Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old May 15, 2013, 12:26 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple Blames Book Publishers in E-Books Antitrust Lawsuit




Reuters is reporting that Apple has responded to the Justice Department's accusations that the company colluded with publishers to increase e-book pricing, saying that it negotiated with the publishers separately and reached different agreements with each.
Quote:
But Apple said the publishers had decided, independent of Apple, to eliminate discounts on wholesale book prices of e-books, to sell lucrative hardcover books first to bookstores in a practice called windowing and to take other measures to push Amazon to raise prices.
In a court filing dated April 26 but released on Tuesday, Apple said it had approached publishers to create an online bookstore that would eventually become the iBookstore and had demanded a 30 percent commission, that publishers would not undercut prices paid to Apple, and that "windowing" be scrapped.

Apple said that points of contention in early negotiations centered around Apple's demand for a 30 percent commission and price caps. Apple went on to note that each publisher immediately offered its own counterproposals in what Apple described as "tough negotiations."

The company also claims that before it entered the market the publishers were engaged in a battle to break Amazon's grip on the low-cost e-book market, with Apple laying the blame for any potential collusion on the publishers.

The lawsuit was originally filed in April 2012 and included HarperCollins, Simon and Schuster, Hachette Book Group, Macmillan and Penguin, but the Justice Deparment settled with the publishers and has since concentrated on Apple. Recently, CEO Tim Cook was ordered to testify in the case.

Article Link: Apple Blames Book Publishers in E-Books Antitrust Lawsuit
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 12:30 AM   #2
maxosx
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Southern California
Apple blames ___________

Fill in the blank with nearly anything & it would be appropriate
maxosx is offline   15 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 12:30 AM   #3
Jayse
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sydney, Australia
__________________
2012 13" Retina MacBook Pro 2.5GHz + iPhone 5 64GB
Jayse is offline   29 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 12:45 AM   #4
Schmitty11
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Today's forecast for MacRumors:

Mostly cloudy with a 100% chance of multiple lawsuit stories.
Schmitty11 is offline   19 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 12:46 AM   #5
EricNau
Moderator
 
EricNau's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: San Francisco, CA
Completely nonsensical. Amazon was paying publishers exactly what they asked for. It was Apple that demanded a different pricing model, and coerced publishers to use that model with all other resellers.
EricNau is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 01:05 AM   #6
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schmitty11 View Post
Today's forecast for MacRumors:

Mostly cloudy with a 100% chance of multiple lawsuit stories.
WWDC can't come soon enough.
__________________
"When we se something huge and powerful we aspire to make it small and meaningful." Jony Ive 
Rogifan is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 01:48 AM   #7
Mak47
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Harrisburg, PA
That title is a bit of an exaggeration. It sounds to me like Apple is responding to an inquiry with an account of events that transpired. How is that "blaming" someone?

The statement even says Apple started the negotiations off with their own list of revenue and policy requirements.

Apple may do their share of finger pointing, but that's not what's being described here at all.
Mak47 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 01:49 AM   #8
etrinh
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
::Yawns:: Slow news day
etrinh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 01:57 AM   #9
tdtran1025
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Eric Holder cannot threaten Apple for the evidence against Apple is weak. The blowback would be quite embarrassing. All Apple care about is $, the 30% cut. Coincidentally, the 8x10 ratio is perfect for nearly all txtbooks.
tdtran1025 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 02:11 AM   #10
mdelvecchio
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxosx View Post
Apple blames ___________

Fill in the blank with nearly anything & it would be appropriate
what on earth are you talking about?

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by EricNau View Post
Completely nonsensical. Amazon was paying publishers exactly what they asked for. It was Apple that demanded a different pricing model, and coerced publishers to use that model with all other resellers.
yeah except not really. the publishers were upset with amazon because amazon would discount the ebooks so deeply, devaluing both them and the hardcover editions. the publishers *liked* the agency model because they could set the price.
mdelvecchio is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 02:31 AM   #11
drorpheus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
^ your so gullible. the publishers dont have to sell anything unless the terms meet there needs. the agency model only helps apple. and the fact that theyre trying to place the blame on the publishers considering they didnt offer individual agreements with each publisher shows the collusion. Remeber Apple buys zero books to sell, Amazon buys all the books they sell. Another example of Apples greed and were better than everyone attitude. ohhh poor Apple somebody quick, get them a tax break.
drorpheus is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 02:31 AM   #12
MagnusVonMagnum
In Time-Out
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
It sounds like Apple was well aware of what the publishers' intents to set price-fixing was for (i.e. to try and break Amazon's market share grip) and Apple knowingly went right along with the pricing scheme despite the knowledge it was part of a plot to break Amazon's grip.

In other words, you don't have to be the creator of the idea for collusion in order to conspire with others to actually do it. "They made me do it" is not a good defense, IMO. Apple should have immediately approached the DOJ when it became clear there was a conspiracy to price-fix.

Of course, I think many gas stations (perhaps unspoken collusion of a sort) pretty much do the same thing and they get away with it so my own faith in these laws and the system is pretty weak. If you don't go along with the flow of the tide, you typically get dragged under and drown. In other words, how could Apple know they would pick this particular battle to fight when they typically ignore nearly all attempts to thwart competition in ways other than making the better product (i.e. competition)? If Apple rocked the boat, they would be out of the market segment. If they don't rock the boat, they risk getting picked up in the same legal raid as the publishers.

OTOH, Apple likes to dictate to ALL of its own distributors exactly what they are allowed to charge for their products and often punish (including removing from distribution) those that don't do it and offer sales of items they don't want to be sold for less than retail. So once again like with the legal battles where Apple is just as guilty of patent lawsuits, etc. as the rest, I don't feel sorry for Apple getting caught with its hand in the cookie jar.
MagnusVonMagnum is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 03:14 AM   #13
EbookReader
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Ebook before Apple: retail price competition

Ebook after Apple: no retail price competition.


At 25 seconds mark:

Quoting Steve Jobs "the price will be the same (everywhere)".


After the DOJ lawsuit and settlements: retail price competition





Retail price competition: prices are different at one seller compare to another. These retailers are competiting.

No retail price competition: prices are the same everywhere (fixed pricing).
EbookReader is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 03:41 AM   #14
Schwerpunkt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
The situation is not clear cut

You seem to imply that before the iBook store there was a competitive situation. Can't agree. Amazon was guilty of predatory pricing in my opinion and this in itself was anti trust. Now, I agree two wrongs don't make a right, but to sanction Apple for manipulating a "market" where it wasn't possible to profit from sales is wrong. If the anti trust bodies had sanctioned Amazon for its pricing policies, and a viable market had emerged, then there would have been no need for the publishers to try to protect themselves from being beholden to a single outlet.
Schwerpunkt is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 03:49 AM   #15
Dr McKay
macrumors 68040
 
Dr McKay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kirkland
Send a message via MSN to Dr McKay Send a message via Skype™ to Dr McKay
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayse View Post
Read the Motto.

News AND rumors. This qualifies as news. Would you rather that the site invent some rumors to start spreading?
__________________
Worth the weight
Dr McKay is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 03:59 AM   #16
EbookReader
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
http://www.washingtonpost.com/busine...767_story.html


In its pretrial arguments, Justice said publishers Hachette and HarperCollins came up with an “agency model” in which publishers rather than retailers would set the prices consumers would pay for e-books.

Cue played the key role, Justice documents contend. He summarized meetings with publishers for Apple’s late CEO, telling Jobs that publishers, “saw . . . the plus” of the agency model and that it “solves [the] Amazon issue,” Justice quoted him as saying.

The company also quoted Jobs as telling biographer Walter Isaacson that Apple had “told the publishers, ‘We’ll go the agency model, where you set the price, and we get our 30 percent, and yes, the customers pays a little more, but that’s what you want anyway.’ ”

Those statements, Justice said, demonstrated an illegal scheme that broke antitrust laws and harmed consumers.

“Apple knew that the plan it was proposing involved a ‘dramatic business change’ for publisher defendants,” Justice wrote in its arguments. “Accordingly, Apple kept each publisher defendant aware that it was orchestrating and coordinating a common approach for all of them.”

---------------------------------------------------------------

How would you feel if the manufacturers rather than the retailers setting the prices consumers would pay for TVs, fridge, laptops, Blu-Ray players, Blu-Ray movies etc...?
EbookReader is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:00 AM   #17
Schwerpunkt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
Predatory Pricing is Anti-Trust

Quote:
Originally Posted by MagnusVonMagnum View Post
It sounds like Apple was well aware of what the publishers' intents to set price-fixing was for (i.e. to try and break Amazon's market share grip) and Apple knowingly went right along with the pricing scheme despite the knowledge it was part of a plot to break Amazon's
So in order to compete with Amazon, Apple should have been prepared to match Amazon's price. Even though Amazon in many cases was selling at break-even or making a loss?

The game Amazon is playing is to go for growth and worry about profit later. Wall Street gets it: Amazon is priced for MASSIVE growth in the long term. They will do this by destroying competition and preventing competitors from entering the market. Once they achieve this, they will own the publishers and be able to strike any deal they desire. They will also be able to charge the reader whatever they like within reason.
Schwerpunkt is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:16 AM   #18
EbookReader
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwerpunkt View Post
You seem to imply that before the iBook store there was a competitive situation. Can't agree. Amazon was guilty of predatory pricing in my opinion and this in itself was anti trust. Now, I agree two wrongs don't make a right, but to sanction Apple for manipulating a "market" where it wasn't possible to profit from sales is wrong. If the anti trust bodies had sanctioned Amazon for its pricing policies, and a viable market had emerged, then there would have been no need for the publishers to try to protect themselves from being beholden to a single outlet.
How can Amazon be predatory pricing when it makes a profit from selling ebooks?

It's called a loss leader. Sell some popular books at cost or below cost, sell 95% of other ebooks at profit. End result: overall profits

Supermarkets have been doing this for decades.

Apple is using this "loss leader" pricing right now for its iBookstore on a few ebooks. Apple could have competed with Amazon on prices if it wanted to. Buy ebook at wholesale like Amazon did. Have a sale on a few popular titles and sell the rest at profits.

Apple is better suited to this strategy than Amazon since Apple is many times more profitable and have a bigger cash hoard.

But Apple wanted the 30% margin. Wholesale competition means the margin would be very tiny. Best way to get the 30% margin is to forced Amazon and B&N and other ebookstore to take the 30% margin too.

When retailers are guaranteed 30% margin and no price competition, who lose out? Consumers


That's why the publishers have agreed to pay something like $52 million in restitution for the ebook price fixing.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Schwerpunkt View Post
So in order to compete with Amazon, Apple should have been prepared to match Amazon's price. Even though Amazon in many cases was selling at break-even or making a loss?

The game Amazon is playing is to go for growth and worry about profit later. Wall Street gets it: Amazon is priced for MASSIVE growth in the long term. They will do this by destroying competition and preventing competitors from entering the market. Once they achieve this, they will own the publishers and be able to strike any deal they desire. They will also be able to charge the reader whatever they like within reason.
What law has Amazon broken in their quest to destroy competitions and preventing competitors from entering the market?

Amazon can't be guilty of what they haven't done yet. I.E. raising the price when they have a monopoly.

In fact, when Amazon have 90% of the ebook market and they jack up the price, buying it at $7 wholesale and selling at $12, what to prevent competitors like a guy in his garage can buy $7 wholesale and sell it at $9.

Amazon price: $12
Competitor price: $9


Look at Apple domination in digital music selling at $1.29.
Amazon competed buy selling a lot of popular songs at $0.99, less margin but increase market share. Some did switch from Itunes to AmazonMP3.

Last edited by EbookReader; May 15, 2013 at 04:11 AM.
EbookReader is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:18 AM   #19
Schwerpunkt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by EricNau View Post
Completely nonsensical. Amazon was paying publishers exactly what they asked for. It was Apple that demanded a different pricing model, and coerced publishers to use that model with all other resellers.
And once Amazon completely dominates the eBook market, will they still give the publishers what they ask for, or would they dictate terms?
Schwerpunkt is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:24 AM   #20
OLDCODGER
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lucky Country
Er .... this won't hurt the one dollar bargain bin, will it?
OLDCODGER is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:26 AM   #21
AppleMark
macrumors 6502a
 
AppleMark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The CCTV Capital of the World
iBook's is something I have yet to embrace anywhere near the level I use, music and iOS Apps..

I personally think there is still more value and comfort in reading real book's than eBooks. Good for travelling though, however with so many other things to do with an iOS device these day's reading often get's demoted..
__________________
Although I may not always reply to negative comments, this will not necessarily mean that I concede the point.
AppleMark is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:27 AM   #22
Schwerpunkt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by EbookReader View Post
What law has Amazon broken in their quest to destroy competitions and preventing competitors from entering the market?
.
That would be Anti-Trust law. Specifically predatory pricing by selling at a loss in order to dominate a market.
Schwerpunkt is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:40 AM   #23
Kattym
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Send a message via Skype™ to Kattym
Quote:
Originally Posted by maxosx View Post
Apple blames ___________

Fill in the blank with nearly anything & it would be appropriate
If Apple continues to suit with everyone, it will waste all the money on lawers )
Kattym is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:40 AM   #24
Schwerpunkt
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: May 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by EbookReader View Post

In fact, when Amazon have 90% of the ebook market and they jack up the price, buying it at $7 wholesale and selling at $12, what to prevent competitors like a guy in his garage can buy $7 wholesale and sell it at $9.
This would make little or no difference to Amazon with a 90% market share. In the same way that selling songs at 30 cheaper has made little or no difference to iTunes.
Schwerpunkt is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old May 15, 2013, 04:45 AM   #25
Jsameds
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jayse View Post
Oh grow up.
Jsameds is online now   2 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New E-book Antitrust Claims, from BooksOnBoard and the Diesel Books Successor macUser2007 Apple, Industry and Internet Discussion 6 Mar 31, 2014 11:03 AM
Publishers in E-Book Antitrust Case File Objection to DOJ's Proposed Punishment for Apple MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 106 Aug 13, 2013 02:41 PM
EU Antitrust Ruling Says Google Abusing Patent Position in German Lawsuit Against Apple MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 81 May 10, 2013 12:38 PM
Apple CEO Tim Cook Ordered to Testify in E-Books Antitrust Lawsuit MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 28 Mar 17, 2013 02:26 PM
Apple CEO Tim Cook 'May Testify' in E-Books Antitrust Lawsuit MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 70 Mar 11, 2013 07:39 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:43 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC