Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 21, 2012, 02:25 PM   #1
kingc0bra
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Best Alternative to iPhoto 11

Just got my 2012 macbook pro, and really surprised that even with the latest technology and speeds, that iphoto is slowwwww

It takes time to scroll thru the pics, and for pics to load, I thought I would at least be able to see my photos instantly...

I will be adding ram and ssd in the near future, but I also know this is a problem with the software itself..

What do you guys recommend as an alternative?
__________________
2012 13" Macbook Pro, 64GB iPhone 4S, 32GB Ipad1
kingc0bra is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 07:41 PM   #2
MCAsan
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
two main alternatives: Aperture and Adobe Lightroom.

No substitute for CPU, GPU, fast drives and a gracious plenty of memory.
__________________
Retina MBP 2.7GHz | 16GB | 768G
Thunderbolt Display
iPhone 5s | Silver | 64GB | AT&T
iPad Air | Silver | 128GB | WiFi only
MCAsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 08:11 PM   #3
someoldguy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Photoshop Elements , but I've never compared it with iPhoto as to speed . Like MCAsan said , a lot of it is a hardware thing .
someoldguy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 09:24 PM   #4
Photoshopper
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Lightroom. Great for file/database management, optimizing, exporting.
__________________
My Zenfolio
Photoshopper is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 10:32 PM   #5
kingc0bra
Thread Starter
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by MCAsan View Post
two main alternatives: Aperture and Adobe Lightroom.

No substitute for CPU, GPU, fast drives and a gracious plenty of memory.
well I would think that buying a BRAND NEW laptop and running Apples' own software would allow me to use the software without any hiccups...I don't think that's high expectations now is it?

I barely got the newest macbook pro model and I already need to upgrade its ram and hdd?!?!
__________________
2012 13" Macbook Pro, 64GB iPhone 4S, 32GB Ipad1
kingc0bra is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2012, 11:19 PM   #6
kevinfulton.ca
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by kingc0bra View Post
well I would think that buying a BRAND NEW laptop and running Apples' own software would allow me to use the software without any hiccups...I don't think that's high expectations now is it?

I barely got the newest macbook pro model and I already need to upgrade its ram and hdd?!?!
I'm not trying to be a snob here (and I'm sorry if it comes off that way), but by the sounds of it you purchased the entry level MacBook Pro with a slow hard drive and only 4gigs of RAM. It's not really the model that will give you your pictures instantly. If you wanted that kind of performance you should have purchased a model with an SSD like the MBA or MBP Retina. Sorry, but this sounds like your putting unfair expectations on an entry level product. There no way you can expect a 5400rpm HD to be instant just because it's Apple's software. By that logic you should be able to run FCPX and Motion without issue, which is just not possible. Thats why they have higher end hardware. Sorry, but it sounds like you should have been more specific with your expectations when doing your research.

Maybe see if you can exchange it?
__________________
13" White Macbook, 4 GB RAM, 500GB HD, 22" external monitor, 320 GB Firewire scratch disc, 2 TB partitioned expansion/backup HD; iPad 2, 64 GB, 3G; iPhone 4S, 16 GB.
kevinfulton.ca is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 08:33 AM   #7
rick d
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
alternative to iphoto

Lightroom, non destructive edits, virtual copies, metadata, and great printing.
rick d is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 09:52 AM   #8
blanka
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
If you have a Nikon DSLR: Capture NX, otherwise try any of the mentioned above.
blanka is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 22, 2012, 11:04 AM   #9
snberk103
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: An Island in the Salish Sea
Quote:
Originally Posted by someoldguy View Post
Photoshop Elements , but I've never compared it with iPhoto as to speed . Like MCAsan said , a lot of it is a hardware thing .
Elements is not quite the same thing as iPhoto. Elements is an editor, that uses allows use of layers and editing down to the pixel level. However it does, by default, by replacing the original file with the edited file. It has no asset management capabilities.

iPhoto is Digital Asset Manager, which also edits. The editing abilities are limited, compared to Elements, but the edits are 'non-destructive' - the original file is not altered. As well, iPhoto is far superior for handling multiple versions of the same image (e.g. a BW, a square crop, a pano crop, etc etc).

You should not be choosing either iPhoto or Elements - but instead use them together, setting Elements as the external editor for iPhoto. This is true of for Lightroom, and Aperture as well (as DAMs)... they should be paired with an external editing application.
__________________
My friends, love is better than anger. Hope is better than fear. Optimism is better than despair. So let us be loving, hopeful and optimistic. And we'll change the world. - Jack Layton
snberk103 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2013, 01:36 AM   #10
Xacto01
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinfulton.ca View Post
I'm not trying to be a snob here (and I'm sorry if it comes off that way), but by the sounds of it you purchased the entry level MacBook Pro with a slow hard drive and only 4gigs of RAM. It's not really the model that will give you your pictures instantly. If you wanted that kind of performance you should have purchased a model with an SSD like the MBA or MBP Retina. Sorry, but this sounds like your putting unfair expectations on an entry level product. There no way you can expect a 5400rpm HD to be instant just because it's Apple's software. By that logic you should be able to run FCPX and Motion without issue, which is just not possible. Thats why they have higher end hardware. Sorry, but it sounds like you should have been more specific with your expectations when doing your research.

Maybe see if you can exchange it?
I think he justifies the performance based on the pricing.
Xacto01 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2013, 04:03 AM   #11
hafr
Banned
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
I have the entry level 13" 2011 MBP, and iPhoto is very fast despite a 90+ GB library of almost 30 000 pictures. The only times it becomes slow is when TimeMachine or Spotlight is running at the same time.
hafr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 20, 2013, 10:57 AM   #12
MCAsan
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
These days I would not order any computer with less than 8GB and better still 16GB. Keep in mind that you will likely keep the machine for 3-5 years. What will the workload be on the CPU and memory years from now running new OSs and apps that will use up more and more resources?

That is why I got our rMBPs with 16GB. If I were doing a regular MBP or 27" iMac I would order the min memory from Apple then upgrade it from OWC or other vendor to at least 16GB.
__________________
Retina MBP 2.7GHz | 16GB | 768G
Thunderbolt Display
iPhone 5s | Silver | 64GB | AT&T
iPad Air | Silver | 128GB | WiFi only
MCAsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:13 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC