Register FAQ/Rules Forum Spy Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

Welcome to the Mac Forums forums. Please read the FAQ if you have questions. Register to participate.

 
Go Back   Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)
TouchArcade.com - iPhone Game Reviews and News

 
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jan 3, 2006, 12:44 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Vongo: Starz and Microsoft $9.95 per Month Unlimited Movies

http://www.macrumors.com/images/macrumorsthreadlogo.gif

The New York Times is reporting on the announcement of a new unlimited movie download service from Starz Entertainment. The $9.95 a month subscription service called Vongo will allow users to download movies from the Internet for use on their computers, portable video players and TVs.

Starz had previously offered a movie download subscription through RealNetworks but has now switched over to Microsoft. Microsoft will be promoting Vongo in an upcoming release of its Windows Media Player software.

The service is available at Vongo.com and currently offers 800 movies for download at $9.95 a month. Users are allowed unlimited downloads. Movies are in Windows Media Player format, widescreen aspect ratio and approximately 600MB in size. (Example Specs: The Incredibles comes in a 700Kbps bitrate, Windows Media 9, 64Kbps stereo WMA9 audio, and 680x368 resolution.)

According to the article, Starz has not been able to work out an arrangement for Vongo to work on the iPod. As well, at present time the service does not work on Macs, but according to their website:

Quote:
Vongo is currently PC based, but will soon be Mac compatible (really!)
This service was previously rumored.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	vongo.JPG
Views:	785
Size:	130.2 KB
ID:	37929  

Last edited by arn : Jan 3, 2006 at 01:06 AM.
MacRumors is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 12:47 AM   #2
jrhone
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Send a message via Yahoo to jrhone
Interesting.....This looks like the Apple vs. Microsoft war will be quite heated this year and will be fought on many many levels. This in my opinion is a direct attack on iTunes and iPod Video....
jrhone is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 12:48 AM   #3
dlastmango
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: West Coast - FLORIDA
Send a message via AIM to dlastmango
WOW ... this should get interesting

I see this as M$ trying to beat Apple to something... Too bad apple service will actually work/succeed
JRHONE... sure post something basic to just be first...then go back and add to it... i see how you are... :0)
dlastmango is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 12:50 AM   #4
kevinuaa
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Hawaii
great news

This is great news...competition is always a good thing. This will push Apple to introduce something similiar. When the two compete, we as consumers win.
kevinuaa is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 12:57 AM   #5
kainjow
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
kainjow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
Seriously, once Apple gets their own movie download service, I predict the death of the DVD

Now we just need to wait for the hackers to remove the encryption

No wonder their site requires Windows.. they use VBScript!

Last edited by Doctor Q : Jan 3, 2006 at 01:18 AM. Reason: post merge
kainjow is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:02 AM   #6
chicagdan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
I went on Virtual PC and checked out the website -- what a totally crappy system. It doesn't work on the video iPod or the PSP, only devices that support some kind of MS portable Windows Media player. Dead on arrival.

The battle for portable video is coming down to PSP vs. iPod ... Sony has the better movie player but is clueless how to exploit it. But it still may win because it's ridiculously easy to rip a DVD and format it for PSP. (Equally true for iPod, but the first generation screen can't compete with PSP.) Once dual processors and huge HDs become the norm, everyone's going to be ripping their DVDs and putting time shifted TV onto PSPs and iPods and Hollywood is going to be in full panic.

So rip any DVD you want and keep it forever or pay $9.99 a month, buy an awful dedicated Windows Media player and watch crappy Starz movies. Easy choice. Let's see if Apple can come up with a better third option.

EDIT: The NY Times story notes that Starz will offer the same content to Sony Connect, which means it will be available for PSP in another manner. Sony Connect is such an awful music service, I can't imagine that it's video offerings are going to be any better. I'm tempted to say that a company so big with so many smart people has to get something right some day, but given the horrible and expensive UMD format, the incredibly expensive and unwatchable LocationFree player and the user unfriendly way videos are saved on the PSP, I think BYO content is Sony's best option.

Last edited by chicagdan : Jan 3, 2006 at 01:10 AM.
chicagdan is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:05 AM   #7
kainjow
Demi-God (Moderator)
 
kainjow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2000
In Safari, if you change your user agent (via Debug menu) to Windows MSIE 6, you can view the page here: http://www.vongo.com/vongoweb/pages/...e.jsp?hostVar= (Click on Step 2 then vongo.com)
kainjow is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:05 AM   #8
mduser63
macrumors 68030
 
mduser63's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
Send a message via AIM to mduser63
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevinuaa
This is great news...competition is always a good thing. This will push Apple to introduce something similiar. When the two compete, we as consumers win.
I agree. If it starts to gain significant momentum, Apple will have to compete and will do something (hopefully) better. Of course if Vongo (or another site) works well and is Mac compatible, I'll use it. It's not like I think Apple is the only company that can do anything right.

I went to the site and put my email in to be notified when a Mac version is ready. I figure that will help tell them that Mac support is important.
__________________
20" 2.0 GHz iMac Core Duo, 1.5 GB RAM
12" 1.33 GHz Superdrive PowerBook G4, 768 MB RAM
2.0 GHz Black Core 2 Duo MacBook, 1 GB RAM
mduser63 is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:06 AM   #9
savar
macrumors 68000
 
savar's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Location: District of Columbia
Send a message via AIM to savar
Quote:
Originally Posted by kainjow
No wonder their site requires Windows.. they use VBScript!
Where do they get these names? Vongo? WTF is that?

An iPod version is never coming, let's be honest. I doubt the mac version will even make it. (Unless they introduce a new IE that is required to run it.)

But if people crack the DRM on this like they did with Napster, I would definitely sign up and download a bunch of movies non-stop for a couple months.
__________________
Mehce
savar is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:07 AM   #10
Lacero
macrumors 601
 
Lacero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Without the iPod, Vongo will fail, most likely. Ease of use will be very important, as well as portability of the video downloads.

I'd like to see something like this offered by Apple, since they have the foundation in place to make this happen.
Lacero is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:09 AM   #11
narco
macrumors 65816
 
narco's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: California.
Quote:
Originally Posted by savar
Where do they get these names? Vongo? WTF is that?

An iPod version is never coming, let's be honest. I doubt the mac version will even make it. (Unless they introduce a new IE that is required to run it.)

But if people crack the DRM on this like they did with Napster, I would definitely sign up and download a bunch of movies non-stop for a couple months.
I'm assuming Vongo means Video on the go. V=video, on, go. Still stupid.

Fishes,
narco.
narco is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:10 AM   #12
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
overall, specs and pricing are impressive.

arn
arn is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:12 AM   #13
virus1
macrumors 65816
 
virus1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: LOST
Quote:
Originally Posted by arn
overall, specs and pricing are impressive.

arn
no kidding...

i wonder how they pulled that off.. with prices like that, it looks like apple may be able to lower the price of thier hypothetical itunes movie store to $10 a movie..

sweet..
__________________
No, really. I completely understand you. (Pay no attention to my 'tar)
virus1 is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:16 AM   #14
miradu
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
some things to remember

resolutions of the incredibles file is 680x384.. native dvd resolution is 720x480, so this is not much worse in raw resolution than a dvd.. Sound is much worse.. it will be interesting to see how the WM9 compression compares to MPEG2. This is higher quality probs than normal cable tv, which at widescreen is no more than 640x400.
miradu is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:16 AM   #15
After G
macrumors 68000
 
After G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: California
Send a message via AIM to After G Send a message via Yahoo to After G
Actually, one can do this with cable and an EyeTV. Just buy an EyeTV instead of a Windows Media player, and you can get movies just like that, transportable to any device. Only costs $150 or so as well, no monthly fees, except for the cable bill, which you probably already pay for already if you have cable.
After G is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:18 AM   #16
Phat_Pat
macrumors 68000
 
Phat_Pat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: I Live Where I Live
now will this work on my 5.1 dolby digital surround sound and 50" widescreen? No?

i want the whole expreence of a movie.. not a dumbed down version
__________________
HELP STOP GLOBAL WARMING; USE MRoogle
Phat_Pat is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:19 AM   #17
Object-X
macrumors 6502a
 
Object-X's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Vongo sucks

This says it all...
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	vongosucks.gif
Views:	283
Size:	29.5 KB
ID:	37930  
Object-X is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:22 AM   #18
Doctor Q
macrumors god
 
Doctor Q's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: at the table with countless relatives
Quote:
Originally Posted by savar
I doubt the mac version will even make it. (Unless they introduce a new IE that is required to run it.)
Why couldn't they issue a player for Mac anytime they want, with any DRM system they want? It's only playing back on an iPod that would require a deal with Apple. Or am I missing something obvious?
__________________
"You've just been abducted, of course you need crepes!" -- Walter Bishop
Doctor Q is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:26 AM   #19
arn
macrumors god
 
arn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
Send a message via AIM to arn
bad news for Apple... at least with these movies

Quote:
Several years ago, when Starz renewed its long-term contracts with studios, including those owned by Sony and the Walt Disney Company, to put movies on its cable channels, it bought the rights to use them on the Internet as well. This means that other digital services cannot offer these movies in rental or subscription services during the period covered by the Starz contract.
This ironically seems to include Pixar's movies done with Disney it seems.
arn is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:44 AM   #20
walkingmac
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Greater Cincinnati
Like most things coming from M$ these days...

First off the starting line, but without any real forethought and/or plan for the future. Props to them for getting it started (I don't know what is holding Apple back) but thats about it. I personally never liked WMP and now that M$ has basically said SCREW YOU to the Apple community by not releasing new versions of their software for the mac and essentially locking them out of third-party offerings because they decided to use the proprietary systems. Maybe it's just my lack of knowledge for the format, but can you even convert those WMP format files to DVD? Surely their is some sort of DRM on these that would inhibit that, until the hackers get involved of course. I know people download movies via P2P all the time and watch them on their computers, but thats not the best, plus there are too few people who have their computers connected to their TV's for movie watching. IDK, I think I would have to go over the rules of use and all that to see how the system works, but I am sure it is not a pleasant arrangement. To me, the thing that needs to happen is a video download service where you can purchase a movie in digital format at DVD quality. Once you have downloaded it, you can of course watch it on your computer or burn it onto a DVD (in limited quantities, 1-3 I think) with complete menus that are included in the download. Additionally, move it to a portable video player like a laptop or Video iPod or alike and so on. All of these an be done with todays current technologies and DRM schemes. The other thing that needs to be done right is to get your computer in to the living room and on your TV that makes sense. Apple is obviously working on that with the initial release of Front Row, but that is just for starters. I left off 'rent' movies from this service, but that could work as well, just makes things a but messier IMHO. Maybe it's just me, but I like to own the media I enjoy and don't like the idea of having to pay to keep it. It's like the Napster Music Service approach, collect your music but be sure to pay us or we will take our ball back and go home. Once Apple has theirs up and running thats when things will get interesting. Not to mention as Apple continues to develop into the living room and we see Mac Mini's as common place in entertainment systems and such, thats when these types of services will take off, when there is a legitimate market and established market. The key there is you need the hardware to work with the software and the equipment. Apple is poised well, they just need to bring it to market and out of the labs.
__________________
Let your Life shape your passions, and your passions guide your Life.
walkingmac is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:45 AM   #21
chicagdan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by arn
bad news for Apple... at least with these movies
Right, which is why Apple has been so aggressive on the TV side, not movies. Just look at the iPod Video -- it's a device made for TV, not movies. I wouldn't be surprised if Apple skips movies for now and pushes to be the time shifting TV king instead.
chicagdan is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:50 AM   #22
hubristol
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Send a message via AIM to hubristol
Quote:
Originally Posted by kainjow
Seriously, once Apple gets their own movie download service, I predict the death of the DVD
I dunno about that. I think most people like to own something tangible...at least I know I do.
hubristol is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:52 AM   #23
Lacero
macrumors 601
 
Lacero's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Quote:
Originally Posted by jrhone
Interesting.....This looks like the Apple vs. Microsoft war will be quite heated this year and will be fought on many many levels. This in my opinion is a direct attack on iTunes and iPod Video....
If PlaysForSure is any indication of Microsoft's pre-emptive strike, Apple has nothing to worry about.
Lacero is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:53 AM   #24
miradu
macrumors Demi-God
 
Join Date: Jun 2003
Ok.. So I bit the bullet, and downloaded it to my dell and paid the $10. I rented the incredibles like Arn did.

It's ****tastic. Honestly, the quality is worse that most divx rips. Huge color banding, tons of artifacts, poor frame rate. I opened up frontrow's full streaming trailers, and had my family compare two computer side by side with me.. Frontrow's instant on streaming fullscreen trailers, handsdown beat out the paid for fullscreen downloaded movie. Apple defs has the technological advantage to deliver content. The player is also very slow at launching.

That said, $10 for a ton of movies ain't that bad. I may actually keep it, though not to watch on my HDTV, but more because torrents are blocked at my school.

Last edited by Doctor Q : Jan 3, 2006 at 03:24 AM.
miradu is offline  
Old Jan 3, 2006, 01:57 AM   #25
chicagdan
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Chicago, IL
Quote:
Originally Posted by hubristol
I dunno about that. I think most people like to own something tangible...at least I know I do.
Right. I really don't see what's so great about this service. I have Starz on Demand for my HDTV cable, I can watch any of these movies right now in HD anyway ... why would I want to watch them on my PC for additional cost? And if I wanted to put the movie on PSP or video iPod, I could just schedule one of the 10 million Starz channels, copy it on EyeTV and have it for as long as I want. People who have TiVo can do the same and if I wanted to get ubergeeky I could run a firewire cable from my HD DVR to my Mac and record any HD program I wanted in high def by using the DVHS script.

I'm already paying $20 a month for NetFlix, another $12 for Sirius, $100 for cable ... I'm sick of companies charging me for a basket of services I don't use.
chicagdan is offline  

 

Mac Forums > Archive > Archives of Old Posts > MacRumors News Discussion (archive)

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:38 PM.

Mac News | Mac Rumors | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.6.10
Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 2002-2009, MacRumors.com, LLC