Go Back   MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 29, 2013, 01:20 AM   #1
macbook123
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Back-facing camera on iPad -- why on Earth?

Question: Why does Apple not offer a version without back-facing camera? I have never talked to anybody about it who has ever used this camera. It seems a complete waste of resources. I'd buy a $5 cheaper iPad without this camera without hesitation.

I also wonder this: how much do the 16 GB extra in the 32 GB storage version cost Apple compared to that camera? Most people I know (myself included) would much prefer having getting that upgrade for free in return for losing the camera.

There surely must be a reason why Apple is still putting the camera in there I fail to see. Please enlighten me.
macbook123 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 01:24 AM   #2
anim8or
macrumors 65816
 
anim8or's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Scotland, UK
While I do agree that the camera in the rear of the iPad seems stupid to me and I never use it even when using Skype or FaceTime, I have however seen loads of people who do use it.... They look like fools but heck it gets used!
anim8or is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 01:37 AM   #3
luqtotheman
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
I thought the same but it does have uses.

During FaceTime, apps like eBay and turbotax. Obviously the ipad isn't someone's main camera.
luqtotheman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 01:40 AM   #4
Macman45
macrumors G5
 
Macman45's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Somewhere Back In The Long Ago
I use it to show relatives abroad around my place, and stuff outside too....It serves no other function for me though.
__________________
Thats Not All Folks
Macman45 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 01:47 AM   #5
acorntoy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
My mother uses the camera a lot, she likes it more than the 4S camera because its easier for her to see want she is taking a picture of.

On my iPad I use it often enough for apps like eBay when using IMessage or just taking a quick shot when my phone is in the other room that it would be missed.

I do agree though it looks ridiculous when you see people using it.
acorntoy is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 02:01 AM   #6
ucfgrad93
macrumors G5
 
ucfgrad93's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Colorado
I was watching the Pro Bowl last night, and during one of the interviews there was a fan in the background that lifted up her iPad to take a picture.

I wouldn't use it, but other people do.
ucfgrad93 is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 02:30 AM   #7
Gibbons
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
because maybe on a video call a person might want to show someone something other than their face, like a new house, car, or infant child.

besides if I was using my ipad and saw a photo or video op, perhaps of said infant child, i wouldn't hesitate to launch the photo app and snap away. who cares how it looks to some people?

so the answer is that it can be a very useful feature for most sane people.
Gibbons is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 02:39 AM   #8
ZuneMan?
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Apple Store
Quote:
Originally Posted by macbook123 View Post
I'd buy a $5 cheaper iPad without this camera without hesitation.
And what are you going to buy with that $5?
ZuneMan? is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 02:49 AM   #9
trvsglr
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Even if there was a $5 cheaper model with no camera, I think most people would end up forking out the extra $ because they would be thinking "just in case" and "it's only $5 you never know, right?"
__________________
16 GB White iPhone 5
16 GB Black iPad mini
Apple TV3
trvsglr is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 02:58 AM   #10
raccoonboy
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
I think people use it because it is there on the Ipad. No one would really miss it if its gone. Especially later gen Ipad is quite heavy and holding it to take picture is a little ridiculous.

If Ipad could cut the price down and remove the rear camera and make it lighter, slimmer. I would definitely buy it. Camera on the mini makes more sense because it is still small and light enough.
raccoonboy is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 03:03 AM   #11
dinggus
Banned
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
I see the iPad being used to take pictures and record, first time was during 2011 New Years in NYC, second time was last month at Disney World, a lot of people were doing it.

It's better to have it than not have it and then want it. I'm sure if the iPad didn't have a back facing camera, then someone would have created a thread similar to this, just saying they'd fork out the extra $5..

I don't need majority of the stock Apple Apps, I should create a thread about it.
dinggus is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 03:13 AM   #12
syd430
Guest
 
Because the cost of the additional camera to Apple is almost negligible. Even if it wern't why would they complicate the line up by having a model with no rear-facing camera? Should they also sell the 'iPad with no Bluetooth radio edition' as well? BTO online like Dell or Lenovo is one thing, but having whole different products in store with $5 peripherals missing doesn't make sense for any OEM.
  3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 04:20 AM   #13
Fruit Cake
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
I just wanted to say I read this thread and want 5 mins of my life back spent 2mins reading this crap (3mins interest
Fruit Cake is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 04:32 AM   #14
shortcrust
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
I often use it to take photos of pages of book, magazines etc.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fruit Cake View Post
I just wanted to say I read this thread and want 5 mins of my life back spent 2mins reading this crap (3mins interest
Perhaps spending time replying to the thread wasn't such a great idea then?
shortcrust is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 05:21 AM   #15
Amplelink
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
I love the back facing camera and it'd feel weirder without one. I don't use it as my daily shooter, obviously. But it's great for impromptu moments when you just have your iPad. I've also used it with my scanner app and it turns out great PDFs when I've needed it in a few circumstances where there wasn't a physical scanner around. And as other people have already noted, it's great being able to FaceTime with both cameras, with the back one allowing people to see what you see.

Got a Nexus 7 as well and it feels incredibly odd to not have a back facing camera.
Amplelink is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:09 AM   #16
iPhysicist
macrumors 6502a
 
iPhysicist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Dresden
I use the back camera every day. I would like to have a better one installed :-)
iPhysicist is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:17 AM   #17
Abazigal
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Singapore
Odd you create this thread, I just put together a quick keynote this morning using images snapped using the ipad's back camera.

Definitely more handy than many people are giving it credit for.
Abazigal is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:18 AM   #18
MultiFinder17
macrumors 65816
 
MultiFinder17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Tampa, Florida
I use the back camera on my mini when I'm using my iPad and want to snap a quick picture of something to send to someone. It's nice to not have to go grab my phone to do that.
__________________
2011 iMac, iMac G5, 2012 13" rMBP, ThinkPad X200, iPad mini, iPhone 5.
"...But there is one more thing - your patience was worth it. Introducing the PowerBook G5!" - Steve Jobs Hologram @ WWDC 2014
MultiFinder17 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:21 AM   #19
adnbek
macrumors 65816
 
adnbek's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Quote:
Originally Posted by macbook123 View Post
I'd buy a $5 cheaper iPad without this camera without hesitation. .
Seriously? :face palm:

I'd look at it the other way: Only 5 bucks more for a back-facing camera? I'll take that one instead!
adnbek is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:23 AM   #20
rockyroad55
macrumors 68040
 
rockyroad55's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Phila, PA
$5. Wow
rockyroad55 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:30 AM   #21
maflynn
Moderator
 
maflynn's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Boston
The last time I was on vacation (in DisneyWorld), I saw quite a lot of people using their iPads as cameras. So while the OP may not see value in the camera others do not share that sentiment.

My kids love playing with my iPad mini and the camera and while I can understand his point, the cost difference is probably not enough to justify supporting a different product configuration
__________________
~Mike Flynn
maflynn is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:37 AM   #22
Arran
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Atlanta, USA
I recently filed a product warranty claim. The camera made it easy.
1) Download claim form.
2) AirPrint form.
3) Fill out form by hand.
4) Snap picture of completed form.
5) Snap picture of damaged product.
6) Email both to manufacturer.
Done.

If I was clever I'd have annotated the form onscreen - but that would've taken longer.
__________________
When the world zigs, zag
Arran is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 06:45 AM   #23
HobeSoundDarryl
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Hobe Sound, FL (20 miles north of Palm Beach)
It is a camera they have with them (handy for the impromptu photo or video).

If you watch any "behind the scenes" shows, the pros shoot quality programming using a big preview screen (bigger than iPad). Being able to see the finer details of what they are shooting means getting a better photo or video.

This device is trying to evolve into an everything device: don't need a separate camera, remote control, phone, computer, music player, portable movie player, GPS, internet-connected device, etc. Lots of functionality in one device.

Have you seen the apps that use it for stuff other than photos or videos? For example, there's travel apps where you aim the camera at a sign written in a foreign language and it translates that sign to english. There's check deposit options where you can deposit a check without going to the bank by snapping a picture of it. Download Star Walk and go outside at night, aim your iPad camera skyward and the app tells you the names of everything you can see. Etc. There's lots of utility for giving an iPad an "eye" beyond just taking photographs or video.

Lastly, not everyone has an iPhone. So assuming iPhone makes many functions available within an iPad redundant. Perhaps one should argue the iPad should be cut down to just a bigger screen ONLY for iPhone users who want to stream iPhone images to a bigger screen (a "dumb screen" iPhone companion if you will)? The better choice is to assume that not everyone has an iPhone: then think about what needs to be in an iPad. If I don't have an iPhone, I want a lot of iPhone functionality in an iPad.

I'm with the other guy above: if the whine is about saving $5, I'd rather pay the $5 and get the camera (something like that Star Walk or visual language translation benefit is mind blowing if one cares about such stuff). Several retailers will regularly discount iPads by a few bucks (like $5). Buy yourself one from there and put a piece of duct tape over the camera hole. Save $5 and end up with the exact same functionality- or lack thereof- you seek.

Last edited by HobeSoundDarryl; Jan 29, 2013 at 06:56 AM.
HobeSoundDarryl is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 07:02 AM   #24
ougum
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gibbons View Post
because maybe on a video call a person might want to show someone something other than their face, like a new house, car, or infant child.

besides if I was using my ipad and saw a photo or video op, perhaps of said infant child, i wouldn't hesitate to launch the photo app and snap away. who cares how it looks to some people?

so the answer is that it can be a very useful feature for most sane people.
I'm with you. I can't believe how much people really care what folks think of them using their iPads for picture taking.. I could care less what a person would think of me using my iPad to take pictures. They sure didn't help me pay for my device. I haven't used mine yet, but it's nice to know it's there if I need it.
ougum is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 29, 2013, 07:10 AM   #25
Kebabselector
macrumors 68020
 
Kebabselector's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Birmingham, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by macbook123 View Post
There surely must be a reason why Apple is still putting the camera in there I fail to see. Please enlighten me.
Sometimes it's the only camera you have on you........


London_2012_Triathlon_28 by Scphoto_uk, on Flickr
__________________
Mac Mini 1.66Ghz/2gb - 2.3/i5/8gb - MacBook 2.0Ghz/2gb
iPhone 6 64gb - iPad Mini Retina 16gb wifi
Others: Canon Eos Stuff - Passat B6 - Smeg - Firewire devices - Prefers Matte
Kebabselector is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > iPhone, iPod and iPad > iPad

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is there a way to turn the iphone5 back camera into a front facing one? jstar002 iPhone 8 Jul 5, 2013 04:06 AM
What do you use your front facing camera for? jcorbin iPhone 39 Jan 9, 2013 03:46 PM
Iphone 4 Front Facing Camera Faulty ?? inked666 iPhone Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 6 Oct 27, 2012 12:37 AM
iPhone 5 front facing camera off-center II BISTRO II iPhone 1 Oct 5, 2012 12:53 PM
Weird Thing on Front Facing Camera Lightey iPhone 1 Sep 21, 2012 04:27 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC