I'm in the market for two desktops for home use and was wondering if anyone has any insight into Mac Pro vs. iMac.
I don't think I would buy two Mac Pros so I'm considering MP/iMac vs iMac/iMac.
It all depends on what you're using them for. For most people an iMac will be enough - no need to get a MacPro.I'm in the market for two desktops for home use and was wondering if anyone has any insight into Mac Pro vs. iMac.
I don't think I would buy two Mac Pros so I'm considering MP/iMac vs iMac/iMac.
No it doesn't. An iMac should be fine for what you're looking at using it for. Maybe you should buy one iMac and after getting the feel for it, you could then decide between anothe riMac or a MacPro.I guess in the past I did some programming and used windows at the same time (dedicated cores) as well as light movie conversions so I benefited from Mac Pro's hard drive expansions and ability to upgrade RAM to 16 or more.
I don't think I will be doing much programming anymore except to check others codes.
Movie conversion also not a big deal.
I like Mac pros because I've never owned an iMac in the past.
Does this signal any need for a Mac Pro?
You forgot to add a high quality screen to the MacPro. Also, the internal disks aren't the same size.This is a hard choice if you are like me and would get the highest end BTO options. I priced it out over the weekend:
iMac: 3.5 i7, 3TB Fusion, 780m + 32GB (3rd party) + Pegasus TB External RAID
$4,300
Mac Pro: 3.7, 256 SSD, D300 + 32GB (3rd party) + Pegasus TB External RAID
$4,899
That's not a huge price difference.
This is a hard choice if you are like me and would get the highest end BTO options. I priced it out over the weekend:
iMac: 3.5 i7, 3TB Fusion, 780m + 32GB (3rd party) + Pegasus TB External RAID
$4,300
Mac Pro: 3.7, 256 SSD, D300 + 32GB (3rd party) + Pegasus TB External RAID
$4,899
That's not a huge price difference.
the only reason for going with Mac pro is if you are a professional film maker or extreme gamer and you need the dual GPU cards.
The only thing that is user upgradeable inside the iMac is memory.Is it easy to upgrade the hdd on an iMac?
I already have monitors so that's a non issue.
The only thing that is user upgradeable inside the iMac is memory.
Is it easy to upgrade the hdd on an iMac?
I'm in the same boat but I'm leaning towards the Mac Pro. Why?
Because the current iMac model (although plenty fast) is missing some key features that the new lineup has. Those being Thunderbolt 2 ports and PCIe flash storage.
If you're like me, you'll keep your system for a minimum of 4 years, and you'll want to be in the current hardware offerings. The iMac is now behind the MBP in performance. It's no slouch with TB1 and SSD (SATA) but I feel like Apple is not going to bring the specs up on the iMac for a bit to prevent competing with nMP sales.
If for some reason they do a refresh in December on the iMac and brought it up to the rest of the lineup, I'd probably get it. I would love to have that big screen with TB2 ports and PCIe but I just don't see that happening in time.
Again, most users wouldn't really notice a difference but it's harder for me to put down close to 3k on a high spec'd iMac when it's missing this new tech that Apple is probably going to push hard this year.
I'm in the same boat but I'm leaning towards the Mac Pro. Why?
Because the current iMac model (although plenty fast) is missing some key features that the new lineup has. Those being Thunderbolt 2 ports and PCIe flash storage.
If you're like me, you'll keep your system for a minimum of 4 years, and you'll want to be in the current hardware offerings. The iMac is now behind the MBP in performance. It's no slouch with TB1 and SSD (SATA) but I feel like Apple is not going to bring the specs up on the iMac for a bit to prevent competing with nMP sales.
If for some reason they do a refresh in December on the iMac and brought it up to the rest of the lineup, I'd probably get it. I would love to have that big screen with TB2 ports and PCIe but I just don't see that happening in time.
Again, most users wouldn't really notice a difference but it's harder for me to put down close to 3k on a high spec'd iMac when it's missing this new tech that Apple is probably going to push hard this year.
The flash storage connects via PCIe on the current 2013 iMacs
just an FYI, the 2013 imac does have PCIE flash for its SSD. This was one of the big announcements they made during its release, Its really only missing TB2, but there aren't many TB1, let alone TB2 devices out to make too big of a deal about that. Until prices come down, adoption and release of new equipment will be quite low.
Can you point me to that documentation? I've asked several store employees/geniuses and they state it is not PCIe.
Because the current iMac model (although plenty fast) is missing some key features that the new lineup has. Those being Thunderbolt 2 ports and PCIe flash storage.
If you're like me, you'll keep your system for a minimum of 4 years, and you'll want to be in the current hardware offerings. The iMac is now behind the MBP in performance. It's no slouch with TB1 and SSD (SATA) but I feel like Apple is not going to bring the specs up on the iMac for a bit to prevent competing with nMP sales.