Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
I'm interested in getting like another G5 along side my iMac. I want to use it as a file server. I have tons of files and would like to save all of it onto that server so I don't have to save all of it to external hdd's and my SSD. Any thoughts?
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
Do you really want the G5 to be a file server? They don't make the best file servers. They're hot, have limited internal storage, and use lots of energy at idle. How about a low end G4 PowerMac?
 

CptSky

macrumors regular
Feb 1, 2013
148
35
I'm interested in getting like another G5 along side my iMac. I want to use it as a file server. I have tons of files and would like to save all of it onto that server so I don't have to save all of it to external hdd's and my SSD. Any thoughts?

May I ask why a Mac as a file server ? A NAS would be way better and is designed for this use... Personally, I have used a Netgear NAS, but Synology is popular too.
 

westrock2000

macrumors 6502a
Oct 18, 2013
524
22
You can run maczfs on it if you install 10.5 Snow Leopard. That's a good start to file server. The downside is that the PowerMac was limited to 2 SATA drives natively. So you will have to invest in a SATA expansion card (not hard) and also mount the additional drives (harder).

The big downside is that you will be severely limited to what can run on the PPC. The universal binaries thing did not pan out a whole lot and most companies went to Intel only. iTunes stopped supporting PPC at <iTunes version> 10.6.

For ~$100 more you can find a 2006 Mac Pro, which will also suffer from not being supported officially by Apple anymore, but at least it still runs modern software and uses modern hardware. Not to mention it still has good processing strength.

You can do it, just understand the many limitations you will run into. Apple pretty much abandoned us PPC users when they switched to Intel.
 

wobegong

Guest
May 29, 2012
418
1
Get a NAS box, I use a Dlink ShareCenter (DNS-320L) and it works great, is silent and uses little power.
 
If it were me and I wanted to stay in the Apple universe I would probably go with a Mac mini G4 using firewire external drives to raise the capacity for storage. The mac mini is way smaller, runs cooler and cheaper, and will fit nicely into your setup. Or, if you want to go cheap the PowerMac G4 will be your better option as they can be had rather inexpensively now. PowerMac G5 is expensive to run for a file server and will run hot, for this application a G4 would be better, IMO.
 
How about an iMac G4? Never owned one, Love the design.

Sure, it would do the job fine. The only issue is the space it takes, and the cost. They usually are more expensive than the PowerMac G4 or some mac mini G4. Space to power to use the Mac mini G4 is the best bet for this use, IMO.

But if you love the iMac G4 for the design then this is a decent reason to keep one around. :)
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
Alright. I'd love to get a Cinema Display for the Mac Mini G4. They are expensive! There like at least 100 bucks for JUST the Display. I was thinking about getting a cheap PM G4 with an ADC port, and getting a cheap used Apple LCd display. Never owned one and would love to have an Apple Monitor. Thoughts?
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
Sure, it would do the job fine. The only issue is the space it takes, and the cost. They usually are more expensive than the PowerMac G4 or some mac mini G4. Space to power to use the Mac mini G4 is the best bet for this use, IMO.

But if you love the iMac G4 for the design then this is a decent reason to keep one around. :)
Alright. I'd love to get a Cinema Display for the Mac Mini G4. They are expensive! There like at least 100 bucks for JUST the Display. I was thinking about getting a cheap PM G4 with an ADC port, and getting a cheap used Apple LCd display. Never owned one and would love to have an Apple Monitor. Thoughts?:D
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
A G4 iMac would work, but you'd be limited to two internal drives and 100Mbit Ethernet. Same with the Mac Mini, two drives and 100Mbit. For a cheap PowerMac, you'd want between the Gigabit Ethernet model and a Quicksilver. The MDD's could be used, but they go for slightly more. You can put many drives into any of those with some SATA cards. For a cheap screen, look into the 15" or 17" Studio displays. While small and old, the 17" still has a nice picture at a resolution that isn't too bad for the modern era. Both of those sizes can be found much more cheaply than the 20+ models.
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
What about Airport Cards? I can share my connection from my iMac to the Powermac via ethernet. What is the best model for me? ow should i set it up once i receive it?
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
All PowerMac G4's, except the FireWire 800 MDD, use the older Airport B card. You can put in a newer WiFi PCI card to allow it to use G and N.
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
I found one...

Alright, I found a solution. My sister still has her old eMac. It has a 1.25 ghz processor and only 512 mb or ram with Leopard on it. Still works but puts off a lot of heat. I can use this as my server because I have several external HD's I can plug into it. do I need Leopard or Tiger Server on it? Can I just use Leopard on it and configure it to be my server?
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
An eMac would work. They're limited to two internal drives, are loud, and generate quite a bit of heat with the CRT on. You can use regular Tiger or Leopard to share files with. Mac OS X Server would run on that machine, but I would advise upgrading its ram to the maximum before doing so. I also suggest not using the server edition unless you have a reason to use it.
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
An eMac would work. They're limited to two internal drives, are loud, and generate quite a bit of heat with the CRT on. You can use regular Tiger or Leopard to share files with. Mac OS X Server would run on that machine, but I would advise upgrading its ram to the maximum before doing so. I also suggest not using the server edition unless you have a reason to use it.

Ok. How do i set it up? What settings?
 

OpTic Jayex

macrumors regular
Original poster
Sep 1, 2013
123
1
Broken Arrow
Basically plug in the drives and check the file sharing boxes in the Sharing pref pane.

That's it? Dang, I thought it would be complicated. Cool! Thanks so much! I just don't want all my external drives connected to my iMac. I'm upgrading to Mavericks as we speak. Can't wait! How do I setup the computer so my iMac will recognize it as a server?
 

Intell

macrumors P6
Jan 24, 2010
18,955
509
Inside
That's it? Dang, I thought it would be complicated. Cool! Thanks so much! I just don't want all my external drives connected to my iMac. I'm upgrading to Mavericks as we speak. Can't wait! How do I setup the computer so my iMac will recognize it as a server?

As long as the eMac is connected to the same network and has file sharing turned on, it'll show up in the iMac's sidebar and you'll be able to connect to it.
 

AdrianK

macrumors 68020
Feb 19, 2011
2,230
2
Would FreeNAS work on a Raspberry Pi?

You don't want to do that. The NIC is on the USB bus, combined with the armv6 CPU makes transfers stupidly slow. I get speeds of 1.3 megabytes/s over SCP to an EXT4 USB stick.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.