Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacBytes.com News Discussion
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:41 PM   #1
MacBytes
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Apple releases broadband tuner 1.0




Category: Apple Software
Link: Apple releases broadband tuner 1.0

Posted on MacBytes.com
Approved by Mudbug
MacBytes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:46 PM   #2
liketom
macrumors 68040
 
liketom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Lincoln,UK
Send a message via AIM to liketom
thats cool , but when i downloaded it it went straight into the installer? i thought 10.4 always had that download pop up?

but cool anyway
__________________
18,000 miles is a long way
liketom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:52 PM   #3
crazzyeddie
macrumors 68030
 
crazzyeddie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Florida, USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by liketom
thats cool , but when i downloaded it it went straight into the installer? i thought 10.4 always had that download pop up?

but cool anyway
Same here. It must be one of those net-enabled DiskImages with some sort of Apple-trusted key.... sounds sorta like M$.
__________________
MacBook Pro
Core 2 Duo 2.4Ghz
4GB DDR3 RAM
32GB iPod Touch
crazzyeddie is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:54 PM   #4
GKThursday
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2005
Ditto,
I did get a warning as it started installing, but it's a bit late at that point.
Yi+
Thursday
__________________
"War is not 'the best way of settling differences; it is the only way of preventing their being settled for you." - G. K. Chesterton: ILN, 7/24/15
GKThursday is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:54 PM   #5
thejadedmonkey
macrumors 68040
 
thejadedmonkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Pa
Send a message via AIM to thejadedmonkey
Quote:
Originally Posted by crazzyeddie
Same here. It must be one of those net-enabled DiskImages with some sort of Apple-trusted key.... sounds sorta like M$.
This is where I spaz. Please, never ever ever ever compare Apple to M$ (No matter how similar they are :P )
__________________
Mac Mini G4 • MacBook Pro • iPod Nano
"Good judgement comes from experience,
experience comes from bad judgement.
- Mark Twain
thejadedmonkey is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 06:58 PM   #6
mduser63
macrumors 68030
 
mduser63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Send a message via AIM to mduser63
I think this is Tiger only. Tried to install it on my Power Mac (running Panther) and it said that it couldn't be installed.
__________________
20" 2.0 GHz iMac Core Duo, 1.5 GB RAM
12" 1.33 GHz Superdrive PowerBook G4, 768 MB RAM
2.0 GHz Black Core 2 Duo MacBook, 1 GB RAM
mduser63 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:04 PM   #7
ITASOR
macrumors 68040
 
ITASOR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Oneida, NY
Send a message via AIM to ITASOR
I'm hesitant to install this because my internet it working surprisingly well lately and I have a feeling this will end my happiness. Besides, how much faster can it make it?
__________________
Alumium MacBook 2.0Ghz C2D | 2GB RAM | 320GB HD | Snow Leopard
ITASOR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:12 PM   #8
mainstreetmark
macrumors 68000
 
mainstreetmark's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Saint Augustine, FL
Quote:
Originally Posted by liketom
thats cool , but when i downloaded it it went straight into the installer? i thought 10.4 always had that download pop up?

but cool anyway
I hate that stupid thing.
__________________
iTunesRegistry.com <-- v3.0 Now Playing
mainstreetmark is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:15 PM   #9
bluebomberman
macrumors 6502a
 
bluebomberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
Where does it install to exactly? I don't see how you uninstall it...
__________________
Treo 700p.
bluebomberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:17 PM   #10
treblah
macrumors 65816
 
treblah's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: 29403
Send a message via AIM to treblah
Quote:
Originally Posted by liketom
thats cool , but when i downloaded it it went straight into the installer? i thought 10.4 always had that download pop up?

but cool anyway
I'm guessing you have 'Open safe files automatically' checked?
treblah is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:19 PM   #11
samh004
macrumors 68020
 
samh004's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Australia
Send a message via AIM to samh004
Quote:
Originally Posted by bluebomberman
Where does it install to exactly? I don't see how you uninstall it...
It mentions:

There is an optional uninstaller that can be used to restore the settings that were in effect at the time just before the system parameters were changed.

So I would assume you just launch it again and select uninstall if need be.
__________________
samh004 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:22 PM   #12
bluebomberman
macrumors 6502a
 
bluebomberman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Queens, NYC
Quote:
Originally Posted by samh004
It mentions:

There is an optional uninstaller that can be used to restore the settings that were in effect at the time just before the system parameters were changed.

So I would assume you just launch it again and select uninstall if need be.
Okay, not entirely intuitive to launch the installer to uninstall it...but your answer sounds plausible enough.

Internet's working, at least, so I'll stick with it.
__________________
Treo 700p.
bluebomberman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:26 PM   #13
runninmac
macrumors 65816
 
runninmac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Rockford MI
So im takin it wont help for standard homenetworks? (if i even understand what it does?)
__________________
2.0 Ghz CoreDuo. 2 GB Ram. 80 Gig HDD.
Black MacBook
runninmac is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:52 PM   #14
dejo
macrumors Demi-God
 
dejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On the roadside
Quote:
Originally Posted by mainstreetmark
I hate that stupid thing.
Would you prefer malware instead?
dejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:56 PM   #15
iGary
macrumors Demi-God
 
iGary's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: La Villa Strangiato
Not touching this one.
__________________
Mac Pro Octophallus 2.8 | 13" UMBP 2.26
iGary is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 07:59 PM   #16
dejo
macrumors Demi-God
 
dejo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: On the roadside
Does anyone know if this will have much effect on the following setup: Mac to Airport Base Station via Airport Extreme, Base Station to cable modem via cat-5, cable modem to... well, you know the rest?
dejo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:02 PM   #17
rdowns
macrumors Demi-God
 
rdowns's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by iGary
Not touching this one.

What he said.
__________________
I'm Larry David. I happen to enjoy wearing women's panties.
rdowns is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:03 PM   #18
DavidLeblond
macrumors 68000
 
DavidLeblond's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Quote:
Originally Posted by dejo
Does anyone know if this will have much effect on the following setup: Mac to Airport Base Station via Airport Extreme, Base Station to cable modem via cat-5, cable modem to... well, you know the rest?
Unless you have one bitchin' cable connection, I'm guessing no. I'm not touching this one... says for very fast connections (5Mbps or greater) and thats not me.
__________________
www.davidleblond.com
Try my new iPhone game, Claustrophobia!
DavidLeblond is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:14 PM   #19
bentoon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NYC
I'll let this one pass as well,
bentoon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:15 PM   #20
xStep
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Blaine, Washington
Will it Help Home Networks

Here is a short (Linux) tutorial about this very subject...
http://www.onlamp.com/pub/a/onlamp/2...cp_tuning.html

How I understood it was; when you have a very high speed network connection and the time for the packets to get from your box to the destination is long, your better off sending bigger chunks of data. It sounded to me part of the issue was that the client was waiting for acknowledgments that the packets were received correctly, before sending more data. If your sending more data per packet, your waiting on fewer receipt notices.

So, it doesn't sound like this will help your internal network which has high bandwidth and very low latency.

I wonder what happens when this goes through a router. Does the router have to be tuned too?
xStep is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:19 PM   #21
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
According to the Apple page, it is meant for people with high-speed (5M or faster) links with high-latency. In other words, satellite users.

People using satellite broadband often have problems with internet access, because of the high latency, relative to the bandwidth. You've always been able to hack around this by tweaking some system parameters (increasing the size of the TCP buffers). This application simple performs the tweak for you (increasing the send-buffer to 128K and the receive buffer to 350K) using an Apple-supported installer.

It doesn't do anything you couldn't do yourself, but the self-contained installer should (hopefully) prevent people from making mistakes that might cripple their networking capabilities.
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:20 PM   #22
iMeowbot
macrumors 601
 
iMeowbot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Quote:
Originally Posted by mduser63
I think this is Tiger only. Tried to install it on my Power Mac (running Panther) and it said that it couldn't be installed.
Yep. Nothing wrong with your system, 10.4 is in the system requirements. You can, however, still get the same effect by using the sysctl command from the terminal.
iMeowbot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:21 PM   #23
Eidorian
macrumors G3
 
Eidorian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Indiana
Send a message via AIM to Eidorian
My connection does seem a little more perky now. Then again It's 6 Mb at least.
__________________
MRoogle it!
hikari T7500 2.2 GHz / 4 GB / 320 GB / GMA X3100 / 10.5.8
chobimaru Core i5 750 2.66 GHz / 4 GB / 640 GB / 4830 / Windows 7
Eidorian is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:23 PM   #24
mkrishnan
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
mkrishnan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Grand Rapids, MI, USA
It's weird for Apple to release a one-off "tuner" instead of making this a configurable option in an upgrade to the networks preference pane....
__________________
Mohan
mkrishnan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old Nov 28, 2005, 08:33 PM   #25
shamino
macrumors 68040
 
shamino's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Vienna, VA
Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidLeblond
Unless you have one bitchin' cable connection, I'm guessing no. I'm not touching this one... says for very fast connections (5Mbps or greater) and thats not me.
Unless you've got a seriously crippled ISP, only satellite users will need this.

All other kinds of high-speed connections (like cable modems and leased lines) usually have very low latency.

The problem with satellite is that the speed of light can't be increased. A geostationary satellite (which is what you must use if your antenna doesn't have elaborate controls to follow it across the sky) must be at an altitude of about 36,000km. Light moves at about 300,000km/s, so it takes light about 0.12s to get to the satellite. Multiply that by 4 (you to the satellite, satellite to the destination, reply from the destination to the satellite, reply from the satellite to you) and you get about a one-half second (0.48s) round-trip delay.

So, when TCP sends a packet, it will be at least half a second before the ACK comes back from the computer on the other end. When you've got a high speed link, a LOT of traffic can arrive (or be sent) during that half-second. (at 5Mbps, a half-second is 2.5Mb or 320KB.) This is enough to easily overflow your buffers, causing TCP's congestion control to kick in, drastically slowing down the entire connection.

The workaround is to increase the buffers enough so that they don't fill up before the ACK packets arrive. This way, everything keeps on streaming nicely, without annoying slowdowns. Apple's choice of 350K for the receive buffer covers the estimated 320K burst, plus a little slack space.
__________________
In theory, theory is the same as practice. In practice, it isn't.
shamino is offline   Reply With Quote

Reply

Mac Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacBytes.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:47 AM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC