Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 6, 2013, 11:22 PM   #1
flavr
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
My 2012 27 i5 3.2 675MX feels slower than my late 2009 i7 2.8 Radeon 4850...WHY?!

My 2012 27 i5 3.2 675MX 1GB feels slower than my late 2009 i7 2.8 Radeon 4850 512MB...WHY?!

Like much slower...in applications such as Photoshop, general OSX feel, Cinebench GPU render looked and clocked slower, even restarts take longer. Did I thought getting an iMac 4 years newer would feel like an upgrade...honestly, even the screen isn't much of a noticeable improvement besides less glare...

Thoughts? Anybody else come from the same machine (late 2009 2.8)?
flavr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2013, 11:29 PM   #2
Raima
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by flavr View Post
My 2012 27 i5 3.2 675MX 1GB feels slower than my late 2009 i7 2.8 Radeon 4850 512MB...WHY?!
Can you provide the full spec of both machines?
__________________
G5 PowerMac, MBA11, MBA13, rMBP15, 2 x iMac27
Raima is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2013, 11:46 PM   #3
flavr
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
2009 27 iMac 2.8 i7, 12GB RAM, 1TB HD, Radeon 4850 512MB VRAM

2012 27 iMac 3.2 i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HD, GeForce 675MX 1GB VRAM
flavr is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 6, 2013, 11:56 PM   #4
flynz4
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Portland, OR
I just upgraded from the same machine as you (2009, 27", i7, 16GB, 2TB HDD) to the new 27", i7, 680MX, 32GB, 768 GB SSD. The difference is like moving from a golf cart to a Ferrari.

You may want to check your migration and reinstall from scratch. Something must have gone wrong.

Have you considered the Fusion Drive? That should make a noticeable difference. You typically have 2 weeks (in the U.S.) to return it.

/Jim
flynz4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 12:02 AM   #5
Raima
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by flynz4 View Post
I just upgraded from the same machine as you (2009, 27", i7, 16GB, 2TB HDD) to the new 27", i7, 680, 32GB, 768 GB SSD. The difference is like moving from a golf cart to a Ferrari.

You may want to check your migration and reinstall from scratch. Something must have gone wrong.

Have you considered the Fusion Drive? That should make a noticeable difference. You typically have 2 weeks (in the U.S.) to return it.

/Jim
That's a good suggestion.

Quote:
Originally Posted by flavr View Post
2009 27 iMac 2.8 i7, 12GB RAM, 1TB HD, Radeon 4850 512MB VRAM

2012 27 iMac 3.2 i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HD, GeForce 675MX 1GB VRAM
A couple of differences are it's i7 vs i5. I think i7 has hyperthreading while i5 doesn't. Also i7 has more cache from memory, and the 2nd thing is, the i7 has more memory. The thing that should offset the speed in the i5 is, the HDD should be slightly faster and the graphics should be faster.

I also concur on Flynz recommendations.
__________________
G5 PowerMac, MBA11, MBA13, rMBP15, 2 x iMac27
Raima is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 12:03 AM   #6
boto
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
What OSX version are you using on the older iMac? Also, what is your hard drive manufacturer? iMac 27" 2012 users have noted that Seagates are a bit faster than Western Digital drives. Otherwise, as for the GPU performance, I believe Apple needs to update the drivers. I have noticed the GTX 680MX receiving lower FPS than a AMD 6970m in Cinebench, although in real gaming it outperforms it significantly.
__________________
iMac 27" 3.4Ghz, GTX 680MX, 1TB FD, 32GB RAM | rMBP 2.6Ghz/16GB RAM/256GB | 16GB iPhone 5 White | 16GB iPad 3rd Gen White | Time Capsule 2TB | Apple TV 3
boto is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 03:29 AM   #7
Dreamboy
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by flynz4 View Post
I just upgraded from the same machine as you (2009, 27", i7, 16GB, 2TB HDD) to the new 27", i7, 680MX, 32GB, 768 GB SSD. The difference is like moving from a golf cart to a Ferrari.

You may want to check your migration and reinstall from scratch. Something must have gone wrong.

Have you considered the Fusion Drive? That should make a noticeable difference. You typically have 2 weeks (in the U.S.) to return it.

/Jim
I've made a very similar upgrade:

Old iMac >> Late 2009 27" i7 1TB 8GB ATI4850
New iMac >> Late 2012 27", i7, 1TB FusionDrive, 8GB, 680MX

I feel a BIG difference. I don't consider my old iMac a golf cart, but I agree with you. I've been impressed by the performance of the new iMac.

I think most of the performance is due to the FusionDrive. It's amazing to see the full OSX boot in 6 seconds, or launch Photoshop CS6 in less than 2 seconds. The 680MX is a beast. I'm actually playing Crysis 3 via BootCamp and the graphic performance is surprising.
__________________
iMac 27" Late 2012 3.4GHz 680MX 1TB Fusion Drive
iPad 3rd Gen 32GB
iPhone 5 32GB
AppleTV
Dreamboy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 12:36 PM   #8
bmcgrath
macrumors 65816
 
bmcgrath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: London, United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by Raima View Post
That's a good suggestion.



A couple of differences are it's i7 vs i5. I think i7 has hyperthreading while i5 doesn't. Also i7 has more cache from memory, and the 2nd thing is, the i7 has more memory. The thing that should offset the speed in the i5 is, the HDD should be slightly faster and the graphics should be faster.

I also concur on Flynz recommendations.
Still the newer gen i5 is no slouch against the model he had. I realise it had HT but even still...
__________________
iMac, Macbook Pro, iPhone, iPad, Sony Nex7
www.twitter.com/bazmeister
www.flickr.com/bazzymcg/
bmcgrath is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 01:24 PM   #9
elev8d
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by flavr View Post
My 2012 27 i5 3.2 675MX 1GB feels slower than my late 2009 i7 2.8 Radeon 4850 512MB...WHY?!

Like much slower...in applications such as Photoshop, general OSX feel, Cinebench GPU render looked and clocked slower, even restarts take longer. Did I thought getting an iMac 4 years newer would feel like an upgrade...honestly, even the screen isn't much of a noticeable improvement besides less glare...

Thoughts? Anybody else come from the same machine (late 2009 2.8)?
I don't think an old i7 to a new i5 is a big bump in processor speed.
From what I've read, hyperthreading is used by everything from games, to video editing, to excel, so losing that feature could decrease processing speed for your applications.

Also, I would not ever consider a computer without an SSD inside of it since I installed one on my 2010 MBP. It makes a world of difference. I would definitely return and get a fusion drive.

Moving from 12GB to 8GB might slow the computer, but I think the new RAM might be faster in the '12 models. Whether the speed of RAM offsets the capacity... I'm not sure. I'm planning on ordering 16GB RAM from OWC, although this will be the last upgrade I'd spend money on.
__________________
'10 15" MBP 2.66 Core i7
'12 27" iMac 3.4 i7
'13 15" rMBP 2.4 i7 Ivy Bridge
iPhone4
elev8d is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 01:28 PM   #10
FreemanW
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: The Real Northern California
Quote:
Originally Posted by flavr View Post
2009 27 iMac 2.8 i7, 12GB RAM, 1TB HD, Radeon 4850 512MB VRAM

2012 27 iMac 3.2 i5, 8GB RAM, 1TB HD, GeForce 675MX 1GB VRAM
Immediately I'm looking at the delta of CPU, system memory, graphics card, and hard disk drive. In that order.

It's almost as if you set out to prove that you could find a new iMac that would not beat your old iMac.

I moved from a capable Windows PC to my 3.4GHz i7, 680MX, 3TB Fusion, & 32GB and I get in, sit down, shut up, and hold on. The thing takes me on the ride of my life every time I hit the power button.
__________________
iMac, iPad, iPhone, TimeCapsule x 2
FreemanW is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 03:07 PM   #11
Raima
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmcgrath View Post
Still the newer gen i5 is no slouch against the model he had. I realise it had HT but even still...
True, I don't think it was that much of a performance improvement tho

According to http://www.marketingtactics.com/Speedmark/

The i7 scored 225 vs the new i5 that scored 224.

Different software was used between the generation gap, but it gives some reference to the performance comparison.

The Hyperthreading will also allow everything to run more smoothly. The extra RAM and refined drivers probably made it more evident it was just a more optimised machine.

I'm hoping for Flavr the improvement of his machine will improve as they release new drivers. In the mean time, he can look at upgrading more RAM.
__________________
G5 PowerMac, MBA11, MBA13, rMBP15, 2 x iMac27
Raima is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 03:54 PM   #12
virginblue4
macrumors 65816
 
virginblue4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: United Kingdom
Quote:
Originally Posted by elev8d View Post
I don't think an old i7 to a new i5 is a big bump in processor speed.
From what I've read, hyperthreading is used by everything from games, to video editing, to excel, so losing that feature could decrease processing speed for your applications.
From what I have read, it is actually the complete opposite. I believe HT is only used in 3D rendering etc, with very few programs and games actually taking advantage of it.
__________________

iPhone 5S, gold, iOS 8b2
iPad mini with Retina display, silver, iOS 7.1.1
Late 2012 27" iMac - 3.4GHz i7, 1TB Fusion, 24GB RAM, 680MX 2GB
virginblue4 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 04:39 PM   #13
rnb2
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: West Haven, CT, USA
Something is wrong with your machine or migrated data - I went from the same late-2009 i7 iMac to a 2012 21.5" 2.9GHz i5 w/Fusion Drive. I was booting my 2009 iMac from a FW800 SSD (which was more responsive than the internal WD 1TB Caviar Black), but the 2012 feels just as fast in day-to-day use, and is actually faster for some tasks.

Based on everything I'd seen, I expected the 2.9GHz i5 in the 2012 to be about equal to the 2009 2.8GHz i7, and that's basically what I'm seeing. Your 3.2GHz i5 should be a bit better at some tasks, though there are also some (anything that really takes advantage of hyperthreading) that might not be quite as fast. Still, you shouldn't notice a big difference - the fact that you seem to be points to some sort of problem on the new machine.
rnb2 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 7, 2013, 07:49 PM   #14
flavr
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
I think my iMac was indexing for the first time when I first bought it yesterday which slowed it down dramatically....MUCH faster tonight! Thanks everybody!
flavr is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2013, 09:40 PM   #15
Count Blah
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Sterling, Va
Quote:
Originally Posted by flavr View Post
I think my iMac was indexing for the first time when I first bought it yesterday which slowed it down dramatically....MUCH faster tonight! Thanks everybody!
Oh yeah. The 1st indexing is a bit off-putting. No doubt. I had a similar reaction
__________________
I tell you this, no eternal reward will forgive us now for wasting the dawn.
Count Blah is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 8, 2013, 10:17 PM   #16
JackBurton70
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Highland, Utah
 
I agree. I think that the main difference is the i5 and the i7. My old iMac had the i7 and it is faster than my daughter's new macbook pro with the i5 processor. You may have got some parts that aren't up to what they say they are, that has happened to me too many times in the past not Best of luck.
---------------------------------
Jack
Best AMD APU Processors
JackBurton70 is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > iMac

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Advice Needed: Repair Late 2009 iMac vs. Buy Late 2012 MacMini AhmedFaisal Buying Tips and Advice 1 Nov 21, 2013 02:39 PM
2012 i5 3.2 feels slower than my older 2009 i7 2.8...it hangs flavr iMac 12 Jun 5, 2013 08:50 PM
ATI Radeon 4850 driver not working on Imac late 2009 using Windows 8 sorlaker Windows, Linux & Others on the Mac 0 May 11, 2013 12:03 AM
Late 2009 27 iMac as a monitor for 2012 mbp? logicpro7 iMac 2 Nov 27, 2012 09:11 PM
Late 2009 iMac vs Mid 2012 Mac mini alphaod Buying Tips and Advice 3 Nov 11, 2012 12:38 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:51 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC