Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:15 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple in Negotiations With Content Providers for Internet-Based Subscription Television Service




Apple is involved in high-level negotiations with television content providers, including ESPN, HBO, and Viacom, to provide programming through 'apps' instead of channels, reports Quartz -- a relatively new business publication with a number of former Wall Street Journal reporters on staff.
Quote:
It's unclear how close these deals are to fruition. Some people cautioned that, with the TV industry in such flux, "everybody is talking with everybody." Any deal with an internet TV service like the one envisioned by Apple is likely to be under similar terms as the networks have negotiated with traditional cable companies.

Sources say Apple's strategy could include forming its own pay TV service, essentially becoming a cable company itself, except with content delivered entirely over the internet. Intel, Sony, and Google are known to be pursuing similar tactics, and could launch their own pay TV services before Apple.
Quartz claims that Apple does want to release a much-rumored television set -- not just a set-top box like the current Apple TV 'hobby' -- to "usurp the role of the cable box" and "control the entire experience of watching TV".

The site also says cable companies have been seeking to prevent providers from signing deals with Apple, but Apple believes it does not need all content providers on board before releasing a TV set -- instead, it needs standout programming to distinguish the product and pioneer the concept of Internet-delivered video programming. The Apple TV boasted only a few content providers when it launched, but has since added a number of new content providers including ESPN, HBO, and Hulu.

A deal to offer standalone ESPN or HBO packages -- or perhaps NFL Sunday Ticket -- could "represent a tipping point" after which Apple would feel comfortable bringing the product to market. ESPN in particular has been open to the idea of streaming its live channels online as part of a standalone subscription service, something that some vocal consumers have been clamoring for -- though it's unclear how many cord-cutters would actually pay for such a service.

Previous reports have said that Apple wishes to 'erase the distinction' between live and on-demand television programming by allowing viewers to begin streaming a show minutes after it began airing live. Last month it was said that Apple was negotiating directly with cable companies and TV networks to allow customers to skip commercials, with Apple compensating for the lost ad revenue.

In his biography, Steve Jobs said he had "cracked" the redesign of television to make it seamless and easy to use, and some analysts have been claiming for years that Apple is working on a television set.

With multiple reports of Apple negotiating with both content providers like Sky News and ESPN and cable companies like Time Warner, the company appears to be examining multiple possible strategies for reinventing television.

Article Link: Apple in Negotiations With Content Providers for Internet-Based Subscription Television Service
MacRumors is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:21 AM   #2
AppleWarMachine
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Michigan, US
Please give me a standalone ESPN app that I can watch live TV (without having a cable tv subscription) on my apple TV for $4.99 a month, or even $9.99
__________________
-Mike

iMac; iPad; iPhone; Apple TV...and whatever's next (iWatch)
AppleWarMachine is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:22 AM   #3
Sky Blue
Guest
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
makes sense to circumvent the cable providers and offer individual channels/shows as apps. People are pretty cheap (look at all the cable cutters who always pop up in these threads wanting something for nothing), so remains to be seen how well that'll work.
Sky Blue is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:24 AM   #4
mw360
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Any word on the Pope's religious leanings?
mw360 is offline   18 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:25 AM   #5
Cougarcat
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
If this happens, I hope Apple brings back Front Row or adds some way to watch in iTunes. I don't own or want a TV but I would be interested in standalone HBO, provided the price is right.
Cougarcat is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:25 AM   #6
Tilpots
macrumors 68040
 
Tilpots's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Carolina Beach, NC
The NFL would be the game changer. I just don't want to have to buy the whole TV to get it. If the AppleTV could do it, just fine with me.

And I'm one of those cable cutters who want "something for nothing." I'm fine with ads and I'm fine with subscribing, just don't make me do both.
__________________
A tree is known by its fruit.
Tilpots is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:25 AM   #7
ForzaJuve
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
I don't have cable because I am not interested in expensive packages full of channels that I will never watch. I wish these negotiations would come to fruition so that I could choose and pay only for the channels I want. It might make me want to start watching TV again.
ForzaJuve is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:26 AM   #8
alent1234
macrumors 603
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
some people are dumb and will a la carte themselves to high prices

time warner and comcast both offer cable + internet for $90. stand alone internet is $50. why would i spend close to $40 a month for a few channels when i could just buy the whole package and get the streaming with it as well

unless ESPN and others will start selling the streaming separate and it won't be part of the cable TV price
alent1234 is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:27 AM   #9
chumawumba
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Ask the NSA
Can I have a new iOS 7 beta now.
chumawumba is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:27 AM   #10
TMay
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Carson City, NV
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post
makes sense to circumvent the cable providers and offer individual channels/shows as apps. People are pretty cheap (look at all the cable cutters who always pop up in these threads wanting something for nothing), so remains to be seen how well that'll work.
I'm a cable cutter and I will happily pay for quality programming. I don't watch television per se, but I do watch "Breaking Bad" via iTunes, and I would watch "Game of Thrones", "Boardwalk Empire", etc. and pay a subscription. Netflix and Amazon Prime are popular, but don't have much in the way of high end programming that is current.
TMay is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:27 AM   #11
bushido
macrumors 601
 
bushido's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: España y Germany
in an alternative universe i am enjoying unlimited access to tv shows and movies from the itunes library for sth like 29$ a month
__________________
¡No hables a menos que puedas mejorar el silencio!
bushido is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:30 AM   #12
manu chao
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Sources say Apple’s strategy could include forming its own pay TV service, essentially becoming a cable company itself, except with content delivered entirely over the internet.
And with the internet provided by the cable companies.
manu chao is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:30 AM   #13
disagree
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Comcast will just screw us all with internet cost.

It's nice in theory, but it'll end up costing more in practice.
disagree is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:32 AM   #14
jfrancis04
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by AppleWarMachine View Post
Please give me a standalone ESPN app that I can watch live TV (without having a cable tv subscription) on my apple TV for $4.99 a month, or even $9.99
Yes! I really hope this happens soon. That's literally the one thing holding me back from cutting out my satellite completely. Freakin' ESPN.
jfrancis04 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:32 AM   #15
FlatlinerG
macrumors 6502a
 
FlatlinerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Give me the ability to buy one channel at a time and I'll gladly pay a premium for it. I don't want to have to buy an entire package just for one channel. I want each channel to appear as a single app on my AppleTV interface and be able to be organized into folders at my convenience.

This is my dream AppleTV television experience.



Quote:
Originally Posted by alent1234 View Post
some people are dumb and will a la carte themselves to high prices

time warner and comcast both offer cable + internet for $90. stand alone internet is $50. why would i spend close to $40 a month for a few channels when i could just buy the whole package and get the streaming with it as well

unless ESPN and others will start selling the streaming separate and it won't be part of the cable TV price

Because maybe I only want a few channels. And what's wrong with me "a la carte"ing myself a huge bill, at least I made that choice as a consumer. The current alternative is, "you want just that one channel? Well, it's only available if you subscribe to this package which includes 12 other channels you are going to hate and never watch. Oh, and before you can get that package you have to have our premium service/these other basic channels".

If I'm going to pay high prices or be ripped off, I want to make the choice to pay high prices and rip myself off.
__________________
Late 2011 MBP 13"
2TB Time Capsule, 2nd Gen AppleTV
16GB Black iPhone 5, 32GB Black iPad 2
...and many more.
FlatlinerG is offline   10 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:35 AM   #16
Thunderhawks
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by mw360 View Post
Any word on the Pope's religious leanings?
24/7 catholic!
__________________
It's ready, when it's ready !
"Any fool can criticize, condemn and complain and most fools do." — Benjamin Franklin
Thunderhawks is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:35 AM   #17
conshok26
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: North Tonawanda, NY
What if they could do something like Pandora but for TV? You find a certain type of show you like after that is over it finds another show like it or it shows you another episode of that show. If somethign comes up that you don't like you can skip and another comes up. The more you watch the more custom the playlist becomes.

I'm not saying this would be the only option but a nice feature....there are times when you don't want to flip channels to find something to watch...this would give you some direction.
conshok26 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:35 AM   #18
mozumder
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by jfrancis04 View Post
Yes! I really hope this happens soon. That's literally the one thing holding me back from cutting out my satellite completely. Freakin' ESPN.
ESPN charges cable companies $15-$20/month just for them.

If you want A-la-carte, it's going to cost at least that much.

It really is going to be that expensive.
mozumder is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:36 AM   #19
Cuban Missles
macrumors 6502a
 
Cuban Missles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: East Coast, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by TMay View Post
I'm a cable cutter and I will happily pay for quality programming. I don't watch television per se, but I do watch "Breaking Bad" via iTunes, and I would watch "Game of Thrones", "Boardwalk Empire", etc. and pay a subscription. Netflix and Amazon Prime are popular, but don't have much in the way of high end programming that is current.
I agree. I cut the cable a year ago (except for the internet cable ). I find myself buying/renting more through Apple TV than through Netflix due to quality of what is available. A subscription based service through Apple TV would likely make me finally give up on Netflix. Everyone agrees that most of the channels and programming on cable is essentially crap, so anything that allows me to pick and pay for what I actually want would be very interesting. The crappy buffet that the cables offer (and frankly Netflix on-line) is not my thing. Give me higher quality channels that I can pick.
__________________
I have a collection of Apple stickers from all my Apple product purchases - they are white (the stickers not the products)
Cuban Missles is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:37 AM   #20
tipp
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post
People are pretty cheap (look at all the cable cutters who always pop up in these threads wanting something for nothing), so remains to be seen how well that'll work.
Nice insult when you clearly don't understand people's motivation here. Cable cutters (I am one) don't mind paying, they just don't want to pay upwards of $80-$100 per month for a ton of channels they have no interest in watching. HBO + ESPN + Comedy Central + 5 other random channels are not worth that much. There's also the issue of not wanting to support oligopolies made up of dinosaur companies who have no clue how or desire to innovate, and actually oppose it until they are forced to act (DVRs). The cable companies have effectively halted the process of innovation in the television industry. It's well past time for a serious disruption.
tipp is offline   16 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:37 AM   #21
mozumder
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tilpots View Post
The NFL would be the game changer. I just don't want to have to buy the whole TV to get it. If the AppleTV could do it, just fine with me.

And I'm one of those cable cutters who want "something for nothing." I'm fine with ads and I'm fine with subscribing, just don't make me do both.
NFL is going to go for $1/billion/year to whoever licenses them.

You can figure out the subscriber content costs for that just from that number.
mozumder is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:38 AM   #22
Fast duck
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Oh I would love this as I have free local tv and free Internet at my house.
Fast duck is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:39 AM   #23
HarryKeogh
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
In future articles about Apple TV or an Apple television could we replace the TV in the picture with a TV made after 2005?
HarryKeogh is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:40 AM   #24
appleisking
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sky Blue View Post
makes sense to circumvent the cable providers and offer individual channels/shows as apps. People are pretty cheap (look at all the cable cutters who always pop up in these threads wanting something for nothing), so remains to be seen how well that'll work.
People aren't cheap because they don't want to pay exorbitant amounts for cable and still be subjected to ads, it's called not being a sucker. I don't even use cable, I use antenna TV, yet people who actually pay for some of the channels I get still have to watch the same commercials I do. It's egregious.
appleisking is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 22, 2013, 10:41 AM   #25
FlatlinerG
macrumors 6502a
 
FlatlinerG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Prince Edward Island, Canada
Quote:
Originally Posted by mozumder View Post
ESPN charges cable companies $15-$20/month just for them.

If you want A-la-carte, it's going to cost at least that much.

It really is going to be that expensive.

But what if ESPN was all you wanted? There are plenty of people that would be content with one or two channels. And even at $20/month for each channel, it's still cheaper than the alternative of having to subscribe to hundreds of other channels that are, essentially, useless to that person.
__________________
Late 2011 MBP 13"
2TB Time Capsule, 2nd Gen AppleTV
16GB Black iPhone 5, 32GB Black iPad 2
...and many more.
FlatlinerG is offline   5 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Amazon Examining Online Subscription-Based Live Television Service [Update: Amazon Denies] MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 22 Jan 22, 2014 03:39 PM
Apple Edging Further Into the Living Room by Cooperating with TV Content Providers MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 91 Jul 24, 2013 11:02 PM
Google Working on Subscription-Based Streaming Music Service MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 112 Mar 5, 2013 08:49 AM
Questions About Apple Authorized Service Providers beeinformed iMac 1 Jan 3, 2013 01:52 AM
No New Apple Television Products Coming in 2012 as Content Negotiations Stall Once Again MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 193 Oct 3, 2012 02:43 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:59 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC