Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jul 31, 2013, 02:03 PM   #1
jjk454ss
macrumors 68040
 
jjk454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Which wifi SD Card?

I'm looking at the Eye-Fi, but is this the best option? I primarily want to transfer pics to my ipad right away, but being able to wirelessly transfer to my Mac a Mini, straight to iPhoto is something else I look forward to.
jjk454ss is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 02:15 PM   #2
Laird Knox
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
I found the Eye-Fi to be OK at best. Sometimes it was a hassle to get it to connect to their app and the range was limited. It is a good idea but the implementation is lacking.
Laird Knox is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 02:45 PM   #3
jjk454ss
Thread Starter
macrumors 68040
 
jjk454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Laird Knox View Post
I found the Eye-Fi to be OK at best. Sometimes it was a hassle to get it to connect to their app and the range was limited. It is a good idea but the implementation is lacking.
I'm not to worried about range, but I hate hearing about hassles connecting. Anyone have experience with other options? Thanks
jjk454ss is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 03:43 PM   #4
NeGRit0
macrumors 6502a
 
NeGRit0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Las Vegas, Nv
Not sure what you shoot, but here's my experience with Eye-Fi...


I can't use Eye-Fi on my Canon body though because I have already set it up for MagicLantern, and apparently they conflict.

I never got it work on my Oly E-PL1 body, but works flawlessly on my Oly E-PL3.
__________________
Flickr.. | Tumblr | Google+ | Instagram
NeGRit0 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 03:50 PM   #5
Laird Knox
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
When I mention range I had issues with a Nikon D70 and iPad 2 when they were a foot or two apart. With the D7000 I got it to work at 10 feet or so but moving in and out of range would cause issues. The may have resolved the reconnect issues - it has been over a year since I have messed with it.

While it isn't what you are looking for, I have found that the CamRanger works much better for my needs. As a result I haven't revisited the Eye-Fi. I'm not even sure where it is. =/
Laird Knox is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 04:00 PM   #6
jjk454ss
Thread Starter
macrumors 68040
 
jjk454ss's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
I'd be using it with a Nikon D5100
jjk454ss is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jul 31, 2013, 10:45 PM   #7
Laird Knox
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
That's fine, I was just relating my experience with it. When it worked I liked it. Hopefully it has improved since then.

I know they have updated it to some extent. It originally didn't work with the D800 and they fixed that I believe.
Laird Knox is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 1, 2013, 04:11 AM   #8
Padaung
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: UK
Range is definitely a limitation. Don't expect to transmit much over 3-4m away, and forget about from a different room in the house. Reconnection is okay, I find I need to be in range and then fire off a couple of shots in the camera to wake the eye-fi connection up.

Images transmit quickly when the connection is solid. I only ever transmit jpeg files wirelessly. A raw file would take a fair while to transmit.

I've not used an eye-fi to try to connect to an iPad. I only use mine with my Nikon DSLR, wi-fi router and Mac. It is possible to cut out the wi-fi router and link the card direct to the Mac, but I've found that to be very unreliable.

I get very frustrated with the software insisting on having an internet connection to be able to change certain settings. I don't understand why that is a requirement.

They are cheap and cheerful, you get what you pay for. They work fine, just don't let your expectations exceed what they are capable of. You could say that to pack a tiny wi-fi transmitter inside a SD card is a major feat in itself!

As someone else already mentioned, if you want something more reliable with greater range, go with a CamRanger.
Padaung is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 8, 2014, 08:58 PM   #9
willcapellaro
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Eye-fi is terrible, but we don't have many options.

Works for slow and unreliable file transfers, but the experienced is marred by really poor applications design.
willcapellaro is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 11:27 AM   #10
MCAsan
macrumors 68030
 
MCAsan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Atlanta
agreed. I slide my Lexar class 10 SDXC card out of myE-M1 into my rMBP's reader and get a fast and reliable transfer. The E-M1 sets up its own network for communication with a smartphone app. I use wifi for remote control of the E-M1.
__________________
Retina MBP 11,3 2.6GHz | 16GB | 1TB
Thunderbolt Display
iPhone 6 | Silver | 128GB | Unlocked
iPad Air 2 | Silver | 128GB | WiFi only
MCAsan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 9, 2014, 12:06 PM   #11
windowpain
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Japan
Quote:
Originally Posted by jjk454ss View Post
I'm looking at the Eye-Fi, but is this the best option? I primarily want to transfer pics to my ipad right away, but being able to wirelessly transfer to my Mac a Mini, straight to iPhoto is something else I look forward to.
I know it is not what you asked..but the sd card reader for the ipad would likely be a lot quicker and easier than using a wifi-card.
Once on your ipad they will photostream to your mini..

I looked at the wifi cards too and wasn't taken by any of them.
It is a slight pain to plug something in, but the reader is small and works well.
windowpain is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 12, 2014, 08:53 PM   #12
Commy1
macrumors 6502a
 
Commy1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
I picked up the Eye-Fi Pro 16GB on sale awhile back. As mentioned, it does have some flaws, but once you understand the settings and how the relate to each other it's not so bad.
When it finally starts working then it works quite well. I strongly recommend picking up the ShutterSnitch app, it works much better than the Eye-Fi App.
I can try an answer any questions you may have.
__________________
Late 2013 Macbook Pro Retina 13" i5/16/256 | iPhone 5 16GB White ~ Virgin | iPad 4th 16GB WiFi White | Canon T3i | GoPro Hero3+ Black
Commy1 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 14, 2014, 09:12 AM   #13
TheAppleFairy
macrumors 65816
 
TheAppleFairy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 岩手県
Quote:
Originally Posted by Commy1 View Post
I picked up the Eye-Fi Pro 16GB on sale awhile back. As mentioned, it does have some flaws, but once you understand the settings and how the relate to each other it's not so bad.
When it finally starts working then it works quite well. I strongly recommend picking up the ShutterSnitch app, it works much better than the Eye-Fi App.
I can try an answer any questions you may have.

Agreed, I have two of them one for my camera, an older one I think it's class 6, 8GB, and I have the new 16GB class 10 one for my wife's camera. I have tried several combinations of how I have them set up. I used to have them go directly to my windows server, but now I have them go to my iPhone because it's 64GB and I don't have to keep worrying about space. Then I have a week to download the zip file from the eye.fi site if I want them on my server also.

I could use send them to dropbox or some other app to store them if I want, but I am content with this. I think the EyeFi cards work great. I like that I never have to delete pictures from the SD card as long as I sync it with my phone every once in a while.
__________________
Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. -H. L. Mencken
iPhone 6 64GB (Gray AT&T) -Samsung Galaxy S3 16GB (white) - iPad rMini 32GB (AT&T ) 2 aTV gen2
TheAppleFairy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2014, 02:35 PM   #14
elixe.
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: orange county.
Before I got my 6d I was using an Eye-Fi. Depending on your phone it can be a hassle to get the pictures. Before upgrading to a newer phone I had issues connecting/transferring. But after I upgraded to a 4s *at the time* it was a lot better/easier to transfer.
__________________
euphoria.

Photography | Flickr
elixe. is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Apr 15, 2014, 02:40 PM   #15
TheAppleFairy
macrumors 65816
 
TheAppleFairy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: 岩手県
Quote:
Originally Posted by elixe. View Post
Before I got my 6d I was using an Eye-Fi. Depending on your phone it can be a hassle to get the pictures. Before upgrading to a newer phone I had issues connecting/transferring. But after I upgraded to a 4s *at the time* it was a lot better/easier to transfer.
Another thing for users to look at is the compatibility with their camera. http://support.eye.fi/cameras/

My Canon SD800 has no issues at all, my Canon PowerShot G1 X has a little bit of issues, but we manage to get it to work ok now using direct mode. Before it would keep stopping.
__________________
Those who can, do. Those who can't, teach. -H. L. Mencken
iPhone 6 64GB (Gray AT&T) -Samsung Galaxy S3 16GB (white) - iPad rMini 32GB (AT&T ) 2 aTV gen2
TheAppleFairy is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > Special Interests > Visual Media > Digital Photography

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Need help finding driver for this wifi card cameroncr95 PowerPC Macs 14 Feb 19, 2014 04:14 AM
water damaged wifi card Lindabadmac MacBook Air 2 Jan 28, 2014 02:10 PM
Time Capsule wired to PC with no wifi card. cool1boy1 Mac Peripherals 1 Jan 26, 2014 10:15 PM
Anyone tried the MacBook Air WiFi card in an iMac? mmomega iMac 0 Aug 6, 2013 04:40 PM
Second Wifi Card for Macbook gbredneck Mac Peripherals 1 Nov 20, 2012 02:39 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:07 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC