Kind of a rant.
I recently had a PC crash and I had to use an old eMac 700mhz for several weeks as my main machine. I hadn't been using this machine in quite a while so the software was out of date and not working very well. But even the old versions wouldn't play youtube videos. I found this really strange. Despite the higher compression of YT videos vs SVCD and DVD, it played those fine. VLC was also able to play high resolution, highly compressed video, yet YT (flash) wouldn't play even at 240p. Many of the websites I viewed were so slow that they just locked the machine up.
So I decided to see what was available to help. I immediately found Tenfoxfour. I was amazed at how much better this browser really was. My PC is a 1.8GHZ Athlon 64 3000+ while my lowly eMac was only 700mhz, yet on many webpages (particularly those with a lot of JS), the sites actually were much faster on the Tenfoxfour than they were on Firefox for Windows. The optimization tactics worked, at least for me, very well. This machine is also ram starved at only 512MB.
Next, I looked into YT and found Youview. Trying to play YT videos through flash or HTML5 through was so bad that it almost looked like when you watch a video of a CRT, the frames weren't even skipping, they weren't drawing fast enough, even at 240p. Once I downloaded Youview, 480P videos played flawlessly.
Assuming the software industry was more worried about performance than adding features nobody (or hardly anyone) ever uses, there would be no reason that a faster G4 or a G5 machine couldn't be your daily machine (not to mention being cut off by apple, but that's another story). This has been a problem with desktops as soon as they moved into the 16 bit platform (the old 8 bits were not expandable or upgradable so the software was written to perform well).
I wish more developers would spend far more time optimizing than bloating. The upgrade from mac 7.6 to 8 was really good. I felt like I got a new machine. Though I haven't had a chance to use snow leopard, I understand that one of it's major goals was trimming down the OS and optimization. I know my 'wish' will not come true any time soon, but it just pisses me off that I have perfectly good hardware that is quite capable of doing what I want (tenfoxfour and youview being great examples that it CAN do what I want), but I can't really use it because of sloppy programming.
For all the supposedly new features of both the OS and the software I use, I pretty much use my computer the same exact way I did 7 years ago with the only major change being watching streaming video. When I write documents or do photo organizing and cleaning up or manage e-books or mp3s, I do it the same exact way I've been doing for years. It's not like I don't like progress, that's not the point. If Youview can play YT videos in 480P and flash won't work at all, the problem isn't my hardware, it's the damn flash. HTML5 isn't really any better (either on my PC or the eMac). In fact, I just don't see how a move to bigger, slower software is anything like 'progress'.
Just ranting. But I was also wondering if you guys got ticked off at this type of thing.
Chris
I recently had a PC crash and I had to use an old eMac 700mhz for several weeks as my main machine. I hadn't been using this machine in quite a while so the software was out of date and not working very well. But even the old versions wouldn't play youtube videos. I found this really strange. Despite the higher compression of YT videos vs SVCD and DVD, it played those fine. VLC was also able to play high resolution, highly compressed video, yet YT (flash) wouldn't play even at 240p. Many of the websites I viewed were so slow that they just locked the machine up.
So I decided to see what was available to help. I immediately found Tenfoxfour. I was amazed at how much better this browser really was. My PC is a 1.8GHZ Athlon 64 3000+ while my lowly eMac was only 700mhz, yet on many webpages (particularly those with a lot of JS), the sites actually were much faster on the Tenfoxfour than they were on Firefox for Windows. The optimization tactics worked, at least for me, very well. This machine is also ram starved at only 512MB.
Next, I looked into YT and found Youview. Trying to play YT videos through flash or HTML5 through was so bad that it almost looked like when you watch a video of a CRT, the frames weren't even skipping, they weren't drawing fast enough, even at 240p. Once I downloaded Youview, 480P videos played flawlessly.
Assuming the software industry was more worried about performance than adding features nobody (or hardly anyone) ever uses, there would be no reason that a faster G4 or a G5 machine couldn't be your daily machine (not to mention being cut off by apple, but that's another story). This has been a problem with desktops as soon as they moved into the 16 bit platform (the old 8 bits were not expandable or upgradable so the software was written to perform well).
I wish more developers would spend far more time optimizing than bloating. The upgrade from mac 7.6 to 8 was really good. I felt like I got a new machine. Though I haven't had a chance to use snow leopard, I understand that one of it's major goals was trimming down the OS and optimization. I know my 'wish' will not come true any time soon, but it just pisses me off that I have perfectly good hardware that is quite capable of doing what I want (tenfoxfour and youview being great examples that it CAN do what I want), but I can't really use it because of sloppy programming.
For all the supposedly new features of both the OS and the software I use, I pretty much use my computer the same exact way I did 7 years ago with the only major change being watching streaming video. When I write documents or do photo organizing and cleaning up or manage e-books or mp3s, I do it the same exact way I've been doing for years. It's not like I don't like progress, that's not the point. If Youview can play YT videos in 480P and flash won't work at all, the problem isn't my hardware, it's the damn flash. HTML5 isn't really any better (either on my PC or the eMac). In fact, I just don't see how a move to bigger, slower software is anything like 'progress'.
Just ranting. But I was also wondering if you guys got ticked off at this type of thing.
Chris