My 15 1GHz Titanium PowerBook is finally dying after a decade of faithful service. I like to buy the best machine I can and run it into the ground.
My next one needs to be portable (weekly not daily), do the usual MS Office/browsing/e-mail but also some video encoding for my iPad and Id like to play some games (nothing too hard core, but given Im finally getting up to date I want to be impressed). Ill often be working in trains with overhead bar lights. Ill use my iPad or TV to watch video.
I want a 15 MBP. I respect the retina and the relative price premium, but dont want it I use the optical drive too much and hate the idea that you cant upgrade/(easily) repair it. I gather the oldies deeper body gives better sound but thats not a major issue. I also *love* my current matt display and am pretty sure I want another thing is I havent been able to see them in the flesh, though my wife has a white plastic MacBook, if that's comparble to the glossy.
Looking at refurbs my choices are:
A) USD 1,449 - a 2012 glossy basic spec (Ivy Bridge quad i7 at 2.3Ghz w/Turbo boost to 3.3GHz, 4/500GB, Intel HD Graphics 4000 & NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 512MB of GDDR5 memory) see what I think & maybe buy a glare filter (BTW I cant find Power Support anywhere, and ppl seem to think Moshi not as good, so not sure what premium one Id choose).
B) USD 1,599 - a late 2011 mid spec high res anti-glare (Sandy Bridge quad i7 at 2.5 Ghz, 4/750GB, Intel HD Graphics 3000 and 1GB AMD Radeon HD 6770M).
C) Wait for a 2012 anti-glare to appear?
Id buy an SSD and 16GB RAM from OWC and put the internal in an enclosure for Time Machine duty.
So its a USD 150 difference, 1600 vs 1333MHz RAM, USB 2 vs 3, the graphics, the chip and the screen. Im least worried about USB I dont often move large volumes of data, and theres FW and Thunderbolt for that. Looking at Geekbench the basic 2012 should be slightly, but only slightly, faster overall. And then the screen isnt just matt but high-res in the 2011.
Should I be looking anywhere else and what should I do? If screen filters are reliable (and Im quite good at installing things) I think I value the 2012s performance over the 2011s high-res. But after a lot of research I just can't decide!
Your advice/experience/prejudices all gratefully received!
Chris
My next one needs to be portable (weekly not daily), do the usual MS Office/browsing/e-mail but also some video encoding for my iPad and Id like to play some games (nothing too hard core, but given Im finally getting up to date I want to be impressed). Ill often be working in trains with overhead bar lights. Ill use my iPad or TV to watch video.
I want a 15 MBP. I respect the retina and the relative price premium, but dont want it I use the optical drive too much and hate the idea that you cant upgrade/(easily) repair it. I gather the oldies deeper body gives better sound but thats not a major issue. I also *love* my current matt display and am pretty sure I want another thing is I havent been able to see them in the flesh, though my wife has a white plastic MacBook, if that's comparble to the glossy.
Looking at refurbs my choices are:
A) USD 1,449 - a 2012 glossy basic spec (Ivy Bridge quad i7 at 2.3Ghz w/Turbo boost to 3.3GHz, 4/500GB, Intel HD Graphics 4000 & NVIDIA GeForce GT 650M with 512MB of GDDR5 memory) see what I think & maybe buy a glare filter (BTW I cant find Power Support anywhere, and ppl seem to think Moshi not as good, so not sure what premium one Id choose).
B) USD 1,599 - a late 2011 mid spec high res anti-glare (Sandy Bridge quad i7 at 2.5 Ghz, 4/750GB, Intel HD Graphics 3000 and 1GB AMD Radeon HD 6770M).
C) Wait for a 2012 anti-glare to appear?
Id buy an SSD and 16GB RAM from OWC and put the internal in an enclosure for Time Machine duty.
So its a USD 150 difference, 1600 vs 1333MHz RAM, USB 2 vs 3, the graphics, the chip and the screen. Im least worried about USB I dont often move large volumes of data, and theres FW and Thunderbolt for that. Looking at Geekbench the basic 2012 should be slightly, but only slightly, faster overall. And then the screen isnt just matt but high-res in the 2011.
Should I be looking anywhere else and what should I do? If screen filters are reliable (and Im quite good at installing things) I think I value the 2012s performance over the 2011s high-res. But after a lot of research I just can't decide!
Your advice/experience/prejudices all gratefully received!
Chris