Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:43 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
New Report Tempers iWatch Expectations, Device May Have 'Simpler' Technological Capabilities




Apple's much-rumored iWatch has been depicted as a standalone device able to function as a typical smart watch and monitor everything from glucose to blood pressure, but a new report from Brian Dolan of MobiHealthNews (via NetworkWorld) suggests that the iWatch's actual functionality may be somewhat more simple, with Apple aiming to make the health-tracking experience more accessible to everyone.

In a report that covers existing rumors and predictions for Apple's iWatch, Dolan aggregates known information and adds a few tidbits from his own sources, which he says "have limited but direct knowledge of Apple's plans for the iWatch and Healthbook."

While rumors have indicated the iWatch may be a standalone device able to function without an iPhone, that may not be the case. Poised as a peripheral device, the iWatch may require connectivity to a smartphone for its full functionality.

iWatch concept by Todd Hamilton

Throughout 2013, Apple made a number of health and sensor related hires for its iWatch, indicating the device could potentially track a wide range of health-related functions with advanced sensors, including glucose sensing and hydration levels.

Actual iWatch functionality may be somewhat more simple, however, as many of the hires are said to be focusing on making basic health-tracking functions more effective. Some of the hires' more exotic expertise, in fields like blood and glucose monitoring, may not make it into the iWatch.
Quote:
A source tells us that the team Apple has assembled is intended to ensure that the health sensing capabilities of the device are efficacious. Some fitness tracking devices available today primarily give users feedback in the form of an arbitrary points system -- like Nike Fuel. Apple will likely not do this, but instead focus on real metrics like calories. Having a team with such advanced pedigrees will help ensure Apple's device is accurate. Don't expect glucose sensing though.
Today's report confirms the existence of the Healthbook concept that was detailed in late January, but could not verify the app's rumored name. The app is said to serve as a repository for all health and fitness information and could integrate not only with the iWatch, but other health-tracking apps and devices on the market. It focuses on simple concepts like exercise, diet, sleep, stress, and medication adherence.

Apple's overall focus with the iWatch is said to be on the experience rather than the technology. With the iWatch and its accompanying health-related app, Apple aims to make health tracking "a mass market behavior" by increasing its mass market appeal and moving the concept beyond something that interests just "data-obsessed" people.

The report speculates that Apple's recent FDA meeting may have been about keeping the iWatch unregulated, which would inherently limit its ability to collect and analyze medical data and prevent it from collecting data from regulated medical devices, again pointing to a somewhat more simple device than previous rumors have suggested.

Information on the iWatch remains sketchy, but we may begin to get a clearer picture as we creep nearer to a release date. It is unknown when Apple plans to launch the iWatch, but in the fall alongside iOS 8 is a strong possibility.

Though Brian Dolan does not have an established track record for reporting rumors, he was the first to report on Apple's hiring of former Masimo Chief Medical Officer Michael O'Reilly.

Article Link: New Report Tempers iWatch Expectations, Device May Have 'Simpler' Technological Capabilities
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:44 PM   #2
ZacNicholson
macrumors 6502a
 
ZacNicholson's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Indiana
Send a message via Skype™ to ZacNicholson
everyday we are closer to an iwatch
__________________
follow me on twitter @zac_nicholson
watch my youtube www.youtube.com/mrzacnicholson
2011 13" MBP, iPhone 4 (jailbroken), iPad 3 32 GB Verizon(jailbroken), Apple tv 2(jailbroken)
ZacNicholson is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:45 PM   #3
D.T.
macrumors 68030
 
D.T.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Vilano Beach, FL
Simpler capabilities ... as in it only tells time.
__________________
"I am not in danger, Skyler. I am the danger. A guy opens his door and gets shot, and you think that of me? No, I am the one who knocks." ~Walter White
D.T. is offline   23 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:46 PM   #4
BJMRamage
macrumors 68000
 
BJMRamage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
a watch, a health meter, a song player....iBand
BJMRamage is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:47 PM   #5
Lapidus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2012
No way it wil work without an iPhone. That thing will be one big battery and the brain will be inside the iPhone.
Lapidus is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:47 PM   #6
goobot
macrumors 601
 
goobot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: long island NY
It should have lot of health related functions, be a mp3 player, and pair with your phone for information feedback and most importantly tell time!

Also i really love those renderings. I would buy one without hesitation if it looked like that.
__________________
Unibody Macbook |iPad|Apple TV 2|Black iPhone 6
goobot is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:47 PM   #7
taptic
macrumors 65816
 
taptic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: California
Are you trying to tell me it won't let me time-travel?!
__________________
If you want a cool new feature on a Samsung phone, just suggest it to Apple.
taptic is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:48 PM   #8
LukasValine
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
The number of people who would buy an iWatch without already owning iPhone is probably very small. iWatch as an accessory to the iPhone doesn't bother me.
__________________
http://www.lukasvaline.com
LukasValine is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:48 PM   #9
Gudi
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Berlin
It's unnecessary to temper expectations. We know a smartwatch can't have smartphone capabilities, because of its much smaller size.
Gudi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:48 PM   #10
CJM
macrumors 6502a
 
CJM's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: U.K.
I always thought its reliance on an iPhone-type device was logical. Saves on battery life if it doesn't need high powered radios.
__________________
iPad 3 64GB / iPhone 6+ 64GB
MacBook Air 2013 13" / i5 / 8GB RAM / 256 SSD
6-core 5820k @ 4.6GHz / Rampage V Extreme / Windforce GTX 780 / 16GB DDR4 / 512 Samsung 850 Pro / Custom loop / LG 34"UM95
CJM is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:50 PM   #11
CasinoOwl
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
I keep seeing that same image of a bracelet with a screen. It looks cool, but I wonder if it clouds expectation of what the actual device will be. Time and again, we see speculation of devices that can't actually be made only to be disappointed at the reality.
CasinoOwl is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:51 PM   #12
newyorksole
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: LongIsland/NYC
Why would anyone be surprised if it had "basic" functionality anyway? Apple's devices never really do anything "over the top". It's always practical, fluid and "cool".
newyorksole is offline   14 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:53 PM   #13
APlotdevice
macrumors 68020
 
APlotdevice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
As long as it relays notifications and lets me control basic functions, that's all I care about.
__________________
There is something deeply wrong with a society more offended by breasts than by entrails.
Pebble SmartWatch | iPhone 5c | 11" Macbook Air '13 | HTPC | TV | Numerous Old Consoles
APlotdevice is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:54 PM   #14
proline
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gudi View Post
It's unnecessary to temper expectations. We know a smartwatch can't have smartphone capabilities, because of its much smaller size.
The expectations had been getting quite out of hand. Non-invasive glucose monitoring is not broadly available and would likely be expensive and expose Apple to huge regulatory hassle. Not likely to be included.

This story, on the other hand, is not credible enough to reign in expectations. Apple keeps their employees isolated from the big picture. The guy who designed the M7, for example, had no idea it would go in the iPhone 5S, nor did he know any other features of the 5S. Only a very high level exec could know the complete iWatch feature set, and such a person would not be talking to nobodies like the source of this rumor.
proline is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:54 PM   #15
markfc
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Prestatyn, Wales, UK
Send a message via ICQ to markfc Send a message via AIM to markfc Send a message via MSN to markfc Send a message via Skype™ to markfc
Come on, this is apple. iWatch 1 will just about tell the time. V2 will give us time zones and colours, V3 will bring an adjustable wriststrap while V4 will bring a camera...
markfc is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:55 PM   #16
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
I hats that render. Looks uncomfortable and how would it work with different wrist sizes?
__________________
"I have a very optimistic view of individuals. As individuals, people are inherently good. I have a somewhat more pessimistic view of people in groups." -- Steve Jobs , Wired interview
Rogifan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:56 PM   #17
Smartass
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
suddenly, this watch is going to be far less appealing to fat geeks
Smartass is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:56 PM   #18
baryon
macrumors 68030
 
baryon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
I really like that concept mockup in the article, I'd love it if Apple's device looked like that.

At this time I can't really imagine what the true purpose of the iWatch would be. I mean having a phone and the internet in your pocket is an obvious thing now, but it's hard to imagine what the iWatch has to be. But as always, maybe once it's released, it'll all make sense and we won't be able to live without one?
__________________
Sent from my iPod Shuffle
baryon is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 03:57 PM   #19
JustinGN
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
While others may bemoan connectivity, I'm the opposite: why add yet another cellular modem into a device? In an ideal world, I think the iPhone should be your communications device (cellular modem/data connections) while other ecosystem devices (tablets, watches, glasses) use low energy wireless (Bluetooth) to connect to it for extra processing power (smaller devices) or external communications (all devices). Tablets and Phones are really the only devices I see benefitting from a cellular modem, really, and the tablet just because it's a highly portable device like the phone (and has the space and battery power for it).

See? Makes sense. It keeps cellular plans to a minimum while allowing maximum functionality.
JustinGN is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:03 PM   #20
AngerDanger
macrumors 65816
 
AngerDanger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: doing the Dada Polka
As long as I can watch superpanoramic videos on my watch, I'll be all set!
AngerDanger is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:08 PM   #21
SmileyBlast!
macrumors 6502a
 
SmileyBlast!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by LukasValine View Post
The number of people who would buy an iWatch without already owning iPhone is probably very small. iWatch as an accessory to the iPhone doesn't bother me.
That was my expectation.

It's an ancillary. More handy or convenient than a put away iPad or pocketed iPhone.
SmileyBlast! is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:11 PM   #22
2IS
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
So the iWatch is going to suck... Pretty much what I expected all along anyway.
__________________
No one can deny that Apple's growth is slowing down or that they have new competitors in the market or that they need something exciting in the near future.
-Pirg
2IS is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:13 PM   #23
kerrikins
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
While rumors have indicated the iWatch may be a standalone device able to function without an iPhone, that may not be the case. Poised as a peripheral device, the iWatch may require connectivity to a smartphone for its full functionality.
What exactly does this mean, though? If it functions just fine if a person goes out for a jog or hiking or whatever and then you connect it to your phone or computer at home to update stuff, great.

But if it requires you to carry both then they're going to be missing out on a big market, IMO. A lot of people are interested in this because they DON'T want to have to carry such a big device or multiple ones.
kerrikins is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:15 PM   #24
goMac
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
I'm not sure why people are asking for a music player on this. Why? Are you going to be plugging headphones into your watch? What's wrong with your phone?
goMac is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Feb 10, 2014, 04:17 PM   #25
zoozx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: ca
Quote:
Originally Posted by DShap5 View Post
Are you trying to tell me it won't let me time-travel?!
Yes you can!

it has a Flex Capacitor built in.
zoozx is offline   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple: iPad Sales at High End of 'Internal Expectations', 2/3 of Users New to Device MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 27 Apr 29, 2014 08:01 AM
New Concepts Imagine the iWatch as a Lifestyle Device, Traditional Timepiece MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 240 Apr 15, 2014 10:51 AM
Sketchy Report Claims LG to Provide Flexible OLED Displays for Apple's iWatch MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 39 Jan 27, 2014 03:09 PM
Required Device Capabilities xArtx iPhone/iPad Programming 21 Apr 26, 2013 12:15 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:35 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC