Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 14, 2005, 12:58 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Intel's Napa Platform with Yonah

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

eWeek reports on Intel's new mobile platform called Napa, which was detailed yesterday to reporters.

According to Intel, the new laptop platform (Napa) which incorporates their dual-core Yonah processor will outperform their current laptops by 68%. Along with this will be a reduction in power consumption by 28%, which will extend battery life beyond 5 hours.

Quote:
The chip benefits from a two-pronged assault on power usage, cutting amps by completing tasks faster and employing a new feature termed Dynamic Power Coordination, which allows its two cores to be power-managed independently, making it possible for one core to shut down while the other performs the heavy lifting.
Napa/Yonah is expected in 2006 and Intel is expecting over 230 laptop designs. Intel was reportedly tight lipped, however, about whether or not Apple would adopt the entire platform. The expected release for Yonah is indeed January as rumored.

Yonah has been widely expected to be used by Apple in the first Intel Macs, also rumored to be released in January.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 12:59 PM   #2
Lacero
macrumors 601
 
Lacero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
All the more reasons I see Apple adopting the Yonahs for the upcoming PowerBooks.

"Maloney said the Napa platform has been shrunk over 30 percent since its initial design. The chip set will be 69 percent smaller, in terms of board space, than the original Centrino chip set."

Now, if we could see Apple adopting some of AMD's lower-priced dual-core offerings.
http://www.chron.com/disp/story.mpl/...s/3520799.html
Lacero is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:00 PM   #3
RJP31484
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Philadelphia, PA
Send a message via AIM to RJP31484
Wow

That all sounds truly amazing
__________________
Rev. B 17" iMac G5 2.0Ghz, superdrive with BT KB/M and 1.5 Gb RAM
RJP31484 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:03 PM   #4
twoodcc
macrumors 603
 
twoodcc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Right side of wrong
Send a message via AIM to twoodcc Send a message via MSN to twoodcc
Quote:
Originally Posted by RJP31484
That all sounds truly amazing
yeah it does. january will be interesting ....
twoodcc is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:04 PM   #5
Peace
macrumors Demi-God
 
Peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
Dual-Core Yonah Powerbooks at MWSF
Peace is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:06 PM   #6
FoxyKaye
macrumors 65816
 
FoxyKaye's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Oakland, Terre d'Ange, Bas Lag
2006, the year of the (HD) laptop?

So, the Intel-based stuff is going to cost less, last longer, and potentially come with dual-core chips that feature a 68% improvement in speed (at least over previous Intel designs)? Wow, watch those used G4 iBook and Powerbook prices bottom out...
__________________
G5/2GHz iMac | G3/600MHz iBook | iPod 5G, 60GB | 8GB CF modPod Mini
The afternoon, born on the day of the sunlight streaming through the leaves.
FoxyKaye is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:06 PM   #7
LaMerVipere
macrumors 6502a
 
LaMerVipere's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Chicago
Send a message via AIM to LaMerVipere
I'm more interested in what will be in the Rev. B Intel PowerBooks, since buying a Rev. A version just seems crazy to me. Problems and "issues" seem almost assured.
__________________
MacBook Pro + iPhone 3G
LaMerVipere is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:07 PM   #8
GFLPraxis
macrumors 601
 
GFLPraxis's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
68% faster, 28% lower power consumption, lower price, dual core, HD screens (remember, ThinkSecret claims 1280x720 WXGA screens- that's 720p, which is HD), and the ability to boot Windows and/or run Windows apps through WINE?

Sign me up!



However, I bet someone, somewhere is going to find some way to rate this negative. They always do.
GFLPraxis is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:11 PM   #9
AoWolf
macrumors 6502a
 
AoWolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Daytona Beach
Send a message via AIM to AoWolf
Everything is pointing to WWDC I can't wait hopes its the iBooks.
__________________
I do not exist
1.6 Ghz. MacBook Air
AoWolf is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:11 PM   #10
hhlee
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: May 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by GFLPraxis
68% faster, 28% lower power consumption, lower price, dual core, HD screens (remember, ThinkSecret claims 1280x720 WXGA screens- that's 720p, which is HD), and the ability to boot Windows and/or run Windows apps through WINE?

Sign me up!



However, I bet someone, somewhere is going to find some way to rate this negative. They always do.
shizza.... screw the fact that its rev a. i think i'm gonna need to sell my 15'' powerbuuk pronto!
hhlee is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:12 PM   #11
Darwin
macrumors 6502a
 
Darwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: round the corner
Bring it on
Darwin is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:14 PM   #12
tristan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: high-rise in beautiful bethesda
So the Intel iBook is going to smoke the G4 Powerbooks? That'll be interesting. 2006 is going to be a crazy year with lots of crazy rumors.
__________________

Index Roll: Indexing on Steroids
tristan is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:15 PM   #13
Lacero
macrumors 601
 
Lacero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by AoWolf
Everything is pointing to WWDC I can't wait hopes its the iBooks.
I don't see it going into iBooks quite yet. Maybe next year? There's going to be a premium on the dual-core Yonahs, so it'll likely make its debut on the higher margined PowerBooks. Professionals need this power... not the sophomore in college surfing for music and pr0n.

Apple's got to offset the cost of development, plus Intel charges more per chip than IBM's PPC. (at least that's what has been reported).

Lacero is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:16 PM   #14
polinho
macrumors newbie
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Sorry, just want to clarify something...What makes you think that Powerbooks are to first ones, and not Ibooks? Haven't the rumors been more incisive on Ibooks? Really, I'm just trying to figure out why are you still talking about PB's...Did I miss something...?
polinho is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:16 PM   #15
Peace
macrumors Demi-God
 
Peace's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: On top of the Storm Peaks waiting for the Time-Lost Proto Drake
Quote:
Originally Posted by tristan
So the Intel iBook is going to smoke the G4 Powerbooks? That'll be interesting. 2006 is going to be a crazy year with lots of crazy rumors.
That will be one heck of a marketing scheme tho..

I can see Jobs saying:

Here's the new iBook..Wait till you see the new Powerbook!
Peace is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:21 PM   #16
840quadra
macrumors 68040
 
840quadra's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Twin Cities MN
Send a message via AIM to 840quadra Send a message via Skype™ to 840quadra
Quote:
Originally Posted by article
In addition, the chip maker is working with Cisco Systems Inc. deliver network capabilities that can be easily deployed and managed.
I wonder if this is going to be a partial SOAC that can offload some of the old cisco logic board tasks to one chip? If this chip were to contain networking intelligence of a higher power, it could also mean possibility of faster copper (or fiber) interconnects, and or more localized processing, as opposed to having many chips on the logic board to do networking. If that were true, and installed in a Powermac or Xserve, users of clusters or other high bandwidth hogging systems could see major improvements in performance! (Okay I am reaching out).
__________________
The iPhone is nice, but I am here for the Macrumors
Neucast the European automotive podcast
840quadra is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:22 PM   #17
Koodauw
macrumors 68030
 
Koodauw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Madison
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lacero
I don't see it going into iBooks quite yet. Maybe next year? There's going to be a premium on the dual-core Yonahs, so it'll likely make its debut on the higher margined PowerBooks. Professionals need this power... not the sophomore in college surfing for music and pr0n.
You'd be surprised how much CPU power P2P takes up. We need that ish now!
Koodauw is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:35 PM   #18
Randall
macrumors 6502a
 
Randall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norwood, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by Peace
Dual-Core Yonah Powerbooks at MWSF
I can almost guarantee it. *chomps at bit*

Quote:
Originally Posted by Koodauw
You'd be surprised how much CPU power P2P takes up. We need that ish now!
Try using bittorrent (not Azureus) for more CPU friendly file sharing. Transmission for OS X uses less then 3% CPU, and it's just as fast at downloading/seeding as Azureus, which tends to use close to 80% CPU in contrast.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tristan
So the Intel iBook is going to smoke the G4 Powerbooks? That'll be interesting. 2006 is going to be a crazy year with lots of crazy rumors.
Any laptop that has a Yonah processor in it will smoke any G4. That is why it makes sense to replace all of the G4 laiden hardware with Intel at once. "Get the G4 out the door"

Last edited by Randall : Dec 14, 2005 at 01:44 PM.
Randall is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:36 PM   #19
york2600
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Antarctica & Portland, OR
Send a message via AIM to york2600
So now the question becomes: Do I want to be cheap and get an ibook with the single core Yonah or a PowerBook with a dual core. Dual 2Ghz in my lap would be pretty sweet.

It'll also be nice to have a 'Book named after my town. Perhaps Apple can give me a discount when it gets mailed to Napa


Quote:
Originally Posted by Macrumors
http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

eWeek reports on Intel's new mobile platform called Napa, which was detailed yesterday to reporters.

According to Intel, the new laptop platform (Napa) which incorporates their dual-core Yonah processor will outperform their current laptops by 68%. Along with this will be a reduction in power consumption by 28%, which will extend battery life beyond 5 hours.



Napa/Yonah is expected in 2006 and Intel is expecting over 230 laptop designs. Intel was reportedly tight lipped, however, about whether or not Apple would adopt the entire platform. The expected release for Yonah is indeed January as rumored.

Yonah has been widely expected to be used by Apple in the first Intel Macs, also rumored to be released in January.
york2600 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:44 PM   #20
Hattig
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
I can see iBooks adopting the 1.5 or 1.66GHz dual-core Yonahs, whilst the Powerbook adopts the 1.83, 2.0 and 2.16GHz versions.

Given the performance increase (probably twice as fast per clock overall than a single core G4), and total lack of care from the PowerPC companies, Apple has no choice, it has to turn the PowerBook Intel sooner rather than later despite many of the third party pro applications not being intel-ised until late next year.

Which is a reversal on what I thought a couple of months ago, but then I thought Apple would be changing nearer June than January, and I thought they might hold out with a 7448 or that dual-core G4 until 2007 ...
__________________
iBook — 12" 1.33GHz, 1.5GB RAM, 40GB, Combodrive, 200GB Firewire Hard Drive :: iPod — 8GB Black G3 iPod nano
Hattig is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:46 PM   #21
aaronsullivan
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Rochester, NY
Unless running PowerPC code on these things (Rosetta) has been vastly improved, it will be iBooks first. Steve said consumers first then professionals in that Intel keynote didn't he? I'm 80% sure he did.

Remember, it's going to take some time to get the big professional apps transitioned over to Universal binary so they can run at better than snail speeds on an mactel machine. Apple jumping the gun on the Intel transition makes it even more likely that most professional apps will still be stuck with PowerPC only code.

I have no idea how Apple marketing would handle it if the iBooks smoked the Powerbooks for in general computing, but it's pretty much assured that programs still running PowerPC code (like most every professional app) would still run quite a bit faster on even today's Powerbooks than on a smokin' fast mactel iBook.

It will be iBooks and Powerbooks, or just iBooks, but I'd be VERY surprised to see JUST the Powerbooks updated.

I'd say the tiny iBook reaching into broader market territory with a good price and lower speed is the most likely announcement along with a redesigned mac mini/media device and a big focus on Leopard because Vista is now set to mid 2006 and Steve said they'd meet the release date.
aaronsullivan is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:46 PM   #22
Randall
macrumors 6502a
 
Randall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norwood, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by york2600
So now the question becomes: Do I want to be cheap and get an ibook with the single core Yonah or a PowerBook with a dual core. Dual 2Ghz in my lap would be pretty sweet.

It'll also be nice to have a 'Book named after my town. Perhaps Apple can give me a discount when it gets mailed to Napa
I personally would go for a dual core Yonah Powerbook (as soon as one exists of course ) I think it will be well worth the wait. All kinds of speed and power improvements are on thier way. This is a very exciting time for the mobile computing world.
Randall is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:49 PM   #23
Randall
macrumors 6502a
 
Randall's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Norwood, MA
Quote:
Originally Posted by aaronsullivan
Unless running PowerPC code on these things (Rosetta) has been vastly improved, it will be iBooks first. Steve said consumers first then professionals in that Intel keynote didn't he? I'm 80% sure he did.

Remember, it's going to take some time to get the big professional apps transitioned over to Universal binary so they can run at better than snail speeds on an mactel machine. Apple jumping the gun on the Intel transition makes it even more likely that most professional apps will still be stuck with PowerPC only code.

I have no idea how Apple marketing would handle it if the iBooks smoked the Powerbooks for in general computing, but it's pretty much assured that programs still running PowerPC code (like most every professional app) would still run quite a bit faster on even today's Powerbooks than on a smokin' fast mactel iBook.

It will be iBooks and Powerbooks, or just iBooks, but I'd be VERY surprised to see JUST the Powerbooks updated.

I'd say the tiny iBook reaching into broader market territory with a good price and lower speed is the most likely announcement along with a redesigned mac mini/media device and a big focus on Leopard because Vista is now set to mid 2006 and Steve said they'd meet the release date.
It would be a crime against humanity to make the iBooks run faster then the Powerbooks, regardless of the PPC emulation factor. That is why it's my opinion that they will release both. Let's face it, anything with a G4 in it is screaming for an upgrade.
Randall is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:50 PM   #24
gnasher729
macrumors 68040
 
gnasher729's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by FoxyKaye
2006, the year of the (HD) laptop?

So, the Intel-based stuff is going to cost less...
Excuse me, where did you read "cost less"?

Just because there are plenty of cheap laptops with cheap Intel celery processors around, doesn't mean that their high end chipsets will be cheap.
gnasher729 is offline  
Old Dec 14, 2005, 01:51 PM   #25
crazydreaming
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Salt Lake City, UT -Westminster College
Send a message via AIM to crazydreaming Send a message via MSN to crazydreaming
So does this mean that when deciding between an apple or a windows laptop, the Mac will finally outperform the windows laptop? Instead of just buying mac for form factor and OS X, they might actually perform better?


...I'm still happy with my Powerbook... but that might change soon , but I knew this was coming. I'll wait for the quadruple core powerbooks
__________________
17" Powerbook G4 Rev E, iCurve, Apple Keyboard + Mouse, WD external, JBL Creatures, Airport Express, Nikon D200, no iPod
crazydreaming is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:06 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC