Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:28 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Updates from New York Media Event

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

Initial updates from the Media Event in New York today.

- Upgrades to the 15" and 17" PowerBooks.
- 15" gets a new display with 1440 x960 resolution, while the 17" will get 1680 x1050. Both will be brighter thanprevious models and have better battery life.
- SuperDrives will be standard and all will support Apple's 30" Cinema HD Display
- Prices start at $1,499 for 12", $1,999 for 15" and $2,499 for 17".
- Powerbooks ship today
MacRumors is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:30 PM   #2
devilot
Demi-Goddess (Moderator emeritus)
 
devilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
That sounds great! Man... all you people waiting for the larger PBs have got 'em now!
__________________
Razzle dazzle me!
devilot is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:31 PM   #3
shawnce
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
More live details...
__________________
Steve Balmers the CEO of Microsoft... Dance Monkey, Developers!, The remix, The ad
shawnce is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:30 PM   #4
SuperSnake2012
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York City, NY
Send a message via AIM to SuperSnake2012
Standard Superdrive
SuperSnake2012 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:51 PM   #5
weg
macrumors 6502a
 
weg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Oxford, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by SuperSnake2012
Standard Superdrive
Dual layer? And faster than the old ones? Or just what we used to have?
__________________
- weg
weg is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:56 PM   #6
metrocon
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by weg
Dual layer? And faster than the old ones? Or just what we used to have?
Store is back up, looks like they're still 8x single layer superdrives.
metrocon is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:38 PM   #7
raincoat
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Southampton, UK
Send a message via Skype™ to raincoat
Quote:
Originally Posted by metrocon
Store is back up, looks like they're still 8x single layer superdrives.

15" and 17" come with DL Superdrives. Can also get 7200rpm 100GB hard drive

Dual-Dual look nice


Still gonna wait for the Mactel Powerbooks, probably Rev 2.

Where is 10.4.3!!!!
__________________
Raincoat
Don't get caught in a rainfall of viruses, always carry your macintosh.
17" Powerbook G4 1.33, Mac Pro (early 2008) 2.8GHz, Dell 3008WFP.
raincoat is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:30 PM   #8
yoak
macrumors 6502a
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Not the biggest of upgrades, what about speed?
__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo
2,66ghz MBP, Express card slot!
12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM
www.sombrafilm.com
yoak is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:54 PM   #9
Burai
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoak
Not the biggest of upgrades, what about speed?
Speedbumps to the Pro line are nigh on impossible with the Power PC.

It's the whole reason why we're going Intel next year.
Burai is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:00 PM   #10
JasonDawg18
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Thumbs down I am sorely disappointed!

The PB upgrade is horrible. I mean, a brighter screen, higher resolution, and better battery life are all good. BUT, what about speed? What about performance? I may as well just get a stupid iBook - they're close enough in speed.

What a joke.
JasonDawg18 is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:07 PM   #11
stealthboy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonDawg18
The PB upgrade is horrible. I mean, a brighter screen, higher resolution, and better battery life are all good. BUT, what about speed? What about performance? I may as well just get a stupid iBook - they're close enough in speed.

What a joke.

You're right, it would have been better if they had not done any upgrades at all. Then you wouldn't complain, right?
__________________
MacBook Pro 15"
iPhone 4gb
http://www.7b5labs.com/
stealthboy is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:18 PM   #12
deputy_doofy
macrumors 6502a
 
deputy_doofy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
<rant>
I don't understand why so many people are miserable about these upgrades. I think people just still don't believe that there is a REASON we are going Intel. PPC is great, but not being advanced. As long as it doesn't advance, Apple can do nothing. Well, some people will just always complain, I guess.

That said, the G5 updates are nice. It is nice to see us in dual-core mode and it's even nicer to "quad"-core mode. I don't understand the complaint about RAM. We all know Apple just boosted their minimum to 512 and probably shouldn't expect them to boost it again for some time. However, nobody was really complaining as much when the price was $2999 for 2 processors, so why is $3299 all of a sudden bad when it is for FOUR processors?

The Powerbook updates were as expected (to me). Helloooooooooooooooooooooooooooooooo????????????????????? We are going to Intel. Wash. Rinse. Repeat. We are going Intel.... and we are going for a reason. The G4 WAS a good chip for its ORIGINAL time, but is not a good chip for our current time in 2005. Those of you that were expecting a dual-core G4 were smoking something. When..... WHEN has Motorola (Freescale, if you must) delivered anything good since the 500MHz debacle?

If you're that upset about this round of updates you have a few choices:
- Go get a Windows PC and join the spyware/adware/virus crowd.
- If you don't absolutely NEED a computer, continue to work/play on the one you have.
- If you need more power than your laptop is offering but want to stay with Apple, go get an iMac.
- Lastly, if you can wait for Intel, then wait. Unless Intel becomes the new Moto/IBM, we should have good things soon.
</rant>
__________________
15" (Glossy) MacBook Pro/2.33GHz C2D/2GB RAM/160GB 5400RPM/6x DL SuperDrive
deputy_doofy is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:12 PM   #13
nagromme
macrumors 601
 
nagromme's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Blinking blue dot
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonDawg18
I mean, a brighter screen, higher resolution, and better battery life are all good. BUT, what about speed? What about performance?
Raw performance is why Apple's going to Intel (sooner rather than later, I'd say). Freescale can't deliver. Apple can only do what is possible.

It would be hard to be someone who HAS to buy now... but keep in mind: you won't have to worry about Rosetta or software compatibility. Being an early Intel adopter isn't without its rough edges.
__________________
nagromme
Would you like a treatment?
nagromme is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:36 PM   #14
jkhanson
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by JasonDawg18
The PB upgrade is horrible. I mean, a brighter screen, higher resolution, and better battery life are all good. BUT, what about speed? What about performance? I may as well just get a stupid iBook - they're close enough in speed.

What a joke.
Blame Freescale. Apple doesn't make processors. There is a reason for the switch to Intel, after all.

Last edited by jkhanson : Oct 19, 2005 at 01:52 PM.
jkhanson is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:41 PM   #15
kingstontown
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Oktoberfest
Quote:
Originally Posted by jkhanson
Blame Motorola. Apple doesn't make processors. There is a reason for the switch to Intel, after all.
NO WAY! It's Apple! They could've used the MPC7448, but instead they kicked Freescale 's and our asses!
Thank you Apple! NOT!
kingstontown is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 01:46 PM   #16
maddav
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Manchester, UK
Well I think that this means I'll be getting a 12" PowerBook over a 12" iBook, though it's awfully close
__________________
Research is what I am doing when I don't know what I am doing. ~ Wernher von Braun
maddav is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:42 PM   #17
clayj
macrumors 601
 
clayj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: 1123,6536,5321
<yawn>

The PB upgrades are OK, but incremental at best. The PowerMac changes are more exciting... as are the new ACD prices.
__________________
mba guru
mac pro
2.8 ghz 8 core 14 gb ram 4 tb hd 30" acd | macbook air 1.8 ghz 64 gb ssd | mac minis 2.0 ghz c2d 1.66 ghz cd | iphone 3G | ipods x4
clayj is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:44 PM   #18
cr2sh
macrumors 68020
 
cr2sh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Quote:
- PowerMac G5s updated
- Dual core processors, up to 16GB of DDR2 RAM, 1TB of internal storage, PCI Express
- Four new nVidia cards, including the Quadro FX 4500 - all four cards support 30" cinema display - PowerMac G5 Quad, with dual dual-core processors
- Single dual-core 2.0 GHz CPU version is $1,999; single dual core 2.3Ghz is $2,499; dual CPU dual-core is $3,299
But what is the speed of the dual dual?!
__________________

Search before you post: MRoogle
cr2sh is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:49 PM   #19
sai_digitalle
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Dual processor Dual-Core

what's the friggin' speed of the Dual-processor Dual-Core systems??? and Prices, does the the first model Dual-processor Dual-Core system cost $3299 or is that the highest model???
sai_digitalle is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:49 PM   #20
slu
macrumors 6502a
 
slu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Buffalo
Quote:
Originally Posted by cr2sh
But what is the speed of the dual dual?!
Store is back up.

It says dual-dual 2.5 Ghz
__________________
Rev A. iMac G5 / iPod classic 160 GB / Macbook 2.4 C2D / 3G iPhone
slu is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:50 PM   #21
Moxiemike
Banned
 
Moxiemike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
give me aperture NOW.

NOW NOW NOW NOW NOW



sounds so good
Moxiemike is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:49 PM   #22
Oryan
macrumors 6502a
 
Oryan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Lincoln, NE
Quote:
Originally Posted by cr2sh
But what is the speed of the dual dual?!
Two dual-core 2.5GHz PowerPC G5 processors

Edit: I guess I'm too slow.
Oryan is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:50 PM   #23
Sca1pel
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
My macs for sale
Sca1pel is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 12:58 PM   #24
kkapoor
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Toronto, Canada
Wow, those are some dissapointing PB updates. No bump in processing power whatsoever. This has to be a stop-gap update. They will be ramping down production of the PB's while they put in place their new production lines for the Intel PB's. They can't hope to compete for another six months with these machines.

Creative pro's must be drooling at the Quad-Core machine, that thing is a beast!! And I personally will be looking into Aperture which looks absolutely amazing.
kkapoor is offline  
Old Oct 19, 2005, 02:16 PM   #25
neoxion
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Question Pc4200 = 333?

why PBs work at 333MHz not 533MHz?
neoxion is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:58 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC