|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Search this Thread | Display Modes |
|
|
#76 |
|
'merica.
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#77 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#78 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
How to Prevent your Mac from Overheating |
||
|
|
3
|
|
|
#79 |
|
This is one of those laws that leave you scratching your head saying WTF?
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#80 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
5
|
|
|
#81 |
|
|
2
|
|
|
#82 |
|
Does ATT offer discounted cell/data plans if you already own your unlocked phone? (that is, do they offer subsidized and un-subsidized plans at different prices?)
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#83 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#84 |
|
Ah, the joys of DMCA....
We are all guilty, until proven innocent.Thank your friendly congressman, who will sell all of us in exchange for a few donations which keep him/her in office. But they know that while large corporations pay attention to these things and can hurt their reelection chances, the Joe Publics out there are oblivious and much more concerned with hot button "issues" like banning gay marriage or abortion. BS. If you have a contract, you still have to pay your monthly fees, or pay the penalties for breaking the contract. Why should it matter if the phone is unlocked? |
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#85 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#86 |
|
I don't believe they currently do which is a big complaint people have (un-subsidized plans should be much less).
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#87 |
|
|
1
|
|
|
#88 |
|
Can someone PLEASE explain to me where the advantage actually lies for the telcos to sell you a locked phone?
Even if your phone is unlocked and you want to use it with another provider, that doesn't stop you being billed each month for the contract you signed up to. Sooo....I don't get it? The whole concept of phone locking is stupid. Also something else, Jailbreaking has been ruled legal in the US has it not? Well don't most jailbreaks unlock the phone? Thus by extension wouldn't jailbreaking now be illegal? |
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
#89 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
1
|
|
|
#90 |
|
So would that $4 eBay iPhone unlock be legal after this law?
__________________
27" iMac 11" MacBook Air iPhone 4 iPad 2 |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#91 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
How to Prevent your Mac from Overheating |
||
|
|
7
|
|
|
#92 | |
|
Quote:
Now, if I had a locked AT&T iPhone and wanted to use it there, I would have to pay AT&T roaming fees for voice/text and $120 for 800MB of data. Tl;dr Q: What is the advantage actually lies for the telcos to sell you a locked phone? A: $$$$$$$$$$$$$$$$
__________________
27" iMac 11" MacBook Air iPhone 4 iPad 2 |
||
|
|
4
|
|
|
#93 |
|
Disgusting. Fortunately, it cannot and will not be enforced.
__________________
"If Jesus Himself came back to earth and turned water to wine, half of MacRumors would say 'meh, this is red. I wanted white.'"
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#94 |
|
So? Even if I'm on contract and I unlock, I either a) have to pay the ETF set by the carrier, so they still get all the money they need for the rest of the cost of the phone, or b) continue paying the contract, so either way the telcos win whether I unlock or not. All this does is punish us consumers "cuz we can."
__________________
PowerBook G5, 1.67GHz MacBook Pro, iPhone Nano, iPhone 6, Apple Television Set
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#95 |
|
If having an unlocked phone was a constitutional right, your point would have been valid.
__________________
The Bill of Rights is not a Bill of Loopholes. |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#96 |
|
Nice backwards move there.
Seriously why does the US insist on cocking up technology?
__________________
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#97 |
|
So if I get my AT&T iPhone 5 unlocked tomorrow, it's technically okay? If I do it saturday, its illegal?
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
#98 | |
|
Quote:
If this is the case then then it would be bad for the carriers (in the long term) to be proponents of this policy. Currently, if I get a subsidized phone from a major US carrier, they are 1. financing the phone 2. providing the service. My understanding is that this policy makes it (unlocking) illegal base on copyright act (according to the Federal register)... that is, the proponents say the carrier "owns" the phone, and the subscriber/leaser cannot change the software without the "owner's" permission. Well Walmart (and others soon) are offering plans like StraightTalk where they offer 1. service only for $45 or 2. phone financing for an additional $25. So Walmart separated the smartphone financing from the service provider. This opens the door for ANY financier (including Apple) to lease out unlocked phones, and the sub can buy "service only" from plan re-packagers like Walmart. Wouldn't this diminish the grip that carriers have on bundling subsidies with their plans? . Last edited by paul4339; Jan 24, 2013 at 05:40 PM. |
||
|
|
2
|
|
|
#99 |
|
Land of the free?
__________________
Maybe if everyone who'd ever been close to you had died, you'd be sarcastic, too.
Also come join us Steam users! |
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
#100 |
|
No, it will always be legal. If you BUY an iPhone 5 after tomorrow, then it would be illegal.
__________________
27" iMac 11" MacBook Air iPhone 4 iPad 2 |
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:30 AM.







We are all guilty, until proven innocent.
Linear Mode
