Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Dec 23, 2013, 03:29 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Catch: How Apple Could Integrate Note-Taking Capabilities into Reminders, Siri, Maps, and More




Before shutting its doors in August of 2013 following an acquisition by Apple that was revealed this morning, Catch operated a web-based note taking service and iOS and Android apps known as Catch Notes. Ahead of the company's acquisition, Catch Notes was well-known as a high-quality productivity app and had been featured by Apple as a new and noteworthy app when it was first released in 2010 and as part of the Apple's "Why You'll Love an iPhone" advertising campaign.

Designed for note taking, Catch Notes allowed users to capture and share ideas, writing notes in text, saving images, and recording voice notes. It functioned similarly to Evernote, organizing notes into different categories that could be easily shared with others. Deep organization was one of the key features of Catch Notes, which organized notes into "Spaces" or folders that included tags for labeling. Spaces could be manipulated with simple touch gestures, giving Catch Notes an easy-to-use interface. The app also organized notes into "Streams,"

In addition to bundling a variety of note formats into a single note-taking app, Catch Notes also included task-oriented functionality like checklists and reminders, along with a lot of collaborative features. With Catch Notes, for instance, users could create a task list or note that was shared and synced between multiple people. Collaborative content was organized into "Streams," which aggregated a collection of notes that could be used to allow multiple users to contribute to and build upon a single idea, even functioning as an ongoing conversation.

Shortly before Catch shut down its services, the company also launched Catch Team, designed to make team collaboration both easier and more secure through the implementation of "team leader" functionality allowing an admin to manage individual users.

It is impossible to predict how Catch and its Evernote-style note-taking capabilities might be incorporated into Apple's OS X and iOS operating systems, but there are multiple possible use cases for the technology, across Notes, Reminders, Siri, and Maps.

Notes and Reminders

Catch's base functionality, which included note taking that incorporated both images and audio clips, is an easy to imagine expansion for Apple's own Notes and Reminders apps. Currently, Notes and Reminders are limited to text functionality, though voice dictation can be used to transcribe text. With design elements taken from Catch Notes, notes, reminders, and checklists could be created from and include both audio clips and photos or other images directly within a note or reminder.

Catch Notes used a tag-based system for organizing notes, much like Finder in OS X. While Reminders incorporates colored tags as well, a more unified tagging system across Reminders and Notes apps for both iOS and OS X could make Apple's productivity apps far more functional by facilitating quicker searches for relevant content.

The collaborative features within Catch Notes could also be useful within the Reminders and Notes apps, allowing users to easily share content over iCloud. With collaboration, deeper functionality, and better organization for the Notes app, Apple's built-in productivity software could edge closer to competing with more robust solutions like Evernote, which was formerly one of Catch's competitors.

Catch also had an innovative click-wheel style menu system that was simple to use for the creation of new content, along with visual notifications, and it is possible that some of these design elements could make it into Apple's apps in the future.

Siri and iCloud

An expanded Evernote-like note and reminder functionality bundled into Apple's own Notes and Reminders apps could also be extended to Siri, allowing the service to potentially capture voice-based notes to be remembered later.

Catch's robust syncing capabilities, which allowed content to be synced to multiple iOS devices and multiple user accounts, is also technology that Apple could look into incorporating into future versions of iOS and iCloud.

Maps

Along with its Catch Note app, Catch also operated an Android App called Compass, which was a location-based app that allowed users to make location-based notes about individual places, similar to how Foursquare allows users to leave tips on each location within the app.
Quote:
New to Compass? Compass is our location-based app that allows you to always know where North is, save your favorite locations, navigate back to them (with Google Maps), and take notes about a location.
It is possible that Apple could use this location-based note-taking technology in order to expand its mapping capabilities, as it has worked hard in recent months to beef up its Maps app through the acquisition of several Mapping apps including Embark, Locationary, and HopStop. Aggregating location-based notes could be a way for Apple to introduce location discovery and additional points of interest to Maps.

Catch was shut down in August of 2013 and according to recent reports, was acquired by Apple during the same month. It remains unknown when or how Apple will incorporate the purchase into its own products, but at this time, several former Catch employees are now working at Apple on iOS-related software.

Article Link: Catch: How Apple Could Integrate Note-Taking Capabilities into Reminders, Siri, Maps, and More
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 03:38 PM   #2
SeenJeen
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
It would be pretty brilliant to have a chronological journal of all your actions in one central place. Notes you've highlighted from websites, pictures you've taken, places you've been, reminders, notes, conversations...

I use Evernote, but its lack of integration with the whole OS sucks. I know it's not Evernote's fault, either.
SeenJeen is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 03:55 PM   #3
entropys
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Brisbane, Australia
It might also have uses for collaboration in pages, numbers etc.
__________________
27 inch i7 imac 3.4 Ghz
entropys is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 04:13 PM   #4
macduke
macrumors 68020
 
macduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
__________________
MacBook Pro R-Type / Quad 2.6GHz Core i7 / 2880×1800 / 16GB / 512GB SSD
Canon 7D w/grip / 24-105L / 100-400L / Sony RX100
64GB iPad Mini Retina LTE / 64GB iPhone 5 / 8GB Original iPhone / Xbox One
macduke is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 04:17 PM   #5
thelookingglass
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by macduke View Post
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Completely agree. Apple's relative lack of expertise in search is glaringly obvious when performing a search in Maps vs a search in Google Maps. It's a night and day difference. Thank god Google came out with an iOS version of Google Maps - it's so much more robust than Apple's Maps.
thelookingglass is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 04:20 PM   #6
NT1440
macrumors G3
 
NT1440's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Hartford, CT
Quote:
Originally Posted by macduke View Post
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Quote:
Originally Posted by thelookingglass View Post
Completely agree. Apple's relative lack of expertise in search is glaringly obvious when performing a search in Maps vs a search in Google Maps. It's a night and day difference. Thank god Google came out with an iOS version of Google Maps - it's so much more robust than Apple's Maps.
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
NT1440 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 04:28 PM   #7
158274
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by NT1440 View Post
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
No, it's not a matter of data, Google's search algorithms are actually better. Many times I've searched for a store or a restaurant in Apple Maps and not getting any relevant results, I almost concluded that they didn't have it in their database... then I zoom into the exactly street corner where I know it is, and lo and behold, there it is, clearly labeled. Other times I have to specify my city, while Google Maps automatically infers from my location data and provides me more relevant results.
158274 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 06:49 PM   #8
Nickerbocker
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by macduke View Post
I just want to type a query into Apple Maps and get relevant results. I've found that the directions seem to be getting more reliable, but actually finding results that match what you're looking for is tricky. Switching to Google maps, the results are higher quality. I hate the Google Maps navigation voice though.

Apple needs to get better at search. I'm not saying they need to become a search engine company. There is a difference.
Tell me about it! Trying to direct Apple Maps to La Quinta by the airport in Austin TX can turn into quite the effort if you do not know the exact street name, for example.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by 158274 View Post
No, it's not a matter of data, Google's search algorithms are actually better. Many times I've searched for a store or a restaurant in Apple Maps and not getting any relevant results, I almost concluded that they didn't have it in their database... then I zoom into the exactly street corner where I know it is, and lo and behold, there it is, clearly labeled. Other times I have to specify my city, while Google Maps automatically infers from my location data and provides me more relevant results.
That is true, but it is not just the map data but the user search data that Google has more of and seems to be good at leveraging.
Nickerbocker is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 23, 2013, 11:13 PM   #9
charlituna
macrumors 604
 
charlituna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Los Angeles, CA
If they used Catch to replace the current Notes app it would already be a major improvement. iOS Notes rather sucks when you consider you can't do things from the Mac version like transfer notes between accounts, include images or even view included ones from Mac version
charlituna is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 02:32 AM   #10
kis
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Switzerland
Well, I can now say bye-bye to the Android app, I'm guessing :-/ Next thing, Google will probably acquire Evernote and multi-platform note-taking is a thing of the past, due to the large tech companies' moronic little war.
__________________
27" iMac Late 2013 / 3.4 Ghz / 16GB RAM / 3TB FD / GTX775M 2GB ; 2012 rMBP 15" 2.7ghz / 768gb / 16G ; iPhone 5S / 32gb / Space Gray ; Apple TV
kis is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 04:23 AM   #11
vladi
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Where is substance in all of this?
vladi is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 04:45 AM   #12
FieldingMellish
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Developers for apps like Catch create their own language of its facets of control, a language much like that invented by Starbucks. Looking into it’s various features, Catch developers are essentially describing OmniFocus for iPhone, developed long ago by Omnigroup. http://www.omnigroup.com
FieldingMellish is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 04:45 AM   #13
Jynto
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Nottingham, UK
Quote:
Originally Posted by kis View Post
Well, I can now say bye-bye to the Android app, I'm guessing :-/ Next thing, Google will probably acquire Evernote and multi-platform note-taking is a thing of the past, due to the large tech companies' moronic little war.
Fortunately that's not likely to happen. Evernote Corp would not sell themselves out like that. They have publicly stated that they want to be around for 100 years, and whilst that does sound a bit presumptuous for a tech company, it does mean that your notes are safe.

Trust me, I've seen the future.
__________________
15'' AirBook Pro (late 2018) with 5.1 GHz Core i9, 64 GB RAM, 4 TB SSD, and iOS X 10.12 (jailbroken)
Jynto is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 05:57 AM   #14
Gutwrench
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
I liked Catch but my chief complaint was its' date display. A note or comment added would only display a date duration rather than the actual date or date-timestamp it was entered.

Displaying a note was created "17 days ago" was useless to me.
I needed a date-timestamp to document the notes/comments.
Gutwrench is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 07:30 AM   #15
cgsnipinva
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by charlituna View Post
If they used Catch to replace the current Notes app it would already be a major improvement. iOS Notes rather sucks when you consider you can't do things from the Mac version like transfer notes between accounts, include images or even view included ones from Mac version
It would also be a great part of their iWork Apps in OS X like One Note is for MS Office.
cgsnipinva is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 24, 2013, 12:58 PM   #16
powers74
macrumors 68000
 
powers74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: At the bend in the river
Send a message via AIM to powers74
Never been a fan of the roundel interface. Never liked it in Alias. Never liked it in Sketchbook Pro. Takes up space weirdly, and just never seemed faster to me. But then again, what the hell do I know.
__________________
“What do you think, Phil? Too much?”
powers74 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 25, 2013, 08:05 PM   #17
jonnysods
macrumors 68030
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Aussie living in Canada
How about not making Reminders suck? It's horrific right now.
jonnysods is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Dec 29, 2013, 02:37 PM   #18
macduke
macrumors 68020
 
macduke's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Quote:
Originally Posted by NT1440 View Post
It's not that Google's searching is better when it comes to maps, its actually that Google has a much bigger database to search through. Map search results are not the same as web searching results, Google has had MUCH more time to build up.
While their database might be bigger, there are certainly instances where Apple Maps finds the same places but you need to be much more specific. So it isn't cross referencing different terms that have similar meanings.
__________________
MacBook Pro R-Type / Quad 2.6GHz Core i7 / 2880×1800 / 16GB / 512GB SSD
Canon 7D w/grip / 24-105L / 100-400L / Sony RX100
64GB iPad Mini Retina LTE / 64GB iPhone 5 / 8GB Original iPhone / Xbox One
macduke is offline   0 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > MacRumors.com News Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:52 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC