Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Mac Basics and Help

Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 31, 2013, 05:41 PM   #1
macrumors 6502
Join Date: Mar 2008
Which makes more sense: upgrading components or replacing computer every x years?

Apple has received a lot of criticism on these forums for its increasingly non-user-serviceable computers. For many models, you need to buy the RAM and storage you expect to need for as long as you plan to own the computer. If you plan to own it for many years, you have to pay Apple's expensive upgrade prices for hardware you might not need for another couple years, by which time that hardware will have dropped in cost. The alternative is to buy only what you need now, and sell every couple years and buy a new computer. That way, you get a better resale price for the computer you're selling. The third alternative no longer exists, for the most part: buy what you need now, and upgrade components as you need to, until the computer becomes so old that no further upgrades are practical.

The arguments over which approach is best seem to be more philosophical than practical: people who like to upgrade components like to do so as a matter of principle (I exclude professionals who truly need Mac Pros for their businesses). I haven't read any discussion on whether one approach makes more financial sense than another. I used to be of the upgrade-as-you-go philosophy. I got eight years out of my 2000 Power Mac G4 "Sawtooth," upgrading every component that could be upgraded. It wasn't worth much money at the end, because it was too slow for much beyond web browsing and writing text documents, so I gave it to my dad, because that was all he needed to do. The computer's upgradability allowed me to spread out the cost of ownership over eight years. In retrospect, though, if I add up the costs of bigger hard drives, more RAM, new processor, new video card, Super Drive, and FireWire card, I'm not sure I saved any money than if I'd bought three new computers during that period.

This year, I plan to upgrade my aging early 2008 MBP. The tinkerer in me wishes that Apple still offered an easily upgradable mid-priced tower like my beloved Sawtooth, but that's not going to happen. I'm thinking of switching to a strategy of buying only what I need now and upgrading to a new model more frequently, as opposed to buying more-expensive configurations and keeping them longer. I realize there are other factors to consider, such as the hassle of selling your computer and migrating data to a new computer, and the environmental impact of all this Stuff that's being produced. What do other people here think is the most sensible strategy, and why? I'm guessing there's not going to be any single "right" answer.
Ubele is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2013, 07:23 PM   #2
macrumors 65816
designs216's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Down the rabbit hole
That's a good question and one I chose to kick down the road. I just bought the cMBP so I could pay less today and upgrade it myself. If HAD to buy a rMBP, I guess I would have had to bite the bullet and swing for the fence, keeping the machine for the next 4 to 6 years. To me it's not efficient buying and then selling every couple years. It seems that most people that do are just doing it to have the next bigger, better.
designs216 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 31, 2013, 07:43 PM   #3
macrumors 65816
phoenixsan's Avatar
Join Date: Oct 2012

if I got you point, you are right in the point: No "right" answer for your question. To me, depends in two things/factors: What are you doing with the equipment and what is your budget. I am more the guy that buys the base configuration, upgrades based in money available/need to get work/things done. Ugrades, as you can know, comes in various packages, e.g DYI upgrades or paid ones. So, my trend with computers is using and upgrading them until I not am longer capable of get work done with them. By example, if some future OS X upgrade improve some important workflows for me, say, by a 40% improvement, buying a new machine without the option of upgrade, I will not hesitate tu pull the trigger, assuming I have the budget. But if I not have the budget in the given moment, and can get only a 25% improvement, I will do the upgrade.

Sorry for my convoluted and lenghtly answer

Mac Pro 2012 3.06 Westmere version, 12 Core 64 GB RAM, 4 TB , iPhone 5 (black), Moto G 8 GB (black)
phoenixsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote

MacRumors Forums > Apple Systems and Services > Mac Basics and Help

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iMovie Library file makes no sense Mjmar OS X 0 Apr 19, 2014 04:10 PM
iPad Mini: Makes no sense to buy Mini 2 without retina srkmish iPad 40 Aug 9, 2013 07:34 AM
MBPR and this monitor = makes sense freelancer27 Mac Peripherals 1 Feb 3, 2013 08:53 PM
All iPads: Why an iPad 5 in March makes sense. gladoscc iPad 54 Dec 30, 2012 06:53 PM
There's a reason a taller screen makes sense. Matt912836 iPhone 66 Aug 15, 2012 02:03 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:36 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2015, MacRumors.com, LLC