds. I know that Lion builds for the MacBook Air wouldn't boot on other Macs and vice versa. Also, how are you connecting the drive to the iMac? The 2010 model didn't have Thunderbolt, and Firewire is noticeably slower than USB 3.0 or Thunderbolt.
I think it would be fine. I think the build numbers are for installation purposes, no reason it wouldn't boot I don't think. It's the 2012 iMac so TB port on board! :-)
shenan1982 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 12:40 PM   #24
hfg
macrumors 68020
 
hfg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Cedar Rapids, IA.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
I think it would be fine. I think the build numbers are for installation purposes, no reason it wouldn't boot I don't think. It's the 2012 iMac so TB port on board! :-)
Your 2012 iMac has a slightly newer build of OS X, but should boot fine on the Macbook Air. The other way around won't work. The next public release of OS X will resolve this. You shouldn't have any problems doing what you desire.
hfg is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 17, 2013, 01:34 PM   #25
ybz90
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by shenan1982 View Post
I'm not sure why the general consensus here seems to be that the non-powered solution won't work then. In several forums on here as well as other sites, people are saying that powering a drive off the system's BUS is prone to failure when using processor intensive tasks and using the external as the primary boot drive. I just can't have that kinda failure. I'd like to see someone who's actually got that setup successfully. Most people, like you, don't fully use it as an external boot drive as their primary day to day OS disk.

----------



So here's what I ordered:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B003ZUXXVU/..._M3T1_ST1_dp_1

Do you think the Seagate TB solution would perform as well if not better than this drive? One concern I do have is the sleep\wake functionality of a non-powered unit. If the computer shuts the power off to the external drive, I'm afraid of issues when sleep waking when using the external TB unpowered Seagate as my boot drive
Hmm, it could be possible there are issues with USB, but I haven't had any with Thunderbolt yet. Not saying they don't exist, you have documented some yourself from other forums, but afaik, Thunderbolt has its own controller chips, like Firewire, whereas USB is the one that necessarily leverages the CPU for everything.
ybz90 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Notebooks > MacBook Air

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Portable external drive dilemma. HDD/SSD; 3.0/Thunderbolt? fruu Mac Peripherals 21 Sep 26, 2013 04:33 AM
Options for external thunderbolt drive using my own SSD? Boe11 Digital Video 7 Jul 5, 2013 01:13 AM
Best external Thunderbolt drive that I can open and install SSD? shenan1982 iMac 126 Mar 24, 2013 06:07 AM
2011 imac ssd with external HDD or 2012 with internal HDD and thunderbolt ssd Black Tiger iMac 2 Jan 26, 2013 10:17 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:12 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC