|
|
#1 |
|
What should I buy?
I have two option, forget about portability and the storage, those are not an issue for me.
1 Macbook pro retina 13" standard-1699$ or 2 iMac 21.5" 2.9 ghz i5, 1Tfusion drive, Geforce 650M-1750$ |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
iMac. I have an iBook G4 and the 12" screen gets tiring after a while just like the 13" rMBP screen would. It's always a joy coming back to my 20" iMa screen.
__________________
12" iBook G4/ 1.33GHz/ 1.5GB/ 40GB HDD/ Leopard 10.5.8, 32GB iPad 1 WiFi+3G. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
If portability is not an issue, always go with a desktop system. Better ergonomics and performance/cost.
__________________
27" i7 iMac, 15" MacBook Pro, Mac mini with SL Server, 4 other Macs and an Apple TV. |
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
#5 |
|
iMac for sure. The 13" rMBP doesn't have a dedicated GPU (graphics) as the iMac does. This will make a huge difference in any video rendering or applications (such as video games or video editing). The screen is obviously way bigger, too (more screen real estate).
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
i think beside day by day use, probably ill do something games too, but not top system req games.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 |
|
Yeah go for the iMac. I'm very curious to get feedback about that fusion drive technology and how users like the thinner profile.
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Can i use the iMac screen for a macbook air?
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 |
|
I would go with MacBook Pro retina 13 as the MacBook Pro is followed its larger sibling, the 15-in. notebook by the same name, in adopting a "Retina" high-resolution display. Its 13-in. display produces resolution of 2560-x-1600-pixels, or approximately 227 pixels per inch (ppi), slightly denser than June's pricier Retina 15-in. I love MacBook Proretina-13.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:53 AM.







Linear Mode
