Rare Recordings from The Beatles to Launch Exclusively on iTunes Next Week - MacRumors Forums
Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 14, 2013, 06:14 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Rare Recordings from The Beatles to Launch Exclusively on iTunes Next Week




A digital compilation of 59 rare and unheard recordings from The Beatles is set to be released exclusively on the iTunes Store this coming Tuesday, December 17, reports NME (via BBC).

Titled The Beatles' Bootleg Recordings 1963, the collection of music is reportedly being released in order stop the expiration of the copyright protection surrounding the records, as the tracks themselves consist of BBC sessions, alternative versions of popular hits, and studio outtakes.
Quote:
EU law protects songs for 70 years after they are recorded, but only if they get an official release. Otherwise, copyright lasts 50 years.

In the case of The Beatles, that means their 1963 debut album Please Please Me is protected until 2033, but the unreleased session tapes for that album are not.

If the Beatles chose not to release the recordings before the end of the year, it would mean other record labels could theoretically put them out and profit from them.
The Beatles' music originally debuted on iTunes in November 2010 after years of speculation and prolonged negotiation between record label EMI and Apple. The group's music went on to sell 2 million songs and 450,000 albums in its first week on the iTunes Store, and eventually reached overall sales of 5 million songs and 1 million albums within in two months. Exclusive ringtones by The Beatles also were made available on iTunes in February 2012.

Article Link: Rare Recordings from The Beatles to Launch Exclusively on iTunes Next Week
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 06:18 AM   #2
macs4nw
macrumors 68020
 
macs4nw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: On Safari…..
I wish they would release some more of those 1961 Hamburg sessions with Tony Sheridan…..as well as some other Cavern recordings…..but also curious to hear these 1963 bootleg recordings…..
__________________
Due to my aversion to bragging and clichés, no words of wisdom to be found on this line.....

Last edited by macs4nw; Dec 14, 2013 at 06:32 AM.
macs4nw is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 06:31 AM   #3
BillyBobBongo
macrumors 68000
 
BillyBobBongo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: On The Interweb Thingy!
....and they won't need to buy out the iTunes store front-page to bring attention to it.
__________________
"You didn't have a bad experience with tequila, you had an experience with bad tequila!" : crushedagave
Mac Pro: 2.93GHz Quad-Core, iMac 21.5":2.7 GHz Core i5, MacBook Air: 1.8GHz i5
BillyBobBongo is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 06:35 AM   #4
BlueParadox
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
I guess no 'Carnival of Light'. Not now, anyway...
BlueParadox is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 07:24 AM   #5
djgamble
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
'If the Beatles chose not to release the recordings before the end of the year, it would mean other record labels could theoretically put them out and profit from them.'

Or the BBC could just chuck them online as a free download without retribution.

TBH I find this greedy. In 50 years they haven't found any of these tracks worthy of being released. Come the 11th hour and they are releasing a massive compilation album in order to extend their stranglehold over the tracks for another 20 years.

The Beatles are old news. They've made their squillions and their families are set for many generations to come (even after spending 90% of their riches on heroin/LSD).

They are no longer performing (and most of the originals are dead). The record label doesn't need to lock down the rights to all music that they never intended to sell.

Good on them for potentially re-mastering it and putting it out there but one must question why they didn't do this years ago, or for free.
djgamble is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 07:39 AM   #6
Shaun, UK
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Amazed that they're still finding previously unheard or unreleased tracks 50 years later. Either way as a Beatles fan I'm interested to hear what they've found.
__________________
All that is necessary for the triumph of evil is that good men do nothing
Shaun, UK is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 07:42 AM   #7
Monkeydude
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Hamburg, Germany
Beatles - 50 years old music

What is it with Apple and The Beatles?
I think it had a reason, why the Beatles didn't want to publish this. They made some good songs, but they also released really bad ones - and even in their opinion these bootlegs seemed to be even worse - so what's the fuzz about some 43+ year old records?
Monkeydude is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 07:51 AM   #8
furi0usbee
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgamble View Post
The Beatles are old news. They've made their squillions and their families are set for many generations to come (even after spending 90% of their riches on heroin/LSD).

They are no longer performing (and most of the originals are dead). The record label doesn't need to lock down the rights to all music that they never intended to sell.
.
Wow, a bunch of dumb statements. Real old news... yet we are still talking about them. Yeah, McCartney spent 90% of his wealth, and still managed to be a billionaire. Unlike many artists... the Beatles are not known for their drug use. They dropped LSD in mid-sixties, smoked pot, Lennon had a heroin addiction for a time, etc. We are not talking about Keith Richards here. Most of the originals are dead? Yeah, try two... half. Not most. I guess most of the originals died of drug overdose as well? Well, it's true, they are no longer performing, since 1969 on a rooftop. Your post is stupid on so many levels.
__________________
YouTube - Apple iPhone Support Hotline (Actual Phone Call Recording)
MacBook Pro 15" (Retina) 2.3GHz i7 / 8GB RAM  iPad mini (AT&T) (16GB)
furi0usbee is offline   23 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 07:56 AM   #9
Sol
macrumors 65832
 
Sol's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Australia
Send a message via Skype™ to Sol
After five decades, I wonder who The Beatles' market is today. I'm in my thirties and their music never grabbed me like the Jimmy Hendrix Experience, The Doors and The Who did. Personally I can appreciate some of their later, ballsier songs but for the most part they sound too poppy and inoffensive to not sound dated.
__________________
DOWN WITH BIG BROTHER
Sol is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 08:01 AM   #10
furi0usbee
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol View Post
After five decades, I wonder who The Beatles' market is today.
With 30 million record sales in the first decade of the 21st century, either all those old hippies keep buying the same records, or new generations are taking a liking. Question, 40, 50 years after Eminem goes away, will people be buying 30 million copies of his albums? Prolly not. There is something special going on there...

http://music-mix.ew.com/2009/12/08/b...minem-beatles/
__________________
YouTube - Apple iPhone Support Hotline (Actual Phone Call Recording)
MacBook Pro 15" (Retina) 2.3GHz i7 / 8GB RAM  iPad mini (AT&T) (16GB)
furi0usbee is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 08:11 AM   #11
arefbe
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
I suppose that means no 24 minute version of Helter Skelter, either.
__________________
2013 rMacBook Pro 13", iPad 4 AT&T, iPhone 5 AT&T, iPod touch 5G
arefbe is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 09:02 AM   #12
kerryb
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
ignorant

To the ignorant and for some unknown reason Beatle hater posting here... What difference does it make to you if the Beatles are releasing rare tracks which only will be purchased by die hard Beatles fans? To say such negative things about a pop group that left us with some great music and songs which will stay in our culture for generations is just mean. George died from a brain tumor do you fault him for dying this way? John was murdered by a mentally illl man. Despite John's many years of supporting the Peace Movement he was killed violently. There was a time when young people cared about our country being involved in wars that had no good reason, today young people might be more interested in buying the latest Apple product than the US military being forced to fight wars for corporate America. Paul is alive and still touring and releasing new albums. He works for animal rights and conservation. Do you think Beiber or Swift would ever pick up a cause beyond themselves when they can make commercials selling Coke. I'm not sure why I bother to "learn" you but someone has to say something to balance the lameness posted here.
kerryb is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 09:15 AM   #13
kerryb
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Revolution

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sol View Post
After five decades, I wonder who The Beatles' market is today. I'm in my thirties and their music never grabbed me like the Jimmy Hendrix Experience, The Doors and The Who did. Personally I can appreciate some of their later, ballsier songs but for the most part they sound too poppy and inoffensive to not sound dated.
When I heard the Beatles for the first time in 1964 I could not believe my ears. Pop music before this time was (MOR) middle of the road stuff like, Pat Boone, Connie Francis, etc.. Safe stuff your parents and grand parents enjoyed. Teens did not have a music that made them want to jump and dance and let loose. Most young people were hooked at that point. The Beatles brought us our own culture back to us with rhythms and lyrics that they were influenced by from such black artists such as Chuck Berry and Little Richard which were considered "race music" at the time, meaning little airplay. Elvis connected to young people the same way coming from the south and being white he played the kind of music that was not allowed on white radio stations and young people got their first taste of R&B and Blues. The Beatles were part of the perfect storm of music and cultural counter revolution. They lived in London and where everything cool was happening. Each album was a evolution as they experimented in a variety of musical form and styles. They had a short trip into eastern spiritualism and drugs like LSD as many artist did at the time. There was never anyone as famous as the Beatles were at their peak in the history of modern music. Hope this explains a little of what it was like growing up during that time and why the Beatles still fascinate so many people. By the way I was 6 the first time I heard first album.
kerryb is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 09:19 AM   #14
Porco
macrumors 68000
 
Porco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
#All you need is love... and copyright renewal strategies...

I like The Beatles, but this feels a bit cynical. Hopefully it will be quite a low price. Nice for dedicated fans to have this stuff available, but that seems like an accidental bonus rather than a well-meant motivation.

That said, the idea of other people being able to profit from their work for no good reason is not great either, so you can't really blame them for the concept of trying to stop that within the broken system that exists.
__________________
I really wish Apple would use the option key a little more, and the command key a little less.
*soundcloud/fdporco*
Porco is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 10:20 AM   #15
pocket3d
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryb View Post
When I heard the Beatles for the first time in 1964 I could not believe my ears . . .
I couldn't either, and I was already primed for it, at the age of 22, by having been hammered by many hours of Chuck Berry, Jerry Lee Lewis, Little Richard, Jimmy Reed and far too much Elvis. I agree with what you say here.

The Beatles were the second rock and roll revolution, followed closely by The Rolling Stones, and they showed that non-Southern white boys could do it too, with class, even. It was the beginning of the counterculture sound track, and it's great that there are still (some) kids who get into it. It all represented the dying off of corporate white-bread culture, still in progress and obviously not finished. As such it's a world cultural treasure, and hats off to Apple for sticking with it. Steve knew the score.
pocket3d is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 10:21 AM   #16
Baumi
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
I'm curious whether these are really unreleased session tapes or just the stuff Swingin' Pig Records put out on the semi-legal "Utra Rare Trax" albums in the late 80s and early 90s.

("Semi-legal" because they used a since-closed loophole in EU copyright that allowed them to release the tracks without the rightsholders' consent.)
Baumi is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 10:31 AM   #17
JackieInCo
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Colorado
Quote:
Originally Posted by BillyBobBongo View Post
....and they won't need to buy out the iTunes store front-page to bring attention to it.
That's right. I'm avoiding the iTunes Music store until that nonsense is gone.

People still want the Beatles after all these years. The interest is amazing. Younger people love this band. It's like so much of their music was recorded today. It doesn't sound old. I'm 19 and own all the albums.
JackieInCo is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 10:38 AM   #18
Iconoclysm
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: May 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgamble View Post
'If the Beatles chose not to release the recordings before the end of the year, it would mean other record labels could theoretically put them out and profit from them.'

Or the BBC could just chuck them online as a free download without retribution.

TBH I find this greedy. In 50 years they haven't found any of these tracks worthy of being released. Come the 11th hour and they are releasing a massive compilation album in order to extend their stranglehold over the tracks for another 20 years.

The Beatles are old news. They've made their squillions and their families are set for many generations to come (even after spending 90% of their riches on heroin/LSD).

They are no longer performing (and most of the originals are dead). The record label doesn't need to lock down the rights to all music that they never intended to sell.

Good on them for potentially re-mastering it and putting it out there but one must question why they didn't do this years ago, or for free.
Heroin and LSD? It's no wonder you have no freaking idea what you're talking about with the rest of it...this is about as stupid as stupid gets.
Iconoclysm is offline   7 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 11:06 AM   #19
3goldens
macrumors 68000
 
3goldens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Bravo. Well said.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryb View Post
When I heard the Beatles for the first time in 1964 I could not believe my ears. Pop music before this time was (MOR) middle of the road stuff like, Pat Boone, Connie Francis, etc.. Safe stuff your parents and grand parents enjoyed. Teens did not have a music that made them want to jump and dance and let loose. Most young people were hooked at that point. The Beatles brought us our own culture back to us with rhythms and lyrics that they were influenced by from such black artists such as Chuck Berry and Little Richard which were considered "race music" at the time, meaning little airplay. Elvis connected to young people the same way coming from the south and being white he played the kind of music that was not allowed on white radio stations and young people got their first taste of R&B and Blues. The Beatles were part of the perfect storm of music and cultural counter revolution. They lived in London and where everything cool was happening. Each album was a evolution as they experimented in a variety of musical form and styles. They had a short trip into eastern spiritualism and drugs like LSD as many artist did at the time. There was never anyone as famous as the Beatles were at their peak in the history of modern music. Hope this explains a little of what it was like growing up during that time and why the Beatles still fascinate so many people. By the way I was 6 the first time I heard first album.
3goldens is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 11:22 AM   #20
3goldens
macrumors 68000
 
3goldens's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Clearly, those who make the disparaging uneducated remarks don't understand the historic significance of these 4 lads from Liverpool. Making these comments based on whether you personally like the music and not recognizing the historical significance of this band is simply being unable to be objective, and well, stupid !


Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryb View Post
To the ignorant and for some unknown reason Beatle hater posting here... What difference does it make to you if the Beatles are releasing rare tracks which only will be purchased by die hard Beatles fans? To say such negative things about a pop group that left us with some great music and songs which will stay in our culture for generations is just mean. George died from a brain tumor do you fault him for dying this way? John was murdered by a mentally illl man. Despite John's many years of supporting the Peace Movement he was killed violently. There was a time when young people cared about our country being involved in wars that had no good reason, today young people might be more interested in buying the latest Apple product than the US military being forced to fight wars for corporate America. Paul is alive and still touring and releasing new albums. He works for animal rights and conservation. Do you think Beiber or Swift would ever pick up a cause beyond themselves when they can make commercials selling Coke. I'm not sure why I bother to "learn" you but someone has to say something to balance the lameness posted here.
3goldens is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 11:56 AM   #21
John.B
macrumors 68040
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Flyover Country
Quote:
Originally Posted by djgamble View Post
'If the Beatles chose not to release the recordings before the end of the year, it would mean other record labels could theoretically put them out and profit from them.'

Or the BBC could just chuck them online as a free download without retribution.

TBH I find this greedy. In 50 years they haven't found any of these tracks worthy of being released. Come the 11th hour and they are releasing a massive compilation album in order to extend their stranglehold over the tracks for another 20 years.

The Beatles are old news. They've made their squillions and their families are set for many generations to come (even after spending 90% of their riches on heroin/LSD).

They are no longer performing (and most of the originals are dead). The record label doesn't need to lock down the rights to all music that they never intended to sell.

Good on them for potentially re-mastering it and putting it out there but one must question why they didn't do this years ago, or for free.
I just love it when people want to "give away" stuff that belongs to someone else.

The best part is watching the contortions they twist themselves into to try to justify their "logic".
__________________
Apple develops an improved programming language. Google copied Java. Everything you need to know, right there.

MA497LL/A FB463LL/A MC572LL/A FC060LL/A MD481LL/A MD388LL/A ME344LL/A
John.B is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 12:10 PM   #22
ChrisA
macrumors G4
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Redondo Beach, California
Quote:
Originally Posted by Monkeydude View Post
What is it with Apple and The Beatles?
I think it had a reason, why the Beatles didn't want to publish this. They made some good songs, but they also released really bad ones - and even in their opinion these bootlegs seemed to be even worse - so what's the fuzz about some 43+ year old records?
Yes, the home and bootleg recording coming out are very poor quality. But it is interesting for historic reasons. Some people might want to hear how they progressed over time.

What's interesting about such wary work is that is was not "produced" There wa not big lable and producers. It was just four guys and a primitive tape recorder. Compare this to what was done with big budgets and professional engineers at Abbey Road a few years later.

So that is what this album (and other like it) allows, you can hear them before they had the big budget and studio.
ChrisA is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 01:28 PM   #23
darkfiber
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Columbus, OH USA
Quote:
Originally Posted by kerryb View Post
Do you think Beiber or Swift would ever pick up a cause beyond themselves when they can make commercials selling Coke.
I don't know about Beiber, but Taylor Swift, absolutely she has...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Taylor_swift#Philanthropy
__________________
iPhone 5s (64GB) AT&T "Space Gray" 09-25-2013
darkfiber is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 01:32 PM   #24
IJ Reilly
macrumors Pentium
 
IJ Reilly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Palookaville
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChrisA View Post
Yes, the home and bootleg recording coming out are very poor quality. But it is interesting for historic reasons. Some people might want to hear how they progressed over time.

What's interesting about such wary work is that is was not "produced" There wa not big lable and producers. It was just four guys and a primitive tape recorder. Compare this to what was done with big budgets and professional engineers at Abbey Road a few years later.

So that is what this album (and other like it) allows, you can hear them before they had the big budget and studio.
Technically, these don't seem to be "bootleg" recordings, by the usual meaning of the word. In the past this has always meant recordings made illicitly. These may be previously unreleased recordings, but they were authorized at the time they were made.
__________________
*The season starts too early and finishes too late and there are too many games in between.
Bill Veeck
IJ Reilly is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 14, 2013, 02:09 PM   #25
Doctor Q
Administrator
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Los Angeles
Perhaps some of these recordings will make it to the Breakfast With the Beatles radio show, which celebrates its 30th anniversary tomorrow. The Beatles' music's longevity is quite amazing.
__________________
Oh do pay attention 007. In the wrong hands, this 12-core Mac Pro with three 4K displays, FirePro graphics, and Thunderbolt 2 could be very dangerous.
Doctor Q is offline   1 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
launch week 5s now dust under camera mustu iPhone 14 Dec 15, 2013 03:25 PM
BBC Releases Lost Episodes of 'Doctor Who' Exclusively on iTunes MacRumors Mac Blog Discussion 50 Oct 17, 2013 05:36 AM
Rdio Announcing Free Music Service Ahead of iTunes Radio Launch This Week MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 22 Sep 17, 2013 05:08 PM
2K and Lucid Games Launch '2K Drive' Exclusively For iOS MacRumors iOS Blog Discussion 14 Sep 8, 2013 07:08 PM
Buy in UK or US in launch week? fatboyslick iPhone 6 Aug 30, 2013 08:04 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC