Become a MacRumors Supporter for $50/year with no ads, ability to filter front page stories, and private forums.

SenileTomato

macrumors member
Original poster
Mar 31, 2014
42
0
Palm Beach Gardens, FL
After looking at the differences of the 15 inch 3rd gen 8gb ram model vs the 15 inch 4th gen 8gb ram model, it looks like the 3rd gen takes the cake. Despite that Apple has put in a new and 'faster' processor, the 4th gen is .4 ghz slower, and is also lacking the 1gb Nvidia Geforce 650M dedicated memory. Instead, it has the on board graphics card, which I am doubtful of.

Now my question is, does anyone have any personal experiences in comparing both of these models in action? I know this may sound silly, but I enjoy using my MBP retina for gaming with its excellent display, and have found the 3rd gen does an excellent job so far. The problem is they no longer sell the 3rd gen, so I am wondering what are the pros and cons, specifically in gaming, when it comes to the 4th gen vs the 3rd gen.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Mark
 

leman

macrumors Core
Oct 14, 2008
19,234
19,127
If you play lots of games, the older model with the 650M would be a better choice. Otherwise, they are more or less equal. The Haswell CPU has potential to be faster in certain areas, but for that you would need software that supports its new features (which is still quite rare). The new integrated GPU can be faster than the 650M in certain scenarios and slower in other ones (e.g. gaming). I'd take the cheaper one.
 

mrcheezit

macrumors member
Jun 11, 2012
40
0
Yep I agree with the poster above me, the 3rd generation one is better. I've used both at a local reseller and it definitely handles games better but again like he said some software will take advantage of the haswell processor but not much at this point. I would just go for the 3rd gen. :)
 

Naimfan

Suspended
Jan 15, 2003
4,669
2,017
I may be missing a generation, but aren't the current retina models the third generation?

First was Mid-2012 2.3, then Early 2013 2.4, and currently Late 2013 2.0.

Yes, no, maybe?
 

simon48

macrumors 65816
Sep 1, 2010
1,315
88
I may be missing a generation, but aren't the current retina models the third generation?

First was Mid-2012 2.3, then Early 2013 2.4, and currently Late 2013 2.0.

Yes, no, maybe?

Yeah, I think that's right.
 

Justinhub2003

macrumors regular
Jul 17, 2012
137
0
Cincinnati Oh
I may be missing a generation, but aren't the current retina models the third generation?

First was Mid-2012 2.3, then Early 2013 2.4, and currently Late 2013 2.0.

Yes, no, maybe?

I would say a generation update would mean a new CPU generation and the MBP usually sees 2 models per generation update.

Example: Mid 2012 was Ivy Bridbge
Early 2013 was IVy bridge but with a spec bump: 2.3ghz to 2.4ghz
Late 2013 was Haswell.. And depending on when the haswell upgrades come out, we could see the early 2014 model with haswelll chip but .1 ghz faster
 

dalupus

macrumors regular
Jul 19, 2011
132
0
After looking at the differences of the 15 inch 3rd gen 8gb ram model vs the 15 inch 4th gen 8gb ram model, it looks like the 3rd gen takes the cake. Despite that Apple has put in a new and 'faster' processor, the 4th gen is .4 ghz slower, and is also lacking the 1gb Nvidia Geforce 650M dedicated memory. Instead, it has the on board graphics card, which I am doubtful of.

Now my question is, does anyone have any personal experiences in comparing both of these models in action? I know this may sound silly, but I enjoy using my MBP retina for gaming with its excellent display, and have found the 3rd gen does an excellent job so far. The problem is they no longer sell the 3rd gen, so I am wondering what are the pros and cons, specifically in gaming, when it comes to the 4th gen vs the 3rd gen.

Any advice would be greatly appreciated!

Mark

just save up an extra $600 and get the one with the 750M with 2GB of video memory. Or you can pick it up from the refurb store for just $120 more.
As a bonus you get 16GB or ram.
 

mcarling

macrumors 65816
Oct 22, 2009
1,292
180
I would say a generation update would mean a new CPU generation and the MBP usually sees 2 models per generation update.

You're extrapolating from a data set of one. It happened once, so you say "usually"??? I use terms like "Ivy Bridge rMBP, "Haswell rMBP", "Broadwell rMBP", etc. to avoid ambiguity in how "generations" are counted.

With the regard to the OP's question, if gaming performance is the criterion, get a 2.3GHz or 2.6GHz Haswell 15" rMBP with the 750M discrete GPU. Why are you looking at only the 2.0GHz model? Price? If so, then keep the one you have.
 

yjchua95

macrumors 604
Apr 23, 2011
6,725
233
GVA, KUL, MEL (current), ZQN
You're extrapolating from a data set of one. It happened once, so you say "usually"??? I use terms like "Ivy Bridge rMBP, "Haswell rMBP", "Broadwell rMBP", etc. to avoid ambiguity in how "generations" are counted.

With the regard to the OP's question, if gaming performance is the criterion, get a 2.3GHz or 2.6GHz Haswell 15" rMBP with the 750M discrete GPU. Why are you looking at only the 2.0GHz model? Price? If so, then keep the one you have.

For Sandy Bridge, there were two models (early-2011 and late-2011).

For Ivy Bridge, there were also two models (mid-2012 and early-2013).

For Haswell, I wouldn't be surprised if a speed bump was announced during WWDC.
 

Justinhub2003

macrumors regular
Jul 17, 2012
137
0
Cincinnati Oh
For Sandy Bridge, there were two models (early-2011 and late-2011).

For Ivy Bridge, there were also two models (mid-2012 and early-2013).

For Haswell, I wouldn't be surprised if a speed bump was announced during WWDC.

Exactly what i was saying.

Its not even just the retina models, its been the trend as of the last few Intel chip interations.
 
Register on MacRumors! This sidebar will go away, and you'll see fewer ads.