Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Apr 26, 2013, 07:11 AM   #1
ZaYoOoD
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
27" 1080p IPS monitor vs 2560x1440?

Hey,
I'm looking to buy a new display for my 2013 Mac Mini.
I'm afraid if I go with the 2560x1440 it might not work, some people have issued some complaints..

Anyone who has worked with 27" of both resolutions can tell me which one to go with?
ZaYoOoD is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 07:15 AM   #2
donjuan2009
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2009
I have this one and I love it but not 250x1440 http://www.shopping.hp.com/en_US/hom...acklit-Monitor

Quote:
Originally Posted by ZaYoOoD View Post
Hey,
I'm looking to buy a new display for my 2013 Mac Mini.
I'm afraid if I go with the 2560x1440 it might not work, some people have issued some complaints..

Anyone who has worked with 27" of both resolutions can tell me which one to go with?
donjuan2009 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 07:43 AM   #3
Colchiro
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
I have a pair of HP 2711x, and really like them, but like most monitors, they're 1920x1080.

http://www.amazon.com/HP-2711x-27-In...=hp+monitor+27
Colchiro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 07:47 AM   #4
MJL
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
I love my Dell U2713H. No PWM, no sore eyes, no headaches. Wide gamut, software from Dell running in the background automatically changing from wide gamut to normal etc. Easily tailored to personal preferences.
MJL is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 08:00 AM   #5
toughboy
macrumors 6502a
 
toughboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Izmir, Turkey
Send a message via ICQ to toughboy Send a message via MSN to toughboy
if you wanted a 2013 mac with a 27" monitor, why didnt you buy an iMac??
__________________
12" PB G4 Rev A ~ "Ice" (what an irony!)
15.2" PB G4 ~ "DevIce"
17" MBP 2.5GHz/4GB/ Hi-Res LED Screen FTW! ~ "BigMac"
toughboy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 09:28 AM   #6
Fishrrman
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
A 27" monitor using 2560x1440 will work just fine with the Mini -- so long as you connect it through the MiniDisplayPort and use the proper cable.

There are several 1080p 27-inchers out there, including some with a recent well-received IPS panel (panel by LG). Here's one, for example (no financial interest):
http://www.bestbuy.com/site/AOC+-+27...&skuId=6293177

Just be aware that because they are larger than a 24" display -- but with the same resolution as is considered "normal" with 24" -- a 27" 1080p display will yield an image that looks "blown up" a bit, because the pixel size is larger (.031mm, I believe).

If you are a younger person with good eyesight, your response to such an image might be, "it looks too grainy!".

But for us older folks, or for people with impaired or weakening vision, it looks excellent….
Fishrrman is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 10:58 AM   #7
blanka
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJL View Post
I love my Dell U2713H. No PWM, no sore eyes, no headaches. Wide gamut, software from Dell running in the background automatically changing from wide gamut to normal etc. Easily tailored to personal preferences.
Or get the half-price sRGB version, the U2713HM.

Be sure the display has a Display Port connector (I think they should ban sellers who sell these resolutions with dual-link DVI only in 2013). That one is easily interfaced to thunderbolt with a DP->miniDP cable.
blanka is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 12:10 PM   #8
RoastingPig
macrumors 65816
 
RoastingPig's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: SoCal
Send a message via AIM to RoastingPig
Quote:
Originally Posted by blanka View Post
Or get the half-price sRGB version, the U2713HM.

Be sure the display has a Display Port connector (I think they should ban sellers who sell these resolutions with dual-link DVI only in 2013). That one is easily interfaced to thunderbolt with a DP->miniDP cable.
plus thunderbolt to DP is like 80 dollars cheaper then thunderbolt to dual-link dvi
RoastingPig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 03:55 PM   #9
talmy
macrumors 601
 
talmy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Oregon
If you are intending to use Aperture, FCPX, Adobe CS or Lightroom, you should certainly pay the extra money for the 2560x1440. If you just want the large display to view videos, then you don't want the 2560x1440 display and a 1080P monitor will work better. Frankly, for general use I wouldn't bother with 27" 1080P but would just buy a smaller monitor if that were all the resolution I wanted. It's too grainy at that size.
__________________
27" i7 iMac, 15" MacBook Pro, Mac mini with Mavericks Server, 5 other Macs and an unused Apple TV.
talmy is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 04:04 PM   #10
Ubele
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by toughboy View Post
if you wanted a 2013 mac with a 27" monitor, why didnt you buy an iMac??
1) If you don't need the iMac's dedicated GPU, a Mac mini and a third-party 27" monitor are cheaper.

2) Monitors typically have longer useful lifespans than computers (my 21" Samsung LCD monitor from 2001 is still going strong), so you can upgrade your mini in a few years but keep your monitor.

3) If you have another computer, you can also connect it to most third-party monitors, which have multiple inputs. I sometimes work from home and connect my work Windows laptop to my Samsung monitor, without having to disconnect my Mac mini.

4) It's easier to upgrade the drive in a mini.
Ubele is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 05:27 PM   #11
MJL
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by blanka View Post
Or get the half-price sRGB version, the U2713HM.

Be sure the display has a Display Port connector (I think they should ban sellers who sell these resolutions with dual-link DVI only in 2013). That one is easily interfaced to thunderbolt with a DP->miniDP cable.
- The cable comes with the more expensive model.

- There are several who have problems with the U2713HM, one of them being an annoying sound pitch at times.

- I needed a monitor that has no PWM backlighting.

- The U2713HM is not wide gamut.
MJL is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 26, 2013, 06:37 PM   #12
Abazigal
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Singapore
I would personally spend the money on 2 23- inch monitors.
Abazigal is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2013, 07:27 AM   #13
jhfenton
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
I'm using this MicroCenter Auria branded WQHD 2560x1440 IPS LED monitor with my Mac mini (Late 2012). It was a steal at $399, and it's worked flawlessly at its native resolution connected via an inexpensive MDP->DP cable. I wouldn't buy a WQHD monitor at this point that didn't have a DP connection.

Before the Auria, I was using an AOC 27" 1080p IPS LED with the mini, and I was also happy with it. I didn't think text was too bad at that size and resolution. It was larger than it needed to be, but the quality wasn't disturbing.

The AOC has now been relegated to the family Dell, and I'm using an Acer 23" 1080p as a second monitor with my Mac mini (via HDMI). The 2560x1440 resolution is a big help working with photos.
jhfenton is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 28, 2013, 02:00 PM   #14
Che Castro
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: May 2009
Is that Auria the cheapest option to get here In America ?
Che Castro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 2013, 08:25 AM   #15
Giuly
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: That depends whether you ask for timezone, state of mind or GPS coordinates.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Che Castro View Post
Is that Auria the cheapest option to get here In America ?
Along with the Monoprice 27" 1440p display, yes.
Giuly is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 2013, 04:21 PM   #16
paulrbeers
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Che Castro View Post
Is that Auria the cheapest option to get here In America ?
By far the cheapest that has a display port. Having native display port saves about $100 since you don't have to buy a MDP to dual dvi cable.
paulrbeers is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 29, 2013, 10:37 PM   #17
WharfRat1971
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Loving the Auria so far
WharfRat1971 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 04:03 AM   #18
blanka
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJL View Post
I needed a monitor that has no PWM backlighting.
Why that? And how is the 2713H not having it?
As far as I know is the 2713H using wide-gamut white LED's for backlight, and the only way to dim LED's is with PWM.
Besides, nothing wrong with PWM. The problem is with wrong frequencies, and power-supplies with cheap coils that start oscillating.
Old CCFL backlights also use PWM for dimming.
blanka is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 12:55 PM   #19
fig
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
I'm about to get a Mini and am going with a 23" AOC display with the thought of eventually adding another one.

There's a 27" model as well, but both have the same 1080p resolution so the 27" just seems like a poor usage of space.
__________________
figdigital | @figdigital | dribbble
fig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 04:57 PM   #20
dolphin842
macrumors 65816
 
dolphin842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJL View Post
- The cable comes with the more expensive model.

- There are several who have problems with the U2713HM, one of them being an annoying sound pitch at times.

- I needed a monitor that has no PWM backlighting.

- The U2713HM is not wide gamut.
The U2713HM does not use PWM either, at least according to TFTCentral's tests.
dolphin842 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 05:46 PM   #21
98EXL
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: not on the moon
Quote:
Originally Posted by fig View Post
I'm about to get a Mini and am going with a 23" AOC display with the thought of eventually adding another one.

There's a 27" model as well, but both have the same 1080p resolution so the 27" just seems like a poor usage of space.
says the guy not using 2*E2742's.......

it took all of 48 hours for me to have both of my 27" in use....and with a bitching background to boot
__________________
Late 2013 15" rMBP 2.0 GHz i7, 8 GB RAM, 256 flash
Late 2012 Mac Mini 2.6 GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB + 240 GB SSD's
Airport Extreme (Tower of Doom)
too many iOS devices, more than one man should own
98EXL is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 06:32 PM   #22
fig
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98EXL View Post
says the guy not using 2*E2742's.......

it took all of 48 hours for me to have both of my 27" in use....and with a bitching background to boot
Nope, I never claimed otherwise, though I have used a variety of displays at different resolutions and do have dual displays on my work machine.

I've got dual 24" displays that do fine at 1080p, but IMO a 27" with the same number of pixels doesn't do anything except take up more desk space.

Dual 27" displays at 1440 would be a different case and would offer considerably more screen area.
__________________
figdigital | @figdigital | dribbble
fig is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 30, 2013, 08:57 PM   #23
paulrbeers
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by 98EXL View Post
says the guy not using 2*E2742's.......

it took all of 48 hours for me to have both of my 27" in use....and with a bitching background to boot
I'm not sure what your point is? I don't need to own a Chevy Aveo to know its a POS do I? The 1080p 27" monitors are like cheap those super cheap giant TVs on Black Friday, you get a giant screen but that doesn't mean it looks good. I find that the 95-105 dpi range is ideal. 27" 1080p monitors are 81. That's absolutely crap. The pixels are so big at normal desk usage that you can see the jagged text. Ive done direct comparisons in stores. This is precisely why I use 23" 1080p monitors. DPI is perfect. Anything over 24", you need to increase resolution.
paulrbeers is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 1, 2013, 05:03 PM   #24
98EXL
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: not on the moon
@fig & paul....

you know, you make really good points. I never really thought about it....and now I'm a little irritated.

I got these when I was drugged up from an injury this winter and have since gotten used to it. Not really doing anything detail oriented, other than watching 1080p video on it. At this point, it bothers me because I should have known better. Stepping up from a 17" size, I think I got screen envy.

Oh well, gives me an excuse for 1440 goodness when it becomes the same price for what I paid for these 1080 beasts. Thank you for a good punch to the face
__________________
Late 2013 15" rMBP 2.0 GHz i7, 8 GB RAM, 256 flash
Late 2012 Mac Mini 2.6 GHz i7, 16 GB RAM, 256 GB + 240 GB SSD's
Airport Extreme (Tower of Doom)
too many iOS devices, more than one man should own
98EXL is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 2, 2013, 09:46 AM   #25
Fishrrman
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
"I find that the 95-105 dpi range is ideal. 27" 1080p monitors are 81. That's absolutely crap. The pixels are so big at normal desk usage that you can see the jagged text."

May I ask your age?
You are obviously not older nor is your vision less than very good.

For us older folks, _less_ resolution "is more" -- because it's simply easier to see.

What doesn't work for you may work quite well for someone else.

BTW -- did you know that when the first Macs were introduced, much was made of the fact that the screen was 72dpi, true "what you see is what you get" (on paper) ??
Fishrrman is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Apple Hardware > Desktops > Mac mini

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Planar 27" 2560x1440 Monitor <$400 fredr500 Mac Peripherals 1 Apr 18, 2014 01:33 PM
New iMac 27" with Dell U2711 2560x1440 as external (dual) monitor gnorknagar iMac 27 Feb 10, 2014 10:12 PM
Anyone using those ~$350 27" 2560x1440 S-IPS screens with their Macbook Air? Philflow MacBook Air 35 Dec 19, 2013 03:04 AM
Non-thunderbolt 27" (2560x1440) monitor for rMBP? walkie MacBook Pro 9 Nov 14, 2013 11:42 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC