Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Oct 25, 2005, 03:23 AM   #1
bob909bob
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Mactel Ibooks whats going to be in them?

Just curious what do you all think will be in the mactel ibooks since they will likely be the first mac-intel computers. Do you think being the first will make them buggy in anyways?

I'm guessing that they will probaly be the same as the current Ibooks in most repeects. The only differences I realistically expect is possbily Radeon 9600 vid cards maybe 64mb but probaly still 32mb and probaly 1.3 Pentium M in the 12 inch and 1.4 in the 14 inch. Maybe widescreens too?
bob909bob is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 04:35 AM   #2
chungbob
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
yes exactly that.
__________________
NEW ~ 12" iBook 1.33
chungbob is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 04:41 AM   #3
iEdd
macrumors 68000
 
iEdd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to iEdd
I doubt ibooks are going to go widescreen too soon. 64MB video cards should be in the next revision.
I am almost certain that powerbooks will be first to go intel.. They had the sh.ttest excuse of an update out of all of them (the 12", anyway).
iEdd is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 04:49 AM   #4
Chundles
macrumors G4
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Hamsters and sawdust.

This is what Intel are going to offer us. It'll be good too compared to the Gerbils and sawdust Freescale are offering us at the moment.

Mind you there's not much out there that can beat the Raccoons and pine mulch in the Mac desktops. We'll probably wait a little longer for them to be replaced, hopefully with ferrets or even quokkas. That'd be cool.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 06:56 AM   #5
wide
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: NYC
i don't think we can know for sure. i think the ibook line will be one of the last to go to intel, they will first be revised with faster G4 processors.
__________________
1.33 GHz iBook 12.1"
-iskin protouch pb (artic)
-microsoft intellimouse explorer bluetooth
a dell laptop and a few ipods
wide is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 07:03 AM   #6
DarkNetworks
macrumors 68000
 
DarkNetworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by bob909bob
Just curious what do you all think will be in the mactel ibooks since they will likely be the first mac-intel computers.
Well i dunno...probally the INTEL INSIDE logo?
__________________
procrastination is truly a tool of the devil...
DarkNetworks is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 07:15 AM   #7
Chundles
macrumors G4
 
Chundles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: The Gong, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkNetworks
Well i dunno...probally the INTEL INSIDE logo?
Yeah, it won't be a sticker but it'll be a part of the Apple logo on the back so that you see it everytime your open her up.
__________________
This is going straight to the Pool Room
Chundles is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 08:21 AM   #8
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chundles
Yeah, it won't be a sticker but it'll be a part of the Apple logo on the back so that you see it everytime your open her up.

__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo
2,66ghz MBP, SSD Corsair Force 240GB, 8GB RAM
12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM
www.sombrafilm.com
yoak is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 08:22 AM   #9
yoak
macrumors 65816
 
yoak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Oslo, Norway
No, seriously, I think (or hope) that we will see better screens and a new formfactor
__________________
2.8ghz MP Octo
2,66ghz MBP, SSD Corsair Force 240GB, 8GB RAM
12" iBook 1.2ghz 60GB HD & 768RAM
www.sombrafilm.com
yoak is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 08:43 AM   #10
DarkNetworks
macrumors 68000
 
DarkNetworks's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by yoak
No, seriously, I think (or hope) that we will see better screens and a new formfactor
Maybe...cos this is like wht..the next BIG move for Apple?
__________________
procrastination is truly a tool of the devil...
DarkNetworks is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 08:51 AM   #11
Bear
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Sol III - Terra
Quote:
Originally Posted by wide
i don't think we can know for sure. i think the ibook line will be one of the last to go to intel, they will first be revised with faster G4 processors.
Actually the consumer machines (iBook, mini, iMac) are the ones most likely to go Intel sooner. The Pro machines need to wait for the Pro apps to be available (or they won't sell).
__________________
-----Bear
Bear is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 08:53 AM   #12
wordmunger
macrumors 603
 
wordmunger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: North Carolina
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bear
Actually the consumer machines (iBook, mini, iMac) are the ones most likely to go Intel sooner. The Pro machines need to wait for the Pro apps to be available (or they won't sell).
I disagree. As long as they've got MS office, which is what most people use, they'll sell like hotcakes. Plus you've got to figure all the *apple* apps (FC pro, Aperture, pro audio apps) will be good to go.
wordmunger is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 09:05 AM   #13
bigandy
macrumors G3
 
bigandy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: B'more
but without the heavyweight stuff from Adobe/Macromedia they're going to hold off. Apple's Pro Apps line is responsible for shifting a huge number of pro macs, but without Photoshop, Dreamweaver and so on running natively (esp Photoshop: can you imagine it running through rosetta??) i think they'd keep them back.
__________________
"any day that involves cat pee is a really bad day" - iBlue
bigandy is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 09:49 AM   #14
paulypants
macrumors 6502a
 
paulypants's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: Buffalo, NY
Apple has stated that they will start the transition with comsumer machines and work up to pro by the end of 2007, by this I'm assuming PMacs and XServes? The exception will most likely be for PBooks.
__________________
Mac Pro 2 x 2.8 Quad-Core Xeon - iMac 27" Core i7 - iPad 3G - iPhone 4 - iPod 3rd G - iPod Nano 1st G - PowerMac G3 - Macintosh SE
paulypants is offline   0
Old Oct 25, 2005, 09:53 AM   #15
Spock
macrumors 65816
 
Spock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vulcan
Send a message via AIM to Spock Send a message via Yahoo to Spock
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chundles
Yeah, it won't be a sticker but it'll be a part of the Apple logo on the back so that you see it everytime your open her up.
Yeah ok, just like all the PowerPC logos on the iBook??
Spock is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 03:48 AM   #16
onetwoxu
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2005
Send a message via AIM to onetwoxu
i'd like to see a new form factor, but the fact that it's going to have a pentium m is the major factor in me drooling over them months and months before they're even announced. here is hoping for an ibook that ACTUALLY gets 6 hours of battery life.
__________________
powermac g5 1.6 / 1gig / 80 & 250 gig internal / 320 gig firewire/ NEC ND3540a 16x DVD burner
powerbook g4 12" 1.33 / 768mb / 60 gig hd / combo drive
onetwoxu is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 04:58 AM   #17
Skareb
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Adelaide
Send a message via MSN to Skareb
If it comes with a 9600 I'd be disapointed

Those cards aren't even avaliable for the PC market anymore

JOrdan
Skareb is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 05:00 AM   #18
Palad1
macrumors 6502a
 
Palad1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chundles
Hamsters and sawdust.

This is what Intel are going to offer us. It'll be good too compared to the Gerbils and sawdust Freescale are offering us at the moment.

Mind you there's not much out there that can beat the Raccoons and pine mulch in the Mac desktops. We'll probably wait a little longer for them to be replaced, hopefully with ferrets or even quokkas. That'd be cool.
I was wondering how they fed my Tiger...
Palad1 is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 06:54 AM   #19
JonBoy470
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Don't get your hopes up on video cards.

I wouldn't be surprised if Apple does a new form-factor for the iBook when it transitions to Intel.

That said, get ready for Intel Media Graphics 900 or whatever the bunny suit men are calling their integrated video solution by the time Apple unveils their new product. Be prepared for Apple to use the video as a differentiator/upsell opportunity between the iBook and Powerbook.

The iBook will use integrated graphics for lower cost, design simplicity (these go hand in hand) and offer longer battery life as a bonus. Powerbook will come with discrete graphics, e.g. ATI mobility x300 or x600, or GeForce Go 6600 or 6800, or whatever ATI/NVidia has replaced these with for greater performance.
JonBoy470 is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 07:25 AM   #20
dmw007
macrumors 603
 
dmw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working for MI-6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skareb
If it comes with a 9600 I'd be disapointed

Those cards aren't even avaliable for the PC market anymore

JOrdan
No, they are using "integrated graphics" crap on their consumer laptops. Heck, Dell is still using a 32MB ATI Radeon 9000 on their Inspiron 600m.

So those things considered, the 9600 does not look that bad.
__________________
3.2 GHz Mac Pro Nehalem
PowerBook 1400cs/133, 450MHz G4 Cube, 500MHz Pismo
iPhone 3GS, 60GB iPod
dmw007 is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 07:37 AM   #21
dmw007
macrumors 603
 
dmw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working for MI-6
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBoy470
I wouldn't be surprised if Apple does a new form-factor for the iBook when it transitions to Intel.

That said, get ready for Intel Media Graphics 900 or whatever the bunny suit men are calling their integrated video solution by the time Apple unveils their new product. Be prepared for Apple to use the video as a differentiator/upsell opportunity between the iBook and Powerbook.

The iBook will use integrated graphics for lower cost, design simplicity (these go hand in hand) and offer longer battery life as a bonus. Powerbook will come with discrete graphics, e.g. ATI mobility x300 or x600, or GeForce Go 6600 or 6800, or whatever ATI/NVidia has replaced these with for greater performance.
I sure hope not.

Integrated Graphics = pure evil.
__________________
3.2 GHz Mac Pro Nehalem
PowerBook 1400cs/133, 450MHz G4 Cube, 500MHz Pismo
iPhone 3GS, 60GB iPod
dmw007 is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 08:06 AM   #22
miloblithe
macrumors 68020
 
miloblithe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Washington, DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by JonBoy470
That said, get ready for Intel Media Graphics 900 or whatever the bunny suit men are calling their integrated video solution by the time Apple unveils their new product. Be prepared for Apple to use the video as a differentiator/upsell opportunity between the iBook and Powerbook.
Unfortunately, you're probably right. That sucks though.

I'd add that by the time of the Intel transition, I'd expect the 14" screen to get a bump up from 1024x768.
miloblithe is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 08:24 AM   #23
Skareb
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Adelaide
Send a message via MSN to Skareb
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmw007
Integrated Graphics = pure evil.
Don't all non-PowerMac Mac's have intergrated graphics

Jordan

P.S: Mr. Bond, Dell is Poo and as such shouldn't be used for any comparisims
Skareb is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 09:03 AM   #24
louis_sx
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: International House of Louis
I LOVE the formfactor of the current iBook and 12" PowerBook...they're so small, utilitarian, sleek designs. The fact that we've had the same iBook for 4 years tells me that it was ahead of its time.

Skareb - not really. By "integrated graphics" most people mean shared memory architecture, using part of RAM for video. Apple hasn't done that to us in a VERY long time (68k days, IIRC). Onboard graphics (implying a discrete memory bank and discrete graphics controller) are what non-PowerMac machines have.
louis_sx is offline   0
Old Oct 26, 2005, 09:08 AM   #25
dmw007
macrumors 603
 
dmw007's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Working for MI-6
Quote:
Originally Posted by Skareb
Don't all non-PowerMac Mac's have intergrated graphics

Jordan

P.S: Mr. Bond, Dell is Poo and as such shouldn't be used for any comparisims
Yes, there are essentially "built-in" video. But they have their own cpus and vram so they don't suck away valuable system resources like integrated graphics chipsets do.
__________________
3.2 GHz Mac Pro Nehalem
PowerBook 1400cs/133, 450MHz G4 Cube, 500MHz Pismo
iPhone 3GS, 60GB iPod
dmw007 is offline   0

 
MacRumors Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > Macintosh Computers

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
What are the prices going to be in Australia? marcel-v iPhone 6 Jul 1, 2008 09:10 PM
I'm going to be in my local Newspaper on Friday... wiithan iPhone 17 Jun 27, 2007 06:51 PM
Whats going to be new in iLife 07? x Shadow Dragon Mac Applications and Mac App Store 4 Jun 5, 2007 01:21 PM
What is going to be in the New Imac? fooker General Mac Discussion 0 Jul 3, 2004 03:36 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:01 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.6
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.

Privacy / DMCA contact / Affiliate and FTC Disclosure
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC