Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:35 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Time Warner Cable in Talks with Apple on Streaming Video Deals




According to Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt, who spoke to investors at the Bank of America Merill Lynch Global Telecom and Media Conference today (via FierceCable), Time Warner is in talks with Apple, Microsoft, and Samsung over potential streaming video deals that are similar to its existing partnership with Roku.

Time Warner Cable brought its authenticated cable service, TWC TV, to Roku in March. With the app, Time Warner Cable subscribers are able to watch up to 300 live TV channels with any TV connected to a Roku device, without the need for a cable box. Time Warner has a similar deal with Samsung to deliver cable programming to its connected TVs.

Quote:
"You should assume we're talking to everyone who makes devices like this, whether it's Samsung smart TVs, Apple, Microsoft," Britt said at the Bank of America Merrill Lynch Global Telecom and Media conference. Britt's remarks suggest Time Warner Cable may eventually offer the TWC TV app through the Apple TV set-top and Microsoft's new Xbox One gaming console, which will debut later this year.
Apple recently struck a deal with the CW network to bring content to the Apple TV through a dedicated CW app, and it appears that Apple is open to other deals that could potentially bring the TWC TV to the Apple TV. Presumably, such an app would function similarly to the version offered via Roku, allowing Time Warner Cable subscribers to use the Apple TV to stream live television channels.

Britt's comments confirm a Wall Street Journal report from last year, which suggested that Apple was working on deals to create a set-top box that would allow user to view live cable channels.

Such deals with cable companies are necessary if Apple wants to expand its product lineup with additional TV-centric products like the "iTV," which has been rumored to be in the works since 2011. At the D11 conference last week, Apple CEO Tim Cook reiterated that television continues to be an "area of great interest" for the company.

Article Link: Time Warner Cable in Talks with Apple on Streaming Video Deals
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:37 PM   #2
Tiger8
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
I'm glad Apple is catching up with Roku's concepts
Tiger8 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:40 PM   #3
Mad Mac Maniac
macrumors 68040
 
Mad Mac Maniac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: A little bit of here and a little bit of there.
I'm ready for Apple to deliver something great for the TV... I'm just hoping they can.
__________________
Now I have a Signature!
Mad Mac Maniac is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:42 PM   #4
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Image


According to Time Warner Cable CEO Glenn Britt, who spoke to investors at the Bank of America Merill Lynch Global Telecom and Media Conference today (via FierceCable), Time Warner is in talks with Apple, Microsoft, and Samsung over potential streaming video deals that are similar to its existing partnership with Roku.

Time Warner Cable brought its authenticated cable service, TWC TV, to Roku in March. With the app, Time Warner Cable subscribers are able to watch up to 300 live TV channels with any TV connected to a Roku device, without the need for a cable box. Time Warner has a similar deal with Samsung to deliver cable programming to its connected TVs.

Apple recently struck a deal with the CW network to bring content to the Apple TV through a dedicated CW app, and it appears that Apple is open to other deals that could potentially bring the TWC TV to the Apple TV. Presumably, such an app would function similarly to the version offered via Roku, allowing Time Warner Cable subscribers to use the Apple TV to stream live television channels.

Britt's comments confirm a Wall Street Journal report from last year, which suggested that Apple was working on deals to create a set-top box that would allow user to view live cable channels.

Such deals with cable companies are necessary if Apple wants to expand its product lineup with additional TV-centric products like the "iTV," which has been rumored to be in the works since 2011. At the D11 conference last week, Apple CEO Tim Cook reiterated that television continues to be an "area of great interest" for the company.

Article Link: Time Warner Cable in Talks with Apple on Streaming Video Deals
Fantastic headline. I'm sure it will get lots of clicks. As the quote says - one should assume (and don't we already anyway) that if TWC is talking about streaming services - they are talking to the likes of Microsoft, Samsung, Apple, etc

Also - the press should stop referring to it as iTV.
samcraig is online now   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:42 PM   #5
barkomatic
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Manhattan
Ok, so what am I missing? It seems like the only benefit to the TWC app is that you can avoid renting an additional set top box if you've got an Apple TV to stream from right? Otherwise, you have to be a TWC subscriber already and probably can't use the app on an iPad outside of your home wifi network. Snooze.
barkomatic is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:43 PM   #6
basesloaded190
macrumors 68030
 
basesloaded190's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to basesloaded190
Not sure what the point of this would be if you still need to sign up for the same cable package. If they offered a streaming only package for cheaper, then you have something.
basesloaded190 is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:43 PM   #7
Ajones330
macrumors 6502a
 
Ajones330's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: SEC Country
I wonder will we see a iTV sometime this year. Could be that time to introduce it into the wild...
__________________
There is nothing so useless as doing efficiently that which should not be done at all.~Peter F. Drucker

13" MBP l 13" MB l iPhone 5S Gold Jailbroken 64GB l
Ajones330 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:44 PM   #8
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by barkomatic View Post
Ok, so what am I missing? It seems like the only benefit to the TWC app is that you can avoid renting an additional set top box if you've got an Apple TV to stream from right? Otherwise, you have to be a TWC subscriber already and probably can't use the app on an iPad outside of your home wifi network. Snooze.
It's not terribly exciting other than it might save you a few box of a box rental. And one less remote/etc.

But overall - it's not "magical."
samcraig is online now   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:46 PM   #9
Porco
macrumors 68000
 
Porco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Such deals with cable companies are necessary if Apple wants to expand its product lineup with additional TV-centric products like the "iTV,"


In case no-one has said this before , it won't be called that.

And people will keep saying this every time those three letters are used together in every article about Apple and television. I'm boring myself even typing this.
__________________
I really wish Apple would use the option key a little more, and the command key a little less.
*soundcloud/fdporco*
Porco is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:46 PM   #10
GoCubsGo
macrumors Nehalem
 
GoCubsGo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
If there is something worked out where we can finally get live TV or something streaming where we can have our content without having to use a Time Warner box, I may be inclined to use them again myself.

What they will need to do is ensure pricing is right. I'm not paying $80 for cable alone (after any introductory price expires) and then pay for streaming content.

I want NFL Sunday Ticket and what is available on Hulu, minus movies.
__________________
Because I'm a smartass.
GoCubsGo is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:47 PM   #11
thelink
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mad Mac Maniac View Post
I'm ready for Apple to deliver something great for the TV... I'm just hoping they can.
Oh, they can.... at the cost of $6000+ for the consumer.
thelink is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:49 PM   #12
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelink View Post
Oh, they can.... at the cost of $6000+ for the consumer.
I imagine even at that price - and even if some people JUST bought a TV - they would still run out and shout "shut up and take my money"
samcraig is online now   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:54 PM   #13
Jeaz
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
No, I think they are going at this the wrong way. You can't win over the TV-market by making the deals with CW, Warner or anyone. On the biggest problem is that any deals you make are A) Temporary and B) local.
Even if the US is a big market and probably Apples main focus, it's a small part of the global market.

Instead, release an app store, have the same rules as everywhere else. 30% cut on subscription fees. The big ones will resist at first, with enough customers on the AppleTV, they'll come around.
Jeaz is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 02:55 PM   #14
bbeagle
macrumors 65816
 
bbeagle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Buffalo, NY
Quote:
Originally Posted by basesloaded190 View Post
Not sure what the point of this would be if you still need to sign up for the same cable package. If they offered a streaming only package for cheaper, then you have something.
The only point would be if the interface of the Apple TV was better than the interface of Time Warner's boxes. Your choice would be to rent Time Warner's boxes for like $10/month or buy a $99 Apple TV. (Similar to the choice users have now with Tivo vs Time Warner's boxes)
bbeagle is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:01 PM   #15
fa8362
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
I don't need or want any of it. I pay $8 per month for Netflix and nothing for TV, since it's free with cable internet.
fa8362 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:02 PM   #16
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiger8 View Post
I'm glad Apple is catching up with Roku's concepts
Allegedly.

For all we know, Time Warner came to the table and said "hey we'll be happy to let you add our Time Warner TV to your service." and Apple countered. "No thanks, we want you let folks subscribe directly to HBO and such via the existing apps. Without needing cable. Oh and stop making folks wait for a zillion months to get legal downloads for Warners stuff."
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )
charlituna is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:03 PM   #17
ConCat
Banned
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: In an ethereal plane of existence.
Quote:
Originally Posted by samcraig View Post
Also - the press should stop referring to it as iTV.
Seriously. iTV is already taken guys! There's a reason they called it the Apple TV, a name that doesn't jive with the vast majority of their products. They simply couldn't use iTV.

As an alternative, how about we call it "Apple Television" from now on? You know... A generic term for a television made by Apple. Sounds good to me!

Of course there's also iTube (probably not since this is more of a reference to the vacuum tubes of old...), iWatch (works for a television, but works better for a watch. Who knows.), iStream (maybe...) or iVision (actually sounds quite nice).

Last edited by ConCat; Jun 4, 2013 at 03:27 PM.
ConCat is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:04 PM   #18
abbstrack
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
so according to this article, apple isn't looking to innovate in the TV space, but rather be a 'me too' company.

no thanks. i'm trying to cut cable, not switch set top boxes.
abbstrack is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:08 PM   #19
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
p.s. you can tell how old these rumors have gone on by the image that gets reused and what was a "top movie"
samcraig is online now   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:14 PM   #20
Risco
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: United Kingdom
No love for UK....
__________________
15" Macbook Pro 2012, 2.3ghz, 8GB Ram, 256GB SSD | iPhone 5s 32GB Space Grey
Risco is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:22 PM   #21
mic j
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Where would iTunes be today if you had to buy the cd before you could download the music to listen to?

If these are the type deals Apple is spending it's time negotiating, they need to get a clue! Wow...I get to eliminate a cable box!!
__________________
17" MBP '09, 2.66 GHz, 8GB RAM; 13" MBP (Retina) '12, 2.5GHz, 8GB RAM; iPad 2, 32GB; AE; TV 3; AEBS w 1TB Seagate HDD; 65" Mits DLP, Sony STR-DB1070 AVR
mic j is online now   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:23 PM   #22
Patriot24
macrumors 68000
 
Patriot24's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Just getting cable companies to give up their grip on hardware would be a great step in the right direction. Maybe they are starting to acknowledge that they don't need to be in the hardware business.
__________________
iphone + air + ipad + time capsule + classic + shuffle + tv
Patriot24 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:23 PM   #23
MacLawyer
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Uh, oh!

Comcast, Cox, and the rest won't like this at all!
__________________
It's a trap!
MacLawyer is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:32 PM   #24
samcraig
macrumors G5
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConCat View Post
Seriously. iTV is already taken guys! There's a reason they called it the Apple TV, a name that doesn't jive with the vast majority of their products. They simply couldn't use iTV.

As an alternative, how about we call it "Apple Television" from now on? You know... A generic term for a television made by Apple. Sounds good to me!

Of course there's also iTube (probably not since this is more of a reference to the vacuum tubes of old...), iWatch (works for a television, but works better for a watch. Who knows.), iStream (maybe...) or iVision (actually sounds quite nice).
I'll add in iScreen
samcraig is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 4, 2013, 03:36 PM   #25
JayCee842
macrumors 6502a
 
JayCee842's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
I see no point in any of this. Just bring me my damn TV already!
JayCee842 is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Introducing New Apple TV Box in April for Holiday Launch, Still Talking With Time Warner Cable MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 150 Feb 22, 2014 05:31 PM
Time Warner Cable app rbcp Apple TV and Home Theater 7 Jan 12, 2014 08:30 PM
Apple Close to Completing Apple TV Deal with Time Warner Cable MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 232 Aug 25, 2013 04:58 PM
Time Warner Cable Brings Live TV Streaming On the Go to iOS MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 25 May 13, 2013 12:41 PM
Time Warner Willing to Cede Control of User Interface in Potential Deals for Apple TV Products MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 83 Sep 24, 2012 01:47 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:28 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC