Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:33 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Google Releases Chromecast App for iOS




Google has released its official Chromecast app for iOS today, allowing Apple mobile devices to officially control the HDMI accessory. The app allows for functionality such as managing Chromecast settings for changing the name, password, and settings of the device, as well as allowing setup of the Chromecast through an iOS device. The app also allows users to stream content from iOS apps, including YouTube and Netflix.

Quote:
Chromecast is the easiest way to enjoy online video and anything from the web on your TV. Plug it into any HDTV and control it with your existing smartphone, tablet, or laptop. No remotes required. Cast your favorites from YouTube, Netflix, Google Play Movies and Google Play Music and Chrome to your TV with the press of a button.
Originally announced and released in July, Chromecast allows for functionality similar to AirPlay and Apple TV, allowing users to mirror content from a tablet, smartphone, or computer. Following the launch of Chromecast, Apple lowered the price of its refurbished Apple TVs to $74, offering a $24 discount off of its intended $99 price. Additionally, a comparison chart between Chromecast, Apple TV, and media device Roku surfaced to examine the differences between all devices.

Google's Chromecast app can be downloaded from the App Store for free. [Direct Link]

Article Link: Google Releases Chromecast App for iOS
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:35 AM   #2
musika
macrumors 65816
 
musika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New York
Just in time!

Google blocks Chromecast app that let you stream your own videos

EDIT: I just read the update at the bottom of the article, and it doesn't seem that Google is interested in limiting the types of content you can use with the Chromecast.
__________________
I write about lots of things at turtlepie.net.

Last edited by musika; Aug 27, 2013 at 09:08 AM.
musika is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:40 AM   #3
Skika
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
They should have incorporated AirPlay.
__________________
MacBook Pro, iPad, iPhone
Skika is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:42 AM   #4
superwoman
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Monterey,CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
...Chromecast allows for functionality similar to AirPlay and Apple TV, allowing users to mirror content from a tablet, smartphone, or computer.
This statement is false. That's not how Chromecast works at all.
superwoman is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:48 AM   #5
Nbapapa
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Melbourne, Australia
If only they incorporated Airplay - that would really end Apple TV. Nevertheless, still a highly valuable and cheap item!
Nbapapa is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:49 AM   #6
The Phazer
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by musika View Post
Not read the update at the bottom of the article, huh?
The Phazer is online now   3 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 08:52 AM   #7
ssspinball
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phazer View Post
Not read the update at the bottom of the article, huh?
I read the update--And the fact remains Google intentionally blocked the local content workaround at the moment.
ssspinball is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:02 AM   #8
The Phazer
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssspinball View Post
I read the update--And the fact remains Google intentionally blocked the local content workaround at the moment.
"Intentionally blocked" is a pretty different thing from "was indifferent about breaking something acting against the terms of what is clearly marked as an unfinished SDK."

Anyway, this app - surely this is irrelevant to actually casting to a Chromecast? The app wouldn't be able to affect what YouTube or Netflix did inside their apps.

It's just the settings app, yeah?
The Phazer is online now   2 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:04 AM   #9
Northgrove
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Chromecast isn't able to receive streamed data directly from any device, so AirPlay would be hard.

Chromecast is actually running a simplified version of Chrome OS, i.e. a Google Chrome browser on a chip that you give commands to.

For example, to play a YouTube clip, the app actually tells Chromecast to "Visit YouTube and play this clip at this address". No video is sent from your device! That's why it can do Netflix, YouTube, or mirror a Google Chrome tab (it simply visits the page for you), but why AirPlay would be hard and probably also suffer in quality since it'd need to stream AirPlay via some proxy website. It can show anything that Chrome can show easily, but everything else is hard or impossible. It'll probably never be able to mirror an iPad display.

Chromecast has unofficial PC desktop mirroring support, but I assume this one uses some proxy method, so that your desktop (grabbed by the local Google Chrome) is sent somewhere on the web, and Chromecast retrieves it from there. If this method doesn't support audio, that would explain why this experimental feature indeed doesn't mirror audio along with the screen.
__________________
iPhone 5 rMBP 15" (2012)
Northgrove is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:07 AM   #10
musika
macrumors 65816
 
musika's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: New York
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Phazer View Post
Not read the update at the bottom of the article, huh?
Nope, whoops. I read that two days ago and just linked back to it without rereading.

Thanks for letting me know!
__________________
I write about lots of things at turtlepie.net.
musika is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:09 AM   #11
JGRE
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Dutch Mountains
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northgrove View Post
Chromecast isn't able to receive streamed data directly from any device, so AirPlay would be hard.

Chromecast is actually running a simplified version of Chrome OS, i.e. a Google Chrome browser on a chip that you give commands to.

For example, to play a YouTube clip, the app actually tells Chromecast to "Visit YouTube and play this clip at this address". No video is sent from your device! That's why it can do Netflix, YouTube, or mirror a Google Chrome tab (it simply visits the page for you), but why AirPlay would be hard and probably also suffer in quality since it'd need to stream AirPlay via some proxy website. It can show anything that Chrome can show easily, but everything else is hard or impossible. It'll probably never be able to mirror an iPad display.

Chromecast has unofficial PC desktop mirroring support, but I assume this one uses some proxy method, so that your desktop (grabbed by the local Google Chrome) is sent somewhere on the web, and Chromecast retrieves it from there. If this method doesn't support audio, that would explain why this experimental feature indeed doesn't mirror audio along with the screen.
Just wondering....what can it do, what an ATV can't?
__________________
iPhone 5s, 2008 iMac 20", 2011 MBP 13", ATV3, iPad Mini.
JGRE is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:21 AM   #12
benpatient
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssspinball View Post
I read the update--And the fact remains Google intentionally blocked the local content workaround at the moment.

You don't seem to know what the words "fact" or "intentionally" mean.

If I released an unsupported iOS app that relied on an unlisted testing feature in OS X Mavericks that was removed or rewritten during the developer preview, you wouldn't be dogging Apple for anything, you'd be saying "well, what did they expect? it wasn't even an approved feature, and it wasn't made for that purpose!"

This is the same thing, only the developer reverse-engineered Google's proprietary code to enable the work-around. That's not a reliable solution for anything. It's possible that all they had to do to "break" his code is to recompile the source a slightly different way, or standardize the name on a couple of functions, or merge a couple of code libraries that were redundant.

We have no idea, but it is transitional, early code, and they said as much right from the start. Google isn't known for malicious coding. It isn't worth the investment of developer time, and it isn't worth the potential backlash. This is a company whose major products are all free.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Northgrove View Post
Chromecast isn't able to receive streamed data directly from any device, so AirPlay would be hard.

Chromecast is actually running a simplified version of Chrome OS, i.e. a Google Chrome browser on a chip that you give commands to.

For example, to play a YouTube clip, the app actually tells Chromecast to "Visit YouTube and play this clip at this address". No video is sent from your device! That's why it can do Netflix, YouTube, or mirror a Google Chrome tab (it simply visits the page for you), but why AirPlay would be hard and probably also suffer in quality since it'd need to stream AirPlay via some proxy website. It can show anything that Chrome can show easily, but everything else is hard or impossible. It'll probably never be able to mirror an iPad display.

Chromecast has unofficial PC desktop mirroring support, but I assume this one uses some proxy method, so that your desktop (grabbed by the local Google Chrome) is sent somewhere on the web, and Chromecast retrieves it from there. If this method doesn't support audio, that would explain why this experimental feature indeed doesn't mirror audio along with the screen.
Not quite right, there. When you cast a Chrome tab, it doesn't go and pull that content from the internet directly via the Chromecast. That wouldn't be possible on things like websites that require authentication. It is casting directly from your local device (laptop, for example), and sending that info (audio and video) to the Chromecast directly.

I can Cast my work email, which won't even let me log in to two browser sessions at once using two different browsers or two windows of the same browser. It's legitimately like "screen sharing", and there is experimental support for screen sharing, as well. That isn't going out to the internet and coming back to the chromecast. It's staying on the local network.
__________________
Home Office: Mac Pro 8x2.8 10GB 2TB GTX 650 Ti Boost 2GB
Work:15" Retina MacBook Pro 2.0 8GB 512GB
benpatient is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:44 AM   #13
ssspinball
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by benpatient View Post
You don't seem to know what the words "fact" or "intentionally" mean.
Google inserted this code with the obvious purpose of blocking this workaround:
Code:
if("mirror_tab" != a) {
return null;
}
This code prevents the ability to play media from external sources. Seems pretty clear cut, no?

There's a lot more detail in the ArsTechnica post here.
ssspinball is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 09:46 AM   #14
PracticalMac
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
If Apple made the ATV App to allow Android control/use it, would that make help Apple in ATV sales?
Or will it loose too many iOS sales?

IMHO, ATV is a sales point, like the Kindle Fire. Its value comes from the media it sells, not the device itself.
Apple should sell the ATV for $59, make an Android app to control it, and watch iTunes profits surge!
__________________
FireWire 1394 Intelligent network guaranteed data transfer, 1500mA power, Ethernet compatible
Read: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 70% faster then USB2
Write: 160 files, 650MB total, FW400 48% faster
PracticalMac is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 10:01 AM   #15
egoistaxx9
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
phew!! had been waiting for this...
egoistaxx9 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 10:09 AM   #16
technopimp
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Nice...now how about you release the promised Google Play All Access app?
__________________
Yes I caved.
technopimp is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 10:32 AM   #17
JimboLodisC
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by superwoman View Post
This statement is false. That's not how Chromecast works at all.
Exactly. Also, this app isn't needed to cast. The YouTube and Netflix apps should do it already if you're up to date. The article makes it sound like you need this app in order to cast. The app is simply for connecting to your Chromecast to set it up. Once you're up and running, you can delete the Chromecast app if you'd like.
JimboLodisC is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 11:13 AM   #18
Exotic-Car Man
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
For those unsure how Chromecast works.
Exotic-Car Man is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 11:15 AM   #19
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by JGRE View Post
Just wondering....what can it do, what an ATV can't?
Access the google play movie store. That's it

But that's also why it's cheaper. And for those that don't care about mirroring local content like games, home videos off an iPad etc, that might be fine
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )
charlituna is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 11:19 AM   #20
Codestud
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by superwoman View Post
This statement is false. That's not how Chromecast works at all.
Yes, the Chromecast's main function is to just receive coimmands from a mobile device which tells it what to play. However, AFAIK it does also have mirror-like functionality built in as well, although it is currently rough around the edges and is not as good as AirPlay.
Codestud is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 11:19 AM   #21
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Quote:
Originally Posted by PracticalMac View Post
Apple should sell the ATV for $59, make an Android app to control it, and watch iTunes profits surge!
I disagree. Keep it at $99 even bump it to say $129, spice up the specs with 802.11 AC, better graphics etc.

As for the Android app, something tells me that many if not most android users are devoted google store users so iTunes profits wouldn't surge so much cause they would still be buying for their own. Making it all moot.
__________________
Return of the Non Tech's Wish List
(She's family so I'm biased )
charlituna is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 01:00 PM   #22
fallenjt
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by Northgrove View Post

For example, to play a YouTube clip, the app actually tells Chromecast to "Visit YouTube and play this clip at this address". No video is sent from your device! That's why it can do Netflix, YouTube, or mirror a Google Chrome tab (it simply visits the page for you), but why AirPlay would be hard and probably also suffer in quality since it'd need to stream AirPlay via some proxy website. It can show anything that Chrome can show easily, but everything else is hard or impossible. It'll probably never be able to mirror an iPad display.
From what you said, after you stream the movie, you can power off your mobile device and it still casts the program from online content? Doesn't sound like it.
fallenjt is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 01:20 PM   #23
ghostface147
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: May 2008
Other than playing with it when I first got it off a contest on androidcentral, it has only been used for a live fantasy football draft. I only would care for it more if I could stream local content.
ghostface147 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 01:54 PM   #24
nostaws
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Quote:
Originally Posted by Exotic-Car Man View Post
great link, that was a very good review.
nostaws is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Aug 27, 2013, 03:48 PM   #25
Exotic-Car Man
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by nostaws View Post
great link, that was a very good review.
Yeah, MKBHD is awesome. He's a bit of a fandroid (although he uses a Hackintosh as his main computer), but he honestly has some of the best tech reviews and videos on the 'net.
Exotic-Car Man is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > iOS Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Google Releases New Universal 'Quickoffice' iOS App for Free MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 71 Jun 29, 2014 06:54 PM
Google Launches 'Google Play Movies & TV' App, iOS Chromecast Users Gain Alternative to iTunes MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 130 Mar 15, 2014 10:33 PM
Google Takes Aim at Apple with New Nexus 7, Google Play Games and Chromecast MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 729 Feb 4, 2014 08:04 AM
Google Releases New 'MyGlass' Companion App for Google Glass [Updated] MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 32 Dec 18, 2013 12:50 PM
Google Releases Location Discovery App 'Field Trip' on iOS MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 28 Mar 8, 2013 08:57 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:21 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC