Go Back   MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Search this Thread Display Modes
Old Jun 5, 2014, 10:59 AM   #1
MacRumors
macrumors bot
 
Join Date: Apr 2001
LaCie Upgrades Rugged Hard Drive With Integrated Thunderbolt Cable




LaCie has upgraded its Rugged Hard Drive, adding an integrated Thunderbolt cable and improved damage resistance. The SSD version, available in 250 and 500GB capacities, achieves transfer speeds of up to 387MB/s. There is a USB 3.0 interface as well, though only the Thunderbolt cable is permanently attached.

The integrated Thunderbolt cable allowed LaCie to increase protection against water and dust because the dust cap can be left on even when the device is in use. When not in use, the bus-powered Thunderbolt cable tucks into the case and is protected by the cover. LaCie says the SSD version of the drive can withstand up to two-meter drops and conforms to the IP54 durability standard. LaCie has also increased the warranty from two years to three.

Quote:
"My assignments take me to the top surf spots all over the world," said Surfer Magazine staff photographer Zak Noyle. "So it's imperative that my equipment is ready for any challenge. The LaCie Rugged's speed allows me to deliver projects quickly, and its resilience to water, sand and drops make me confident that my photos are protected. From the beaches of Oahu to Tahiti, the LaCie Rugged has never let me down."
The new LaCie Rugged drive goes on sale today in 250GB ($300) and 500GB ($500) solid state versions, plus 1TB ($220) and 2TB ($300) 5400RPM hard drive versions.

Article Link: LaCie Upgrades Rugged Hard Drive With Integrated Thunderbolt Cable
MacRumors is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:01 AM   #2
Crosscreek
macrumors 65816
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Margarittaville
That's just way too expensive.
Crosscreek is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:06 AM   #3
stiligFox
macrumors 6502a
 
stiligFox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: 10.0.1.3
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crosscreek View Post
That's just way too expensive.
Tell me about it. I know Thunderbolt has it's license costs, that is insane for a hard drive with a built cable and rubber padding.
stiligFox is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:10 AM   #4
noodle654
macrumors 68010
 
noodle654's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Never Ender
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crosscreek View Post
That's just way too expensive.
Yeah definitely stupidly expensive. I am happy I went with the Seagate Goflex Thunderbolt setup. Looks like they kinda 'copied' the WD Thunderbolt Duo RAID solution.
__________________
MacBook Pro 15" i7 2.3GHz (Late 2013) | iPhone 6 128GB | MacBook Air i5 1.3GHz (2013) | Mac Mini C2D 2.26GHz (Late 2009)| iPad Air 2 64GB LTE
noodle654 is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:37 AM   #5
Orlandoech
macrumors 68040
 
Orlandoech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Salt Lake City, UT
All LaCie products are pathetically overpriced and under perform.
Orlandoech is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 11:42 AM   #6
Skika
macrumors 68020
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Quote:
1TB ($220) and 2TB ($300)
You had one job LaCie. One job.

Also

Quote:
using 5400rpm drives with Thunderbolt
for what purpose?
__________________
MacBook Pro, iPad, iPhone

Last edited by Skika; Jun 5, 2014 at 11:48 AM.
Skika is offline   9 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 12:12 PM   #7
OtherJesus
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Bay Area, California
So you want me to buy a product where the most expensive cable is permanently attached so in the event that the cable breaks, I have to replace the entire drive?

Also... Why in the world would I want a 5200rpm drive ever again?

Lolz no thanks.

Last edited by OtherJesus; Jun 5, 2014 at 12:13 PM. Reason: More info
OtherJesus is offline   8 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 12:13 PM   #8
JarScott
macrumors 65816
 
JarScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Leicestershire, UK
Never liked LaCie hard drives. Massively over priced for what they are.
JarScott is offline   4 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 12:15 PM   #9
ArtOfWarfare
macrumors 603
 
ArtOfWarfare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Send a message via Skype™ to ArtOfWarfare
SSDs aren't all created equal, are they? Why not list the drive speeds, Mac Rumors?
__________________
Don't tell me Macs don't last: 2007 iMac, 2007 Mac Mini, 2008 MacBook Air, all Vintage.
(iMac obsoletion: April 28, 2015, MBA: October 14, 2015, Mac Mini: March 9, 2016)
ArtOfWarfare is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 12:35 PM   #10
RightMACatU
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: 192.168.1.1
I'll stick with WD 2TB USB 3.0 paid $120.
Moving on
RightMACatU is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 12:46 PM   #11
unplugme71
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
This product would be better:

- USB 3 attached cable
- No attached TB cable
- SSD or 7200RPM SATA

Why waste a TB port for a low speed performing device.
unplugme71 is offline   5 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 01:23 PM   #12
MrX8503
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Ever wonder why thunderbolt 2.5" enclosures only are hard to come by?

Its so that thunderbolt vendors can charge you 10x the price for a built in drive.

I don't ever remember FireWire being this bad.
MrX8503 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 01:59 PM   #13
Parasprite
macrumors 68000
 
Parasprite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by LaCie.com
LaCie Rugged USB 3.0 Thunderbolt Series
Move at the Speed of Lightning.
I love that they included this specific line.

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrX8503 View Post
Ever wonder why thunderbolt 2.5" enclosures only are hard to come by?
Because they are fairly new and don't offer anything obvious that you can't already get with USB 3, except with less compatibility (barring devices without USB 3 that have Thunderbolt). But some people will buy them anyways because they've heard that Thunderbolt = faster/better, regardless of if they understand the hard drive's limitations.

Anyways, LaCie Rugged has always been ridiculously overpriced.
__________________
Has anyone, anywhere, ever actually used ~/Pictures/iPod Photo Cache/ for anything besides deleting or hiding it?
Parasprite is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:06 PM   #14
Rafagon
macrumors member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Who the hell is Neil Poulton and why would I want his name etched on this piece of crap drive??
Rafagon is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:16 PM   #15
NameUndecided
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafagon View Post
Who the hell is Neil Poulton and why would I want his name etched on this piece of crap drive??
Why you mad about a hard drive?
__________________
"Everything's amazing and nobody's happy" - Louis CK
NameUndecided is offline   3 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:24 PM   #16
larrylaffer
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Los Angeles
Quote:
Originally Posted by unplugme71 View Post
This product would be better:

- USB 3 attached cable
- No attached TB cable
- SSD or 7200RPM SATA

Why waste a TB port for a low speed performing device.
While I would tend to agree with you, especially because that device would surely cost less, I'm actually more at war with by available USB ports. I use a MBP connected to a Thunderbolt display, and I don't have a second monitor.

It would be nice to be able to plug the drive into the spare TB port on the back of the display, and save one of my USB ports. I'm an iOS and Android developer, so I need spare ports for those devices.
larrylaffer is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:31 PM   #17
Icaras
macrumors 601
 
Icaras's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: California, United States
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crosscreek View Post
That's just way too expensive.
I recently purchased a single drive external SSD thunderbolt in 256 GB capacity for a little over $300. I think those prices are pretty much in range with what's offered today on the market.

Yes it's expensive when compared to the GB/$ ratio of traditional HDDs but for thunderbolt equipped external SSD drives, it sounds about right.
Icaras is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:45 PM   #18
MrX8503
macrumors 6502a
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Quote:
Originally Posted by Parasprite View Post
I love that they included this specific line.







Because they are fairly new and don't offer anything obvious that you can't already get with USB 3, except with less compatibility (barring devices without USB 3 that have Thunderbolt). But some people will buy them anyways because they've heard that Thunderbolt = faster/better, regardless of if they understand the hard drive's limitations.



Anyways, LaCie Rugged has always been ridiculously overpriced.

Thunderbolt isn't new. Some people prefer thunderbolt for the TRIM commands and OS boot. USB3 doesn't offer this.
MrX8503 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:54 PM   #19
unplugme71
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: May 2011
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrylaffer View Post
While I would tend to agree with you, especially because that device would surely cost less, I'm actually more at war with by available USB ports. I use a MBP connected to a Thunderbolt display, and I don't have a second monitor.

It would be nice to be able to plug the drive into the spare TB port on the back of the display, and save one of my USB ports. I'm an iOS and Android developer, so I need spare ports for those devices.
This is why I think every Mac should have 2 TB ports at minimum.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by MrX8503 View Post
Thunderbolt isn't new. Some people prefer thunderbolt for the TRIM commands and OS boot. USB3 doesn't offer this.
You can boot an OS from USB 3. I've done this. While not as fast as an internal drive, it wasn't that much slower using an SSD. The CPU just has a little more overhead though.
unplugme71 is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 02:59 PM   #20
4God
macrumors 68000
 
4God's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: My Mac
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafagon View Post
Who the hell is Neil Poulton and why would I want his name etched on this piece of crap drive??
The real question is why would he want his name etched on this drive?

Quote:
Originally Posted by unplugme71 View Post
This is why I think every Mac should have 2 TB ports at minimum....
And every TB device as well.
4God is offline   2 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 03:07 PM   #21
jont-fu
macrumors regular
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
I have a Lacie Rugged 7200 rpm Firewire drive in my old Mac Mini. It's rigged as as fusion drive with the computer's SSD drive, and has worked fine & fast for many years. But it was way cheaper - about 4 years ago when bought - than even those 5400 rpm drives

I still somehow like the design, ymmv!
jont-fu is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 03:14 PM   #22
Parasprite
macrumors 68000
 
Parasprite's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Quote:
Originally Posted by MrX8503 View Post
Thunderbolt isn't new. Some people prefer thunderbolt for the TRIM commands and OS boot. USB3 doesn't offer this.
USB has been standard in just about every computer for 10-15 years and is backwards compatible. Compared to this, yes Thunderbolt is very new.

Also, you can boot from USB 3 as long as the mobo doesn't mind. I installed beta Mavericks on USB 2 when it came out.
__________________
Has anyone, anywhere, ever actually used ~/Pictures/iPod Photo Cache/ for anything besides deleting or hiding it?
Parasprite is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 03:30 PM   #23
JHankwitz
macrumors 68000
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Wisconsin
Send a message via AIM to JHankwitz
Quote:
Originally Posted by larrylaffer View Post
I'm an iOS and Android developer, so I need spare ports for those devices.
USB Hubs are available for under $50.

----------

Quote:
Originally Posted by Rafagon View Post
Who the hell is Neil Poulton and why would I want his name etched on this piece of crap drive??
He's obviously a great industrial designer. I have several of LaCie drives in rough use. They get dropped and banged around on a regular basis, and his case designs have stood the test of time and abuse.

LaCie doesn't design or manufacture the drive mechanisms. They're purchased from other manufacturers and inserted into these great cases.
__________________
Proud Apple fanboy since '77
JHankwitz is offline   1 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 03:37 PM   #24
kwikdeth
macrumors 6502
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Tempe, AZ
Quote:
Originally Posted by ArtOfWarfare View Post
SSDs aren't all created equal, are they? Why not list the drive speeds, Mac Rumors?
because much like the drive speed fiasco in the recent macbook airs, LaCie will obtain their drives from the lowest cost manufacturer at the time of that particular batch run, and as a result speeds will vary from batch to batch.

but given that its lacie, you can probably expect a consumer-grade drive with middle-tier performance.
kwikdeth is offline   0 Reply With Quote
Old Jun 5, 2014, 03:53 PM   #25
Radiomarko
macrumors member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: UK & Russia
Been using these "...piece of crap" series of drives since they were launched for portable backup of broadcast TV files in some extreme environments.

Never ever been let down.

Don't knock it if you haven't got it.
__________________
Long time wrinkly lurker.... Apples since 1970 something.

Last edited by Radiomarko; Jun 5, 2014 at 04:01 PM.
Radiomarko is offline   4 Reply With Quote

Reply
MacRumors Forums > News and Article Discussion > Mac Blog Discussion

Thread Tools Search this Thread
Search this Thread:

Advanced Search
Display Modes

Forum Jump

All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:58 AM.

Mac Rumors | Mac | iPhone | iPhone Game Reviews | iPhone Apps

Mobile Version | Fixed | Fluid | Fluid HD
Copyright 2002-2013, MacRumors.com, LLC