|
|
#1 |
|
New 6.1 update messed up my FaceTime over cellular
I updated today to iOS 6.1. As of a day ago I could use FaceTime over cellular with an att unlimited data plan. Some posters suggested that is was not true, but as another poster pointed out the same happened for them. It seemed to be a glitch. I now can not use FaceTime over cellular and I kind of think apple had something to do with this. I have rebooted my iPhone every week since I got it so it was not because of that it still worked.
Posters wanted to question me when I said apple has all the control over what the phone can do and not do over cellular. In this case AT&T ask them not to allow FaceTime and tethering to unlimited data users. Apple it seems played nice with AT&T and made it happen. Now before all of you blow a gasket I do believe AT&T does have a say just not as much as people think. Apple brings so much business to the table they can call the shots on whatever they want which is why I think they have a lot to do with the issue that I have. AT&T told them they had unlimited user using FaceTime over cellular and Apple had a decision to make. They picked to fix it make FaceTime over cellular no longer work for unlimited users. Apple had control and has all along, why do you think their iPhone has no crapware on Them? There is not AT&T or Verizon or sprint apps preloaded on the iPhone. Because apple says they will not allow it. They have a choice and they choose the carriers in most of them. Which bring me to my point that as much as some of you adore apple they are not all about the customer as much as you would think. They are there to make the big bucks and guess what the carriers give them that. To prove my point of just how much apple has a say look at this article about 4g on the iPhone 5 and which carriers get it. http://www.techradar.com/us/news/pho...hone-5-1116585 Last edited by dejo; Jan 30, 2013 at 12:06 PM. Reason: Insults. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
nothing you can do unless you saved a shsh
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 | |
|
my friend,
AT&T not Apple controls what the phone does on AT&T's cellular network...if this were not true why didn't Apple block Verizon unlimited users from Facetime over cellular? and why does Apple USA allow users in other countries to Facetime and tether unrestricted but not in America? it's the carriers choice not Apple ---------- Quote:
__________________
"people like to feed pigeons, but try to shoot eagles" Last edited by dejo; Jan 30, 2013 at 12:07 PM. Reason: Quoted post edited. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
6.1 did not cause this change.
Some people with unlimited data got FaceTime over cellular to work with an unlimited plan for a short while when AT&T expanded their offering. Not everyone with unlimited had it work for them, myself included. AT&T quickly corrected this and removed it for most unlimited customers long before 6.1 was released- most people who had it saw it disappear in November. Why yours lasted this long isn't clear. I strongly oppose AT&T's decision to limit FaceTime over cellular to customers with a tiered plan. It's yet another reflection of the mess that is the overall wireless situation in the US. I'm no apologist for Apple- they have made plenty of mistakes in how they have handled aspects of the iPhone ecosystem and I have never hesitated to criticize them when, in my opinion, they have messed up. And Apple and AT&T have been at war over a number of features over time. FaceTime is one of those. None of us has access to Apple's contract with AT&T, so anything any of us post about this is mere conjecture. However, blaming Apple for the stand taken by AT&T over this strikes me as being silly. Apple could easily have made it technically impossible for FaceTime to work in any situation they chose. Yet it is clear from the fact that FaceTime over cellular DID work on unlimited AT&T accounts for a while that there is no technical reason for the limitation. And in what way does this limitation serve Apple's interests? Remember, Apple gets paid UP FRONT by the carriers, not as your service agreement with your carrier continues. They have ZERO incentive to limit possible uses of FaceTime- in fact, they have every reason to do just the opposite. The more FaceTime is used by customers, the more people will want devices that have access to FaceTime. Lastly, this isn't like in the early days of iPhone when AT&T had their exclusive arrangement with Apple and there were promises made and kept between the two companies. Carriers compete over features available by plan and these are independent of the characteristics of the phones themselves. And it is also clear by every action they have taken that AT&T is trying like crazy to shed its unlimited customer base by taking every step they can to dis-incentivize keeping this plan. This is yet another example of them doing just that.
__________________
"...and the end of all our searching shall be to return to the place where we first started and know it for the first time" - TS Eliot |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
"people like to feed pigeons, but try to shoot eagles" |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#8 |
|
There will be a jailbreak in roughly a week. Just jb and you can get it back.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
Quote:
You said why would apple care what you do with your phone after you buy it. I can think of a lot of reasons. They want you to buy stuff from the App Store and apple care all that good stuff. If you buy there product and like me and a lot of other people that are on unlimited data plans get mad and have a bad taste in their months then Apple could lose a customer. I mean think about it I am not going to say everything is Apples fault and never buy another iPhone, but some people might, and does Apple really want to make future customers mad? |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#10 | |
|
Quote:
EDIT: An even better example her: if you blacklisted my phone number and I blamed the phone that I have for you blacklisting me. It's not the phone maker who did the black listing it would be you in this case. Same sort of scenario. |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#11 |
|
I think what's clear from your posts in this thread and the other one you started on this same subject is that if someone had a Notarized statement signed by Jobs almighty himself and attested to by The Archangels Gabriel and Michael that AT&T is responsible for this, you still wouldn't believe it was AT&T's doing...
I DO share your frustration and hope there will be a change, but I don't hold out much hope that AT&T will change its mind or that you will believe Apple isn't the culprit here.
__________________
"...and the end of all our searching shall be to return to the place where we first started and know it for the first time" - TS Eliot |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#12 | |
|
Quote:
|
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#13 |
|
http://www.thefiscaltimes.com/Articl...way.aspx#page1
This sure makes it sound like Apple has a lot of power. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#14 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
<\ \>tuntman |
||
|
|
0
|
|
|
#15 |
|
No at this point they do not have much to gain at all. I was just saying if Apple did threaten AT&T with them pulling their agreement then AT&T would be forced to change things. I don't think anything like that will happen, but I was just saying. If what happens with tmobile taking away subsidies with say AT&T or Verizon we might see apple rethink things. Apple would be in a bad spot cause their unsubsidized price is much higher than some of the other big name phones. I just think Apple could threaten a pull of the iPhone from a carrier and have power behind that.
|
|
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 PM.








Linear Mode
