|
|
#1 |
|
cMBP-15in w/ High-Res Anti-Glare-2.3 512 or 2.6 1gb?
Hello All-
I had previously posted this in the macbook pro area, but realized my follow up question may be more appropriate here... I am upgrading from a white macbook (2009) and and i know anything will be a huge improvement. I have it narrowed down to the 15in cMBP with high-res anti glare, but I am waffling between the 2.3ghz and 2.6ghz processor. I will use mostly for work (Word/Excel), and photo editing in iPhoto and maybe Aperture. Also movie editing on iMovie. I would like to stream ripped movies to my ATV (I have an apple extreme). Also maybe some light gaming (Simcity 5, steam games) I have explored the forums and googled my face off, but specifically if i am not using Final Cut or Photoshop- will i notice any difference with a 2.6ghz processor? More precisely - will I notice improvements with the 1GB vram over the 512? I can use the education store (staff, not student), so this upgrade is only $120. After reading other forums where in the past an upgrade of these specs was up to $400 dollars- is this a no brainer? Go for the 2.6ghz with 1gig and feel good about it? Thanks for any advice/insight - much appreciated! |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Considering what you will be doing on the cMBP I would say - no
Consider the upgrade costs only $120 I would say - YES (if you can afford it)
__________________
cMBP 2012 15" 2.7, 8GB, Samsung 830 256GB, 650M 1GB, Hi-Res AG / MBA 2011 11" 1.6, 4GB, 128GB SSD / iMac 2011 27" 2.7, 12GB, 1TB HD, 6770M 512MB / iPhone 5 16GB / iPad 4 16GB / Time Capsule 2TB |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#3 |
|
thanks- i guess i will go for it. I like to keep my computers for 4-5 years so i guess it will be worth it.
|
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#4 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#5 |
|
|
0
|
|
|
#6 |
|
I'll point out what I've mentioned before. Some applications contain features that can utilize OpenCL or CUDA. In those cases for those specific things, vram can be a spec requirement where under a certain amount, the gpu cannot be used to run such a function. 2.3 and 2.6 ghz is a minor difference here in long term value. The two are likely to be indistinguishable unless you're timing renders or time to execute a cpu bound filter on an image of relatively high resolution.
__________________
Legend has it that a bad GPU driver killed Intel's father. To this day intel can't bring themselves to write a good one. |
|
|
|
0
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
Quote:
What is making you want to go that route? Last edited by ovation802; Mar 19, 2013 at 11:42 AM. Reason: left out question |
||
|
|
0
|
![]() |
|
«
Previous Thread
|
Next Thread
»
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:07 PM.







Linear Mode
