Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 7, 2014, 11:09 AM   #1
jnpy!$4g3cwk
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
What it really takes to get ahead: FAI

Economists and social psychologists and statisticians, oh my. All those tiger moms out there trying to teach calculus to their 8th graders have got it all wrong. Their money would better be spent on plastic surgery. Guess what? People are shallow.

Quote:
Never Mind the Résumé. How Hot Is the C.E.O.?
BY ANDREW ROSS SORKIN

Call it the “C.E.O. beauty premium.”

Two economists say their study shows that investors assign higher share values to companies run by attractive chief executives, that these chiefs are paid more than less-appealing counterparts and that the better looking the C.E.O.’s, the better they are at undertaking financially successful deals.

The conclusion of the unusual academic study — a sort of corporate version of “Hot or Not” — is that shareholders are as easily swayed by the glint in the eye of a chief executive as they are by a company’s actual numbers, at least in the short term.

According to a working paper by Joseph T. Halford and Hung-Chia Hsu at the University of Wisconsin, a good-looking C.E.O.’s appearance had “a positive and significant impact on stock returns surrounding the first day when the C.E.O. is on the job,” worth about 43 basis points in increased stock value compared with a C.E.O. 10 percent less attractive. A one-point increase in attractiveness on a scale of 1 to 10, the study also found, “is related to a $873,000 increase in total wage, controlling for various firm and C.E.O. characteristics.”

If you’re wondering who judges this executive beauty pageant, it is a computer.

Mr. Halford and Mr. Hsu loaded the pictures of 677 chief executives onto a website called anaface.com, which measures what it describes as “neoclassical beauty” by looking at the symmetry of a face — “the ratio of nose to ear length, the ratio of eye width compared to inner-ocular distance, the ratio of nose width to face width, the ratio of face width to face height, and the ratio of mouth width to nose width.”

Marissa Mayer, the chief executive of Yahoo, among the top 5 percent of attractive executives, according to the study, scored an 8.45 out of 10 on the Facial Attractiveness Index, or F.A.I. Paul Jacobs, chairman of Qualcomm, scored an 8.19. In comparison, the actress Angelina Jolie scored about 8.5, the economists said. Her significant other, the actor Brad Pitt, scored an 8.46. (It’s worth noting that the average score was no different between male and female chief executives.)

There is a long list of psychology research demonstrating that appearances matter more than most us would care to admit. As shallow as it may be, better-looking people have been shown in various studies to have higher self-esteem and more charisma, are considered more trustworthy and are better negotiators.
http://dealbook.nytimes.com/2014/01/...=business&_r=0

What's your FAI?
jnpy!$4g3cwk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2014, 01:11 PM   #2
Technarchy
macrumors 68040
 
Technarchy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
I think this is only the case for an off the shelf MBA tool that confuses layoffs with profits.

If you actually have a brain and create something great, how you look doesn't mean anything





__________________
Steve Jobs, January 9th 2007, 10:44am: "We filed for over 200 patents for all the inventions in iPhone and we intend to protect them."
Technarchy is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2014, 03:22 PM   #3
jnpy!$4g3cwk
Thread Starter
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Technarchy View Post
I think this is only the case for an off the shelf MBA tool that confuses layoffs with profits.

If you actually have a brain and create something great, how you look doesn't mean anything
Just for fun I plugged in a close-up of Bill Gates that I found. 8.13 out of 10.0. Not quite Angelina Jolie or Brad Pitt, but, pretty high. Unfortunately, people are shallow, and, tend to like and trust people more when they have better facial symmetry.
jnpy!$4g3cwk is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2014, 04:46 PM   #4
sviato
macrumors 68000
 
sviato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: HR 9038 A
Photo taking forever to upload...
sviato is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 7, 2014, 10:41 PM   #5
Sydde
macrumors 68000
 
Sydde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009

Soros

Fiorina


Buffet
__________________
You got to be a spirit. You can't be no ghost.
Sydde is online now   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 8, 2014, 02:45 AM   #6
MyMac1976
Banned
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
^^^ Are all old now but made their fortunes when they were young
MyMac1976 is offline   0 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
iPhone 6. Ahead of the Curve. Klae17 iPhone 6 Nov 10, 2013 06:56 PM
Thinking ahead..... brentg33 OS X Mavericks (10.9) 5 Jul 16, 2013 04:22 PM
Should I wait or go ahead? Gemmy iMac 26 Sep 1, 2012 09:29 PM
Five years ahead GeorgieAcevedo iOS 6 36 Jun 15, 2012 05:39 PM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:00 PM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC