Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 1, 2013, 07:42 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple to Build Solar Panel Farm for Reno Data Center




Apple is planning to work with Nevada utility company NV Energy to build a solar panel farm next to its Reno data center, reports GigaOM. Like the company's two other solar farms located in North Carolina, the Reno solar farm will provide between 18 and 20 MW of power and will be built by solar company SunPower.

The Reno site will incorporate the SunPower Oasis C7 system, which includes a set of parabolic mirrors to reflect sunlight onto solar cell receivers, "concentrating the sun's energy by 7 times."

An Early Image of Apple's Reno Data Center
Apple's solar farm plans were approved on June 12 by the Nevada state utility commission, and under the terms, Apple has the option to expand the solar farm in the future. While the farm is under construction, Apple will use local geothermal power to run its Reno data center, continuing its commitment to clean energy.
Quote:
All of Apple's data centers use 100 percent renewable energy, and we are on track to meet that goal in our new Reno data center using the latest in high-efficiency concentrating solar panels. This project will not only supply renewable energy for our data center but also provide clean energy to the local power grid, through a first-of-its-kind partnership with NV Energy. When completed, the 137 acre solar array will generate approximately 43.5 million kilowatt hours of clean energy, equivalent to taking 6,400 passenger vehicles off the road per year.
Apple first announced that all of its data centers run on 100% renewable energy back in March, with its corporate facilities running on 75% clean energy.*According to Apple's environmental policy pages, the company has decreased its greenhouse gas emissions by 21.5 percent since 2008 and estimated itself to be responsible for 30.9 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions in 2012.

Article Link: Apple to Build Solar Panel Farm for Reno Data Center
MacRumors is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 07:43 PM   #2
Asclepio
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Provided by Darpa
Asclepio is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 07:52 PM   #3
DonutHands
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
these data centers dont look anything like ios 7. gotta jonny ive em up.
DonutHands is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 07:57 PM   #4
bkushner
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
I thought server farms work best in cool climates.
bkushner is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:06 PM   #5
acorntoy
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkushner View Post
I thought server farms work best in cool climates.
They work best wherever it's cheapest to run them.
acorntoy is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:06 PM   #6
Schmitty11
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2011
Still looks like some Area 51/NSA type facility thats very existence is denied.
Schmitty11 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:15 PM   #7
SilianRail
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Looks like the Breaking Bad chicken farm.

SilianRail is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:17 PM   #8
MacDav
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkushner View Post
I thought server farms work best in cool climates.
They work best in highly air conditioned buildings. Yes it's easier to keep buildings cool in cool climates. However, since the big air conditioners will be powered by solar it's cool. I'm sure they got a great deal partnering with Reno NV. energy also.
MacDav is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:20 PM   #9
SJism23
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by SilianRail View Post
Looks like the Breaking Bad chicken farm.

Image
Maybe Mr. Fring runs these "data centres," too.
__________________
15" MacBook Pro (early 2011), 2.0 GHz i7, 16GB RAM; iPad 4, 32 GB; iPhone 6 Plus, 128GB
SJism23 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:21 PM   #10
DTphonehome
macrumors 65816
 
DTphonehome's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: NYC
But where will they fit them in such a densely built up area?
DTphonehome is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:24 PM   #11
york2600
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Quote:
Originally Posted by bkushner View Post
I thought server farms work best in cool climates.
A cool climate is ideal, but when you plan a datacenter there's other concerns that are often more important.

Connectivity: There's a lot of network providers for Apple to peer with in NV. I had equipment in Switch in Vegas and they peered with about two dozen different providers giving you low latency connectivity to a large populous.

Power: The cost of power is huge in a datacenter. If you're generating it yourself this obviously isn't as important, but most datacenters are not self powered (especially not at night). This is why you pay more for EC2 systems in California vs. Virginia or Oregon in Amazon

Taxing: I'm sure Apple is paying no property taxes here, but they also need a location that has no sales tax and doesn't include the cost of the servers in the property tax structure. That was a key point in locating in Oregon for Google/, Apple, and Facebook.
york2600 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:50 PM   #12
bacaramac
macrumors 65816
 
bacaramac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Is the solar farm like the movie Sahara??
__________________
iMac 27" 3.06Ghz 2TB Time Capsule and AP Express Current Gen AppleTV x 3 iPhone 5s Space Gray 16Gb iPod Touch 4th Gen White iPad mini White/Silver 16GB WiFi
bacaramac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 08:55 PM   #13
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
.....According to Apple's environmental policy pages, the company has decreased its greenhouse gas emissions by 21.5 percent since 2008 and estimated itself to be responsible for 30.9 million metric tons of greenhouse gas emissions in 2012.
Hard to grasp how they can even approximate these 'estimates' with any degree of reality. These are indeed estimates, at best.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
.....Apple's solar farm plans were approved on June 12 by the Nevada state utility commission, and under the terms, Apple has the option to expand the solar farm in the future. While the farm is under construction, Apple will use local geothermal power to run its Reno data center, continuing its commitment to clean energy.....This project will not only supply renewable energy for our data center but also provide clean energy to the local power grid, through a first-of-its-kind partnership with NV Energy.

Article Link: Apple to Build Solar Panel Farm for Reno Data Center
Using their acquired knowledge now for broader community applications? Of course, it's not as altruistic as it sounds, but still, it's hard to find fault with the overall concept. Building solar capacity in a sunny state like Nevada, and with the pre-approved option of future expansion, as well as being geared towards future growth, is a sound move by APPLE, and to be applauded. Their energy needs for the foreseeable future are guaranteed, while being able to sell current overcapacity to Nevada's NV Energy. It's a foregone conclusion that APPLE will be generating lots more energy during the day than they'll be drawing from the grid at night. At the rate cities like Vegas are growing, NV Energy could use all the extra capacity they can get.
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....
macs4nw is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:02 PM   #14
appleisking
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2013
Awesome. Now if we just plant 10,000,000 of these, we'll solve the world's energy needs

----------

[QUOTE=macs4nw;17521296]Hard to grasp how they can even approximate these 'estimates' with any degree of reality. These are indeed estimates, at best.

Actually it's really not that tough, obviously they are estimates but they are very close ones at that. Combustion of certain hydrocarbons releases these greenhouse gases, so what you need to know is an approximate usage of whatever they're using by weight (oil prob for plastic and other materials and some other stuff), and they'll know how much they are emitting by weight of carbon and other greenhouse gases based on combustion formulas.
appleisking is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:14 PM   #15
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleisking View Post
Awesome. Now if we just plant 10,000,000 of these, we'll solve the world's energy needs
That, or nuclear fusion. Hurry up CERN. Just don't blow up the universe in the process, lol
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....
macs4nw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:24 PM   #16
appleisking
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by macs4nw View Post
That, or nuclear fusion. Hurry up CERN. Just don't blow up the universe in the process, lol
lol fusion is actually 100% safe. It's fission that leads to nuclear disasters like chernobyl and Japan.
appleisking is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:27 PM   #17
cclloyd
macrumors 68000
 
cclloyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Alpha Centauri A
Area 51.
__________________
iPhone 5 Sprint w/ iOS 7.0.4 Jailbroken
iPad mini Retina w/ iOS 7.0.4 Jailbroken
MacBook Pro Retina Early 2013
cclloyd is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:29 PM   #18
milbournosphere
macrumors 6502a
 
milbournosphere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: San Diego, CA
It kinda looks like they bought Warehouse 13. There must be an iPod with Steve's reality distortion field in there somewhere.

__________________
Russian roulette linux style : dd if=/dev/urandom of=/dev/kmem bs=1 count=1 seek=$RANDOM
milbournosphere is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 09:33 PM   #19
Ralf The Dog
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleisking View Post
lol fusion is actually 100% safe. It's fission that leads to nuclear disasters like chernobyl and Japan.
Until they rip a hole in space and it eats the planet.

********

Now all Apple needs is a 500 foot coat hanger and the worlds largest Marshmallow.
Ralf The Dog is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 10:04 PM   #20
Solomani
macrumors 68000
 
Solomani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Maybe Apple is building a secret nuclear enrichment facility. It would make Iran's Bushehr nuclear facility look like child's play.
Solomani is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 10:07 PM   #21
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Quote:
Originally Posted by appleisking View Post
lol fusion is actually 100% safe. It's fission that leads to nuclear disasters like chernobyl and Japan.
I am aware of the non-polluting qualities of nuclear fusion. I was referring to the uncharted territories that the Large Hadron Collider is 'wading' into. There is that great unknown factor that even respected nuclear physicists have expressed reservations about, when particle accelerators start smashing atoms into each other.

One consolation, our demise will be superfast!
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....
macs4nw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 10:30 PM   #22
AidenShaw
macrumors G5
 
AidenShaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: The Peninsula
Quote:
Originally Posted by macs4nw View Post
I am aware of the non-polluting qualities of nuclear fusion. I was referring to the uncharted territories that the Large Hadron Collider is 'wading' into. There is that great unknown factor that even respected nuclear physicists have expressed reservations about, when particle accelerators start smashing atoms into each other.

One consolation, our demise will be superfast!
The LHC does not smash atoms.

As the name might suggest, it smashes hadrons.

Fail.

(And, it's a large collider that smashes hadrons, not a collider that smashes large hadrons. Although that point is not so clear for Alice.)
__________________
Edward Snowden - American Hero.
Daniel Ellsberg: "Edward Snowden: Saving Us from the United Stasi of America"
Marriage equality is unstoppable
AidenShaw is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 10:31 PM   #23
iMikeT
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: California
Is that where Siri lives?
iMikeT is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 10:52 PM   #24
phoenixsan
macrumors 65816
 
phoenixsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
I am truly glad and.....

praise Apple for all the efforts to use clean energy. And for developing an enviromental conscience. Not being so cynic to talk about Greenpace....


__________________
Mac Pro 2012 3.06 Westmere version, 12 Core 64 GB RAM, 4 TB , iPhone 5 (black), Moto G 8 GB (black)
phoenixsan is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 1, 2013, 11:36 PM   #25
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
Quote:
Originally Posted by AidenShaw View Post
The LHC does not smash atoms. As the name might suggest, it smashes hadrons. Fail.

(And, it's a large collider that smashes hadrons, not a collider that smashes large hadrons. Although that point is not so clear for Alice.)
"The term hadron refers to composite particles composed of quarks held together by the strong force (as atoms and molecules are held together by the electromagnetic force). The best-known hadrons are protons and neutrons; hadrons also include mesons such as the pion and kaon, which were discovered during cosmic ray experiments in the late 1940s and early 1950s." Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Large_Hadron_Collider

Wow, picky, picky, about terminology. It smashes hadrons, which are sub-atomic particles. Even though I'm not a nuclear physicist, I suspect you got the gist of my post, but were just in the mood to pick an argument. Fine.

Not sure what your last point is about, but the collider at CERN is officially refered to as the "Large Hadron Collider". I wasn't implying it smashes large hadrons.
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....
macs4nw is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Panel Installation Nearly Complete at Apple's Massive North Carolina Solar Farm MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 143 Jul 22, 2014 01:00 PM
Apple Continues Hiring for Oregon Data Center as Solar Farm Plans Take Shape MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 27 Jan 12, 2014 04:44 PM
First Phase of Apple's New Reno, Nevada Data Center Ready to Open MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 124 Mar 31, 2013 11:57 PM
Apple Purchases 200 Acres for Second Solar Farm Near North Carolina Data Center MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 47 Oct 25, 2012 08:25 AM
Apple Planning to Invest $1 Billion in New Data Center and Other Facilities in Reno, Nevada MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 108 Jun 29, 2012 07:48 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:37 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC