Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Mar 9, 2013, 05:08 AM   #1
igmolinav
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
A question about breathing - Documentary filming with dSLR

Hi,

I am relatively new to doing video : ) !!!
I have read that many people talk about cine or video primes.
They may look like this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...mm_T1_5_L.html

or like this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...25mm_T2_9.html


Their "counterparts", are regular still photography lenses,
like this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...f_1_4L_II.html

or this one:
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/produc...5mm_f_2_0.html

I would like to do some very short documentaries with a dSLR and with
two or three still photography lenses. In the documentaries I plan
to do, for the most part, I'll interview people. So, the focus does not
really move. I may include buildings and/or landscape, but the focus is
pretty much fixed. (A friend of mine wants to film a dialogue from a script
he wrote. The people in the dialogue stay mostly in the same boring plane
as well ; ) !!!). So, there will always be very little movement back and forth
of the "focus plane"! So, assuming that there is more or less the same
video quality in the video/cine lenses as in the still photography
lenses, there is no need to be interested in those video/cine lenses.
That assumed, since there is very little movement of the subjects, and
therefore no breathing! Would this be correct?

I found this video on the internet, and I couldn't see much of a
difference between using video/cine lenses, and using still photo-
graphy lenses:
http://nofilmschool.com/2012/12/cano...animous-media/

Thank you in advance, kind regards,

igmolinav : ) !!!
igmolinav is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2013, 12:19 PM   #2
acearchie
macrumors 68030
 
acearchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
If your budget allows then go for the Cine primes.

If it's tight then still to L series lenses.

There are other things make cine lenses better than photography lenses apart from the breathing.
acearchie is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 9, 2013, 02:45 PM   #3
igmolinav
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Hi Archie,

Thank you for your message : ) !!!

Quote:
Originally Posted by acearchie View Post
There are other things make cine lenses better than photography lenses apart from the breathing.
I would know more about those characteristics that make cine lenses better.
If you have a link or would like to comment a bit, I would appreciate it.

Kind regards,

igmolinav : ) !!!
igmolinav is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Mar 10, 2013, 07:16 AM   #4
acearchie
macrumors 68030
 
acearchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
I wrote a post on reddit which summarised most of the differences but I can seem to find it now.

I did find this link though which gives some good pointers as to the main differences.

I would seriously recommend going for L series lenses and spending the extra money on other aspects to make your film better as I doubt you would see little difference in the lenses as well as have a complicated time getting PL mount to EF mount adapters.
acearchie is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Video

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:21 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC