Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 20, 2002, 02:46 AM   #1
rainman::|:|
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: iowa
Send a message via Yahoo to rainman::|:|
Yet again; proposed internet monitoring

Well, the Bush administration is at it again, this time preparing to propose requirements to ISPs that enable the government, through a national center, to monitor the internet.

http://www.nytimes.com/2002/12/20/te...gy/20MONI.html
(free registration required)

I can imagine most of your opinions, but let's hear what you have to say i, for one, think this is a step in quite the wrong direction - Sure the 'net isn't perfect, but the thought of a virtual (no pun intended) gestapo running wild gives me the creeps beyond anything hackers, pornographers, and yes even terrorists can do on it--

pnw
rainman::|:| is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 03:53 AM   #2
Megaquad
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
I thought they already monitor this? Anyway they will be catching only terrorists and hardcore hackers, right? So whats the problem?
Megaquad is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 06:42 AM   #3
Wes
macrumors 68020
 
Wes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Send a message via ICQ to Wes Send a message via AIM to Wes Send a message via MSN to Wes Send a message via Yahoo to Wes
Quote:
Originally posted by Megaquad
I thought they already monitor this? Anyway they will be catching only terrorists and hardcore hackers, right? So whats the problem?
I bet they've been doing it for years, but they are just saying this so they can go public.
Wes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 08:44 AM   #4
Megaquad
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Quote:
Originally posted by W-_-W


I bet they've been doing it for years, but they are just saying this so they can go public.
Or we are just a bit too paranoid
Megaquad is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 08:49 AM   #5
dricci
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Let's let the government take away our last form of free communication.

If you want people watching your activity online, that's fine, but I don't. I think the government can find better things to use time and money for.

What's next? USE WINDOWS OR THE TERRORISTS HAVE WON!
dricci is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 10:49 AM   #6
zarathustra
macrumors 6502a
 
zarathustra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Quote:
Originally posted by dricci
Let's let the government take away our last form of free communication.

If you want people watching your activity online, that's fine, but I don't. I think the government can find better things to use time and money for.

What's next? USE WINDOWS OR THE TERRORISTS HAVE WON!
Feel a bit melodramatic? Considering that most adequate hackers/comp geeks can trace, intercept and otherwise follow information on the internet, you don't feel concerned about that?

While I don't think that they want to "control" the internet, monitoring does you no harm if you are doing nothing illegal...
zarathustra is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 11:25 AM   #7
diorio
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Honestly, nobody has anything to worry about if they're not doing anything illegal.
diorio is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 11:39 AM   #8
pgwalsh
macrumors 68000
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Send a message via Yahoo to pgwalsh
The government wants to monitor the Internet like they do the phone lines. They're only looking for keywords in text. A certain number of keywords combined in a paragraph will popup an alert.
pgwalsh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 12:11 PM   #9
Wes
macrumors 68020
 
Wes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Send a message via ICQ to Wes Send a message via AIM to Wes Send a message via MSN to Wes Send a message via Yahoo to Wes
Quote:
Originally posted by pgwalsh
The government wants to monitor the Internet like they do the phone lines. They're only looking for keywords in text. A certain number of keywords combined in a paragraph will popup an alert.
That's going to be a hard thing to do.

The words: Bin Laden, crash, aeroplane, kill, bush.

Could just be:
Person 1: I wonder how long until they catch that Bin Laden dude.
Person 2: Hey my grandmother was in a car crash!
Person 1: Was she killed?
Person 2: No, just a little shaken up, the other person was distracted by an aeroplane going over.
Person 1: Did she hit anything?
Person 2: Just a bush.

A little far-fetched, but not easy.
Wes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 12:36 PM   #10
Rower_CPU
Moderator emeritus
 
Rower_CPU's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: San Diego, CA
What makes the gov't think that terrorists communicating in this fashion wouldn't use a code of some sort...or that they'd even communicate in English for that matter?

*goes back to work at underfunded educational facility for foreign language instruction*
__________________
Join MacRumors.com - Team Folding!
Rower_CPU is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 12:57 PM   #11
Wes
macrumors 68020
 
Wes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Send a message via ICQ to Wes Send a message via AIM to Wes Send a message via MSN to Wes Send a message via Yahoo to Wes
I saw a show a while ago detailing how the terrorists could stay without being detected using those digital monitoring programs. One way was, using a text editor to look at a jpeg and to view all the code that gets the picture to show up. Then you can add text in without effecting the image. This image can then be sent, and the receiver can open it in a similar program to reveal the message. They demonstrated this method and it seemed rather easy to do.
Wes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 01:51 PM   #12
Mblazened
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: The Valley
Send a message via AIM to Mblazened
SCARY!

Quote:
Originally posted by diorio
Honestly, nobody has anything to worry about if they're not doing anything illegal.
What about privacy? I don't really want the government watching over my shoulder as I dredge the net for hardcore porn. What about when I research information on drugs i'm about to experiment with? Some activities are illegal even when they shouldn't be.

This is like granting the power of God over people's digital lifestyles. Internal Intelligence at this scale has never existed before; who knows how it will be wielded. If knowledge is power, then omniscience is omnipotence.

SCARY!
__________________
Animator, Illustrator, Artist: www.maxforward.com
Mblazened is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 02:11 PM   #13
pgwalsh
macrumors 68000
 
pgwalsh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado Springs, Colorado
Send a message via Yahoo to pgwalsh
Re: SCARY!

Quote:
Originally posted by Mblazened


What about privacy? I don't really want the government watching over my shoulder as I dredge the net for hardcore porn. What about when I research information on drugs i'm about to experiment with? Some activities are illegal even when they shouldn't be.

This is like granting the power of God over people's digital lifestyles. Internal Intelligence at this scale has never existed before; who knows how it will be wielded. If knowledge is power, then omniscience is omnipotence.

SCARY!
The government doesn't care if you're into porn. They can't use that against you and why would they. Are participating in illegal activity against the US? However if you were into kiddy porn then I hope they do put you away.
pgwalsh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 02:33 PM   #14
MrMacMan
macrumors 601
 
MrMacMan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: 1 Block away from NYC.
Send a message via AIM to MrMacMan
Re: Re: SCARY!

Quote:
Originally posted by Mblazened


What about privacy? I don't really want the government watching over my shoulder as I dredge the net for hardcore porn. What about when I research information on drugs i'm about to experiment with? Some activities are illegal even when they shouldn't be.

This is like granting the power of God over people's digital lifestyles. Internal Intelligence at this scale has never existed before; who knows how it will be wielded. If knowledge is power, then omniscience is omnipotence.

SCARY!
Well you see the goverment likes to know what your doing every day. Did you have a bad day? Maybe a good day, did he give exact change or not enough.
Is he a good person?
Does he like to look at pron when he is mad or happy, does he have friends, is he single, married, kids?
This is all one big system.
Ah, some of you might remember I said i was being personally taped, well I still am and it seems I have a 'yellow flag' on me which means any gov't office should stop me if I have more than a wallet on me.

Quote:
Originally posted by pgwalsh

The government doesn't care if you're into porn. They can't use that against you and why would they. Are participating in illegal activity against the US? However if you were into kiddy porn then I hope they do put you away.
Anyways... This means they can Monitor you, I don't belive they can use it in a Case Against you, they need warents and maybe hard proof.
Besides, WHO WATCHING KIDDY PORN.
[Warning The Dept. Of Homeland security is now monitoring this Topic]
__________________
There is a little Steve in all of us!
-->Folding is Fighting Against Disease and help MacRumors. Join Today!<--
Props to --> Shadowfax For Making My Avatar!
IM Me On AIM Already!
MrMacMan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 05:19 PM   #15
whfsdude
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Washington DC USA
Send a message via AIM to whfsdude Send a message via Skype™ to whfsdude
If this happens I am going to go walk down to the capitol and throw my own poop @ senators.

I wonder if I would make the evening news? ;-)
whfsdude is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 06:19 PM   #16
alex_ant
Banned
 
alex_ant's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: All up in your bidness
Anyone who thinks internet monitoring is a good idea should read 1984, because you obviously haven't yet.
alex_ant is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 06:26 PM   #17
Wes
macrumors 68020
 
Wes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: London
Send a message via ICQ to Wes Send a message via AIM to Wes Send a message via MSN to Wes Send a message via Yahoo to Wes
Quote:
Originally posted by alex_ant
Anyone who thinks internet monitoring is a good idea should read 1984, because you obviously haven't yet.
I really should read that book! I hear so much about it, but have never read it. Sounds a bit like Minority Report.
Wes is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 06:48 PM   #18
OutThere
macrumors 603
 
OutThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
Well, if you have nothing to hide then the government can watch all they want and you will have no way of knowing it, but the fact that they would be watching everything and you would have knowledge of it poses some serious moral issues. Just imagine sending IM's to your girlfriend and having some guy hunched over a computer watching everything you say. There would be nothing to stop him from watching your love-infused conversation stream by on his screen. He would be legally there to watch everything on the internet, in search of suspicious activities, but as someone mentioned (sorry, i didn't remember who you were and didn't want to lose everything I had written) terrorists could post a picture of their favorite car in that post and encode secret messages to their fellow evil-doers. Would someone monitoring the router that it passed through suspect that there was anything going on. I think not. There are so many Jpeg images on the internet that the government could never possibly monitor all of the image traffic for suspicious coding. Unless we have elected some very strange congressmen, I believe that the opinion of the general public will be to turn down this proposal, and that the congressman should support the views of the public and turn down this proposal.

Thats My 2
__________________
puisqu'on est jeune et con, puisqu'ils sont vieux et fous. . .
OutThere is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 20, 2002, 06:51 PM   #19
OutThere
macrumors 603
 
OutThere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: NYC
In addition to my last post...what happened to the "less government in our lives" that GWB peddled in his campaign. If this were to go through this would be a major breach of his "Philosophy."
__________________
puisqu'on est jeune et con, puisqu'ils sont vieux et fous. . .
OutThere is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 04:54 AM   #20
cr2sh
macrumors 68030
 
cr2sh's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: downtown
Quote:
Originally posted by zarathustra
monitoring does you no harm if you are doing nothing illegal...
That's a very idealistic point of view.

If I'm doing nothing illegal they have no reason to be watching me. They're watching me because they're assuming I'm going to be breakign the law. I'm guilty already, all they need is evidence. Is this what a government is suppossed to do?
__________________

MBP (early' 11/2.2/16GB/500GB/hi-res-ag)
cr2sh is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 08:52 AM   #21
rainman::|:|
Thread Starter
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: iowa
Send a message via Yahoo to rainman::|:|
Quote:
Originally posted by pgwalsh
The government wants to monitor the Internet like they do the phone lines. They're only looking for keywords in text. A certain number of keywords combined in a paragraph will popup an alert.
They're already doing *this*, it's an FBI project called Predator (hunts out the "meat" from the rest), they want to take it further and have an actual center full of employees reading our email, monitoring websites, hell eventually hacking our computers ("for our own good")... Thx guys for backing me up, you don't have to be breaking the law to enjoy privacy, history shows us that WHEREVER the government gets involved, bad things happen. Would you people want the gov't going through your postal mail? then why your email? I'm no gov't conspiracy nut, but this is inevitably the first step towards censorship...

Why is it when another country tries to take away our freedom, thousands of men and women are ready to lay down their lives to prevent it, yet when this happens you people roll out the red carpet? My god, some of you people don't have any clue what freedom you enjoy...


pnw
rainman::|:| is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 04:43 PM   #22
Chef Ramen
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
its actually called carnivore. and its not powerful enough to scan the ENTIRE internet. TIA will try to accopmlish this.

you may not be looking at kiddy porn or downloading warez, but what if you're badmouthing Bush or the gov't in general? Bush himself said "Dissent is treason." So if somebody talks bad about him, they could be tried for treason doesnt that BOTHER you??

i hope you all remember what ari fleischer had to say

"watch what you say"
Chef Ramen is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 04:45 PM   #23
solvs
macrumors 601
 
solvs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: LaLaLand, CA
Who says you have to be doing something illegal for it to be private? I don't want the government to be watching me no matter what I'm doing. Next they'll have camera's in our bathrooms (didn't you guys see the Daily Show the other day?). Maybe we're being paranoid, but this how it starts. Pretty soon you have a police state where even the innocent are not safe.

And it's not "the government". It's a bunch of people working for the government. Do you trust some strange person watching you, judging you? Monitoring what you do? If you don't care, think about it for a second. You might start to realize how creepy it is (unless your voyeuristic or something).

Then they're telling you what to do, how to do it, how to think, what to believe. Don't think it could happen? Anyone heard of Iraq? Anyone notice when someone is accused of something in this country, especially if it's broadcast on the news, they're automatically assumed guilty. People believe what they hear. Read 1984. It's a pretty scary thing, but mostly because of how easily it could happen.

Anyone heard of Nazi Germany?

America is supposed to be about freedom. Innocence before being proven guilty. It doesn't always work, but "give me liberty, or give me death". When we start to give up our freedoms for our safety, we really begin to lose sight of what this country suposed to be all about. People should be more p*ssed about this.

Besides, I prefer KITTY porn:
Attached Images
 
__________________
True love never dies
The only thing more dangerous than a woman scorned, is a man with nothing left to lose...
solvs is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 06:41 PM   #24
dreamlance
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: wouldn't you like to know?
Send a message via AIM to dreamlance
Quote:
Originally posted by Megaquad
I thought they already monitor this? Anyway they will be catching only terrorists and hardcore hackers, right? So whats the problem?
If Bush said "Dissent is treason," and you didn't agree with his tactics, where is the line drawn between free speech and dissent? Solvs is right in saying "this is how it starts." Change doesn't occur in miles, it starts in inches. You give up one, and another, until you've headed over a mile. Monitoring me is an invasion of privacy, whether I'm doing something illegal or not, because my life is my business, not theirs. Monitoring assumes that I have done something of suspicion. I thought we were all innocent until proven guilty.

Quote:
Originally posted by OutThere761
In addition to my last post...what happened to the "less government in our lives" that GWB peddled in his campaign. If this were to go through this would be a major breach of his "Philosophy."
Honeyed words said during a campaign are no promise that the leader will stick to them. Unfortunately.

Quote:
Originally posted by dricci
I think the government can find better things to use time and money for.
Agreed.
dreamlance is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 21, 2002, 10:17 PM   #25
pianojoe
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: N 49.50121 E008.54558
Send a message via AIM to pianojoe
principiis obsta
pianojoe is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Current Events

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
A Proposed G5 SSD Setup robertdsc PowerPC Macs 24 Mar 2, 2014 06:47 PM
Web Proxy, VPN and Internet Data Monitoring via OD fotoruss Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 0 Dec 5, 2013 02:48 AM
Resolved: Proposed Setup / Workflow Macman45 Digital Audio 4 Aug 31, 2013 02:15 AM
Internet monitoring philstone Mac OS X Server, Xserve, and Networking 3 Mar 4, 2013 05:48 AM
Proposed Mechanism for the Cycloramic App... switon iPhone Tips, Help and Troubleshooting 0 Jan 27, 2013 09:52 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:20 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC