|Oct 4, 2005, 10:58 AM||#2|
Tracks may be locked at 0.99$ but albums aren't locked to 9.99$ at all (why does he says that and then contradict himself?).
The "album only" tracks are really annoying, they prevents me from getting that track because I won't pay for a full album if I only want a single track.
Partial albums are annoying too, because if I want the whole thing I can't purchase it via iTMS.
From the comments... "For an even better deal than iTunes, try Walmart.com -- 88 cents per song at 128kbs, all WMAs."
Yeah, right. Like people are going to pay for something:
- locked into a Microsoft format DRM that won't play on iPods (most popular "MP3 player").
- with lower audio quality (WMA at 128kbps is just a bit better than MP3)
I'd rather pay 0.99$CAN and get the best: AAC audio quality, iPod-compatibility, easy-to-use iTunes/iTMS software.
The first 90% of the code accounts for the first 90% of the development time. The remaining 10% of the code accounts for the other 90% of the development time. -Tom Cargill, Bell Labs.
Last edited by bousozoku; Oct 31, 2005 at 11:02 AM. Reason: posts next to each other
|Oct 4, 2005, 12:35 PM||#3|
another one from the comments at the end of the article...
"What this article does not explain is how the publishing companies don't treat the record labels the same for all songs. For example, if a song is over seven minutes long, the publishers charge the record labels double what they normally charge them. So it is not that surprising to me that the labels are complaining that they cannot pass those costs on to iTunes and the consumer..."
lol, that's great. so you are suggesting we should feel bad for the labels, because they are getting raped by the publishers? ... uh no. they are all part of the same machine in the first place and substituting one greedy [bleeper] for another, doesn't change that they are all greedy [bleepers].
|Oct 6, 2005, 05:27 PM||#4|
And in the case of the major labels, the publishers are just a different division of the same company, so it's all just budget shuffling and doesn't mean a thing.
For example, look at Tangerine Dream. Lots of long songs that are available album-only, with albums selling for $10 and generally having less than 10 tracks.
|Thread Tools||Search this Thread|
|thread||Thread Starter||Forum||Replies||Last Post|
|Why Apple Won't Become A Phone Company||MacBytes||MacBytes.com News Discussion||0||Sep 12, 2007 09:59 AM|
|Why Apple Won't Up-Charge Downloads||MacBytes||MacBytes.com News Discussion||12||Oct 1, 2005 12:14 PM|
|Why Apple Won't Embrace Intel||MacBytes||MacBytes.com News Discussion||11||May 24, 2005 03:32 PM|
|Why Apple won't make a less than 4Gb iPod||oldschool||General Mac Discussion||1||Jan 10, 2004 09:45 PM|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:40 PM.