Register FAQ / Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read
Go Back   MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 21, 2014, 06:43 PM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Apple, Google Shuttles to Pay to Use Public Bus Stops in San Francisco




Major tech companies like Apple, Google, and Facebook often use private buses to ferry employees from living areas in San Francisco and the bay area to company campuses in places like Cupertino, Mountain View, and Menlo Park.

Previously, the city was not receiving any income from the campus buses, even though they often used city bus stops. Today that changed as the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) approved a pilot proposal (via The Verge) that will require commuter shuttle buses from companies like Apple to pay $1 for each stop they make every day.

Commuter shuttle buses have been subject to several protests over the course of the last few months, with activists in the area attacking employee buses in protest of rising housing costs in the San Francisco Bay Area.
Quote:
While the Silicon Valley companies will now be giving back to the city more than they have in the past, a formalized shuttle system won't answer the concerns that the tech industry is causing class warfare in San Francisco. Housing prices in the city are skyrocketing out of the reach of ordinary citizens, and many are blaming the high-income individuals employed by companies like Facebook, Apple, and Google.
Set to begin in July of 2014, the program is expected to earn the city approximately $1.5 million over the course of 18 months, which will be used to cover enforcement of the program and evaluations on its efficiency. The $1 per stop fee is unlikely to have any significant impact on Apple or its employees, but it could help to ease tensions within the city.

(Image courtesy of The Castro Biscuit)

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Article Link: Apple, Google Shuttles to Pay to Use Public Bus Stops in San Francisco
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 06:46 PM   #2
Abazigal
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Singapore
I fail to see how. The money won't trickle down to the average citizen anyways.
Abazigal is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 06:47 PM   #3
ZOZO
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
More government greed. Nothing new.
ZOZO is offline   11 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 06:58 PM   #4
paul4339
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
wouldn't having more private commuter buses would be helping the city?

should companies be that much responsible for where their well paid employees decide to live? Or should the cost of maintaining the city be more of a responsibility of the people that decided to live there?

.
paul4339 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:13 PM   #5
szw-mapple fan
macrumors 6502a
 
szw-mapple fan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Bus tax. I wonder what they'll do with the $1.5 million?
szw-mapple fan is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:14 PM   #6
futbalguy
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: May 2007
Quote:
Originally Posted by paul4339 View Post
wouldn't having more private commuter buses would be helping the city?

should companies be that much responsible for where their well paid employees decide to live? Or should the cost of maintaining the city be more of a responsibility of the people that decided to live there?

.

It seems like multiple issues were discussed in the article.

The city is taxing the buses just because they want the money and they can claim the buses are using their bus stops. I don't think its a matter of this costing the city in any real terms. They didnt say it was slowing down the rest of the public transit and Im sure it does actually alleviate some public transit costs.

The other issue is the current San Fran residents are pissed because the buses make it easier for to the wealthier tech guys to live downtown and commute longer distances to work. The residents would rather not have the private buses so the commute was harder and the tech guys have more incentive to leave the city and live closer to the office.
futbalguy is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:16 PM   #7
theBB
macrumors 68020
 
theBB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Talk about class warfare...

If the companies did not provide the shuttle service, there would be more cars on the streets making traffic and pollution worse for everyone. Now the companies will be asked to pay for the "privilege" of providing a service that the transportation authorities are failing to do effectively. SF and Berkeley has the most bone headed city administrations in some respects.
theBB is offline   13 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:29 PM   #8
ZOZO
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by szw-mapple fan View Post
Bus tax. I wonder what they'll do with the $1.5 million?
You have to ask? Waste it.
ZOZO is offline   6 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:57 PM   #9
mdriftmeyer
macrumors 68020
 
mdriftmeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Pacific Northwest
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZOZO View Post
More government greed. Nothing new.
What a crock.

Public Transit and right-of-ways supported by the public shouldn't be double dipped for free by Corporations.
mdriftmeyer is offline   17 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 07:57 PM   #10
procrastinasn
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Quote:
ordinary citizens
Those tech people are not ordinary, I'm guessing?
procrastinasn is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 08:18 PM   #11
Chupa Chupa
macrumors G3
 
Chupa Chupa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post
What a crock.

Public Transit and right-of-ways supported by the public shouldn't be double dipped for free by Corporations.
Except the companies here aren't making $ off the bus stop; it's just a convenient, logical, and safe place to pick up employees; employees who are SF citizens & pay property taxes (either as homeowners or indirectly as renters) which covers things like maintenance for that right-of-way sidewalk/bus stop (mass transit doesn't make a profit to cover all its expenses).

Also, in an era where gov't is trying to encourage ride sharing & mass transit why discourage companies from shuttling employees to work en mass vs the company subsiding parking or other commuter costs? That just creates more pollution and wear and tear on the roads.

Now if it was XYZ shuttle service offering service from SF to wherever for $ I'd agree. That's a for-profit service & that would be piggybacking. But these employee shuttles are not that.

BTW "corporations" is not a dirty word. It's just a word.
__________________
Walled Garden ≠ Prison:
"People who use Apple products considered their options, and chose Apple. If they regret their decision, they can dump it at any time." -- Harry McCracken, Technologizer.com
Chupa Chupa is offline   12 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 08:23 PM   #12
kas23
macrumors 603
 
kas23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Exactly why does it cost money to use a bus stop? I don't get it. And isn't it a public bus stop, where people in the public wait for a bus. That doesn't cost money either. You pay to ride the bus, not wait for it. I guess this is what happens when poor people complain, who, ironically, likely don't pay enough taxes to run these buses.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post
What a crock.

Public Transit and right-of-ways supported by the public shouldn't be double dipped for free by Corporations.
In pretty sure the denizens who wait for these buses do pay taxes. They're not using it for free. Not to mention the tax base these corporations serve.
kas23 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 08:30 PM   #13
davidg4781
macrumors 65816
 
davidg4781's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Moulton, TX
Aren't the busses already paying a tax to use the roadways? All their fees should be included in this. I hope some of these companies find a way around this fee.
davidg4781 is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 08:34 PM   #14
Kenrik
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
And they are using a ferry that brings the Googlers to the port of Redwood City (outside my office) so they don't "abuse" the public built streets. It's funny to see them exit the ferry and get on their buses.

I see it as Google giving the whiners the middle finger.
Kenrik is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 08:41 PM   #15
mrnoglue
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Wow, not a lot of popular support for the new bus tax on this forum. There are quite a few arguments for this tax:

(1) Cost Shifiting - The increased traffic of these bus stops due to private use was not foreseen during the design phase, and therefore the planned lifespan must be discounted accordingly. Increased maintenance costs and improvements due to this unforeseen use will now be borne by the private users.

(2) Ability to pay - Public transportation is a social good, and this puts the burden on those best able to pay.

(3) Punitive damages - This is a penalty enforced against the well-to-do by the envious.

All are sound theories
mrnoglue is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 09:02 PM   #16
larrylaffer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chupa Chupa View Post
Except the companies here aren't making $ off the bus stop; it's just a convenient, logical, and safe place to pick up employees; employees who are SF citizens & pay property taxes (either as homeowners or indirectly as renters) which covers things like maintenance for that right-of-way sidewalk/bus stop (mass transit doesn't make a profit to cover all its expenses).

Also, in an era where gov't is trying to encourage ride sharing & mass transit why discourage companies from shuttling employees to work en mass vs the company subsiding parking or other commuter costs? That just creates more pollution and wear and tear on the roads.

Now if it was XYZ shuttle service offering service from SF to wherever for $ I'd agree. That's a for-profit service & that would be piggybacking. But these employee shuttles are not that.

BTW "corporations" is not a dirty word. It's just a word.
You realize of course that by allowing their employees to live in SF, 60 miles from their campus, they've just grown their potential talent pool by leaps and bounds. Ergo, they do make money from this service.

And to think otherwise is mildly insane, because they aren't going to provide such a service "just cuz". There's always something in it for them.
larrylaffer is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 09:14 PM   #17
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnoglue View Post
(2) Ability to pay - Public transportation is a social good, and this puts the burden on those best able to pay.
Also known as "From each what he is able".

Anyways, I see no problem with charging for the buses. Most cities require you to pay to park. In exchange, tax rates can be lower. Similarly, tax rates go down in exchange for charging the busses to use the stops.

That's the theory, anyways. In reality, taxes never go down, but perhaps they'll maintain a constant level for a bit longer than they would otherwise.

If everybody rode buses, I don't think rush hours would exist anymore. For every 50 cars you see in rush hour, they could all be replaced with a single bus. You'd end up with 1/50 the volume on the road (a bus isn't much different from a car in looking at how much space they take up, on account of how much space each needs in front of them relative to their sizes.) I ride the bus 120 miles everyday to/from work (and the subway about 5 miles. My commute takes about 75 minutes, each way.)
__________________
Don't tell me Macs don't last: 2007 iMac, 2007 Mac Mini, 2008 MacBook Air, all Vintage.
(iMac obsoletion: April 28, 2015, MBA: October 14, 2015, Mac Mini: March 9, 2016)
ArtOfWarfare is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 09:15 PM   #18
eastercat
macrumors 68040
 
eastercat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: PDX
It means less of a chance for a fare increase or a lower fare increase. For the lower income riders, that's a big deal.
This is one of the few instances where trickle down actually works.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abazigal View Post
The money won't trickle down to the average citizen anyways.
__________________
64 GB space grey iPhone 5S (AT&T); 16 GB space grey iPad retina mini (Verizon with T-Mobile sim); 2014 rMBP 2.8 GHz quad core i7, 16 GB RAM, 1TB SSD, Nvidia GeForce GT 750M
eastercat is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 21, 2014, 09:36 PM   #19
jm001
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by MacRumors View Post
Image


Major tech companies like Apple, Google, and Facebook often use private buses to ferry employees from living areas in San Francisco and the bay area to company campuses in places like Cupertino, Mountain View, and Menlo Park.

Previously, the city was not receiving any income from the campus buses, even though they often used city bus stops. Today that changed as the San Francisco Municipal Transportation Agency (SFMTA) approved a pilot proposal (via The Verge) that will require commuter shuttle buses from companies like Apple to pay $1 for each stop they make every day.

Commuter shuttle buses have been subject to several protests over the course of the last few months, with activists in the area attacking employee buses in protest of rising housing costs in the San Francisco Bay Area.Set to begin in July of 2014, the program is expected to earn the city approximately $1.5 million over the course of 18 months, which will be used to cover enforcement of the program and evaluations on its efficiency. The $1 per stop fee is unlikely to have any significant impact on Apple or its employees, but it could help to ease tensions within the city.

(Image courtesy of The Castro Biscuit)

Article Link: Apple, Google Shuttles to Pay to Use Public Bus Stops in San Francisco
Why the hell are the tech employees being blamed for rising costs of housing? It's a capitalist system we live in last I checked and it's the realty market that sets the market price not the tech employees. Hell the sellers which included the ordinary citizen are partly to blame for asking more for their property. But as I said we live in a capitalist society and that's how it runs. You can't afford to buy? Rent. Live on the outskirts where it is relatively cheaper and just commute.
jm001 is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 12:03 AM   #20
mrsir2009
macrumors 604
 
mrsir2009's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post
What a crock.

Public Transit and right-of-ways supported by the public shouldn't be double dipped for free by Corporations.
So instead corporations should be discouraged from providing a free shuttle service to their employees that gets air-polluting cars that congest traffic off the roads? Apple and the other companies that are doing this are doing the city a favor by giving employees FREE public transport -- charging companies for this is like charging people for picking up trash by the side of the road...
mrsir2009 is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 12:24 AM   #21
OLDCODGER
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Lucky Country
Interesting. A lot of Marxist jealousy on this thread - about a free bus service, yet!
OLDCODGER is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 12:41 AM   #22
Solomani
macrumors 68000
 
Solomani's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Quote:
Originally Posted by szw-mapple fan View Post
Bus tax. I wonder what they'll do with the $1.5 million?
The City Councilmen could always use that money to buy extravagant gifts for their mistresses. Did we really think they would put it to good use?
Solomani is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 03:11 AM   #23
iLondoner
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: London (the big one, not London Ohio, Texas, Kentucky, etc)
Quote:
Originally Posted by mrnoglue View Post
Wow, not a lot of popular support for the new bus tax on this forum. There are quite a few arguments for this tax:

(1) Cost Shifiting - The increased traffic of these bus stops due to private use was not foreseen during the design phase, and therefore the planned lifespan must be discounted accordingly. Increased maintenance costs and improvements due to this unforeseen use will now be borne by the private users.

(2) Ability to pay - Public transportation is a social good, and this puts the burden on those best able to pay.

(3) Punitive damages - This is a penalty enforced against the well-to-do by the envious.

All are sound theories
As you say, all sound theories, but what the article actually states is, "the program is expected to earn the city approximately $1.5 million over the course of 18 months, which will be used to cover enforcement of the program and evaluations on its efficiency," i.e. none of what you've written.
__________________
13" MacBook Air 27" iMac 3TB Fusion 3TB Time Capsule Apple TV 3 iPhone 5 iPad Air
iLondoner is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 03:13 AM   #24
mw360
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by kas23 View Post
Exactly why does it cost money to use a bus stop? I don't get it. And isn't it a public bus stop, where people in the public wait for a bus. That doesn't cost money either. You pay to ride the bus, not wait for it. I guess this is what happens when poor people complain, who, ironically, likely don't pay enough taxes to run these buses.

----------



In pretty sure the denizens who wait for these buses do pay taxes. They're not using it for free. Not to mention the tax base these corporations serve.
Paying taxes towards something doesn't mean you can appropriate it for your own means. You have to share it, fairly. Some people believe that running your own segregated service off those facilities is not fair sharing.
mw360 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jan 22, 2014, 03:15 AM   #25
Rogifan
macrumors G3
 
Rogifan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by mdriftmeyer View Post
What a crock.

Public Transit and right-of-ways supported by the public shouldn't be double dipped for free by Corporations.
Only thing that's a crock is this statement. I thought NeXT employees were smarter than this.
__________________
"I have a very optimistic view of individuals. As individuals, people are inherently good. I have a somewhat more pessimistic view of people in groups." -- Steve Jobs , Wired interview
Rogifan is offline   2 Reply With Quote


Reply
MacRumors Forums > Mac Community > Community Discussion > Politics, Religion, Social Issues

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Similar Threads
thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Apple Gets Final Go Ahead for New San Francisco Flagship Store MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 53 Mar 21, 2014 12:48 PM
Flagship San Francisco Apple Store Approved by Planning Commission MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 38 Feb 17, 2014 03:03 PM
Apple's Plans for New Flagship San Francisco Store Receiving Criticism MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 205 May 30, 2013 01:40 PM
Apple to Relocate Flagship San Francisco Retail Store to Union Square MacRumors MacRumors.com News Discussion 60 May 17, 2013 03:37 PM
Public transit stops not available in Google Maps? ddublu iOS 6 4 Dec 14, 2012 12:44 AM

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:24 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC