Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 9, 2013, 03:54 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
iOS 7 Leverages Retina iPhone App Assets to Improve '2x' Mode on Non-Retina iPads




One of the more subtle changes surfacing in Apple's iOS 7 beta 3 released to developers yesterday is a move to leverage the Retina assets included in iPhone-only apps to improve the viewing experience in "2x" mode on non-Retina iPads such as the iPad mini and the iPad 2.

Since the launch of the iPad, Apple has supported the use of iPhone-only apps on its tablet platform, allowing users to toggle between a "1x" mode where the app appears in an iPhone-sized window in the center of the iPad screen and a "2x" mode where pixels are doubled to allow the app to fill more of the iPad's screen. But up until iOS 6, this 2x pixel doubling has been performed on the non-Retina iPhone versions of the apps for non-Retina iPads, expanding a 480x320 app to fill a 960x640 space on the iPad display and resulting in jagged text and blurry images.

But with the advent of Retina displays on the iPhone supporting apps at 960x640, Apple moved to take advantage of those higher-quality assets to provide a better viewing experience on the iPad for those apps that do not have native iPad interfaces. Since the introduction of the third-generation iPad last year, Apple's Retina iPads have been able to tap into the Retina assets in iPhone apps to display higher-quality 2x apps, and with iOS 7 beta 3 Apple has now brought that capability to its non-Retina tablets.

Apple Store app on an iPad mini in 2x mode on iOS 6 (left) and default 2x on iOS 7 (right)
(Click for larger)
Interestingly, on the latest iOS 7 beta users are no longer even presented with a 1x/2x toggle on non-Retina devices such as the iPad mini, and iPhone apps are instead presented simply as 2x apps taking advantage of Retina assets included in the app package. The result is a much better looking 960x640 app on the iPad's 1024x768 screen. Retina iPads have not, however, seen any changes to their handling of iPhone apps and continue to offer the 1x/2x toggle.

Apple's move to leverage the Retina assets in iPhone apps by default is essentially identical to the strategy used by RetinaPad, a jailbreak tweak that provided owners of non-Retina iPads with the higher-quality 2x scaling. That tweak had gained new popularity with the release of the non-Retina iPad mini late last year, but with Apple now building that support directly into iOS 7, all users will be able to take advantage of the higher-quality experience.

Apple announced back in March that as of May 1 it was requiring all app submissions and updates to support both Retina displays and the iPhone 5's taller display, pushing developers to support Apple's latest devices. The Retina support requirement also allows more apps to take advantage of the new 2x improvements for non-Retina iPads in iOS 7.

Article Link: iOS 7 Leverages Retina iPhone App Assets to Improve '2x' Mode on Non-Retina iPads
MacRumors is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 03:57 PM   #2
jabingla2810
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Very good decision.
__________________
2.4 Alu Macbook 2GB 250GB
jabingla2810 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 03:59 PM   #3
AlexHunter
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
This is probably a good sign that the new minis will not be retina.
AlexHunter is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:02 PM   #4
Quercus Alba
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
I could never work out why they didn't do this years ago.
Quercus Alba is offline   29 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:04 PM   #5
Some guy
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Finally.
Some guy is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:05 PM   #6
usersince86
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Columbus, Ohio
Nice!
__________________
More stuff than I need... but not as much as I want.
usersince86 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:05 PM   #7
Gabik123
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHunter View Post
This is probably a good sign that the new minis will not be retina.
I disagree, this is a good sign that the ipad mini non-retina (at $199-229) and the ipad 2 (at $299-349) will continue to sell as "lower end" ipads once the ipad mini retina and ipad 5 are released (with the ipad 4 likely being flat out discontinued). This would make sense, with apple positioning the A5 as their lowest-end current production chip with a free iphone 4S staying on the market with a 5S and 5 being the premium and midrange phones, respectively.

The A5 is likely to be supported for at least 2-3 more years in iOS updates, as the 4S handles the iOS 7 beta WAYYYYYY better than the iphone 4 handled iOS 6 (due to increased RAM and dual-core processor).
Gabik123 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:05 PM   #8
newdeal
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
about time but is it just for ipad mini or for ipad 2 also?
newdeal is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:06 PM   #9
BJMRamage
macrumors 68000
 
BJMRamage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quercus Alba View Post
I could never work out why they didn't do this years ago.
I've heard to "force" developers to develop for the iPad not just iPhone.

but yeah seemed so silly when you stopped and thought about things.
BJMRamage is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:07 PM   #10
WilliamG
macrumors 601
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Seattle
Quote:
Originally Posted by Quercus Alba View Post
I could never work out why they didn't do this years ago.
I know... Seems like such a simple thing to implement.
__________________
iMac, MacBook Air, Mac mini, iPad, iPhone, 55-11
www.bighugenerd.com
WilliamG is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:08 PM   #11
FirstNTenderbit
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Atlanta
I have neither jailbroken my iDevice nor rooted my Android, but both those dev communities deserve a hat tip for pushing the envelope on both OSes(sp?). Some very good things have come to the forefront due to their efforts.
__________________
I'm a big fan of good tech. I don't really care who makes it.
FirstNTenderbit is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:08 PM   #12
ghost187
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabik123 View Post
I disagree, this is a good sign that the ipad mini non-retina (at $199-229) and the ipad 2 (at $299-349) will continue to sell as "lower end" ipads once the ipad mini retina and ipad 5 are released (with the ipad 4 likely being flat out discontinued). This would make sense, with apple positioning the A5 as their lowest-end current production chip with a free iphone 4S staying on the market with a 5S and 5 being the premium and midrange phones, respectively.

The A5 is likely to be supported for at least 2-3 more years in iOS updates, as the 4S handles the iOS 7 beta WAYYYYYY better than the iphone 4 handled iOS 6 (due to increased RAM and dual-core processor).
I agree with everything you said, but the 4S only had 512mb ram same as the 4 (which was a bummer at the time, and history may repeat itself with the 5S as that may only have 1gb of ram). Also, I agree dual core helped alot with performance, but I have to say the 7X better GPU is what really put the "S" (S for Speed) into the iPhone 4S.
ghost187 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:08 PM   #13
dannyyankou
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
What took them so long?
dannyyankou is online now   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:23 PM   #14
Gav2k
macrumors 601
 
Gav2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gabik123 View Post
I disagree, this is a good sign that the ipad mini non-retina (at $199-229) and the ipad 2 (at $299-349) will continue to sell as "lower end" ipads once the ipad mini retina and ipad 5 are released (with the ipad 4 likely being flat out discontinued). This would make sense, with apple positioning the A5 as their lowest-end current production chip with a free iphone 4S staying on the market with a 5S and 5 being the premium and midrange phones, respectively.

The A5 is likely to be supported for at least 2-3 more years in iOS updates, as the 4S handles the iOS 7 beta WAYYYYYY better than the iphone 4 handled iOS 6 (due to increased RAM and dual-core processor).
To keep the mini retina light itll be running an a7 as will the ipad 5.

I think the ipad mini non retina will move to an a6 chip.

Line up will be

Ipad mini
Ipad 4
Ipad mini retina
And finally ipad 5
Gav2k is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:23 PM   #15
blitzer09x87
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2013
wow this is cool, much needed improvement, keep it up apple.
blitzer09x87 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:23 PM   #16
Small White Car
macrumors G4
 
Small White Car's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Washington DC
Quote:
Originally Posted by BJMRamage View Post
I've heard to "force" developers to develop for the iPad not just iPhone.

but yeah seemed so silly when you stopped and thought about things.
I think so too, but I think it was a great idea at the time. The iPad would not have succeeded if it didn't get a full and robust App Store for itself.

Now that that's happened they can relax and stop worrying about stuff like this. But even if it seems obvious in retrospect, a good iPad App Store was not a garunteed thing. There's nothing saying it had to happen.
Small White Car is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:24 PM   #17
gnasher729
macrumors G5
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHunter View Post
This is probably a good sign that the new minis will not be retina.
I'd say it's a good sign that old mini won't be retina ever. Instead of looking for the negative, what about the simple fact that iPhone apps will now look a lot better on iPad 2 and iPad mini.
gnasher729 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:28 PM   #18
Arcsylver
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Chicago, IL
I still think Apple is going to split the product lines into "Pro" and "Consumer" with retina being the dividing line.

Pro = Retina Macbook Pro, full sized iPad, Possibly an eventual Retina Cinema Display for the Mac Pro

Consumer = Non retina Air, iPad Mini and iMac
__________________
2012 Retina Macbook Pro 2.3Ghz/8GB/256GB |2006 15" Macbook Pro 1.1| 2002 G4 iMac Power PC 4.2 |20" Cinema Display|Apple TV 160 GB|3rd Gen Apple TV|16GB White iPhone 5|Black 16GB iPad mini
Arcsylver is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:37 PM   #19
donutbagel
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
It's about time! And this really only helps old iPads, which is good to hear because it means that Apple still cares about them.
donutbagel is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:40 PM   #20
jabingla2810
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
So developers made iPad apps.

See Android tablets to understand.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quercus Alba View Post
I could never work out why they didn't do this years ago.


----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by dannyyankou View Post
what took them so long?
----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by williamg View Post
i know... Seems like such a simple thing to implement.
__________________
2.4 Alu Macbook 2GB 250GB
jabingla2810 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:44 PM   #21
Zellio
macrumors 6502a
 
Zellio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Took them long enough to add what jailbroken devices have had for years.
__________________
2012 iMac i7,16 gb,680mx/2009 iMac I5/27" ACD
2012 13" MacBook Retina,8 gb,256 ssd/2010 11.6" MacBook Air
iPad Air/iPad Mini Retina/CoreDuo MacMini/iMac G3/G4/Apple Tv 1,3/iPod Nano 6/iPod 5.5 80
Zellio is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:48 PM   #22
twoodcc
macrumors P6
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
sounds great to me. but still looking forward to the retina iPad mini
__________________
tville
Smarter than the average bear
twoodcc is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:51 PM   #23
rturner2
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
As a dev, now I don't need to build a full iPad app. This move is bad for Apple longer term.
rturner2 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 04:56 PM   #24
ValSalva
macrumors 68040
 
ValSalva's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Burpelson AFB
The difference is remarkable. Just hope this doesn't keep some developers from making dedicated iPad versions of their iPhone apps though.
ValSalva is online now   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 9, 2013, 05:01 PM   #25
chrisbru
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by AlexHunter View Post
This is probably a good sign that the new minis will not be retina.
Orrrr they'll keep the non-retina iPad Mini at a lower pricepoint. Maybe this is the time to do $299 non-retina Mini, $399 retina Mini, $399 non-retina iPad, $499 retina iPad?
chrisbru is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPad Mini: Improve mini retina Saturation with cydia? WARSTIN iPad 0 Mar 4, 2014 04:19 AM
iPad: Comparing iPad retina and iPhone retina app sizes - (Post SS of your General > Usage) Reminisce32 iPad 0 Oct 29, 2013 04:01 PM
iPad Mini: Can anyone explain the ios 7 2x mode on non retina devices srkmish iPad 2 Jul 13, 2013 08:32 AM
Retina MBP v Non Retina - Retina Luxury or Necessity? Checklist smoking monkey MacBook Pro 23 Jun 11, 2013 07:23 PM
Resolved: Change OSX scaling mode for retina-screen with non-retina content MDFang MacBook Pro 13 Aug 26, 2012 08:23 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC